UNSPSC 50622100: Non GMO brussel sprout purees

The type of Non GMO vegetable known as Non GMO brussel sprouts. This means that they are produced without the use of methods that genetically modify organisms by means that are not possible under natural conditions. Such methods include cell fusion, microencapsulation and macro-encapsulation, and recombinant DNA technology (including gene deletion, gene doubling, introducing a foreign gene, and changing the positions of genes when achieved by recombinant DNA technology).

Traditional methods of breeding, conjugation, fermentation, hybridization, in vitro fertilization, or tissue culture are considered to be non-GMO.

UNSPSC 50622100 Non GMO brussel sprout purees is a Commodity code. State and local governments solicit under this code rarely; the recent opportunities block contains no solicitations matching the code's nominal scope. The single Illinois Veterans Home food order (solicitation 27497DVAQUINCB52821, RFQ, due June 26, 2026) and the Texas HHSC food and consumables procurement (HHS0017449, IFB, due July 13, 2026) both appear tagged with this code but specify broad food and consumable products—proteins, dairy, produce, condiments, and prepared foods—rather than non-GMO brussel sprout purees specifically. The Oregon Department of Corrections canned tomato solicitation (S2910000017145, ITB, due June 19, 2026) and multiple school district food bids likewise show no evidence of Brussels sprout puree procurement. The code does not align with the work actually being bought.

Recent activity under codes tagged as food procurement clusters instead around fresh produce, proteins, dairy, frozen goods, and broad grocery line-item supply for institutional food service—school nutrition programs, state hospitals, state supported living centers, and correctional facilities. Issuing bodies include state departments of corrections and health services, school districts (Fairfax County, Ben Hill County, Burke County, Rockwood, Liberty County, Savannah-Chatham, Douglas County, Muscogee County), and state procurement offices. Opportunity concentration is heaviest in Georgia and Texas, with secondary activity in Oregon, Illinois, Missouri, and Virginia. The code shows little relevant recent activity and should be evaluated for accuracy before pursuing opportunities nominally tagged to it.