Army Special Operations Command
Agency facts
- Full name
- Department of the Army Special Operations Command
- Acronym
-
- USASOC
- Organization
-
-
Parent
- USASOC
-
Parent
- Contract obligations
- $324,560,731 In FY2025
Agency codes and contract spending come from SAM.gov/FPDS.
Contract obligations by fiscal year
| Fiscal year | Obligated |
|---|---|
| FY2027 To date | $0 |
| FY2026 | $230,894,392 |
| FY2025 | $324,560,731 |
| FY2024 | $286,896,611 |
| FY2023 | $263,889,178 |
Top contractors by obligations
| Rank | Contractor | Obligated, FY2026–FY2027 | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Caci Nss, LLC | $62,144,119 | |
| 2 | LMI Consulting, LLC | $31,234,305 | |
| 3 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | $22,192,490 | |
| 4 | Seventh Dimension, LLC | $17,914,493 | |
| 5 | Threat Tec, LLC | $14,059,050 | |
| 6 | Science Applications International Corporation | $13,645,972 | |
| 7 | Consolidated Nuclear Security, LLC | $10,399,372 | |
| 8 | Strategic Solutions Unlimited, Inc. | $6,638,319 | |
| 9 | Nisga'a Ciops LLC | $5,890,308 | |
| 10 | General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc. | $5,072,860 |
Top contract vehicles by obligations
| Rank | Vehicle | Obligated, FY2026–FY2027 | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | One Acquisition Solution for Integrated Services (OASIS) | $62,144,119 | |
| 2 | Special Operations Forces Core Support | $21,956,007 | |
| 3 | Information Analysis Center Multiple-Award Contract (IAC-MAC) | $15,861,532 | |
| 4 | Worldwide Expeditionary Multiple Award Contract TITUS (WEXMAC TITUS) | $5,220,645 | |
| 5 | Alliant II | $5,072,860 | |
| 6 | Solutions for Enterprise Wide Procurement V (SEWP V) | $1,022,401 | |
| 7 | Multiple Award Schedule (MAS) | $343,943 | |
| 8 | General Contruction by OMA | $310,118 | |
| 9 | DOD CIO Wireless and Telecommunications Services | $288,475 | |
| 10 | General construction repair and upgrade of usfk facilities | $226,116 |
10 of 15 vehicles listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
Contracting staff
| Rank | Person | SAM.gov records, last 2 years |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Yesica M. Valladares | 15 |
| 2 | Brian Gilmore | 12 |
| 3 | Donald M. Goeb | 12 |
| 4 | Gabrielle N. Arrazcaeta | 11 |
| 5 | Jonathan Long | 10 |
| 6 | Tyler Cooper | 8 |
| 7 | Debbie Harris | 7 |
| 8 | Justin Burke | 7 |
| 9 | MAJ Jonathan Shelton | 7 |
| 10 | SFC Modlin, Jeffery | 7 |
| 11 | Maegan Castro | 6 |
| 12 | Vernon Shank | 6 |
| 13 | Antonio Woodson | 6 |
| 14 | Terry Davis | 6 |
| 15 | Alan Farr | 5 |
| 16 | Jennifer Burns | 5 |
| 17 | Eduardo Castillo | 4 |
| 18 | Sherri Ashby | 4 |
| 19 | Gail C. Williams | 4 |
| 20 | Salvador Castillo | 4 |
About this agency
Army Special Operations Command, a subordinate command within the Department of the Army, procures equipment, supplies, logistics support, and specialized services for U.S. Army special operations forces worldwide. USASOC awards contracts across combat, training, maintenance, and administrative domains to support its mission in CONUS, OCONUS, and hostile areas.
USASOC has awarded 14,506 federal contracts since 2002, with a combined potential value of $3.22 billion and $2.56 billion in obligated dollars (79% of potential value). Contract volume has declined over recent years—166 awards in 2022, 131 in 2023, 102 in 2024, 136 in 2025, and 101 year-to-date in 2026—suggesting a contraction in acquisition activity or consolidation toward fewer, larger task orders. The agency works with 2,905 distinct prime contractors across its contract portfolio history.
Contract competition is highly fragmented by award count. Over the last five years, Chickasaw Defense Logistics, LLC leads with 71 awards totaling $22.1 million in combined potential value, followed by Inter Marketing Inc. with 29 awards ($2 million) and Comunicacion Celular S A Comcel S A with 28 awards ($341 thousand). These three account for 24 percent of recent awards; the remainder of the contractor base consists of a long tail of smaller players. By potential value, the concentration is even more dispersed—Threat Tec, LLC and Lockheed Martin Corporation each hold roughly $60.5 million and $40.2 million respectively, but these top five primes represent only 4 percent of combined potential value. The implication is that USASOC sustains a broad, distributed vendor base with no single dominant prime and substantial transaction volume flowing through mid-tier and smaller vendors.
Set-aside awards are minimal. Eighty-nine percent of USASOC's 14,506 lifetime awards carry no set-aside designation. Small Business set-asides (competitive, sole source, and partial combined) account for 9 percent of awards; 8(a) awards total roughly 1 percent; and service-disabled veteran-owned small business, HUBZone, and women-owned small business set-asides together represent less than 1 percent. This distribution reflects USASOC's reliance on unrestricted, open competition and its transaction structure—likely dominated by Schedule task orders, BPA calls, and modifications where set-aside designations do not apply.
No recent contract opportunities are recorded in the source. Given the command's operating tempo and the most recent recorded award date of 25 September 2026, solicitation activity likely continues through standard USASOC contracting channels, but specific current openings are not available in this digest.
Quick answers
What is Army Special Operations Command?
Army Special Operations Command (USASOC) is part of Department of the Army, Department of Defense. Its full name is Department of the Army Special Operations Command.
How much does Army Special Operations Command spend on contracts?
Contracts funded by Army Special Operations Command and its offices obligated $324,560,731 in fiscal year 2025 and $1,106,240,912 in fiscal years 2023 through 2027.
Who are Army Special Operations Command's largest contractors?
The contractors Army Special Operations Command and its offices obligated the most to in fiscal years 2026 and 2027 are Caci Nss, LLC ($62,144,119), LMI Consulting, LLC ($31,234,305) and Lockheed Martin Corporation ($22,192,490).
Which contract vehicles does Army Special Operations Command use most?
The contract vehicles Army Special Operations Command and its offices obligated the most through in fiscal years 2026 and 2027 are One Acquisition Solution for Integrated Services (OASIS) ($62,144,119), Special Operations Forces Core Support ($21,956,007) and Information Analysis Center Multiple-Award Contract (IAC-MAC) ($15,861,532). Orders through any contract vehicle obligated $112,707,920 in those years, 49% of its contract obligations.
On GovTribe
See the full record
- Federal contract awards it funded
- IDV awards it funded
- Funding analysis by contractor, NAICS and set-aside
- Contacts at this agency
- Ask GovTribe AI about this agency