00017305_Attachment C Prospectus.pdf
PDF 530 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Willamette Falls Dr: 16th St - Ostman Rd Ped/Bike Upgrades A&E Full Service Mini-RFP (K23242)
- Solicitation number
- S-73000-00017305
- Issued by
- Oregon
About this file
This is a prospectus attachment for the City of Oregon relative to the Willamette Falls Drive pedestrian and bicycle upgrades project between 16th Street and Ostman Road. The project encompasses architectural and engineering (A&E) full-service design work for infrastructure improvements along this corridor. The prospectus outlines the scope of work required to develop comprehensive design documents and construction plans for the pedestrian and bicycle facility upgrades. Specific details regarding project timelines, submission deadlines, site visit requirements, and anticipated award dates are contained within the document to guide potential respondents in the competitive selection process for this design services engagement.
The prospectus establishes the framework for evaluating A&E firms based on qualifications, relevant experience, project understanding, and proposed methodology for delivering complete design services. Funding for this project is derived from public transportation and pedestrian safety improvement allocations. The document specifies evaluation criteria and selection procedures that will be applied during the mini-RFP (Request for Proposal) process, with particular emphasis on the firm's capability to address the specific geographical and functional requirements of the Willamette Falls Drive corridor improvements.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Page 1 of 6734-5198 (3/2021)
SHOW CHECKLIST
ODOT ENVIRONMENTAL PROSPECTUS
PRELIM. NEPA CLASS
PCE
PROJECT NAME
Willamette Falls Drive: 16th St. - Ostman Rd.
REGION
KEY NUMBER
K23242
FEDERAL AID NUMBER
CITY
West Linn
COUNTY
Clackamas
FHWA NEXUS
PE & CON funding
PROJECT SPONSOR
ODOT
HIGHWAY NAME
NA - Regional Roadway (Willamette Falls Drive)
BEGIN MP
NA
END MP
NA
LATITUDE
45.343462
LONGITUDE
-122.663180
TOWNSHIP
RANGE
1E
SECTION
2&3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION (FIELD WILL EXPAND AS YOU TYPE. CLICK TAB TO SEE TEXT IN EXPANDED FIELD.)
Multimodal improvements along the corridor including grade separated bike and pedestrian facilities. Continuing standard transportation cross-section to connect to previously constructed improvements on Willamette Falls Drive from 10th St. to 16th St.
Overall project goals include expanded access to alternative modes of transportation and increased safety along this regionally significant corridor.
Checklist questions marked with an asterisk (*) indicate that the question is related to the qualifying thresholds ("kickouts") identified in the 2015 PCE Agreement.
Estimated Right of Way Impacts
Right of Way
1. * Will the project involve temporary or permanent acquisition of right-of-way?............................ Yes No Unknown
2. * Will the project result in the temporary or permanent displacement of persons or businesses?. Yes No Unknown
Railroads
3. Will the project involve work on or adjacent to railroad-owned property? ................................... Yes No Unknown
Utilities
4. Will the project involve substantial impact to or relocation of existing reimbursable utilities that could create a disruption to service or additional environmental impacts??................................ Yes No Unknown RIGHT OF WAY IMPACTS COMMENTS (FIELD WILL EXPAND AS YOU TYPE. CLICK TAB TO SEE TEXT IN EXPANDED FIELD.)
Right of way impacts are minimal and required in few locations in order to meet standard width required for improvements.
Impacts were included in original preliminary engineering drawings submitted with application.
Estimated Traffic/Transportation Impacts
5. What are the current and future ADT volumes for the project?
CURRENT ADT FUTURE ADT
Unknown N/A
TRAFFIC/TRANSPORTATION COMMENTS (FIELD WILL EXPAND AS YOU TYPE. CLICK TAB TO SEE TEXT IN EXPANDED FIELD.)
ADT is only anticipated to significantly increase upon the approval of I-205 Tolling as it is anticipated this corridor will be used as a bypass to tolling area.
Estimated Land Use Impacts
6. Is the project outside of an Urban Growth Boundary? .............................................................. Yes No Partially
7. If the project is outside the UGB, is it expected to require new right-of-way?.............................. Yes No N/A
8. If the project is outside the UGB, is the project allowed, or conditionally allowed, by the rules for Transportation Planning on Rural Lands (OAR 660-012-0065)? ............................................... Yes No N/A
9. Region Planner's opinion that the project conforms with:
a. Transportation Planning Rule ........................................................................................... Yes No
b. * Statewide Planning Goals.............................................................................................. Yes No
c. Comprehensive Plan and/or Transportation System Improvement Plan (city, county or both) Yes No
10. Is the project located within the Oregon Coastal Zone?............................................................ Yes No
11. Will areas of Forest or Exclusive Farm Use (EFU), or Open Space Reserve zoning be impacted by the project? ...................................................................................................................... Yes No
12. Will the project result in the conversion of prime farmland, unique farmland, or land of statewide or local importance by the Farmland Protection Policy Act?....................................... Yes No
Attachment C - Prospectus - Willamette Falls Dr: 16th St. – Ostman Rd. Pedestrian / Bicycle Upgrades (23242)
Page 2 of 6734-5198 (3/2021)
13. What are the general uses of land adjacent to the project area? ...................................... Residential Commercial
Farm/Forest Public
Other (explain below) LAND USE IMPACTS COMMENTS (FIELD WILL EXPAND AS YOU TYPE. CLICK TAB TO SEE TEXT IN EXPANDED FIELD.)
Corridor is primarily adjacent to residential communities and provides direct connection to City's primary commercial downtown corridor.
Estimated Socioeconomic Impacts
14. * Will the project involve displacements of key businesses, business districts, commercial/ industrial areas, or public facilities?...................................................................................... Yes No Unknown
15. * Will the project involve temporary or permanent changes to travel patterns, access to goods/ services, or parking that appear important to business, business districts, commercial/ industrial areas, community events, or neighborhoods? (Explain below)................................. Yes No Unknown
16. Will the project divide or disrupt an established community, or affect neighborhood character or stability? ........................................................................................................................... Yes No Unknown
17. Will the project temporarily or permanently affect emergency and/or public services? ................ Yes No Unknown
18. Does visual inspection and/or information sources such as census data indicate the presence of low-income or minority populations within or near the project area?........................ Yes No
19. Does visual inspection and/or other information sources indicate the presence of elderly, handicapped, or transit-dependent populations?...................................................................... Yes No
SOCIOECONOMIC IMPACTS COMMENTS (FIELD WILL EXPAND AS YOU TYPE. CLICK TAB TO SEE TEXT IN EXPANDED FIELD.)
Proposed improvements expand on existing multimodal improvements within the main street corridor which has a primary transit service line for the area.
Estimated Water Resources and Wetlands Impacts
Stormwater
20. Will the project trigger the need for stormwater treatment? ....................................................... Yes No Unknown
Waters of the U.S./State
21. Are there waters of the U.S. or State within the project area? (If no, skip to Question 30) .......... Yes No
Water Supply Wells
30. Will any active wells be impacted by the project?.................................................................... Yes No Unknown
Wetlands
31. Are wetlands potentially present in the project area?............................................................... Yes No
32. Do soil surveys indicate hydric soils in the project area?.......................................................... Yes No
33. Is wetland vegetation evident from visual inspection? ............................................................. Yes No
34. Will the project fill or remove material from wetlands? ............................................................. Yes No Unknown
35. * Will the project require an Individual Permit, Nationwide Permit, General Authorization or General Permit? ................................................................................................................. Yes No Unknown
WATER RESOURCES AND WETLANDS IMPACTS COMMENTS (FIELD WILL EXPAND AS YOU TYPE. CLICK TAB TO SEE TEXT IN EXPANDED FIELD.)
The addition of new impervious surface and changes of conveyance to stormwater due to new curbing are likely federal stormwater treatment triggers.
Estimated Biological Resources Impacts
Threatened, Endangered and/or Sensitive Species
36. Does the project have the potential to affect migratory birds and/or bats?................................. Yes No
37. Are there USFWS T&E species, Proposed species, or critical habitat in the project's area of potential impact? .................................................................................................................. Yes No
38. Are there NMFS T&E species, Proposed species, or critical habitat in the project's area of potential impact? .................................................................................................................. Yes No
39. Are there State T&E or Proposed species present that are not federally listed? ........................ Yes No
40. Is the project located on or adjacent to BLM or USFS land? .................................................... Yes No
Page 3 of 6734-5198 (3/2021)
41. * Will the project require an individual project-level formal consultation under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act? .................................................................................................. Yes No Unknown
In-Water Work
42. Are any streams or water bodies potentially impacted by the project? Yes No
43. Will the project require in-water work?.................................................................................... Yes No Unknown
Fish Passage
44. Will the project trigger the Oregon State Fish Passage Statute (ORS 509.585)? ....................... Yes No Unknown
45. Are there any culverts within the project limits that are on the ODFW priority list for replacement/retrofit? ............................................................................................................ Yes No
Wildlife Passage
46. Is the project within a wildlife collision hot spot, priority wildlife linkage area, or an area otherwise known to be a barrier to wildlife passage?............................................................... Yes No
Noxious Weeds
47. Are there known noxious weed populations in the project area? .............................................. Yes No BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES IMPACTS COMMENTS (FIELD WILL EXPAND AS YOU TYPE. CLICK TAB TO SEE TEXT IN EXPANDED FIELD.)
There are no anticipated removal or disruption to existing trees or bird nesting sites. There are no fish passage or water ways located within the proposed project site. There is no wildlife collision hot spots within the proposed project location or noxious weed populations.
Estimated Cultural Resources Impacts
Archaeological Resources
48. Are there known archaeological sites in the project area? ....................................................... Yes No Unknown
49. Will the project entail disturbance of previously undisturbed ground? ....................................... Yes No Unknown
50. Will archaeologically sensitive areas (confluence of rivers, headlands, coves, overlooks, etc.)
be affected? ......................................................................................................................... Yes No
51. If the project is on or adjacent to BLM or USFS land, does contact with BLM or USFS archaeologist indicate any issues?......................................................................................... Yes No N/A
Historic resources (Built)
52. Does the SHPO historic database list any resources in the project area? ................................. Yes No Unknown
53. Will there be any impacts to known historic resources (either listed or determined eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places)? ................................................................. Yes No Unknown
54. Does any city/county comprehensive plan list any buildings/items in the project area as Goal 5 resources? ................................................................................................................ Yes No Unknown
55. Are any buildings in the project area thought to be 50 years old or older?................................. Yes No
56. Are there any apparent/unique structures of potential historical interest?.................................. Yes No
Section 4(f)
57. * Could the project impact any archaeological or historic resources eligible for protection under Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act? .......................................................... Yes No Unknown
CULTURAL RESOURCES IMPACTS COMMENTS (FIELD WILL EXPAND AS YOU TYPE. CLICK TAB TO SEE TEXT IN EXPANDED FIELD.)
The project is expected to be cleared for cultural resources via the Section 106 Programmatic Agreement with FHWA.
Estimated Parks / Recreation and Visual Impacts
Parks/Recreation Areas
58. * Could the project impact any parks, recreation areas, or wildlife/waterfowl refuges eligible for protection under Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act? .................................. Yes No Unknown
59. Could the project cause a Section 6(f) conversion or temporary occupancy of park or recreation area property encumbered by Land and Water Conservation funds? ....................................... Yes No Unknown
Wild and Scenic Rivers
60. Is the project area within ¼ mile of the bank of an Oregon Scenic Waterway? ......................... Yes No
61. * Will the project affect waterways designated as National Wild and Scenic Rivers?.................. Yes No
Page 4 of 6734-5198 (3/2021)
Visual
62. Will the project involve any potential triggers for visual impact analysis? .................................. Yes No Unknown PARKS / RECREATION AND VISUAL IMPACTS COMMENTS (FIELD WILL EXPAND AS YOU TYPE. CLICK TAB TO SEE TEXT IN EXPANDED FIELD.)
There are no parks or viewpoints within the project corridor.
Estimated Air Quality and Noise Impacts
Air Quality
63. Is the project in an air quality nonattainment or maintenance area? ......................................... Yes No
64. Is the project type exempt from conformity or Mobile Source Air Toxic analysis (MSAT)?
(If yes, skip to Question 69)................................................................................................... Yes No
Noise
70. Are noise-sensitive land-uses present within 500 feet of the project roadway?.............. Yes No
71. Does the project require a noise analysis? ................................................................. Yes No Unknown
72. Does the project qualify for a screening analysis?....................................................... Yes No Unknown N/A AIR QUALITY AND NOISE IMPACTS COMMENTS (FIELD WILL EXPAND AS YOU TYPE. CLICK TAB TO SEE TEXT IN EXPANDED FIELD.)
The project does not change the vertical or horizontal alignment of Willamette Drive therefore no Noise analysis is needed.
Estimated Hazardous Materials / Waste Impacts
73. Does the project involve right-of-way acquisition or subsurface disturbance (e.g., excavation or drilling)? (If no, skip to Question 76)................................................................................... Yes No
74. Does a search of DEQ databases (LUST, UST or ECSI) indicate the presence of any potentially contaminated sites within or adjacent to the project area? ....................................... Yes No
75. Does a search of the Oregon Fire Marshal’s Hazardous Materials Incident database indicate any hazardous materials releases within the project area? ................................................... Yes No
76. Are there known current or historical land uses within or adjacent to the project area that could possibly have involved the use or storage of hazardous materials?................................. Yes No
77. Will the project include any structure (including buildings or bridges) demolition, repair, or removal of potentially hazardous materials (e.g., lighting or electrical equipment, hydraulic equipment, bridge mechanics, striping paint, bridge/barrier paint, treated timbers, etc.)? ........... Yes No
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS / WASTE IMPACTS COMMENTS (FIELD WILL EXPAND AS YOU TYPE. CLICK TAB TO SEE TEXT IN EXPANDED FIELD.)
Striping paint will be removed in conjunction with demolition of existing roadway pavement.
Estimated Geological / Geotechnical Impacts
Geological Resources/Geotechnical
78. Will an ODOT owned/permitted material source be offered for this project?.............................. Yes No Unknown
79. Will ODOT owned/permitted disposal sites be offered for this project? ..................................... Yes No Unknown
80. If an ODOT owned/permitted disposal or material source site is being offered, has it been previously cleared to federal environmental standards? .......................................................... Yes No N/A
81. Is drilling/subsurface exploration anticipated? ......................................................................... Yes No GEOLOGICAL / GEOTECHNICAL IMPACTS COMMENTS (FIELD WILL EXPAND AS YOU TYPE. CLICK TAB TO SEE TEXT IN EXPANDED FIELD.)
The project does not anticipate the need for geotech drilling.
Stakeholder Concerns / Public Involvement STAKEHOLDER CONCERNS / PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT COMMENTS (FIELD WILL EXPAND AS YOU TYPE. CLICK TAB TO SEE TEXT IN EXPANDED FIELD.)
Proposed improvements have been previously vetted through the public outreach process associated with the adoption of the City's Transportation System Plan and Willamette Falls Drive Concept Plan.
Key Environmental Issues and Requirements KEY ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES AND REQUIREMENTS COMMENTS (FIELD WILL EXPAND AS YOU TYPE. CLICK TAB TO SEE TEXT IN EXPANDED FIELD.)
Any identified environmental issues will be addressed with qualified consultants during the PE phase of the project.
Potentially Required Permits / Approvals / Clearances
82. Local Land Use .................................................................................................................... Yes No Unknown
83. Local Agency Floodplain Permit............................................................................................. Yes No Unknown
Page 5 of 6734-5198 (3/2021)
84. U.S. Corps of Engineers Section 404 and DEQ Section 401 Cert ............................................ Yes No Unknown
85. U.S. Corps of Engineers Section 10....................................................................................... Yes No Unknown
86. DSL Removal/Fill.................................................................................................................. Yes No Unknown
87. U.S. Corps of Engineers Section 408 (federal facilities) ........................................................... Yes No Unknown
88. NPDES 1200-CA permit (or 1200-C permit for local agencies)................................................. Yes No Unknown
89. U.S. Coast Guard New Bridge Permit .................................................................................... Yes No Unknown
90. U.S. Coast Guard Permit Modification.................................................................................... Yes No Unknown
91. U.S. Coast Guard Construction Plan Approval ........................................................................ Yes No Unknown
92. FAHP Programmatic BO ....................................................................................................... Yes No Unknown
93. SLOPES Programmatic BO................................................................................................... Yes No Unknown
94. Individual Biological Opinion.................................................................................................. Yes No Unknown
95. Marine Mammal Protection Act IHA ....................................................................................... Yes No Unknown
96. ODFW Fish Passage Plan Approval ...................................................................................... Yes No Unknown
97. State Endangered Species Act .............................................................................................. Yes No Unknown
98. No Effect Memo.................................................................................................................... Yes No Unknown
99. Archaeological Excavation Permit.......................................................................................... Yes No Unknown
100. Section 106 – State Historic Preservation Officer (Historic–Built) ........................................... Yes No Unknown
101. Section 106 – State Historic Preservation Officer (Archaeological) ......................................... Yes No Unknown
102. Section 4(f) temporary occupancy........................................................................................ Yes No Unknown
103. Section 4(f) de minimis........................................................................................................ Yes No Unknown
104. Section 4(f) Programmatic ................................................................................................... Yes No Unknown
105. Section 4(f) Evaluation – Individual ...................................................................................... Yes No Unknown
106. Section 6(f) Temporary Occupancy or Conversion ................................................................ Yes No Unknown
107. Wild and Scenic River Section 7 Determination..................................................................... Yes No Unknown
108. Oregon Scenic Waterways .................................................................................................. Yes No Unknown
109. FHWA Noise ...................................................................................................................... Yes No Unknown
110. * Air Conformity .................................................................................................................. Yes No Unknown
111. Hazardous Materials Study.................................................................................................. Yes No Unknown
112. DOGAMI Permit.................................................................................................................. Yes No Unknown
113. Other (specify): NA
114. Other (specify): NA
115. Other (specify): NA
116. Other (specify): NA
117. Other (specify): NA
118. Other (specify): NA
Preliminary NEPA Classification
Based upon the answers and content above, please answer the following questions:
23 CFR 771.117(a) – Would the project involve any of the following effects:
119. Induce significant impacts to planned growth or land use for an area?.................................... Yes No Unknown
120. Require relocation of significant numbers of people?............................................................. Yes No Unknown
121. Have a significant impact on any natural, cultural, recreational, historic or other resources? .... Yes No Unknown
Page 6 of 6734-5198 (3/2021)
122. Involve significant air, noise, or water quality impacts? ......................................................... Yes No Unknown
123. Have significant impacts on travel patterns? Yes No Unknown
23 CFR 771.117(b) – Would the project involve unusual circumstances such as:
124. Significant environmental impacts? ...................................................................................... Yes No Unknown
125. Substantial controversy on environmental grounds?.............................................................. Yes No Unknown
126. Significant impacts to properties protected by Section 4(f) of the DOT Act or Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act? ...................................................................................... Yes No Unknown
127. Inconsistencies with any federal, state, or local law, requirements or administrative determination relating to the environmental aspects of the project? ........................................ Yes No Unknown
Based upon questions 119-127 and the Environmental Prospectus responses, identify the project's preliminary NEPA class of action:
Programmatic Categorical Exclusion (PCE)
Documented Categorical Exclusion (CE)
Environmental Assessment (EA)
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
For preliminary PCEs and CEs, identify the up to three category(ies) of project work from the activities listed in CFR 771.117(c) and CFR771.117(d):
APPLICABLE CATEGORY
(c)(3)
APPLICABLE CATEGORY
(c)(8)
APPLICABLE CATEGORY
Signatures Digital signature/date are required from the preparer and/or ODOT REC.
PREPARER NAME AND TITLE
Morgan Coffie - Support Services Supervisor
ODOT REC NAME AND TITLE
Tom McConnell, Region Environmental Coordinator
PREPARER DIGITAL SIGNATURE AND DATE ODOT REC DIGITAL SIGNATURE AND DATE
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .