UNSPSC 50383882: Scarlet royal grape purees

The variety of table grapes known as scarlet royal grapes which have been pureed.

UNSPSC 50383882 Scarlet royal grape purees, a Commodity code, shows minimal alignment between its nominal scope and recent state and local procurement activity. The code's name suggests a narrowly specified fruit puree product, yet the recent opportunities tagged under it span canned applesauce, dried fruit bars, apple crisps, general food supply contracts, fresh produce, eggs, and comprehensive food service provisioning. State and local buyers posting under this code include corrections departments, school districts, school nutrition programs, health and human services agencies, and boards of education across multiple states. The actual work being solicited—bulk food supply for institutional food service, particularly school nutrition and facilities operations—bears little relation to scarlet grape purees specifically.

Recent activity clusters heavily in school nutrition procurement. The Oregon Department of Corrections issued ITB S-29100-00017453 on July 10, 2026, requesting 4,760 cases of canned applesauce (due July 31, 2026); Austin Independent School District posted RFP 27RFP004 on June 26, 2026, for dried fruit bars and apple crisps (due July 16, 2026); and Hancock County Board of Education in Georgia issued IFB #SN002-2027 on June 10, 2026, for fresh produce spanning over 200 line items (due June 26, 2026). Additional substantial procurements include the Texas Health and Human Services Commission's IFB HHS0017449 for food and consumable products at the El Paso State Supported Living Center (due July 13, 2026, estimated prior period value $1.5 million), and Douglas County School System's RFP for fresh produce and eggs through the GEC Buying Cooperative covering 30 school districts with estimated annual spending of approximately $5.5 million (questions due February 18, 2026). Geographic concentration is heaviest in Georgia, Texas, Oregon, and Missouri, with activity also in Connecticut and Illinois. The code appears to be a categorical mismatch—state and local procurement systems are tagging broad food service supply solicitations with a specific commodity code that does not reflect the actual scope or commodities being purchased.