Attachment_12__Past_Performance_Questionnaire__12314418R0005_Updated.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 33 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Request for Proposal (RFP) _USDA/FSA_NAIP 2018
- Solicitation number
- 12314418R0005
About this file
Attachment 12_Updated Past Performance Questionnaire _NAIP 2018
View the file
Other files
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Overview
| Dear Fellow Customer, | Due Date: 5:00pm Mountain Standard Time/7:00pm Eastern Standard Time, Thursday, May 10, 2018 |
| Email directly to: tracy.jackson@ftc.usda.gov |
The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) is in the process of evaluating vendors’ abilities to provide vertical, high resolution, direct digital orthorectified imagery to support various Government geographic information system (GIS) programs. The location of the scope of work for the 2018 National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP) collection will acquire imagery for approximately one-third of the Continental United States.
We understand your response to this request takes precious time and energy; we guarantee the information we are requesting is of utmost importance and enables the USDA to select the vendor offering the best value to the government.
We will not release the source of the information provided, however you are advised vendors will be given an opportunity to respond to adverse past performance information if not previously addressed (via CPARS or other method).
If you have any questions please feel free to contact me.
Best Regards, Tracy Lynn Jackson Contracting Officer 970-295-5261 tracy.jackson@ftc.usda.gov
This evaluation shall be completed by the customer organization receiving the applicable products and services only. If the USDA determines the vendor being evaluated was involved in drafting the response in any manner, the past performance relating to this questionnaire will be excluded from consideration.
The following contact information helps us track responses received as well as resolve whatever differences may arise between your perception of the contractor’s performance and the contractor’s perception of their performance. The USDA may contact you with additional questions if required during the evaluation process.
| Confidential |
| Evaluator’s Name: |
| Title/Role: |
| Telephone Number: |
| Organization, Office Symbol, and Address: |
| Length of involvement in the contract: |
| Date of questionnaire completion: |
&KC00000Source Selection Sensitive: Once completed, please safeguard in accordance with FAR 3.104-4&K01+000 Please send completed questionnaires directly to USDA Contracting Officer at tracy.jackson@ftc.usda.gov
&KC00000Source Selection Sensitive: Once completed, please safeguard in accordance with FAR 3.104-4&K01+000 Page &P of &N
Project Identification Project Indentification
| Contractor's Name |
| Contract Number |
| Program Title |
| Contract Type |
| Period of Performance |
| Total Contract Dollar Value |
(as of this date) Total Number of Vendor Personnel (as of this date) Brief Description of Contracted Support Service(s)
&KC00000Source Selection Sensitive: Once completed, please safeguard in accordance with FAR 3.104-4&K01+000 Please send completed questionnaires directly to USDA Contracting Officer at tracy.jackson@ftc.usda.gov
&KC00000Source Selection Sensitive: Once completed, please safeguard in accordance with FAR 3.104-4&K01+000 Page &P of &N
Firm Fixed Price Firm Price Incentive Labor Hour / Time and Materials Cost-Plus Award Fee Cost-Plus Incentive Fee Other - Please explain:
Instructions and Rating Guide Evaluation Instructions
Please respond to the following questions regarding the contractor’s past performance. For all ratings other than satisfactory, please provide a narrative explaining how the vendor either exceeded your requirement or how the vendor failed to meet your requirement.
If the vendor had problems in a specific area, but you determined them not to have had an impact to the mission, please state such in you narrative remarks.
| Evaluation Rating Definitions | ||
| Rating | Definition | Note |
| Exceptional | Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or subelement being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. | To justify an Exceptional rating, identify multiple significant events and state how they were of benefit to the Government. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. |
| Very Good | Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or subelement being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective. | To justify a Very Good rating, identify a significant event and state how it was a benefit to the Government. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified. |
| Satisfactory | Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or subelement contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. | To justify a Satisfactory rating, there should have been only minor problems, or major problems the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract/order. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. A fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be evaluated with a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract/order. |
| Marginal | Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or subelement being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. | To justify Marginal performance, identify a significant event in each category that the contractor had trouble overcoming and state how it impacted the Government. A Marginal rating should be supported by referencing the management tool that notified the contractor of the contractual deficiency (e.g., management, quality, safety, or environmental deficiency report or letter). |
| Unsatisfactory | Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective | To justify an Unsatisfactory rating, identify multiple significant events in each category that the contractor had trouble overcoming and state how it impacted the Government. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating. An Unsatisfactory rating should be supported by referencing the management tools used to notify the contractor of the contractual deficiencies (e.g., management, quality, safety, or environmental deficiency reports, or letters). |
| Unknown | Did not observe performance in this area. |
&KC00000Source Selection Sensitive: Once completed, please safeguard in accordance with FAR 3.104-4&K01+000 Please send completed questionnaires directly to USDA Contracting Officer at tracy.jackson@ftc.usda.gov
&KC00000Source Selection Sensitive: Once completed, please safeguard in accordance with FAR 3.104-4&K01+000 Page &P of &N
Questions - General
| # | General | Narrative |
| G1 | Was the company able to successfully perform the requirements at the price they originally bid? If not, why? | |
| G2 | If non-fixed price, how accurate were their price estimates compared to actual billing? | |
| G3.0 | In your assessment, what, if any, would you consider the contractor’s strong points and what did you prefer the most about their performance? | |
| G3.1 | In your assessment, what, if any, would you consider the contractor’s weak points and what did you prefer least about their performance? | |
| G3.2 | Please provide any additional comments or remarks you feel may be useful in evaluating the respective contractor. | |
| G4 | Would you recommend this contractor for the award of additional contracts? |
&KC00000Source Selection Sensitive: Once completed, please safeguard in accordance with FAR 3.104-4&K01+000 Please send completed questionnaires directly to USDA Contracting Officer at tracy.jackson@ftc.usda.gov
&KC00000Source Selection Sensitive: Once completed, please safeguard in accordance with FAR 3.104-4&K01+000 Page &P of &N
Questions - Management
| # | Management | Rating | Narrative |
| M1 | Please rate and provide comments regarding the contractor’s overall ability to meet delivery schedules. | ||
| M2 | Other than imagey deliveries, please rate and provide comments regarding the contractor’s overall compliance with the contract terms and conditions. | ||
| M3 | Please rate and provide comments on the contractor’s ability to monitor overall progress, resolving issues, and initiating corrective action as appropriate. | ||
| M4 | Please rate and provide comments regarding the contractor’s overall ability to meet manage subcontractors. | ||
| M5 | Please rate and provide comments related to your experience with this contractor’s allocation of aircraft/sensor resources to complete the project. | ||
| M6 | Please rate and provide comments related to your experience with this contractor’s ability to schedule and forward deloy flight crews and aircraft. | ||
| M7 | Please rate and provide comments related to your experience with this contractor’s understanding of weather patterns and atmospheric conditions (such as smoke for fires) to complete the project. | ||
| M8 | Please rate and provide comments related to your experience with this contractor’s understanding FAA controlled airspace and DOD managed restricted airspace to complete the project. | ||
| M9 | Please rate and provide comments related to your experience with this contractor’s ability to manage conflicting workload from other projects. | ||
| M10 | Please rate and provide comments on the contractor’s ability to ensure that adequate personnel are assigned to complete the project. |
&KC00000Source Selection Sensitive: Once completed, please safeguard in accordance with FAR 3.104-4&K01+000 Please send completed questionnaires directly to USDA Contracting Officer at tracy.jackson@ftc.usda.gov
&KC00000Source Selection Sensitive: Once completed, please safeguard in accordance with FAR 3.104-4&K01+000 Page &P of &N
Question - Technical
| # | three | Rating | Narrative |
| T1 | Please rate and provide comments on the contractor’s technical experience and capability to produce high-resoluton orthorectified imagery on a large scale project. | ||
| T2 | Please rate and provide comments on the contractor’s ability to produce orthorectified imagery within the contract terms and conditions. | ||
| T3 | Please rate your satisfaction with the overall image quality. | ||
| T4 | Please rate your satisfaction with the overall spatial accuracy. | ||
| T5 | Please rate your satisfaction with contractor generated metadata. |
&KC00000Source Selection Sensitive: Once completed, please safeguard in accordance with FAR 3.104-4&K01+000 Please send completed questionnaires directly to USDA Contracting Officer at tracy.jackson@ftc.usda.gov
&KC00000Source Selection Sensitive: Once completed, please safeguard in accordance with FAR 3.104-4&K01+000 Page &P of &N
Question - Quailty Management
| # | Quality Management | Rating | Narrative |
| Q1 | Please rate and provide comments on the contractor’s ability to deliver quality products or services. | ||
| Q2 | Please rate and provide comments on the contractor’s willingness to fix defects or make corrections to customer identified deficiencies. | ||
| Q3 | Please rate and provide comments the contractor’s overall commitment from senior management to quality. |
&KC00000Source Selection Sensitive: Once completed, please safeguard in accordance with FAR 3.104-4&K01+000 Please send completed questionnaires directly to USDA Contracting Officer at tracy.jackson@ftc.usda.gov
&KC00000Source Selection Sensitive: Once completed, please safeguard in accordance with FAR 3.104-4&K01+000 Page &P of &N
File details come from the government source that posted it.