1.17 OPPD 26-R-3110 SMWDC SSM.docx
DOCX document 29 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N0024426R3110
About this file
This is an Offeror's Past Performance Data form used by NAVSUP FLC San Diego to evaluate contractor performance history for Solicitation N00244-26-R-3110 SSM. The form is designed to be completed by references or prior customers of an offeror to assess the probability of successful contract performance. Responses should be submitted to Christine Jordan, Code 240, at NAVSUP FLC San Diego no later than the solicitation closing date via email at christine.jordan@navy.mil.
The form requests comprehensive evaluation across four quality dimensions: (1) Quality/Meeting Contract Requirements, including customer satisfaction, rework instances, and innovative work applications; (2) Quality/Timeliness, assessing schedule compliance and submission timeliness; (3) Quality/Contractor Responsiveness, evaluating customer concern response, problem resolution, issue severity, and cost control performance; and (4) Additional Observations/Information, requesting identification of contractor strengths and weaknesses, overall satisfaction with the award decision, willingness to re-engage the contractor, awareness of similar contracted efforts, and recommendations for additional references. The form includes detailed sub-questions under each category to guide comprehensive past performance assessment. This is a template document intended to solicit third-party feedback on contractor performance and does not establish specific contractual requirements or deliverables.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| PWS for B3291 SSM rev4 8-25-26.docx | DOCX document | |
| Section L and M SSM 25 Aug.docx | DOCX document | |
| Solicitation Amendment - N0024426R31100002.pdf | ||
| Solicitation Amendment N0024426R31100002 SF 30.pdf | ||
| Solicitation Amendment N0024426R31100001 SF 30.pdf | ||
| Solicitation Amendment - N0024426R31100001.pdf | ||
| Section L and M SSM 20 Aug.docx | DOCX document | |
| DD 1423 SSM 5.pdf | ||
| DD254 - B3291 SSM.pdf | ||
| DD 1423 SSM 3.pdf | ||
| DD 1423 SSM 1.pdf | ||
| DD 1423 SSM 2.pdf | ||
| PWS for B3291 SSM rev4.docx | DOCX document | |
| Section L and M SSM 11 Aug.docx | DOCX document | |
| Solicitation - N0024426R3110.pdf | ||
| DD 1423 SSM 4.pdf | ||
| DD 1423 SSM 6.pdf | ||
| DD 1423 SSM 7.pdf |
Show all 18
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
OFFEROR’S PAST PERFORMANCE DATA
Solicitation N00244-26-R-3110 SSM
Complete and return no later than the solicitation closing date to:
NAVSUP FLC San Diego Attn: Christine Jordan, Code 240 Phone: (619) 556-6121 Email: christine.jordan@navy.mil
On behalf of:
| Company's Name: | _________________________________ | |
| POC/Title/Position: | _________________________________ | |
| Email Address: | _________________________________ | |
| Contract/Purchase Order No.: | _________________________________ | |
| Contract Amount: | _________________________________ | |
| Contract Type: | _________________________________ | |
| Period of Performance: | _________________________________ | |
| Business Address: | _________________________________ | |
| _________________________________ | ||
| _________________________________ | ||
| Phone Number: | _________________________________ | |
| Description of Effort: | _________________________________ | |
| Phone Number: | _________________________________ | |
| Phone Number: | _________________________________ |
NOTE: DO NOT RETURN TO THE CONTRACTOR WHO ORIGINATED THIS REQUEST
The completion of this questionnaire is requested from your agency/company in order for the NAVSUP FLC San Diego to evaluate the aforementioned contractor’s past performance on previous contracts and efforts as it relates to the probability of successful accomplishment of the work required by the Government, relative to the award of a contract.
Completed by :
| Command/Company’s Name: | _________________________________ | ||
| POC/Title/Position: | _________________________________ | ||
| Email Address: | _________________________________ | ||
| Address: | _________________________________ | ||
| _________________________________ | |||
| _________________________________ | |||
| Phone Number: | _________________________________ |
PAST PERFORMANCE QUALITY RATING TABLE
Quality:
1. Quality/Meeting Contract Requirements: The offeror’s demonstrated history of delivering products and services that met or exceeded the requirements of the contract.
a. How would you describe your level of customer satisfaction?
b. Were there instances of rework and/or deficiency reports? (If yes, explain)
c. Did the contractor engage in effective and/or innovative work applications that were beneficial to the Government?
2. Quality/Timeliness.
a. Did the Contractor meet/comply with performance schedules?
b. Rate the timeliness of submission of requested information, reports and invoicing.
3. Quality/Contractor Responsiveness. The offeror’s demonstrated ability to:
a. respond to customer concerns
b. isolate and resolve problems
· the number and severity of problems
· the effectiveness of corrective actions taken.
c. Contractor's cost control. Did the contractor deliver at the agreed-to price/cost? Describe the reasons for changes to contract value (e.g., scope changes, overrun/under-run, Government-imposed schedule changes, etc.)
4. Additional Observations/Information
a. Identify the contractor's overall strengths and weaknesses.
b. Given hindsight, are you satisfied that the contract was awarded to this contractor? Would you be pleased to have this contractor perform work for you again? Why?
c. Are you aware of any other contracted efforts performed by this contractor similar in nature to this contract? Please identify contract/program and point of contact.
d. Is there anyone else we should send this questionnaire to? Please identify by name, organization, and phone number.
(If more comment space needed, please attach additional pages.)
Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .