12314418R0005_0003_Q&A_NAIP_2018.pdf

PDF 119 KB Posted

Attached to
Request for Proposal (RFP) _USDA/FSA_NAIP 2018
Solicitation number
12314418R0005
Issued by

About this file

Question & Answer_ NAIP 2018

View the file

Other files

Show all 11

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

12314418R0005_0003

NAIP 2018

Question & Answer

2018 National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP) Page 1 of 1

1. Question

Can the government clarify intent of column B on the pricing attachment, where it states “Insert X to Propose for State Sites”?

Answer

Offerors should only insert an “x” in Column B on the pricing attachment for the states offerors have based their Technical Proposal, PART II on. For example, the states marked with an “x” in Column B should match the technical proposal submitted addressing: planned approach, flight plans, site basing, resources being assigned, ortho production capacity, small business participation.

The Government encourages offerors to provide pricing for any or all states that they are willing to be awarded but have not based their technical proposal on. For these secondary states, do not insert an “x” in Column B on the pricing attachment. Having the additional pricing gives the Government flexibility in awarding states even if it is not an offeror’s preferred state. Please note, the Government can only award a state if pricing has been provided.

File details come from the government source that posted it.