03 - Attachment 1 - OFFEROR PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE.docx

OFFEROR PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

INSTRUCTIONS: The Offeror is responsible for the completion of Section 1 of the Offeror Past Performance Questionnaire for each Similar Project. After completing Section 1 of the Past Performance Questionnaire for each Similar Project, the Offeror shall distribute the Past Performance Questionnaires to the References who will complete Section 2. Each Reference, after completion of Section 2, shall submit the completed Past Performance Questionnaire directly to the GSA Contracting Officer not later than 10:00 AM MOUNTAIN TIME, JANUARY 26, 2021.

Past Performance Questionnaires shall be submitted directly to:

Rhonda Widick, Contracting Officer at rhonda.widick@gsa.gov

Email subject lines should reference “Solicitation No. 47PJ0020R0183 - Frank E. Moss Courthouse - PPQ.”

A SIMILAR PROJECT is defined as a project having all of the following characteristics:

· Substantially completed using the Construction Manager as Constructor (CMc) project delivery method;

· The renovation of a historic office or courthouse building. The office or courthouse building must have been listed on the National Register of Historic Places during the time of Renovation;

· Renovation was substantially complete in the last ten years since issuance of the solicitation;

· Includes at least one office or courthouse building containing a renovation of 160,000 gross square feet or more; and

· Contract cost at award was greater than or equal to $60 million.

SECTION 1 – TO BE COMPLETED BY THE OFFEROR

Name of Offeror: _________________________________________________________________________________________

Did the Offeror perform as the Prime Contractor: ______________________________________________________________

Contract Number: ________________________________________________________________________________________

Contract Type (CMc, D-B, D-B-B): ___________________________________________________________________________

Period of Performance (include start and substantial completion dates):_____________________________________________

When was the Office or Courthouse building initially listed on the National Register of Historic Places: _____________________

Is the Office or Courthouse building currently listed on the National Register of Historic Places: ___________________________

Gross Square Footage of Facility Construction: _______________________________________________________________

Gross Square Footage of Office or Courthouse Space Construction: ________________________________________________

Contract Value at initial award: $___________________________________________________________________________

Did the project include total seismic building stabilization: ________________________________________________________

Briefly describe all construction work performed under this contract:

Continued on next page Section 2 – TO BE COMPLETED BY THE REFERENCE

Is the information provided by the Offeror in Section 1 both accurate and complete (yes or no): ___________

Name of Respondent/Title: _____________________________________________

Firm Name: _________________________________________________________

Address:____________________________________________________________

Phone:_____________________________________________________________

Fax:_______________________________________________________________

Email:______________________________________________________________

Performance Information: Please check the level of the Offeror’s overall performance in each of the past performance categories listed below. Check “N/A” if the factor does not apply to the contract being rated. If any portion of the contract performance was performed by subcontractors, please include the subcontractor’s performance on the same chart.

PAST PERFORMANCE CATEGORY

Identification of cost saving and value engineering measures. How successful was the Offeror at suggesting meaningful cost saving changes during the design process

Collaboration on design and constructability issues. How successful was the Offeror at providing meaningful feedback on potential design constructability issues during the design process

The adequacy of the Offeror’s accounting system for the management and tracking of costs

Correction of deficient work in a timely manner

The adequacy of the Offeror’s quality control measures.

Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)

Timely performance of contract requirements

Overall Rating of the Contractor’s Performance

Continued on next page

1. Would you award to this contractor again? YES ________ NO __________

2. Could you provide another contact for further information? YES ________ NO __________

Remarks: (Please provide detailed facts concerning specific events/actions to justify your rating. Attach additional pages if necessary): ______________________________________________________________________________________________________