1. Past Performance Questionaire.docx
DOCX document 34 KB Posted
- Attached to
- General Construction Services MATOC for BEP Western Currency Facilities Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 2031ZA24B00011
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire for a multiple award task order contract solicitation for general construction services at the Bureau of Engraving and Printing's Western Currency Facility in Fort Worth, Texas. Offerors must submit completed questionnaires from at least three recent and relevant past performance references by April 19, 2024. The total small business set-aside contract has a ceiling value of $70 million. The solicitation seeks general construction services for projects that will be defined at the task order level. An initial site visit will be held on March 18, 2024 in Fort Worth for interested offerors. The Bureau of Engraving and Printing is the contracting agency.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 2. Davis-Bacon Wage Determination.pdf | ||
| 5. IDIQ Pricing Table.pdf | ||
| 4. SOW - Task Order - Air Handler Refurbishment (Phase 4).pdf | ||
| 6. Task Order Pricing Table.pdf | ||
| 3. SOW - General Construction IDIQ.pdf | ||
| Solicitation 2031ZA24B00011.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Instructions:
· The Bureau of Engraving and Printing (BEP) requests recent past performance. Recent is defined as within the last 5 years.
· Offeror shall send the questionnaire to at least three (3) Assessors for which services were provided. Services must be relevant to BEP’s requirement. Relevant is defined as similar in size, scope, and complexity to the BEP’s requirement identified in the Performance Work Statement.
· Offeror shall complete Section II prior to submitting the questionnaire to Assessor(s).
· The Assessor(s) shall validate/confirm Section II information and complete Sections III and V.
· The Assessor(s), NOT THE OFFEROR, shall email the completed questionnaire to the contracting office point of contact no later than the date and time indicated below.
Message to the Assessor: Your assistance is requested by the BEP to assist with establishing the performance history for the Contractor named below. Please validate/confirm Section II information, complete Sections III and V, and sign the questionnaire. Completed questionnaire shall be emailed to William.Parkin@bep.gov no later than 12:00 PM Central Time (CST), Thursday, April 19, 2024.
I. Solicitation Data (for the proposed effort)
Solicitation Number
| Project/Requirement |
| General Construction MATOC for BEP WCF Facilities |
II. Current or Historical Contract Information Assessor: The performance data submitted by the Offeror is |_| correct or |_| incorrect.
Name of Company Reference is for: _____________________________________________________
CONTRACTOR NAME & ADDRESS:
Contract No
Type of Contract
| Initial |
| Final |
Contract Value
Period of Performance/Delivery Schedule
Project/Requirement Description
Please select from the following as it applies to this contract:
| Contracting Role |
| |_| PRIME |
| |_| SUBCONTRACTOR |
| Termination History |
| |_| Convenience |
| |_| Default |
| |_| N/A |
III. Assessor Information
Assessor Name
Organization
Title
Phone Number/Email Address
Identify your role in the contract award or administration and the period of your involvement.
| Role |
| Period of Involvement |
Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO)
Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO)
Contract Specialist
Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR)
Technical Project Lead/Project Manager
Quality Assurance Specialist
Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) Auditor
Other:
IV. Evaluation Definitions
The following definitions should be used in your assessment of Contractor performance.
| EXCEPTIONAL |
| Contractor’s performance significantly exceeded most or all contract requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective. |
| VERY GOOD |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective. |
| SATISFACTORY |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| MARGINAL |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The Contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| UNSATISFACTORY |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problems(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.. |
| NOT APPLICABLE (N/A) |
| Performance information not recent or relevant as defined in the Solicitation. Unable to provide assessment. |
V. Performance Evaluation
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unacceptable |
| N/A |
BUSINESS RELATIONS
The referenced contractor was responsive to the customer’s needs.
The contractor’s personnel were qualified to meet the requirements.
TIMELINESS
The contractor’s ability to ensure, to the extent of its responsibility, that all tasks were completed within the requested time frame.
Time required for vendor to respond to emergencies and service requests.
Timeliness in Meeting Milestones and deliverables (if applicable)
QUALITY
What is your OVERALL assessment of the quality of the contractor’s performance? Were your specifications and expectations met by the contractor?
Quality of the finished product; please note any specific issues.
Conformance to Contract Requirements
Standards of Good Workmanship (technical, professional, environmental, safety, etc.)
COST
The contractor’s ability to accurately estimate cost.
COST/PRICE ESTIMATES—(ability to meet proposed costs and whether actual costs/rates realized reflect negotiated costs/rates)
INVOICING—accuracy and timeliness of submission
Based on this Contractor’s overall performance, would you award this Contractor another contract?
Yes________ No___________ If no, please explain:
General Comments:
| _________________________________ | ____________________ | |
| Assessor’s Signature | Date |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .