amendment 1.docx
DOCX document 28 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 1105951
- Issued by
-
Department of Agriculture Forest Service
About this file
This amendment modifies the solicitation for the Gibbs Wash Bridge Replacement project in the Coronado National Forest in Arizona. The Forest Service revised the statement of work to update the staging area map and potential sources for surfacing aggregate. A local mining company can now provide the needed aggregate instead of a Forest Service pit. In response to questions, the Forest Service indicated subsurface investigation included two test pits with unspecified locations and probe tests, estimating soil depth is less than two feet. Manufacturers are responsible for culvert design, and the opening was sized to accommodate available arch sizes and corrugations without concrete thrust beams if not required.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| amendment 3 (2).docx | DOCX document | |
| amendment 2.docx | DOCX document | |
| Gibb Wash SOW revised.pdf | ||
| Prebid Signin.pdf | ||
| Gibb Wash Test Pit Sieve Tests.pdf | ||
| Gibb Wash Bridge SOW.pdf | ||
| 127EAX23R0007.pdf | ||
| Gibb Wash Bridge Replacement Forest Service Supplemental Specsifications (FSSS).pdf | ||
| Gibb Wash SOW.pdf | ||
| CORONADO FIRE PLAN.pdf | ||
| Wage Determination.pdf | ||
| Gibb Wash Bridge Replacement Plans.pdf |
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER
| 3. EFFECTIVE DATE |
| 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER |
| 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable) |
| 09/12/2023 |
| 1105951 |
| 6. ISSUED BY |
| CODE |
| 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) |
| CODE |
11. (
AMENDMENT
OF
SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION
OF
CONTRACT
1.
CONTRACT
ID
CODE
PAGE
OF
PAGES
USDA FOREST
SERVICE,
ARIZONA
ZONE
OFFICE,
E
MCDOWELL
ROAD PHOENIX AZ 85006
USFS
Procurement and
Property
Service, Field
Procurement Office
E.
McDowell
Rd, Phoenix, Arizona
85006 8.
NAME
AND
ADDRESS
OF
CONTRACTOR
(Number, street, county, State and
ZIP
Code) (X)
9A.
AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION
NUMBER
127EAX2
3R00 9B.
DATED
(SEE
ITEM
11) 8/28 /2023 10A.
MODIFICATION
OF
CONTRACT/ORDER
NUMBER
10B.
DATED
(SEE
ITEM
13)
CODE
FACILITY
CODE
)THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS
The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended.
is not extended.
Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:
(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;
or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.
12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) N/A
13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS. IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.
| CHECK ONE |
| A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NUMBER IN ITEM 10A. |
B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).
C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:
D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)
E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return 1 copies to the issuing office.
14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)
GAOA GIBBS WASH BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, CORONADO NATIONAL FOREST
1.RFP, Section J, Attachment 4, “Delete” and substitute the attached revised SOW: The staging area map and the details on potential sources of Grade G surfacing aggregate were changed. The previous SOW referenced a Forest Service pit as a potential source of surfacing aggregate, at this point this option is eliminated. The revised SOW (Attachment 1) has the contact for a local mining company that can produce the needed aggregate.
2. RFI, Question 1: Was a subsurface geotechnical investigation performed in the project area?
RFI Response: Two test pits were dug, but the locations were not recorded, see test pit sieve results (Attachment 2). Based on the two pits and 14 Williamson Drive probe test locations, the estimated soil depth in the area is less than 2 feet.
3. RFI, Question 2: Will you please advise on the question below concerning the arch material? According to the supplier the arch details in the drawing are not current, the recommendation below is the current standard.
In reference to the large steel Culvert for the Gibb Wash Bridge Replacement, could a BridgeCor Steel Arch, or equal, be acceptable in lieu of the Super Span arch currently depicted on page C-10? BridgeCor steel arch plates have a deeper x wider corrugation profile (15” x 5.5” versus standard 6” x 2”) than the Super Span arches, and are therefore 9x as stiff and do not require any CIP concrete thrust beams like the currently designed arch does. Please see attached pages detailing the BridgeCor spec and common shapes, as well as a couple snapshots below. Happy to provide the coordinates of any of the attached shapes for the EOR to verify hydraulics or any other supporting information. Please confirm a similar shape is acceptable for use in the wash crossing. Thank you!”
RFI, Response: Sheet C-02 of the drawings states the culvert manufacturer is responsible for design of the culvert. This includes structural plate corrugations and thrust beams if they are necessary. The opening was designed with plenty of freeboard to accommodate any corrugation available for an arch of this size.
Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.
| 15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) |
| 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print) |
15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR
(Signature of person authorized to sign)
| 15C. DATE SIGNED |
| 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
(Signature of Contracting Officer)
16C. DATE SIGNED
Previous edition unusable
STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016)
Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .