03. FTQW261200, Industrial District Plan, SOW, 6 Feb 26.pdf

STATEMENT OF WORK

MASTER PLANNING SERVICES

Project Title: Industrial District Plan Project Location: Eielson AFB, AK Base Project Number: FTQW261200 04 February 2026

1.0 INTRODUCTION

The Architect-Engineer (A-E) shall conduct master planning support to include services to develop the Industrial District Plan at Eielson Air Force Base (AFB), by collecting the most recent data and working with installation participants, mission partners, and stakeholders in a 4-day site visit and collaborative planning workshop to update the existing Installation Development Pan (IDP) recommendations as required to meet current and future mission requirements. This Statement of Work (SOW) defines the A-E services to provide a district plan, and required supporting documentation, for the Industrial District at Eielson (AFB), Alaska. This SOW defines what is required for this project.

1.1 PROJECT BACKGROUND

The Industrial District is the installation’s primary industrial area encompassing wetlands and floodplains, key infrastructure including cell towers, antenna farms, munitions storage, fuel storage, water and wastewater treatment plants, civil engineering shops, logistics readiness facilities, light manufacturing facilities, and associated administrative offices. The northern edge of the district is adjacent to Anderson-Crawford Elementary School; therefore, land use compatibility and appropriate buffer zones must be considered when evaluating future development within adjacent areas.

The District Plan continues the comprehensive planning process by focusing on the current operations of a district and providing planning at a manageable scale by bridging the gap between the overarching Installation Development Plan (IDP) and the specifics found within individual site plans. By focusing on the district level, the plan provides additional details addressing mission requirements, planning objectives, and command priority changes. The plan presents a summary of existing conditions, existing capacities and the capacity (i.e. mission operations, built infrastructure, mission support, and quality of life) to accommodate future growth within the district. The key outputs of a district planning effort are incorporated into the Comprehensive Planning Platform (CPP), the Air Force’s digital planning environment. The District Plan will review stewardship requirements for natural, recreational, and cultural resources and compliance with environmental laws.

Future construction and development must support the Air Force’s installation planning objectives to:

• Preserve operational requirements (air, ground ranges)

• Ensure a safe and healthy environment for mission accomplishment

• Protect and preserve natural and cultural resources

• Maintain the ability to respond and recover in the face of adversity

• Support and encourage sustainable and energy-efficient development

• Ensure optimum and cost-effective use of real property assets

• Ensure efficient and compatible land uses

• Protect the installation’s long-term viability by providing capacity for growth

• Create a cohesive, visually appealing environment

1.2 SCOPE OF WORK

The A-E shall develop an Industrial District Plan focused on assessing existing conditions, capacities, constraints, and development opportunities within the Industrial District to support planning and programming of future requirements. The effort shall define alternatives and associated planning-level costs, provide conceptual graphics and spatial data, and refine planning documentation in preparation for

Page 2 of 13 Page 2 of 13 installation programming and prioritization.

The A-E is responsible for providing all research, investigation, estimating, planning, and supporting information required to prepare the District Plan and related documents. All planning considerations and subsequent construction activities produced from the District Plan must follow all applicable codes and laws governing the repair of Air Force Real Property assets identified in Section 1.6. The current version of all applicable codes and laws at the time of contract award will apply. It is the responsibility of the A-E to confirm with 354 CES Programming (354 CEN/CENP) what versions are valid for the District Plan.

The District Plan to support the development of the requirements for the Industrial District will have at a minimum, the following items:

• Illustrative Plan

• Execution Plan

• Capacity Plan

• Regulating Plan

• Executive Summary

The template and/or guidance documents to produce the items listed above are listed in attachments 1 through 4 of this SOW.

1.3 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT

The A-E shall investigate, research, and develop the Industrial District Plan at Eielson AFB by collecting the most recent data and working with installation participants, mission partners, and stakeholders on a 4-day site visit and collaborative planning workshop to update the existing Installation Development Pan (IDP) recommendations as required to meet current and future mission requirements. The A-E will produce an Industrial District Plan, which will be compliant with the requirements and acceptance criteria of this SOW and attachments. A-E Services will be performed in support of program and/or project areas for the Air Force Civil Engineer.

1.4 WORK SITE COORDINATION

The A-E shall coordinate site access with the 354 CES Project Manager (PM). Escorts(s) may be required for entry into restricted areas.

The A-E must conduct work in compliance with the installation environmental policy, in accordance with (IAW) installations EMS, and respective to the installation's significant aspects and environmental action plans (EAPs).

The A-E must comply with Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) safety and health regulations and local safety office requirements. The A-E is required to provide the CO copies of any OSHA report(s) submitted during the duration of this contract.

1.5 PLANNING LEVEL REQUIREMENTS

All work performed under this effort shall be planning level in nature and shall rely primarily on the Government-furnished information supplemented by field reconnaissance and stakeholder interviews. No design-level surveys, testing, modeling, or intrusive investigations are required under this SOW unless specifically authorized in writing by the CO.

Page 3 of 13 Page 3 of 13

1.6 REFERENCES

Comply with all applicable (1) federal, state, and local statutes, instructions, manuals, handbooks, regulations, guidance, policy letters, and rules (including all changes and amendments) in effect. The following shall be considered a partial list and not limit the standards which may apply to the project.

The A-E shall research, identify, and comply with all applicable federal, state, and local statutes including, but not limited to:

• Air Force/ Military instructions, manuals, handbooks, regulations, guidance, and policy letters

• ACEI 34R-05, Basis of Estimate

• AACEI 56R-08, Cost Estimate Classification System -As Applied in Engineering, Procurement, and

Construction for the Building and General Construction Industries.

• ADATPF - Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities Standards

• AFOSHA - Air Force Operational Safety and Health Agency

• DAF District Planning Playbook

• DAF Integrated Installation Planning Playbook

• DAFI 32-1015, Integrated Installation Planning

• DAFI 32-1020, Planning and Programming Built Infrastructure Projects

• DAFI 32-1023, Designing and Constructing Military Construction Projects

• DAFMAN 32-1040, Civil Engineering Airfield Infrastructure Systems

• Eielson AFB Installation Facility Standards

• EPA – Environmental Protection Agency

• UFC 3-260-01, Airfield and Heliport Planning and Design

• UFC 3-260-04, Airfield and Heliport Marking

• UFC 3-250-01FA, Pavement Design for Airfields

• UFC 3-260-18FA, Pavement Maintenance Management

• UFC 3-701-01, DoD Facilities Pricing Guide

• UFC 3-730-01, Programming Cost Estimates for Military Construction

• UFC 3-740-05, Handbook: Construction Cost Estimating

• UFC 4-101-01, Minimum Antiterrorism Standards for Buildings

• FAA Advisory Circulars (as applicable)

• OSHA - Occupational Safety and Health Agency

• SDSFIE (Spatial Data Standards for Facilities, Infrastructure, and Environment)

• Applicable state/local environmental regulations

All Air Force Manuals, Publications, and Guide Specifications will not necessarily be furnished. The A-E may acquire them from the Defense Printing Service Detachment Office, Standardization Document Order Desk, 700 Robbins Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19111-5094, or other Federal agencies. The Special Assistance Desk phone number at Defense Printing Service is (215) 697-2664. Many references and standards are available via the following websites: www.wbdg.org and www.afcec.af.mil/library/index.asp. The A-E may review any Air Force Manual or publication available at the Base Civil Engineering offices.

1.7 ADMINISTRATION

The Eielson AFB Contracting Officer (CO) is responsible for the administration of the contract. No change shall

Page 4 of 13 Page 4 of 13 be made to the provisions of this contract without written authorization from the CO. The Base Civil Engineer (BCE) monitors the work and services furnished and evaluates the performance of the A-E as the CO’s Technical Representative (COTR). The COTR is not a CO and has no authority to contractually bind the Government or modify the contract.

2.0 DELIVERABLES

The A-E shall complete and deliver, at minimum, the items listed in attachment 1 of this SOW and shall perform the tasks identified in this SOW to ensure a complete and usable District Plan is delivered and approved by the Contracting Officer (CO). An electronic copy is anything that is sent via digital format, such as PDF, CAD, GIS. A hard copy is physically deliverable on paper.

The A-E shall perform internal interdisciplinary coordination at each submittal to verify consistency between planning narratives, graphics, GIS data, and cost estimates.

2.1 WRITTEN SUMMARIES

The A-E shall prepare written summaries of all meetings, field investigations, and review conferences held in conjunction with this task order. The A-E shall submit them to the 354 CES PM for concurrence.

All action items shall clearly state the requested information and the party responsible for providing the information.

2.2 FIELD INVESTIGATION

Field investigations shall be limited to planning level reconnaissance and validation of existing information.

After the contract award, the A-E shall conduct all field investigations. The Site Survey will include, but is not limited to, the following:

2.2.1 VERIFICATION OF EXISTING CONDITIONS AND SURVEYS

Use of existing condition data provided by the Government conveys acceptance and as such does not relieve the A-E of liability associated with performance as the DOR. Geotechnical investigation is limited to planning-level reconnaissance and review of existing data; no intrusive borings required unless specifically authorized. The A-E shall visit each site and facility to verify existing conditions that are significant to the project. Two (2) site visits are included. Additional site visits require written approval by the PM and CO. The A-E shall perform instrument surveys, as required. All site visits shall be coordinated with the CO and 354 CES PM.

2.2.2 RECORD DRAWINGS

The A-E shall request/research any available electronic and/or hard copy information from the 354 CES Record Drawing Vault that pertains to each project. The A-E shall not rely on the accuracy of the reference information and must conduct independent site verification of all conditions.

2.2.4 STAKEHOLDER INTERVIEWS AND ON-SITE DATA COLLECTION

The A-E shall visit key facilities within the Industrial District. This will be cursorily evaluated for adequacy, utility and condition. The A-E will coordinate with the PM to build a list of stakeholders along with their contact information. Installation, local, and regional stakeholders shall be considered. To the

Page 5 of 13 Page 5 of 13 greatest extent possible, all interview appointments will be scheduled in advance of the Site Visit, and the A-E will manage scheduling.

The A-E will take detailed notes during interviews and submit a summary of interviews within two weeks after the Initial Site Visit. The Installation will have two weeks for review and comment, and A-E will submit final minutes within two weeks of receipt of comments.

2.2.5 PHOTO DOCUMENTATION

Prepare digital photo documentation. Include photo documentation of site(s) and building(s) under investigation, field activities, and sample locations. Photography of any kind must be coordinated through the installation, customer, or facility Point of Contact (POC).

2.2.6 COORDINATION

The A-E is responsible for planning coordination with the CO and 354 CES PM, using agency (CEN), and other base officials.

2.2.7 SURVEYING/GIS FILES

All projects that include surveying and/or GPS data collection must include a Non-Disclosure Agreement document (NDA) and provide results in GIS formats according to the formats designated in Section 6.3 below. This is in addition to any other report or files generated by survey work. If GIS files are not released to the A-E, the A-E shall propose a means of providing conceptual depictions for each alternative.

2.3 GIS AND SCHEMATIC/DRAWINGS DELIVERABLES

All projects that include surveying and/or GIS data collection must provide results in CAD formats. This is in addition to any other report or files generated by the survey work. The A-E shall prepare and submit schematic/drawing files (PDF) and GIS files with each District Plan submittal.

2.3.1 PROJECT NUMBER

The A-E shall use the FTQW26120 project number as the project number.

2.3.2 ELECTRONIC MEDIA

The A-E shall ensure to submit the electronic files in the following formats:

• Final District Plan shall be provided in a single .pdf format.

• Appendices shall be provided in their native file format unless otherwise specified.

• Cost Estimates shall be provided in .xlsx, .pdf, and native file format.

2.3.3 DRAWINGS

The A-E shall deliver all drawings in .dwg and in .pdf format. AutoCAD drawings shall be developed to be plotted at desired scale on ANSI D (22”x34”) paper when scale of “1:1” is selected during the plotting function. If specific plot assignment files or fonts were used in the creation of the AutoCAD drawings these files shall be included in the electronic file. Provide all x-refs utilized with the drawing files. All x-

Page 6 of 13 Page 6 of 13 refs shall be bound to the appropriate drawing files such that they remain referenced after import.

Drawings and other files for projects become US Government property and shall become part of the 354 CES drawing records or used by the US Government.

2.3.4 PROJECT FILE LIST

The A-E shall submit a Project File List. The Project File List is a document that describes all the files in a project. The A-E shall ensure the Project File List includes the following specific information:

2.3.4.1 A description of the project

• Project number and title

• Any related projects

• Percentage designed

2.3.4.2 A description of the project development

• List of drawing numbers from record drawings of Base Comprehensive Plan tabs that were used to create the drawing files

• Type of site surveys or investigations performed

• Site conditions that differ from above drawings

2.3.4.3 Drawing files

• File names

• Descriptions

• Files referenced

2.4 PROGRESS SCHEDULE

The A-E shall prepare and submit a Progress Schedule (AF Form 3064 or approved equivalent) identifying the sequencing and duration of all major phases and submittals required to complete the Industrial District Plan.

The baseline Progress Schedule shall be submitted at the Kickoff Meeting and all updates IAW the timeframe identified in Attachment 1 of this SOW. The A-E shall not proceed to the next phase without concurrence from the 354 CES PM and CO, unless otherwise directed.

The Progress Schedule shall, at a minimum, include the following phases:

• Kickoff Meeting

• Site Visit and Data Collection

• District Plan Draft Submittal

• District Plan Review and Comment Resolution

• District Plan Final Submittal

3.0 NON-GRAPHIC DOCUMENTATION

The A-E shall use a computer to produce all non-graphic documentation as follows:

Page 7 of 13 Page 7 of 13

• All word processing documents shall be submitted as .docx format. A word processing program other than MS Word may be used, but the files must be saved in the correct format, and the A-E must ensure that the documents are saved without loss of data or structure. All word processing documents must use 11-point Times New Roman as the font.

• All spreadsheet applications shall be submitted as .xlsx format. A spreadsheet program other than MS Excel may be used, but the files must be saved in the correct format, and the A-E must ensure that the documents are saved without loss of data or structure.

• Non-graphic documentation requirements may change at any time during the period of performance for the convenience of the Government.

4.0 PREPARATION OF PROJECT COST PROFILE

The A-E shall prepare a Cost Estimate for each of the preferred alternatives provided in sufficient detail to establish an AACE Class 5 Planning Level Cost Estimate. The Cost Estimate for each alternative shall be prepared for the final submittals using UFC 3-701-07, DoD Facilities Pricing Guide, or other approved method and with the most recent industry and local adjustments. For any questions about preferences on cost estimating consult 354 CES PM and CO.

4.1 COST ESTIMATES

Prepare cost estimates using the most recent standard Construction Specification Institute (CSI) format, or other form as identified in task order.

5.0 SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

The A-E shall prepare and submit all documents, data, and deliverables necessary to support the District Planning effort IAW with this SOW, attachments, and the deliverables listed in attachment 1, A-E Table of Deliverables. Each submittal shall clearly identify the project title, installation, contract number, project number, and applicable SOW section. The detailed requirements for each submittal are provided in this section. A submittal is acceptable when it meets all requirements of this SOW and Attachment 1, A-E Table of Deliverables.

5.1 DISTRICT PLAN DRAFT SUBMITTAL

The A-E shall prepare the District Plan Draft Submittal that will include the following:

5.1.1 DISTRICT PLAN DRAFT SUBMITTAL

The District Plan Draft shall be bound or in notebook form and include the following at a minimum:

5.1.1.1 TABLE OF CONTENTS

The A-E shall provide a table of contents. All pages of the District Plan and appendices shall have a uniform numbering system. The first page of each section and appendices shall be included at a minimum.

5.1.1.2 PLANNING STRATEGIES

The A-E shall present how planning strategies and associated best practices from UFC 2-

Page 8 of 13 Page 8 of 13

100-01 are applicable to each District.

5.1.1.3 DEVELOPMENT CONSTRAINTS

The A-E shall develop a graphic (using existing data provided by the installation) and brief text that summarizes each District-wide opportunities and constraints for the facility areas.

Characteristics that constrain development and present unique opportunities shall be identified during the review of existing information, through visual surveys and observations during the initial data gathering field trip and by interviewing key base personnel.

5.1.1.4 DEVELOPABLE AREAS

The A-E shall develop a series of developable area graphics based on predictive assumptions about constraints over time.

5.1.1.5 REGULATING PLAN

The Regulating Plan provides specific information on permitted development for each building parcel within a district and acts like an enhanced land- use plan. This plan designates the locations where different uses or building standards apply. Instead of defining just uses, as land use plans do, this method defines building form (e.g., height and frontage) while allowing for a range of possible uses.

5.1.1.6 CAPACITY PLAN

The A-E shall present capacity data by category code and each mission/tenant authorized requirement versus assigned occupancies and total capacity within the district. The A-E shall include space optimization opportunities or deficits based on the Capacity. The A-E shall identify facilities with major problems and prioritize them.

5.1.1.7 REQUIREMENTS PRIORITIZATION

The A-E shall recommend a preliminary of all requirements ranked by risk to mission.

The A-E shall also include other identified requirements, as long as they add value to an alternative and that alternative does not exceed funding assumptions.

5.1.1.8 ALTERNATIVE

The A-E shall develop at least three (3) alternative scenarios for each District Plan. The alternatives shall be presented at the initial submittal review conference.

5.1.1.9 INTERVIEWS

The A-E shall document all discussions with the Air Force Project Manager, using agency, and other base officials including names, position titles, and telephone numbers.

Correspondence shall be an appendix. Investigative interviews to determine design requirements etc. shall be included in a separate appendix and referenced in the narrative.

5.1.1.10 OTHER SUPPORTING INFORMATION

Page 9 of 13 Page 9 of 13

Any other items determined necessary by the A-E shall be included in an organized manner as individual appendices.

5.2 DISTRICT PLAN FINAL SUBMITTAL

The A-E shall prepare the District Plan Final Submittal that will include everything required by the Draft Submittal and the following:

5.2.1 DISTRICT PLAN FINAL REPORT

The District Plan Final Report shall be bound or in notebook form and include all documents required in the Draft Report and the following at a minimum:

5.2.1.1 ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS

The A-E shall present the current and future process or state of operations, the users of the process or operation, as well as the impact of the process or operations. The A-E will identify rough order of magnitude costs; benefits associated with each of the alternatives being analyzed and key variables for the Sensitivity/Risk Assessment.

5.2.1.2 ILLUSTRATION PLAN

The A-E shall develop an Illustrative Plan to graphically illustrate the preferred direction of development for the district and clearly show building footprints for projects in the Preferred Alternative. The A-E shall highlight temporary facilities or interim conditions required to phase execution of the program. The illustrative plan will also show all supporting facilities to be programmed with the primary facilities such as proposed roads, sidewalks, bicycle networks, street trees, open spaces, parking, and parks.

5.2.1.3 EXECUTION PLAN

The A-E shall develop an Execution Plan consisting of a detailed list of requirements and associated planning actions required to complete the Preferred Alternative. The list of requirements/actions will be organized by their funding program and include all associated actions (such as sequencing or approvals) required to execute the program. The Execution Plan may be broken into Short-Range (0-7 years), Mid-Range (8-15 years) or Long-Range (15+ years).

5.2.1.4 CAPACITY PLAN

The A-E shall develop the Capacity Plan based on the Regulating Plan to inform future investment requirements when planning new facility requirements. The information in the Capacity Plan will be used to inform new mission siting process, to focus future development in the right locations, and preserve valuable land resources for appropriate mission use.

The A-E will estimate the capacity for new facility construction based on developable areas and the ability for existing infrastructure support. The A-E will apply regulating plan parameters to develop notional buildings for Developable Parcels and estimate the capacity of primary facilities using gross square feet primary unit of measure for all buildings and secondary units of measure (PNS for dorms, AC for hangars, etc.). The A-E will estimate capacity for supporting facilities (e.g., spaces for parking lots, SY for ramp) and utility requirements for primary facilities.

Page 10 of 13 Page 10 of 13

The anticipated outcome of this analysis is an estimate of new facility construction based on developable land area; identification of infrastructure upgrades to accompany future development and establishment of boundaries to promote efficient in-fill development and prevent sprawl.

5.3 COST ESTIMATE

The A-E shall prepare a Cost Estimate for each preferred alternative. Cost estimates shall be marked “CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (CUI)”. Cost estimates shall be prepared using accurate data reflecting construction costs in the Fairbanks, Alaska area. The estimates shall also reflect accurate costs associated with the requirements of construction on Eielson AFB.

5.4 PROJECT FILE LIST AND COMPUTER FILES

The A-E shall make final corrections from the Draft District Plan Review and all comments provided by the 354 CES PM and submit an updated Project File List and PDF files as outlined in section 2.3.4, Project File List.

5.5 RESUBMITTALS

The A-E may be required to resubmit the Draft District Plan Review or the Final District Plan Submittal, if after review, the Government determines that the submittal does not meet the requirements set forth in the contract or if it contains sufficient error requiring major revisions, as determined by the Government.

Upon review by the Government, any submittal that has technical errors or omissions will be rejected and shall be required to be resubmitted. Each resubmittal shall be labeled as “DPRX” with X being the corresponding resubmittal number.

5.6 SUBMITTAL REVIEW

All submittals will be reviewed by Government personnel. The 354 CES PM will provide the A-E with copies of the review comments or marked up drawings and documents IAW with this SOW. If necessary, and if requested by the A-E, CO, or 354 CES PM, a submittal review conference will be held at the earliest mutually acceptable time to resolve questions arising from the submittal or review comments. The draft submittal review conference may optionally be held as an in-person meeting at the Government's discretion. All comments and annotations shall be summarized within a Comment Response Matrix.

5.7 COMMENT ANNOTATIONS

The A-E Shall note all Air Force-furnished comments, noting either the intent to incorporate the comment's direction, or the A-E's exception to any comments. Provide for every exception a brief but specific explanation of the exception. If the comment requires action other than that recommended in the comment, note the intended alternative action. Provide a copy of the noted comments as specified in the TO after either receipt of comments or attendance at the review conference, whichever is later.

5.8 COMMENT ACTIONS

Make all noted corrections identified in the comments or on the marked-up drawing/documents, provided Air Force comments and marks address work within the scope of the required services. If any comments or drawing marks add to, alter, or decrease the scope of services required, identify such to the CO for resolution. Upon resolution, any modifications to the District Plan shall become an integral part of the project requirements identified in the SOW. If a submittal contains numerous errors or deficiencies, or does not meet the specified requirements, the A-E shall re-submit corrected copies of the submittal. Each

Page 11 of 13 Page 11 of 13 submittal must receive concurrence from the 354 CES PM before proceeding to the next submittal point.

If a re-submittal is appropriate due to errors or omissions, no additional time or funds will be made available to the A-E.

6.0 OTHER REQUIREMENTS

The A-E is also responsible for the following:

6.1 A-E PAYMENT INVOICE

The A-E shall submit an invoice for payment only after receiving acceptance of the District Plan and authorization for payment letter from the CO. The A-E shall contact the CO if this letter has not been received within 14 calendar days after acceptance of the Final District Plan.

6.2 ENERGY EFFICIENCY

Energy-efficient technology and equipment is required for all projects at Eielson AFB as mandated by the Energy Policy Act of 1992.

6.3 SPATIAL DATA (MAP) REQUIREMENTS

All products associated with this SOW that provide a map representation of the location of installation features (historical, existing, or planned) including installation maps, site plans, area development plans, walls-out as-built depictions, or other related overhead (plan) views of an installation (partial or entire) must adhere to the following requirements. (NOTE: This requirement does not currently involve walls-in facility floor plans or interior renderings.)

All maps and associated data must comply with the latest version of Spatial Data Standards for Facilities, Infrastructure, and Environment (SDSFIE) available from the SDSFIE web site. The SDSFIE web site address will be provided under separate cover at the task order level. This data will be organized using the current version of the standard approved by the Headquarters Air Force Geo Integration Office (HAF GIO) as the functional lead for installation mapping and visualization. The SDSFIE will determine file and feature class identification and definition, attribution and valid domain values. When any geospatial information collected as a result of the contract includes information identified in the Common Installation Picture (CIP) or recognized Mission Data Set (MDS) the A-E will deliver data consistent with the established requirements for the data and will ensure functionality with the receiving system. Information must be collected at no less than 1:1200 scale for base cantonment areas and 1:4800 scale for larger undeveloped base areas. Spatial data will meet or exceed National Map Accuracy Standards at those scales. Metadata will be provided and will use Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata (CSDGM) for organization.

Geospatial data must be delivered in a geo-referenced GIS format (feature-based file structures with one-to-one cardinality between spatial records and attribute records) which would include Environmental Systems Research Institute’s (ESRI) shape file and geodatabase formats. All attribute data specifically outlined in the task order contract must be included either in the GIS data file or as a separate table with a SDSFIE key variable that may be used to relationally join the separate table with the GIS data file. All geospatial data must be delivered in the North American Datum 1983 (NAD83) projection, State Plane Coordinate System, using feet or metric coordinate units. Further guidance on mapping units, coordinate systems and projections are available from the Installation GIO.

Source data and product data remain the property of the US Government. The A-E may be required to explain and demonstrate the company's process for protecting all geospatial data, including but not

Page 12 of 13 Page 12 of 13 limited to geometry, attributes, metadata, topologies, and relational database schemas and operations used in association with this SOW. The A-E may be required to sign a non-disclosure agreement attesting to the same before source data is released. Further information about security and nondisclosure requirements shall be obtained from the installation GIO. Some installation map data, source and/or product, may be considered by the government to be “sensitive, but unclassified.” The intent of this clause is to prevent intentional or unintentional dissemination of “sensitive, but unclassified” information to include unauthorized access to the source and product data by any entity wishing to do harm to the USSF or U.S. Government while the data resides on the A-E's computer network. The A-E is not authorized to release this information to any third party without the explicit consent of the Headquarters Air Force Office of the Civil Engineer (AF/A4C) or its involved installation. All source information must be returned to the government POC or destroyed upon completion of the project. Special requirements for handling classified map data, if applicable, will be addressed elsewhere in this SOW.

6.4 MONITORING REQUIREMENTS

The A-E shall obtain and note information regarding monitoring hazards relevant to the project, including but not limited to UXO monitoring, biological monitoring, avoidance of biologically or culturally sensitive areas.

7.0 DOCUMENT SENSITIVITY

The A-E shall not release or distribute any map data, sources, or products related to Eielson AFB installations to any third party without the express consent of the Headquarters Air Force Office of the Civil Engineer (AF/A4C) or Eielson AFB.

8.0 POC MAILING ADDRESSES

AIR FORCE PROJECT MANAGER:

Tanner Jacobs

354 CES/CENMP

2310 Central Ave., Suite 200 Eielson AFB, AK 99702 907-377-7146 tanner.jacobs.1@us.af.mil

AIR FORCE CONTRACTING OFFICER:

Darnell Holliman

354 CONS/PKA

Eielson AFB, AK 99702 907-377-0108 darnell.holliman.1@us.af.mil

END OF STATEMENT OF WORK

mailto:tanner.jacobs.1@us.af.mil mailto:darnell.holliman.1@us.af.mil

Page 13 of 13 Page 13 of 13

Attachments:

1. A-E Table of Deliverables

2. Comprehensive Planning Platform (CPP) Requirements

3. Outline of the District Plan

4. Geospatial Information and Services (GI&S) Deliverable