12445121B0001 Vesuvious Pipeline OH questions matrix AO 6-4-2021.doc
DOC document 89 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 12445121B0001
- Issued by
-
Department of Agriculture Forest Service
About this file
This document provides details for a federal contract solicitation for watermain replacement services. The United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, on behalf of the Wayne National Forest Ironton Ranger District Office in Pedro, Ohio, is seeking to award a firm-fixed price contract to replace approximately 21,000 feet of 6-inch, 5,600 feet of 4-inch, and 1,900 feet of 2-inch HDPE watermain servicing the Vesuvius Recreation Area. Services required include mobilization, clearing and grubbing 12 acres of right-of-way, trench excavation including 1,800 cubic yards of rock, installation of pipe and valves, site restoration, and commissioning. The total project value is estimated between $1 million to $5 million. The acquisition is set aside 100% for small businesses. Questions are due by June 19th, bids by June 30th at 1:00pm Eastern, and the completion date is 298 days after notice to proceed.
View the file
Other files
Show all 20
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
COMMENTS MATRIX FOR USDA-FS ISSUANCES: 12445121B0001 Vesuvious Pipeline OH (Please read instructions on back before completing form.)
| # |
| Class |
| Component and POC Name, Phone, and E-mail |
| Page |
| Para |
| Comment Type (C/S) |
| Comments, Justification, and Originator Justification for Resolution |
| A/R/P |
6-3-21 email
Bidder Comment: Can you add us to your plan holders list so we will receive any and all Addendums?
Resolution: You can follow the solicitation on sam.gov and it should notify you if changes occur. You should still check sam.gov for any updates.
6-4-21 email
Bidder Comment: What time is the precon on 6/11 and where will the meeting be held?
Resolution: Page 37 of 41 of the SF1442:
Date: June 11, 2021
Time: 10:00 am local time
Location: Ironton District Office (6518 SR 93, Pedro OH)
6-3-21 email
Bidder Comment: Is directional drilling of the HDPE in the open trench applications acceptable?
Resolution: As per the Engineering plans and specifications.
Directional drilling is only allowed where indicated on the plans (4” line and 2” line). The rest of the project is to be open trench installation.
6-3-21 email
Bidder Comment: HDPE is typically not required to be bedded in open trench applications, will the bedding be required in open trench applications?
Bedding is required to no less than 1’-0” over pipe. Where unsuitable material or bedrock is encountered, trench shall be over-excavated by 4” minimum and bedded uniformly compacted with #57 stone.
6-3-21 email
Bidder Comment: If additional directional boring is acceptable, will the clearing in grubbing be required in those areas not disturbed by the installation?
If additional boring is approved, clearing and grubbing in these areas shall be reviewed and approved at time of installation by the C.O.
Bidder Comment:
Resolution:
Bidder Comment:
Bidder Comment:
Bidder Comment:
Bidder Comment:
Bidder Comment:
Bidder Comment:
Bidder Comment:
Bidder Comment:
Bidder Comment:
Bidder Comment:
Bidder Comment:
Bidder Comment:
Bidder Comment:
Bidder Comment:
Bidder Comment:
Bidder Comment:
Bidder Comment:
Bidder Comment:
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING SD FORM 818
Coordinating OSD Component: Use this form to provide consolidated critical and substantive comments to the OSD Component that originated the issuance. Complete the classification header and footer, columns 1 through 5, and the first two entries in column 6. REVIEW THE COMMENTS, resolve any conflicting views, AND CONFIRM THAT THE COMPLETED MATRIX ACCURATELY REPRESENTS YOUR COMPONENT’S POSITIOn. Upload the form to the DoD Directives Program Portal in microsoft word format, with a scanned copy of the sign SD Form 106, “DoD Directives Program Coordination Record,” or coordination memorandum.
Originating OSD Component: Use this form to consolidate comments from all coordinators and to record adjudication of the comments. (To add comments from an SD 818 submitted by a coordinator, use the “Copy” and “Paste” tools on the Microsoft Word Standard Toolbar.) When consolidating comments, place them in the order of the pages/paragraphs they apply to (e.g., all comments from all coordinators that apply to page 1, paragraph 1.a., should be grouped together as the initial entries; all comments that apply to page 1, paragraph 1.b., should be grouped together next, and so on). Complete column 7 and the third entry in column 6. Adjust the classification header and footer and columns 1 and 2 as appropriate.
Classification – Enter the highest classification of the comments. If all are unclassified, mark the header and footer accordingly and ignore the column.
Column 1 – Enter the number of the comment. Enter comments in the order of the pages/paragraphs they apply to.
Column 2 – Enter the classification of the comment. If all comments are unclassified, mark the header and footer accordingly and ignore the column.
Column 3 – Enter the appropriate information.
Column 4 – Enter the appropriate information.
Column 5 – Enter the appropriate information.
Column 6 – Enter the comment type. Place only one comment per row. Do not include administrative comments concerning non-substantive aspects of an issuance, such as dates of references, organizational symbols, and/or grammatical errors.
(C) Critical: When a Component has one or more critical comments, that Component’s coordination shall reflect a nonconcur. THE JUSTIFICATION FOR CRITICAL COMMENTS MUST IDENTIFY:
– Violations of the law or contradictions of Executive Branch policy or of policy established in DoD issuances. The GC, DoD, or his or her representative shall identify legal objections as critical comments.
– Unnecessary risks to safety, life, limb, or DoD materiel; waste or abuse of DoD appropriations; or imposition of an unreasonable burden on a Component’s resources.
(S) Substantive: Substantive comments are made when a section in the issuance appears to be or is potentially unnecessary, incorrect, misleading, confusing, or inconsistent with other sections, or when a Component disagrees with the proposed responsibilities, requirements, and/or procedures. A substantive comment is usually not sufficient justification for a Component to nonconcur on an issuance. Several substantive comments when taken together may be grounds for a nonconcurrence.
Column 7 – Coordinating Component: Enter the comment in the area provided. Enter your justification for the comment and your requested or recommended changes in the area provided. YOU MUST PROVIDE CONVINCING SUPPORT FOR CRITICAL COMMENTS IN THE JUSTIFICATION.
– Originating Component: Enter your justification for disposition of the comment in the area provided. Include any related communications with the coordinating Component. You must provide convincing support for rejecting critical comments.
Column 8 – Enter whether you accepted (A), rejected (R), or partially accepted (P) the comment. Your justification for disposition of the comment in column 6 must be consistent with this entry.
PAGE
SD FORM 818, JAN 09
PREVIOUS EDITION IS OBSOLETE
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .