032_Attachment_4-Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 163 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 1333MK26Q0025
About this file
This is a Past Performance Questionnaire template for federal contract solicitation 1333MK26Q0025 issued by NOAA. The document is designed to collect performance evaluations of contractors from past contract references and must be completed and submitted to Isaac Bright at isaac.bright@noaa.gov no later than February 25, 2026 at 1600 PST.
The questionnaire evaluates contractor performance across four key criteria: Quality of Service, Schedule, Cost Control, and Management. Each criterion uses a standardized five-point rating scale consisting of Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, and Unsatisfactory, with detailed definitions provided for each rating level. Quality of Service assesses performance against contract requirements, specifications, and workmanship standards. Schedule evaluates timeliness in completing contracts, task orders, milestones, and deliverables. Cost Control measures the contractor's effectiveness in forecasting, managing, and controlling costs. Management assesses integration and coordination of contract activities, including problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals, contractor behavior, and customer satisfaction. The questionnaire provides space for comments after each evaluation section and concludes with fields for the rater's name, signature, and date, along with an additional comments section.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Source Selection Information
ATTACHMENT 4:
PAST PERFORMANCE
QUESTIONNAIRE
SOLICITATION
1333MK26Q0025
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
CONTRACTOR BEING REVIEWED:
BRIEF DESCRIPTION:
REFERENCE CONTRACT #:
PERSON COMPLETING QUESTIONNAIRE:
Send Completed Questionnaire to Isaac Bright at isaac.bright@noaa.gov no later than 02/25/2026
1600 PST
1. QUALITY OF SERVICE
Assess the contractor’s performance to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship (e.g. commonly accepted technical, professional, or environmental standards).
(Check the appropriate rating box.)
RATING ADJECTIVAL
RATING
DEFINITION
EXCEPTIONAL
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.
VERY GOOD
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
SATISFACTORY
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory.
MARGINAL
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
mailto:isaac.bright@noaa.gov
UNSATISFACTORY
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Comments:
2. SCHEDULE
Assess the timeliness of the contractor against the completion of the contract, task orders, milestones, delivery schedules, and administrative requirements (e.g. efforts that contribute to or affect the schedule variance).
to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was being assessed contains some minor problems for which element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the
3. COST CONTROL
Assess the contractor’s effectiveness in forecasting, managing, and controlling cost.
(Check the appropriate rating box.)
RATING ADJECTIVAL
to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was being assessed contains some minor problems for which recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being
4. MANAGEMENT
Assess the integration and coordination of all activities needed to execute the contract, specifically the timeliness, completeness and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals, the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, and customer satisfaction.
to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was being assessed contains some minor problems for which recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS, IF ANY:
Rater’s Name:
Rater’s Signature:
Date:
| PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE |
| Send Completed Questionnaire to Isaac Bright at isaac.bright@noaa.gov no later than 02/25/2026 1600 PST |
| 1. QUALITY OF SERVICE |
| 2. SCHEDULE |
| 3. COST CONTROL |
| 4. MANAGEMENT |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .