UNSPSC 50391568: Organic prime gold apple purees

The variety of organic apples known as organic prime gold apples which have been pureed.

UNSPSC 50391568 Organic prime gold apple purees, a Commodity code, does not align with the state and local procurement activity actually being tracked under this designation. The recent opportunities tagged with this code encompass canned applesauce, dried fruit bars, apple crisps, fresh produce (apples included), eggs, and broad food service commodities for institutional meal programs—none of which are organic prime gold apple purees specifically. The code shows little relevant recent activity when compared to its nominal scope; state and local governments are buying general fruit products, fresh produce, and food service supplies rather than a specialized organic apple puree line item.

The issuing bodies soliciting under this tag span multiple state and local jurisdiction types: the Oregon Department of Corrections, the Texas Health and Human Services Commission, school districts across Texas (Austin ISD, Dallas ISD), Georgia (Douglas County, Liberty County, Muscogee County, Savannah-Chatham County, Hancock County), Missouri (Rockwood R-VI), Connecticut (City of Bridgeport), Illinois (State Chief Procurement Office), and the State of Georgia. School districts dominate the recent opportunities, followed by state health and corrections agencies. Geographic activity is concentrated in Texas, Georgia, and the Pacific Northwest, with secondary activity in the Midwest and Connecticut. Representative recent opportunities include the Oregon Department of Corrections ITB S2910000017453 for canned applesauce (4,760 cases, due July 31, 2026), the Austin Independent School District RFP 27RFP004 for dried fruit bars and apple crisps (due July 16, 2026), and the Douglas County School System RFP SN 26-004 through the GEC Buying Cooperative for fresh produce and eggs spanning 30 districts across Georgia (due March 4, 2026, with an estimated annual spend of $4.4 million for Area One). The mismatch between code name and actual procurement suggests either a tagging error in source systems or a code that is rarely solicited at state and local level in its true form.