Attachment 005 - Past Performance Questionaire - Amendment 0002.docx
DOCX document 31 KB Posted
- Attached to
- French Hazard WUI Project Road Improvements
- Solicitation number
- 1282B124R0026
- Issued by
-
Department of Agriculture Forest Service
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire related to the French Hazard WUI Project Road Improvements contract opportunity with the U.S. Forest Service. The questionnaire requests information on the contractor's adherence to workmanship standards, overall satisfaction with the contractor's services, timeliness of performance, and business relations. The questionnaire is to be returned directly to the Contracting Officer by the proposal due date. The French Hazard WUI Project requires approximately 2.4 miles of new road construction and 10 miles of road reconditioning to facilitate future vegetation and prescribed fire treatment activities. The work includes soil erosion and sediment control, clearing, log decking, pipe installation, excavation, grading, aggregate placement, rock removal, seeding, and gate installation. The solicitation number is 1282B124R0026.
View the file
Other files
Show all 15
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE SHOULD BE RETURNED DIRECTLY TO THE CONTRACTING OFFICER, NO LATER THAN PROPOSAL DUE DATE. QUESTIONNAIRES MUST BE RECEIVED EMAIL.EMAIL ADDRESS IS traci.davis@usda.gov PLEASE SPECIFY IN THE SUBJECT LINE 1282B124R0026
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE
Person completing questionnaire: Firm’s name:
Phone No.:
NOTE: Information obtained may be shared with Contractor if requested, but the name of person providing information will be kept confidential.
Contractor:
Project: FRENCH HAZARD WUI PROJECT
Overview The U.S. Forest Service has a requirement for 2.4 miles of new road construction and approxi8mately 10 of road reconditioning to facilitate future vegetation and prescribed fire treatment activities within and adjacent to the project area. Work includes soil erosion and sediment control, clearing and grubbing, decking merchantable logs, removing and installing corrugated metal pipes, roadway excavation and embankment, borrow excavation, linear grading, aggregate and riprap, roadway reconditioning, rock removal (blasting or other methods), application of seed mix and mulch, installation of gates, and cleanup.
1. Did the contractor adhere to good standards of workmanship? Do you have specific examples of this?
2. Overall, to what extent were you satisfied with the contractor’s completed services?
_ _ Extremely satisfied _ _ Generally satisfied___
_ _ Generally dissatisfied _ _ Extremely dissatisfied___
3. Timeliness of performance:
a. Did the contractor comply with contract performance schedules? If no, were there mitigating circumstances?
b. Were they reliable?
c. Were they responsive to technical direction?
d. Any liquidated damages assessed?
4. Business relations:
a. Does the contractor have effective management?
b. Good working relationship with the Contracting Officer/technical representatives?
c. Are they reasonable, cooperative, and flexible?
d. Do they present effective recommendations for solutions to problems?
e. Do they show a businesslike concern for the Government’s (or landowner if the project was with a private firm) interests?
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .