10b-816598-Exhibit-G-PPQ-Fill.doc

DOC document 164 KB Posted

Attached to
Outside Legal Counsel for Transit-Oriented Public-Private Partnership Project
Solicitation number
147754
Issued by
Travis County, Austin City, Texas

About this file

This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire issued by the Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority (CapMetro) in Austin, Texas for RFP 816598, which solicits outside legal counsel services for a transit-oriented development public-private partnership (P3) project at CapMetro properties in Central Texas. The questionnaire is to be completed by references familiar with an offeror's performance on similar legal services contracts and must be submitted directly to CapMetro by December 9, 2026 at 3:00 p.m. via email to procure.help@capmetro.org or by mail. The questionnaire evaluates contractor performance across 20 criteria including startup management, schedule adherence, communication, personnel qualifications, resource adequacy, regulatory compliance, problem resolution, innovation, customer responsiveness, and overall contract performance.

The services will be entirely funded through federal grant funds and must comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, including requirements under 2 CFR Part 200. Respondents are instructed to rate contractor performance using a six-point scale (Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, Unsatisfactory, or Unknown) and provide narrative rationales for ratings other than "Acceptable" or where the contractor exceeded requirements. The questionnaire requests information about the offeror's firm, contract number, contract amount, contract status, completion date, and the type and extent of any subcontracting. Responses should be based on objective facts supported by program and project management data, with contact information for any follow-up discussions provided by CapMetro's Contracts Administrator III, Deborah Knutson.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

FOR PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCES

FROM:

Procurement Department

Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority

2910 East 5th Street

Austin, TX 78702

RE:

Request for Past Performance Information for RFP 816598 – Outside Legal Counsel for Transit-Oriented Development Public-Private Partnership Project

The Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority (CapMetro) is in the process of selecting a firm to provide legal services (the “Services”) in connection with the potential implementation of a transit-oriented development (“TOD”) public-private partnership (“P3”) project at selected CapMetro property/ies in Central Texas (the “Project”). The Services will be wholly funded through federal grant funds and will comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, including requirements under 2 CFR Part 200.

In the Instructions to Offerors portion of our request for proposals, we request that this letter and the Past Performance Questionnaire be forwarded to points of contact for similar type services performed by the offeror, or currently in progress. The information contained in your completed questionnaire will be one of the evaluation criteria to base a decision about the relative qualifications of the offeror.

Please have the questionnaire completed by the person(s) most familiar with the contractor’s performance on the subject contract. Evaluations should reflect an honest, straightforward, and objective evaluation of the contractor’s performance. Evaluations must be based on objective facts supported by program/project and contract management data and reports.

Your knowledge is crucial to our evaluation of the company’s past performance, and we request that you provide responses to all questions. A simple “unknown” answer may be appropriate when no evidence is available to you in a particular area. We ask that you indicate based on the definitions provided in the questionnaire, the contractor’s performance on the identified contract. Please provide narrative rationales for your answers that are marked other than acceptable or areas where the contractor clearly exceeded contract requirements. Handwritten responses, printed clearly, are sufficient.

Please submit your past performance questionnaire directly to CapMetro (not to the company) no later than December 9, 2026 prior to 3:00 p.m. It may be necessary to call you to discuss questionnaire responses.

If you have any questions concerning this questionnaire please contact Deborah Knutson at Deborah.Knutson@capmetro.org. Responses may be submitted to this office as indicated on the cover of the questionnaire. Your time is greatly appreciated, and we thank you for your participation.

Sincerely, Deborah Knutson, CPPB Contracts Administrator III Enclosure:

Past Performance Questionnaire

THE QUESTIONNAIRE MAY BE SUBMITTED BY EMAIL TO: procure.help@capmetro.org

SECTION A. THIS SECTION ONLY TO BE FILLED IN BY THE OFFEROR:

Offeror (Proposing Firm) Contract Number:
Offeror (Proposing Firm):
Type of Contract:
Contract Amount:

Status:

Active ____ Completed:___

Date of Award:
Contract Completion Date (Including Extensions):
Product Description and/or service provided:
Type and Extent of Subcontracting:

SECTION B. TO BE FILLED IN BY RESPONDENT:

Please provide information for the primary individual completing this questionnaire.

Name:
Firm:
Telephone Number:
Mailing Address:
E-Mail Address:

SECTION C. RATING GUIDELINES:

Use the following descriptions as guidance in providing element ratings. Ratings should only reflect the performance of the contractor in question. For each question, please place an “X” in the box corresponding to the rating.

Exceptional

Very Good

Satisfactory

Marginal

Unsatisfactory

Unknown

SECTION D. CONTRACT/PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION:

Place an X in the appropriate box and provide narrative, if applicable.

1= Exceptional, 2= Very Good, 3= Satisfactory, 4= Marginal, 5= Unsatisfactory, 6= Unknown.

Question:

1
2
3
4
5
6
1
Did the contractor initiate and support startup and management control?
2
Timeliness in achieving schedule elements (delivery/performance), taking into account all excusable delays.
3
Did the contractor accurately and timely attend to and communicate the project status via required reports, inspections etc?
4
Did the contractor provide qualified management and key personnel throughout the contract performance period?
5
Did the contractor provide adequate, competent and qualified technical personnel capable of meeting contract requirements throughout the performance period of the contract?
6
Was the contractor’s top management involved and committed to project success?
7
Rate the contractor’s ability to manage and coordinate subcontractors, and please note any subcontracting issues (positive or negative) that impacted the performance of your contract.
8
How timely and sufficient were the contractor’s resources (manning levels, skill mix, equipment, etc.) to meet contract requirements (technical, management, and contractual)?
9
How well did the contractor work independent of your guidance, oversight and assistance?
10
Rate the effectiveness of the contractor’s program to ensure compliance with federal, state and local regulations.
11
How timely and effective were the contractor’s responses to and resolution of technical problems?
12
How innovative was the contractor in performing the technical aspects of this contract and resolving problems?
13
How well did the contractor respond to and act on customer feedback?
14
How well did the contractor perform the terms of the contract (schedule, scope and budget)?
15
How would you rate the contractor’s overall performance?
16
What were the contractor’s top documented strengths, if any, in performing the contract requirements?
17
What were the contractor’s top documented weaknesses, if any, in performing the contract requirements?
18
Were there any contract concessions/changes/terminations made due to the contractor’s inability to meet contract requirements (Cost schedule/performance)?
19
Have there been any indications that the contractor has financial concerns that would jeopardize contract performance?
20
Please provide any additional information you feel is important not covered elsewhere:

02/03/2026 PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE 1

SOLICITATION NO. 816598

CAPMETRO PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

SOLICITATION NO. 816598

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .