06 TECH EVAL FACTORS.pdf

RFP 47PM0023R0003, Electric Cart Parking Area, St Elizabeths West Campus, SE Wash DC.

TECHNCIAL EVALUAITON FACTORS

The Government is seeking a contractor (and his team) qualified to design and construct a parking surface with a structural covering requiring relocation and installation of electrical connections.

A. Experience on Similar Projects

This factor considers the extent of the Offeror’s past experience as a firm in providing similar construction services.

The Offeror must demonstrate successful experience as a Design-Build (DB) or General Contractor (GC) responsible for the construction of one “similar” parking surface substantially completed within the past eight (8) years from the date of RFP. Project shall be considered “similar” if it meets ALL the following characteristics: (May submit no more than three projects total.)

1 The project was a parking surface – pervious concrete, asphalt, or decomposed granite,

2. The project required a full structural design of an overhang/covering (with calculations).

The SOW requires: "The cover/shelter for the electric carts will require a design that contains structural drawings with calculations from a structural engineer."

3. The project required the relocation of or installation of electrical connections.

Acceptability Standard: This factor will be evaluated based upon the Offeror’s written response to the RFQ. However, the Government reserves the right to contact references under this evaluation factor to verify the scope of the project offered. If the Offeror materially misrepresents information relating to its experience, the Contracting Officer may reject the proposal. Any proposal which does not provide one “similar” parking surface project substantially completed within the past eight (8) years from the date of the RFQ and meets ALL the above similar characteristics then the project will not be considered technically acceptable.

B. Designated Key Personnel (Superintendent, Project Manager, Quality Assurance Manager, Scheduler)

This factor evaluates the Offerors’ demonstrated qualifications of proposed key personnel.

a. General Superintendent –

1) Education: Graduation from an accredited undergraduate program with Bachelor of Science Degree in Engineering, Construction Management, a similar field of expertise, or a higher-level trade specific technical certification.

Note: Appropriate experience may be substituted for education and credentials.

2) Project Experience: Minimum 5 years field construction experience in General Construction projects with at least two projects at least $200,000 each of either repair and alteration, new construction. (10 years with no degree).

3) Training: Certification of completion, OSHA 30 HR Construction Safety & Health Course, or equivalent training.

4) Additional Qualifications: The Offeror may provide any additional qualifications regarding this individual.

b. Project Manager –

1) Education: Graduation from an accredited undergraduate program with a

Bachelor of Science Degree in Engineering, Construction Management, or a similar field of expertise.

Note: Appropriate experience may be substituted for education and credentials.

2) Project Experience: At least 5 years project management experience on general construction with at least two projects at least $200,000 each of either repair and alteration, new construction. (10 years with no degree).

3) Training: Certification of completion, OSHA 30 HR Construction Safety & Health Course, or equivalent training.

4) Additional Qualifications: The Offeror may provide any additional qualifications regarding this individual.

c. Quality Control Manager/Quality Assurance Manager –

1) Education: Graduation from an accredited undergraduate program with a

Bachelor of Architecture, Bachelor of Science Degree in Engineering, Construction Management, or a similar field of expertise.

2) Credentials: Registered Professional Architect (R.A.) and/or Professional Engineer (P.E.) and C.Q.M. for Contractors Course Certification.

Note: Appropriate experience may be substituted for education and credentials.

3) Project Experience: At least 5 years CQC experience on at least two (2) projects at least $200,000 each of either repair and alteration, new construction. (10 years with no degree)

4) Training: Certification of completion, OSHA 30 HR Construction Safety & Health Course, or equivalent training.

5) Additional Qualifications: The Offeror may provide any additional qualifications regarding this individual.

d. Project Scheduler –

1) Certifications: must indicate Scheduling Software experience (e.g., Primavera, Microsoft Project)

2) Project Experience: must possess a minimum of 5 years of experience as a project scheduler on at least two (2) projects either repair and alteration, new construction.

Submission Required by Offeror:

The Offeror must provide a Resume that includes the following bulleted information below for each of the above stated Key Personnel and shall provide information that shows the proposed Key Personnel’s experience meets the minimum qualifications stated above.

• Name and title

• Project assignment

• Name of firm with which associated

• Years of experience with this firm (in the key personnel’s field of expertise/discipline) and years of experience with other firms (in the key personnel’s field of expertise/ discipline)

• Education degree(s), year, and institution

• Active professional registration, year first registered, if applicable

• Other experience and qualifications relevant to same/similar work required under this contract

• List of projects in which the individual has worked to include Name of project(s) and project location(s).

• Include in the resume 1 to 2 sentences why this person is qualified and a “good fit” for the proposed position.

• Include the names, phone numbers, and project names of two references for each of the staff occupying the positions noted above.

Resumes for each position are limited to two (2) pages, and references are limited to one (1) page.

Evaluation Standard: The government will consider the extent to which the key personnel have worked together as a team as well as consider previous education, experience, credentials, project experience, training, and other qualifications that determine the vendor to be capable of successfully performing this contract.

Acceptability Standard: This factor will be evaluated based upon the Offeror’s written response to the RFP. However, the Government reserves the right to contact references under this evaluation factor to verify the resumes. If the Offeror materially misrepresents information relating to the individual resumes, the Contracting Officer may reject the proposal.

C. Past Performance of Offeror

This factor considers the past performance of the Offeror.

Submission Required by Offeror:

The Offeror shall submit one reference (a person or persons who may be contacted regarding the quality of the Offeror’s past performance) for the similar project presented in Evaluation Factor A: Experience on Similar Projects. (PBS Past Performance Questionnaire is attached for your use. PPQ can be submitted directly to the Contracting Officer or included in the Technical Proposal submission.)

The Offeror shall provide the name, title, company name, current address, current phone number, current email address, and current fax number for the reference.

Offeror is responsible for the accuracy of this information.

Evaluation Criteria: This factor evaluates the past performance of the Offeror to determine responsibility.

Acceptability Standard: This factor will be evaluated based upon the Offeror’s past performance record that demonstrates satisfactory performance on the comparable project submitted under Factor A: Experience on Similar Projects. The Government intends to contact individuals provided as references but may solicit other sources including, but not limited to, Federal, state, and local agencies, better business bureaus, published media, and electronic databases as references for information on the identified projects presented by the offeror if deemed necessary. Any proposal which does not demonstrate satisfactory performance on the similar projects submitted under Factor A: Experience on Comparable Projects will not be considered technically acceptable.