UNSPSC 50382605: Duke blueberry purees

The variety of blueberries known as duke blueberries which have been pureed.

UNSPSC 50382605 Duke blueberry purees (Commodity) does not align with state and local procurement activity reflected in recent solicitations. The code's nominal scope—Duke-brand blueberry purées as a specific product line—bears no clear relationship to the food products actually being solicited by state and local jurisdictions in the opportunities posted since February 2026. Instead, the recent contracting activity under this code designation spans broad food service procurement across schools, correctional facilities, state health agencies, and municipal nutrition centers, encompassing canned and fresh fruits, applesauces, produce, dried fruit products, and general grocery items—none of which are blueberry purées, and many of which are commodity or multi-vendor supply contracts rather than branded product purchases.

The issuing bodies are predominantly school districts (Fairfax County Public Schools, Austin ISD, Rockwood R-VI, Douglas County Schools, Savannah-Chatham County Public Schools, Liberty County Schools, Muscogee County Schools, Hancock County Schools, Dallas ISD) and state health and human services agencies (Texas HHSC, Oregon Department of Corrections, State of Illinois, Texas Department of Criminal Justice), with one municipal nutrition center (City of Bridgeport, Connecticut). Geographic activity centers on Texas (multiple school districts and state agencies), Georgia (multiple school districts), and secondary concentrations in Virginia, Oregon, Connecticut, Illinois, and Missouri. Representative solicitations include the Oregon Department of Corrections' ITB S-29100-00017453 for canned applesauce (due July 31, 2026), the Texas HHSC's IFB HHS0017449 for food and consumable products with an estimated $1.5 million historical value (due July 13, 2026), and Fairfax County Public Schools' IFB 2000004323 for Master Grocery K-12 covering 45 schools and distribution kitchens (due April 27, 2026). The mismatch between the Commodity code's stated scope and actual procurement content suggests either a cataloging error in the state or local system applying the code or obsolescence of the code designation for current purchasing patterns.