Attachment 03 PPQ - Services.docx

DOCX document 23 KB Posted

Attached to
USDA Forest Service SRS Hot Springs, AR Lawn Maintenance Services
Solicitation number
12456820Q0001
Issued by

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Attachment 01 Wages.docx DOCX document
SF 1449 12456820Q0001.pdf PDF
Solicitation Body 12456820Q0001.doc DOC document
Attachment 00 Schedule of Items SRS Hot Springs AR.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 02 SOW.doc DOC document

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

12456820Q0001 SRS Hot Springs, AR Lawn Maintenance

PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104

A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:

Contractor’s Name: _____________________ Telephone Number: ______________________

Address: ________________________________________

Project Title or Brief Description of Work: _____________________________________________

Contract Number Provided by Offeror: __________________Dollar Amount: $ _____________________ Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror: ___________________________

Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel.

B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:

Name of Respondent: ___________________Title: _________________________________________ Telephone Number: _______________________________ Email Address: _______________________________

C. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the number on the scale of 1 to 6 that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF 1 OR 2.

1
2
3
4
5
6
UNSATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
SATISFACTORY
VERY GOOD
EXCEPTIONAL
NEUTRAL
Performance did not meet most contractual requirements. There were serious problems and the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.
Performance did not meet some contractual requirements.

There were problems, some of a serious nature, for which corrective action was only marginally effective.

Performance met contractual requirements.

There were some minor problems and corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded some to the government’s benefit. There were a few minor problems, which the contractor resolved in a timely, effective manner.
Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded many to the government’s benefit.

Problems, if any, were negligible and were resolved in a timely, highly effective manner.

No record of past performance or the record is inconclusive.i

1.
Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.
1
2
3
4
5
6
N/A
2.
Home office participated in solving significant local problems.
1
2
3
4
5
6
N/A
3.
Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.
1
2
3
4
5
6
N/A
4.
Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.
1
2
3
4
5
6
N/A
5.
Identified problems as they occurred.
1
2
3
4
5
6
N/A
6.
Suggested alternative approaches to problems.
1
2
3
4
5
6
N/A
7.
Displayed initiative to solve problems.
1
2
3
4
5
6
N/A
8.
Cooperated with Government personnel after award.
1
2
3
4
5
6
N/A
9.
How would you rate the contractor's overall performance?
1
2
3
4
5
6
N/A
10.
Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”
YES/NO
11.
Is the contractor rated in CPARS?
YES/NO
12.
Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.”
YES/NO

CONTRACTOR’S NAME: _ _CONTRACT NUMBER

Remarks: ________________________________________________________________________________ Attachment 03

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .