RFIs.pdf

Requests for Information Solicitation 1232SA26Q0693

Question 1: In the pictures, there appears to be a significant amount of metal tubing associated with the lift. Does all of this tubing need to be removed, or if not, how far back should it be removed?

Answer 1: Tubing can be removed to the above ground wall by the bench/under the hose reel in second image. All of the metal below grade is to be removed to expose the soil below.

Question 2: Regarding the lift pit restoration, my understanding is that the soil where the lift equipment was located needs to be tested for contamination. If the soil is confirmed to be clean, the pit would then be backfilled with suitable material, properly compacted, reinforced with rebar, and filled with concrete. Is that correct, or are there any additional requirements or details we should provide to the contractor?

Answer 2: That is correct. We will need a testing certification from a laboratory stating the soil has been tested and is not contaminated. U.S. EPA analytical methods for petroleum hydrocarbons and related contaminants (e.g., EPA 8015, 8260, 8270).

The Contractor shall use an environmental testing laboratory accredited for the required methods. Soil testing is a contractual deliverable and must meet 100% compliance per project performance measures.

Question 3: Does the existing block wall and front pit floor need to be completely removed, or may these remain in place and be buried/backfilled as part of the final restoration?

Answer 3: Depending on soil sampling results.

Question 4: If the required soil testing indicates contamination, what are the Government's expectations regarding remediation? Should contractors include potential remediation in their pricing, or would contaminated soil be handled separately by the Government through a contract modification or other means?

Answer 4: Soil remediation would be handled separately by a contract modification.

Question 5: Is there a preferred format or template for the required demolition plan, or is the contractor expected to submit their own project-specific demolition plan for Government review and approval?

Answer 5: No preferred format.

Question 6: Can one person triple hat as Superintendent, SSHO, and QC Manager for this project?

Answer 6: Yes

Question 7: Since the maintenance building is occupied and in active use, are there any phasing requirements? How many personnel typically work in the building, and are there temporary heating/cooling requirements during the work?

Answer 7: The building has no cooling, It is heated in the winter for shop use and so the water does not freeze. 1 full time employee uses the shop and 4-5 may use it from time to time but other arrangements can be made for separate work space as long as it is not winter time.

Requests for Information Solicitation 1232SA26Q0693

Question 8: Are soil boring reports available for the site?

Answer 8: There are none.

Question 9: Please confirm whether asbestos or lead is present on this project, and if so, please provide the relevant documentation.

Answer 9: No lead or asbestos is present in this project

Question 10: Is this project tax exempt?

Answer 10: Yes

Question 11: Are third party inspections required for this project?

Answer 11: According to Wisconsin DSPS, may require a final inspection or closure confirmation depending on the lift type. Should be inquired during permitting.

Question 12: Is there a bulk water fill, such as a hydrant or water source, in close proximity that we can use for grading operations?

Answer 12: there is a water hose in the shop. Stand alone pressure washer and a wash sink present inside the shop

Question 13: When do you anticipate onsite work starting following notice to proceed?

Answer 13: Ideally I would like the work to be done by the end of October because of using the shop for working on stuff in a heated environment.