Quote Sheet and Instructions.pdf
PDF 261 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Burke Martin Mine Asbestos Spill Mitigation Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 1240LS21Q0078
- Issued by
- Department of Agriculture Forest Service
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| WD.pdf | ||
| 2021.07.07_sign_in_sheet_Burke_Martin_Asbestos_Mitigation.pdf | ||
| ASBESTOS REPORT.pdf | ||
| SOW.pdf | ||
| FULL SOLICITATION.pdf | ||
| WAGE DETERMINATION.pdf | ||
| 2019_BM_Satellite_View.pdf | ||
| 2019_BM_Photo_Summary.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
1240LS21Q0078
Burke Martin Mine Asbestos Spill Mitigation
PART I—THE SCHEDULE
SECTION B--SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES/COSTS
B.1 SCHEDULE OF ITEMS
Item Supplies/Services Qty Unit Unit Price Total Price 0001 Asbestos Spill Mitigation 1 JOB
B.2 SCHEDULE NOTES
Payment will be made via EFT. Invoice using IPP.Gov
**MUST HAVE ALL INFO BELOW**
Company Name:
Vendor Rep:
Phone:
Email:
Mailing Address:
DUNS #
Performance Bond: REQUIRED
Bid Bond: NOT REQUIRED
L.2 QUOTE PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Submit price on quote sheet.
2. Submit narrative detailing how project will be performed. Submit enough detail to allow for technical evaluation of your proposal.
Technical Proposal
i) Factor 1. Past Performance:
a. submit a list of (3) relevant past projects the contractor has performed with the past 5 years along with contact information so the government may contact prior customers to evaluate past performance.
b. Information should include the project name, location, description of the work, dollar value and name/phone/email of project owner representative.
c. CPARS will also be reviewed.
ii) Factor 2. Experience: Submit a short narrative providing details of the experience the firm has (either as a prime or sub-contractor) for work similar in nature and scope in geographical conditions similar to this requirement.
iii) Factor 3. Technical Approach to Performing the Work: At a minimum, describe your planned approach to performing this work. Include the type of equipment to be used, key personnel and their qualifications, logistics of equipment and supply delivery, crew accommodations, major sub-contractors and their roles, biobased products to be used in the accomplishment of the work, and anticipated schedule of work.
Contact the Contracting Officer by telephone or by e-mail if you do not understand any part of these instructions.
SECTION M--EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD
M.1 PROVISIONS
None.
M.2 PROPOSAL EVALUATION
Quotes will be evaluated using a best value approach. This process permits tradeoffs among price and non-price technical factors and allows the Government to accept other than the lowest priced quote. The government will evaluate quotes based on the technical evaluation factors specified in this solicitation.
M.3 TECHNICAL EVALUATION FACTORS
Factor 1. Past Performance Past performance is a measure of the degree to which the offeror (including major subcontracts) has satisfied previous customers and complied with Federal, State and Local laws and regulations. The Government may contact references to assess the quality of the contractor’s work, timely completion, project management, and compliance with regulatory requirements.
The Government will consider the currency and relevance of the information, source of the information, context of the data and general trends in contractor performance.
In the past performance evaluation, the Government may use information from sources other than the offeror’s technical proposal. When no information is available, the offeror will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance.
Factor 2. Experience The Government will assess the specialized experience and skill of the firm with a focus on experience that is similar to the specified project.
Factor 3. Technical Approach to Performing the Work When evaluating the Technical Approach to Performing the Work, the government will assess the reasonableness of the contractor’s proposed approach to performing the work including the use of biobased products in project implementation.
Factor 4. Price The proposed price will be evaluated for reasonableness. The technical factors, when combined are equal to price.
| 5 |
| 32 |
| 35 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .