00011290_EvaluationScoreMatrix.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 77 KB Posted
- Attached to
- iQMS QA Contractor
- Solicitation number
- S-73000-00011290
- Issued by
- Marion County, Oregon
About this file
This document is an Evaluation Score Matrix for an RFP issued by the state for Independent Quality Management Services for a Crash Data System Replacement (CDSR) project. The RFP number is 73000-00011290. There were 3 proposal evaluators who scored 2 proposing firms, Public Knowledge and Blue Crane. Public Knowledge received the highest total average score of 627, followed by Blue Crane with 461. No other proposing firms received scores. The evaluation criteria included Quality Management Plan, Consultant Experience, Credentials of Personnel, and Work Examples, each weighted up to 250, 100, 225, and 125 points respectively. No interview or reference scores were provided.
The document does not contain details on pricing, set asides, incumbent contractors, funding sources, or other contract terms. It solely focuses on the proposal evaluation scores and ranking of the 2 responding firms.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 00011290_ITA.docx | DOCX document | |
| Preliminary Bid Results~16.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 00011290_CDSR_RFQ_Final.docx | DOCX document | |
| 00011290_Questions and Answers_Vol1.docx | DOCX document | |
| 00011290_RFP_Addendum1.docx | DOCX document | |
| 00011290_CDSR_Attach A_Sample Contract_Final.docx | DOCX document | |
| 00011290_Figure 1. CDSR-Timeline.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Summary Scores
| RFP Number: 73000-00011290 Project Name: Independent Quality Management Services for Crash Data System Replacement (CDSR) | |
| EVALUATION SCORE SUMMARY | |
| Enter data only in gray highlighted fields on Summary, Proposal, Interview and Reference Score worksheets as applicable. |
| SOP Evaluation Summary Scores | Number of Proposal evaluators: | 3 | |||||||||||
| Evaluation Team | |||||||||||||
| Score | |||||||||||||
| Firm | evaluator 1 | evaluator 2 | evaluator 3 | evaluator 4 | evaluator 5 | Total | Average | Rank | |||||
| Public Knowledge | 632 | 1 | 670 | 1 | 580 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1882 | 627 | 1 |
| Blue Crane | 475 | 2 | 475 | 2 | 433 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1383 | 461 | 2 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Statistics | |||||||||
| High Score | 632 | 670 | 580 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| Low Score | 475 | 1 | 475 | 1 | 433 | 1 | ERROR:#NUM! | 1 | ERROR:#NUM! |
| Range | 157 | 195 | 147 | ERROR:#NUM! | ERROR:#NUM! |
| Interview Evaluation Summary Scores | Number of interview evaluators: | 1 | |||||||||||
| Evaluation Team | |||||||||||||
| Score | |||||||||||||
| Firm | name1 | name2 | name3 | name4 | name5 | Total | Average | Rank | |||||
| Firm Name | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Statistics | |||||||||
| High Score | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| Low Score | ERROR:#NUM! | 1 | ERROR:#NUM! | 1 | ERROR:#NUM! | 1 | ERROR:#NUM! | 1 | ERROR:#NUM! |
| Range | ERROR:#NUM! | ERROR:#NUM! | ERROR:#NUM! | ERROR:#NUM! | ERROR:#NUM! |
| References Summary Scores | Number of references scored: | 1 | |||||||||||
| References | |||||||||||||
| Score | |||||||||||||
| Firm | reference1 | reference2 | reference3 | reference4 | reference5 | Total | Average | Rank | |||||
| Firm Name | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
FINAL SCORES (with COST SCORES if applicable)
| Proposal | Interview | Enter | References | Final Scores | |||||
| Firm | Average | Average | Cost Scores | Total | Rank | ||||
| Public Knowledge | 627 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 300 | 0 | 1 | 927 | 1 |
| Blue Crane | 461 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 295 | 0 | 1 | 756 | 2 |
| firm 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| firm 4 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| firm 5 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| firm 6 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
Ver 10/20/16
Proposal Detail Scores
| RFP Number: 73000-00011290 Project Name: Independent Quality Management Services for Crash Data System Replacement (CDSR) | |||||||
| SOP SCORE DETAILS | |||||||
| Proposal Evaluation Detail Scores | Enter actual number of evaluators: | 3 | |||||
| Evaluation Team | |||||||
| Maximum | |||||||
| Score | evaluator 1 | evaluator 2 | evaluator 3 | evaluator 4 | evaluator 5 | ||
| 1 | Public Knowledge |
Administrator: Scoring deductions, if any, are provided by OPO after eval committee has completed SOP evaluation and scoring.
| Enter scoring deduction as percentage; i.e., "2%". (See Required Items section of RFP.) | Quality Management Plan and iQMS Baseline Work Plan | 250 | 215 | 225 | 200 | |||||
| Consultant Experience and References | 100 | 100 | 100 | 90 | ||||||
| Credentials, Qualifications, Expertise and Experience of Proposed Personnel; and Staffing Plan | 225 | 205 | 220 | 180 | ||||||
| Work Examples | 125 | 112 | 125 | 110 | ||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 5 | 0 | |||||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 6 | 0 | |||||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 7 | 0 | |||||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 8 | 0 | |||||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 9 | 0 | Scoring Deductions | ||||||||
| Total | 700 | 632 | 670 | 580 | 0 | 0 | 0% | |||
| Scoring Deduction Points | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | 632 | 670 | 580 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 | Blue Crane | |||||||
| Quality Management Plan and iQMS Baseline Work Plan | 250 | 188 | 175 | 90 | ||||
| Consultant Experience and References | 100 | 72 | 50 | 99 | ||||
| Credentials, Qualifications, Expertise and Experience of Proposed Personnel; and Staffing Plan | 225 | 165 | 150 | 199 | ||||
| Work Examples | 125 | 50 | 100 | 45 | ||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 5 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 6 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 7 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 8 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 9 | 0 | Scoring Deductions | ||||||
| TOTAL | 700 | 475 | 475 | 433 | 0 | 0 | 0% | |
| Scoring Deduction Points | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | 475 | 475 | 433 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 | Firm Name | |||||||
| Quality Management Plan and iQMS Baseline Work Plan | 250 | |||||||
| Consultant Experience and References | 100 | |||||||
| Credentials, Qualifications, Expertise and Experience of Proposed Personnel; and Staffing Plan | 225 | |||||||
| Work Examples | 125 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 5 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 6 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 7 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 8 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 9 | 0 | Scoring Deductions | ||||||
| TOTAL | 700 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | |
| Scoring Deduction Points | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 | Firm Name | |||||||
| Quality Management Plan and iQMS Baseline Work Plan | 250 | |||||||
| Consultant Experience and References | 100 | |||||||
| Credentials, Qualifications, Expertise and Experience of Proposed Personnel; and Staffing Plan | 225 | |||||||
| Work Examples | 125 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 5 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 6 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 7 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 8 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 9 | 0 | Scoring Deductions | ||||||
| TOTAL | 700 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | |
| Scoring Deduction Points | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | Firm Name | |||||||
| Quality Management Plan and iQMS Baseline Work Plan | 250 | |||||||
| Consultant Experience and References | 100 | |||||||
| Credentials, Qualifications, Expertise and Experience of Proposed Personnel; and Staffing Plan | 225 | |||||||
| Work Examples | 125 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 5 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 6 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 7 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 8 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 9 | 0 | Scoring Deductions | ||||||
| TOTAL | 700 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | |
| Scoring Deduction Points | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | Firm Name | |||||||
| Quality Management Plan and iQMS Baseline Work Plan | 250 | |||||||
| Consultant Experience and References | 100 | |||||||
| Credentials, Qualifications, Expertise and Experience of Proposed Personnel; and Staffing Plan | 225 | |||||||
| Work Examples | 125 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 5 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 6 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 7 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 8 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 9 | 0 | Scoring Deductions | ||||||
| TOTAL | 700 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | |
| Scoring Deduction Points | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | Firm Name | |||||||
| Quality Management Plan and iQMS Baseline Work Plan | 250 | |||||||
| Consultant Experience and References | 100 | |||||||
| Credentials, Qualifications, Expertise and Experience of Proposed Personnel; and Staffing Plan | 225 | |||||||
| Work Examples | 125 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 5 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 6 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 7 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 8 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 9 | 0 | Scoring Deductions | ||||||
| TOTAL | 700 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | |
| Scoring Deduction Points | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | Firm Name | |||||||
| Quality Management Plan and iQMS Baseline Work Plan | 250 | |||||||
| Consultant Experience and References | 100 | |||||||
| Credentials, Qualifications, Expertise and Experience of Proposed Personnel; and Staffing Plan | 225 | |||||||
| Work Examples | 125 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 5 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 6 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 7 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 8 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 9 | 0 | Scoring Deductions | ||||||
| TOTAL | 700 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | |
| Scoring Deduction Points | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | Firm Name | |||||||
| Quality Management Plan and iQMS Baseline Work Plan | 250 | |||||||
| Consultant Experience and References | 100 | |||||||
| Credentials, Qualifications, Expertise and Experience of Proposed Personnel; and Staffing Plan | 225 | |||||||
| Work Examples | 125 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 5 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 6 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 7 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 8 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 9 | 0 | Scoring Deductions | ||||||
| TOTAL | 700 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | |
| Scoring Deduction Points | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 10 | Firm Name | |||||||
| Quality Management Plan and iQMS Baseline Work Plan | 250 | |||||||
| Consultant Experience and References | 100 | |||||||
| Credentials, Qualifications, Expertise and Experience of Proposed Personnel; and Staffing Plan | 225 | |||||||
| Work Examples | 125 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 5 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 6 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 7 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 8 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 9 | 0 | Scoring Deductions | ||||||
| TOTAL | 700 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | |
| Scoring Deduction Points | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 11 | Firm Name | |||||||
| Quality Management Plan and iQMS Baseline Work Plan | 250 | |||||||
| Consultant Experience and References | 100 | |||||||
| Credentials, Qualifications, Expertise and Experience of Proposed Personnel; and Staffing Plan | 225 | |||||||
| Work Examples | 125 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 5 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 6 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 7 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 8 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 9 | 0 | Scoring Deductions | ||||||
| TOTAL | 700 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | |
| Scoring Deduction Points | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 12 | Firm Name | |||||||
| Quality Management Plan and iQMS Baseline Work Plan | 250 | |||||||
| Consultant Experience and References | 100 | |||||||
| Credentials, Qualifications, Expertise and Experience of Proposed Personnel; and Staffing Plan | 225 | |||||||
| Work Examples | 125 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 5 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 6 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 7 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 8 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 9 | 0 | Scoring Deductions | ||||||
| TOTAL | 700 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | |
| Scoring Deduction Points | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 13 | Firm Name | |||||||
| Quality Management Plan and iQMS Baseline Work Plan | 250 | |||||||
| Consultant Experience and References | 100 | |||||||
| Credentials, Qualifications, Expertise and Experience of Proposed Personnel; and Staffing Plan | 225 | |||||||
| Work Examples | 125 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 5 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 6 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 7 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 8 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 9 | 0 | Scoring Deductions | ||||||
| TOTAL | 700 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | |
| Scoring Deduction Points | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 14 | Firm Name | |||||||
| Quality Management Plan and iQMS Baseline Work Plan | 250 | |||||||
| Consultant Experience and References | 100 | |||||||
| Credentials, Qualifications, Expertise and Experience of Proposed Personnel; and Staffing Plan | 225 | |||||||
| Work Examples | 125 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 5 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 6 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 7 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 8 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 9 | 0 | Scoring Deductions | ||||||
| TOTAL | 700 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | |
| Scoring Deduction Points | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 15 | Firm Name | |||||||
| Quality Management Plan and iQMS Baseline Work Plan | 250 | |||||||
| Consultant Experience and References | 100 | |||||||
| Credentials, Qualifications, Expertise and Experience of Proposed Personnel; and Staffing Plan | 225 | |||||||
| Work Examples | 125 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 5 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 6 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 7 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 8 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 9 | 0 | Scoring Deductions | ||||||
| TOTAL | 700 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | |
| Scoring Deduction Points | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 16 | Firm Name | |||||||
| Quality Management Plan and iQMS Baseline Work Plan | 250 | |||||||
| Consultant Experience and References | 100 | |||||||
| Credentials, Qualifications, Expertise and Experience of Proposed Personnel; and Staffing Plan | 225 | |||||||
| Work Examples | 125 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 5 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 6 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 7 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 8 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 9 | 0 | Scoring Deductions | ||||||
| TOTAL | 700 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | |
| Scoring Deduction Points | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 17 | Firm Name | |||||||
| Quality Management Plan and iQMS Baseline Work Plan | 250 | |||||||
| Consultant Experience and References | 100 | |||||||
| Credentials, Qualifications, Expertise and Experience of Proposed Personnel; and Staffing Plan | 225 | |||||||
| Work Examples | 125 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 5 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 6 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 7 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 8 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 9 | 0 | Scoring Deductions | ||||||
| TOTAL | 700 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | |
| Scoring Deduction Points | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 18 | Firm Name | |||||||
| Quality Management Plan and iQMS Baseline Work Plan | 250 | |||||||
| Consultant Experience and References | 100 | |||||||
| Credentials, Qualifications, Expertise and Experience of Proposed Personnel; and Staffing Plan | 225 | |||||||
| Work Examples | 125 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 5 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 6 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 7 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 8 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 9 | 0 | Scoring Deductions | ||||||
| TOTAL | 700 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | |
| Scoring Deduction Points | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Interview Detail Scores
| RFP Number: 73000-00011290 Project Name: Independent Quality Management Services for Crash Data System Replacement (CDSR) | |||||||
| INTERVIEW SCORE DETAILS | |||||||
| Enter actual number of interview evaluators: | 1 | ||||||
| Evaluation Team | |||||||
| Maximum | |||||||
| Score | evaluator 1 | evaluator 2 | evaluator 3 | evaluator 4 | evaluator 5 | ||
| Firm Name | |||||||
| Eval criterion/question 1 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 2 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 3 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 4 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 5 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 6 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 7 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 8 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 9 | 0 | ||||||
| TOTAL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Firm Name | |||||||
| Eval criterion/question 1 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 2 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 3 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 4 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 5 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 6 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 7 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 8 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 9 | 0 | ||||||
| TOTAL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Firm Name | |||||||
| Eval criterion/question 1 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 2 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 3 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 4 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 5 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 6 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 7 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 8 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 9 | 0 | ||||||
| TOTAL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Firm Name | |||||||
| Eval criterion/question 1 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 2 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 3 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 4 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 5 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 6 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 7 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 8 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 9 | 0 | ||||||
| TOTAL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Firm Name | |||||||
| Eval criterion/question 1 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 2 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 3 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 4 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 5 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 6 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 7 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 8 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 9 | 0 | ||||||
| TOTAL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Firm Name | |||||||
| Eval criterion/question 1 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 2 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 3 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 4 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 5 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 6 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 7 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 8 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 9 | 0 | ||||||
| TOTAL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
References Detail Scores
| RFP Number: 73000-00011290 Project Name: Independent Quality Management Services for Crash Data System Replacement (CDSR) | |||||||
| References Evaluation Detail Scores | |||||||
| Enter actual number of references scored: | 1 | ||||||
| Reference Scores | |||||||
| Maximum | |||||||
| Score | reference 1 | reference 2 | reference 3 | reference 4 | reference 5 | ||
| 1 | Firm Name | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 1 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 2 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 3 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 4 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 5 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 6 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 7 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 8 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 9 | 0 | ||||||
| TOTAL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2 | Firm Name | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 1 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 2 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 3 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 4 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 5 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 6 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 7 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 8 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 9 | 0 | ||||||
| TOTAL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3 | Firm Name | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 1 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 2 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 3 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 4 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 5 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 6 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 7 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 8 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 9 | 0 | ||||||
| TOTAL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 4 | Firm Name | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 1 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 2 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 3 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 4 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 5 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 6 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 7 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 8 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 9 | 0 | ||||||
| TOTAL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5 | Firm Name | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 1 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 2 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 3 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 4 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 5 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 6 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 7 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 8 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 9 | 0 | ||||||
| TOTAL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 6 | Firm Name | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 1 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 2 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 3 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 4 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 5 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 6 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 7 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 8 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 9 | 0 | ||||||
| TOTAL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
&"Arial,Bold"&12REFERENCES SCORE DETAIL RFP xxx (PCMS xxx) &"Arial,Bold Italic"[insert project name]
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .