1-PiuteSD E-Rate Cat 2 score sheet.pdf
PDF 76 KB Posted
- Attached to
- PiuteSD 2026 E-Rate Cat 2
- Solicitation number
- PiuteSD2026eratecat2
- Issued by
- Juab County, Utah
About this file
This is an E-Rate Category 2 evaluation scoresheet for Piute School District in Utah, detailing the technical and cost scoring methodology for a 2026 procurement solicitation. The bid solicitation closes at noon on March 31, 2026, and requires bidders to provide brand and model equipment specified in the bid documents or functionally equivalent products as determined by Piute School District. Bidders must demonstrate compatibility with existing district equipment and submit a USAC SPIN number along with current Form 473 Service Provider Annual Certification (SPAC) documentation proving qualified vendor status. Award will be made to the bidder achieving the highest combined score on Piute School District's evaluation matrix. Products must be new, not refurbished, with pricing including freight under FOB Destination terms. The contract requires vendors to maintain current USAC certifications throughout the contract period, and bid pricing must remain valid if current product models are discontinued or part numbers change.
The scoresheet allocates 55 total technical points across four weighted evaluation criteria: Criterion 1 receives 36.4% weight (20 points), Criterion 2 receives 27.3% weight (15 points), and Criteria 3 and 4 each receive 18.2% weight (10 points). Evaluations use a 0-5 scale with a minimum 60% technical score threshold (33 points required) for cost scorability. Cost evaluation comprises 50% of total points (55 points), with the lowest proposed price receiving 100% of available cost points; other bidders receive points based on a formula where proposals exceeding 200% of the lowest price receive zero cost points. Mandatory requirements include vendor E-Rate Service Provider registration, submission of current Form 473 certification, and provision of the USAC SPIN number. The district reserves the right to reject bids from vendors with prior performance issues that failed to meet expectations or specifications.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 3-21298376-USAC FCC FORM 470 APPLICATION 260017010 CERTIFIED.pdf | ||
| 2-2026erate470.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Score will be assigned as follows:
0 = Fail, the proposal fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed du to missing information 1 = Poor, the proposal inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to incomplete information 2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP in an unsatisfactory manner 3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP in a minimum satisfactory manner 4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP and in some respects exceeds them 5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFP
RFP
Section
Evaluation (Pass/Fail)
RFP
Section
Evaluator Score (0-5)
Criteria Weight
% of Tech Criteria
Points Possible Points Earned
Minimum Required
1 4 36.4% 20.0 0.0
2 3 27.3% 15.0 0.0
3 2 18.2% 10.0 0.0 4 2 18.2% 10.0 0.0 5 0.0% 0.0 0.0 6 0.0% 0.0 0.0 7 0.0% 0.0 0.0 8 0.0% 0.0 0.0 9 0.0% 0.0 0.0
10 0.0% 0.0 0.0 11 0.0% 0.0 0.0 12 0.0% 0.0 0.0 13 0.0% 0.0 0.0 14 0.0% 0.0 0.0 15 0.0% 0.0 0.0 16 0.0% 0.0 0.0 17 0.0% 0.0 0.0 18 0.0% 0.0 0.0 19 0.0% 0.0 0.0 20 0.0% 0.0 0.0 21 0.0% 0.0 0.0 22 0.0% 0.0 0.0 23 0.0% 0.0 0.0
100.0% 55.0 0.0 0.0
RFP
Section
Min Percent
Min Points Required
Points Earned Percent Earned
Evaluation
60% 33.0 0.0 0.0%
RFP
Section
Low Cost Option
Offered Cost
Percent of Total Points Possible
Points Earned
50% 55.0 0.0
Percent of Total
Points Possible
Points Earned
50% 55.0 0.0 50% 55.0 0.0
100% 110.0 0.0Total Evaluation Points Total Cost Evaluation Points Total Technical Evaluation Points
Total Evaluation Points
* Purchasing will use the following cost formula: The points assigned to each offerors cost proposal will be based on the lowest proposal price. The offeror with the lowest Proposed Price will receive 100% of the price points. All other offerors will receive a portion of the total cost points based on what percentage higher their Proposed Price is than the Lowest Proposed Price. An offeror whose Proposed Price is more than double (200%) the Lowest Proposed Price will receive no points. The formula to compute the points is: Cost Points x (2- Proposed Price/Lowest Proposed Price).
Local or in State vendor Vendor bid exact product
Vendor must be registered E-Rate Service Provider
Required Technical Point Threshold
Cost
Scoreable Technical Criteria
RFP EVALUATION SCORESHEET
Firm Name:
Evaluator:
Date:
Minimum Mandatory Requirements
PiuteSD E-Rate
PiuteSD Prior Experience W/Vendor
Prices for ineligible products/services/fees
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .