01. Attachment J.3 Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 35 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Legal Advisory Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 95332421Q0022
- Issued by
- Millennium Challenge Corporation
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire and details of a related federal contract opportunity for legal advisory services. The Millennium Challenge Corporation is seeking a contractor to provide legal advisory services to support its review, negotiation, implementation, oversight, and closeout of MCC-funded programs in eligible countries. The contractor will assist with both country-specific and overall MCC legal matters. Offerors must submit responses by April 30, 2021 and direct any questions to the points of contact by May 18, 2021. The evaluation criteria include technical capability, past performance, and price. The past performance questionnaire contains sections for offerors to provide references and for references to rate offerors' past cost/price control, schedule adherence, performance, quality, business relations, personnel qualifications, and overall performance on prior contracts. It also includes spaces for identifying strengths and weaknesses.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 95332421Q0022 Amendment 0001- Legal Advisory Services.pdf | ||
| 01. Attachment J.2 MCC Current and Incumbent Local Counsel Engagements.pdf | ||
| RFQ 95332421Q0022_Legal Advisory Services.pdf | ||
| 01. Attachment J.1 MCC Policy on Engagement of Outside Legal Counsel (Attachment to SOW).pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFQ # 95332421Q0022
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
| Solicitation #: | 95332421Q0022 |
| Offeror Name: |
| Name of Reference: | |
| Title/Role: | |
| Email: | Phone: |
| Agency/Company: |
CONTRACT INFORMATION:
| Contract #: |
| Total Contract Value ($): |
| Period of Performance: |
| Was the Offeror Prime or Sub? |
Description of product/service provided:
RATING CATEGORIES:
| RATING |
| CODE |
| PERFORMANCE LEVEL |
| Very Good |
| VG |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds several requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| Satisfactory |
| S |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| Marginal |
| M |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| Unacceptable |
| U |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| Not Applicable |
| NA |
| Unable to provide a score. Performance in this area not applicable to effort assessed. |
ASSESSMENT ELEMENTS:
Using the rating categories on page 1, check the appropriate box for each assessment element and provide supporting narrative.
(1) Cost/Price Control – Rate the contractor's ability to control cost and deliver at the agreed-to price. Describe the reasons for changes to contract value (e.g., scope changes, overrun/underrun, Government-imposed schedule changes, etc.).
|_| VG |_| S |_| M |_| U |_| NA
Supporting Narrative:
(2) Schedule Adherence – How well did the contractor adhere to the agreed-to schedule? What were the causes of any schedule variances? Were data deliverables and reports submitted on time?
|_| VG |_| S |_| M |_| U |_| NA
(3) Performance – Rate the contractor's ability to successfully comply with the contract requirements, statement of work, subcontracting plan, etc.
|_| VG |_| S |_| M |_| U |_| NA
(4) Quality – How well did the contractor adhere to the requirements of a Quality Assurance Plan or Performance Based Contracting requirements? Did the services provided meet the required level of quality or results?
|_| VG |_| S |_| M |_| U |_| NA
(5) Business Relations – Did the contractor exhibit reasonable/cooperative behavior in dealing with problems? Was turnover of personnel frequent? Rate the contractor's responsiveness to managing changes in providing replacement personnel.
|_| VG |_| S |_| M |_| U |_| NA
(6) Personnel Qualifications – Rate the contractor’s ability to staff and retain a highly-qualified team with the knowledge and experience required to successfully complete the project.
|_| VG |_| S |_| M |_| U |_| NA
(7) What is your overall rating of the contractor’s performance?
|_| VG |_| S |_| M |_| U |_| NA
(8) Please identify the contractor’s strengths.
(9) Please identify the contractor’s weaknesses.
(10) Given the choice, would you award to this contractor again? Why?
CERTIFICATION:
I certify that the ratings and comments reflected in this questionnaire were made by the undersigned and are accurate to the best of my knowledge.
| ______________________________________ | ________________ | |
| [Enter Name of Reference] | Date |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .