Past Performance Final.docx
DOCX document 62 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Construction of New Cotton Classing Facility on Texas Tech University Campus Lubbock, Texas
- Solicitation number
- 12474020R0002
About this file
This document includes a past performance questionnaire and federal contract opportunity for the construction of a new cotton classing facility on the Texas Tech University campus in Lubbock, Texas. The opportunity is a full and open competitive procurement issued by the USDA Agricultural Marketing Service. Offerors are required to submit past performance information from references using the questionnaire provided, with completed questionnaires due back to the contracting officer no later than February 25, 2020. Proposals for the construction of the new cotton classing facility are also due on February 25, 2020. The pre-proposal conference will be held onsite on February 6, 2020. The solicitation, specifications and design documents are attached to the opportunity notice.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment 6.pdf | ||
| Amendment 5.pdf | ||
| Amendment 4.pdf | ||
| Amendment 3.pdf | ||
| Amendment 2.pdf | ||
| Amendment 0001.pdf | ||
| 12474020R0002.pdf | ||
| Wage Determination.pdf | ||
| 100CD_DRAWINGS_USDA-LBB.pdf | ||
| 100CD_PM_USDA-LBB.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
USDA, AMS, Cotton & Tobacco Program 100 Riverside Parkway, Suite 101 Fredericksburg, VA 22406
Past Performance Questionnaire for: 12474020R0002
INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFEROR:
Complete the CONTRACTOR INFORMATION section, below (type answers into light blue shaded boxes). Save the document. Send an electronic or hard copy print of the form to each of your reference contacts, asking them to please complete the form and submit it according to the instructions, below.
Company Name
Street Address
Point of Contact (POC)
City
POC Phone Number
State
Reference Project Title
Zip Code
Contract Period of Performance (start to finish):
Contract Number
Contract Dollar Value
Description of Work
| Role of Contractor on This Project (check appropriate box) |
| |_| Prime Contractor |_| Sub-contractor |_| Key Personnel |
INSTRUCTIONS TO REFERENCE CONTACT
The contractor named above is submitting a proposal for a United States Department of Agriculture contract, and has sent this form to you as a past performance reference contact. Please complete the following pages in full (all areas shaded in light yellow, below). Once completed, please send the form to the Contracting Officer via postal mail or email directly to:
USDA, AMS, Cotton and Tobacco Program Attn: Beverly Brown 100 Riverside Parkway Suite 101 Fredericksburg, VA 22406 Email: BeverlyS.Brown@usda.gov Fax: 540-361-1181 Phone: 540-361-1126
Please return the completed form ASAP, but no later than 10:00 am Eastern Standard Time, Thursday, February 25, 2020.
If you have any questions, please contact the Contracting Officer: BeverlyS.Brown@usda.gov via email.
RESPONDENT INFORMATION [completed by Reference Contact]
Company Name
Street Address
POC Name
City
Phone Number
State
Zip Code
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the number on the scale of 0 (Neutral) to 5 (Exceptional) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE AN EXPLANATION FOR THE OVERALL RATING in the Remarks section, below.
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| NEUTRAL |
| UNACCEPTABLE |
| MARGINAL |
| ACCEPTABLE |
| VERY GOOD |
| OUTSTANDING |
| No record of past performance, or not applicable or the record is inconclusive. |
| Performance did not meet most contractual require-ments. There were serious problems and the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective. |
| Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. There were problems, some of a serious nature, for which corrective action was only marginally effective. |
| Performance met most contractual requirements. There were some minor problems and corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory. |
| Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded some to the government’s benefit. There were a few minor problems, which the contractor resolved in a timely, effective manner. |
| Performance exceeded all contract requirements. There were no problems. |
| The Contractor … |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
QUALITY – MANAGEMENT, PERONNEL, LABOR & WORKMANSHIP
| 1. |
| Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements. |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| 2. |
| Effectiveness of on-site management including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials and/or labor force? |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| 3. |
| Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified construction personnel during the contract period. |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| 4. |
| Did contractor provide knowledgeable and experienced contract personnel to perform the requirements of the contract? |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| 5. |
| Provided and followed approved quality control plan and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements. |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| 6. |
| Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures. |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| 7. |
| Submittals clearly identified the proposed item in the specifications and drawings. |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| 8. |
| Suggested alternative approaches to problems. |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| 9. |
| Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts (meeting notes/agenda’s, RFI’s, safety, SWPPP, etc.) |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| 10. |
| Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
Additional REMARKS:
TIMELINESS AND ADHERENCE TO SCHEDULE
| 7. |
| Contractor provided timely notices of possible delays/schedule revisions. |
REMARKS:
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| 8. |
| Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| 9. |
| Developed realistic and met approved progress schedules. |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
BUSINESS PRACTICES/CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP AND ABILITY TO PERFORM
| 10. |
| Displayed initiative to solve problems. |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 11. |
| How well did the contractor work independent of Government guidance, oversight and assistance? |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| 12. |
| Subcontractors / tradesmen were adequately managed and coordinated. Explain any subcontracting issues (positive or negative) that impacted the performance of your contract(s). |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| 13. |
| For contract changes, contractor provided timely and realistic change order proposals. |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
COMPLIANCE & SAFETY
| 14. |
| Reports (i.e., daily, test, logs) / records were submitted completely and accurately satisfy the requirement. |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| 15. |
| Applicable to Federal Contracts –Contractor complied with applicable Federal Laws and Regulations such as Construction Wage Rate Requirements – timely payrolls and compliance; Drug-Free Workplace; Environmental Regulations and Use of Recovered Materials; Executive Order 13101 Greening the Government. |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| 16. |
| Contractor’s safety program was in compliance with federal regulations. Contractor implemented and followed their safety plan and ran a “safe jobsite”. |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
OVERALL CUSTOMER SATISFACTION
| 18. |
| To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project? |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| 19. |
| Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes; responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication) |
| |_| |
| YES |
| |_| |
| NO |
| 20. |
| Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, please explain in “remarks.” |
| |_| |
| YES |
| |_| |
| NO |
| OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING: |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
REMARKS (Please use as much space as is needed – the box will expand as you type).
RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
| YES |
| NO |
| 21. |
| Did this contract involve the construction of a laboratory facility? |
REMARKS: If no, please explain what type of construction project
| 22. |
| Did the contract involve specialized HVAC conditioning? |
REMARKS: In no, Please explain what type of HVAC system was used/included:
23.
REMARKS (Please use as much space as is needed – the box will expand as you type).
I hereby certify that the information that I have reported above is accurate to the best of my knowledge.
Printed Name
E-mail address
Business Title
Signature
Date image1.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .