Army Pacific Command
Camp H.M. Smith, HI
Agency facts
- Full name
- Department of the Army Pacific Command
- Acronym
-
- USARPAC
- Organization
-
-
Parent
- USARPAC
-
Parent
- Contract obligations
- $400,716,403 In FY2025
- Address
- Box 64031, Camp H.M. Smith, HI 96861
- Website
- pacom.mil
Agency codes and contract spending come from SAM.gov/FPDS.
Contract obligations by fiscal year
| Fiscal year | Obligated |
|---|---|
| FY2027 To date | $0 |
| FY2026 | $227,262,229 |
| FY2025 | $400,716,403 |
| FY2024 | $363,390,710 |
| FY2023 | $354,089,143 |
Top contractors by obligations
| Rank | Contractor | Obligated, FY2026–FY2027 | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Innovative Management Concepts, Inc. | $33,212,364 | |
| 2 | Peraton Inc. | $17,874,196 | |
| 3 | Valiant Global Defense Services Inc. | $14,467,492 | |
| 4 | Chenega Security International, LLC | $12,755,456 | |
| 5 | Korea Container Pool Co.,Ltd | $8,506,646 | |
| 6 | El Dorado Resort Co.,Ltd. | $8,453,387 | |
| 7 | Torch Technologies Inc. | $8,110,340 | |
| 8 | Dongwon Loex Co., LTD. | $6,220,790 | |
| 9 | A Joint Stock Corporation Jung Won Tour | $5,814,884 | |
| 10 | General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc. | $5,260,567 |
Top contract vehicles by obligations
| Rank | Vehicle | Obligated, FY2026–FY2027 | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Veterans Technology Services 2 (VETS 2) | $33,212,364 | |
| 2 | Information Technology Enterprise Solutions 3 - Services (ITES-3S) | $17,649,388 | |
| 3 | One Acquisition Solution for Integrated Services (OASIS) | $15,473,070 | |
| 4 | One Acquisition Solution for Integrated Services - Small Business (OASIS SB) | $8,110,340 | |
| 5 | Mission Training Complex Capabilities Support II (MTCCS II) | $5,659,510 | |
| 6 | Army Desktop and Mobile Computing 3 (ADMC-3) | $5,214,534 | |
| 7 | Responsive Strategic Sourcing for Services (RS3) | $5,066,606 | |
| 8 | Alliant II | $4,361,945 | |
| 9 | Utility Monitoring and Control Systems Fifth Generation (UMCS-V) | $3,596,397 | |
| 10 | Multiple Award Schedule (MAS) | $2,815,903 |
10 of 26 vehicles listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
Contracting staff
| Rank | Person | SAM.gov records, last 2 years |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pon V. Tran | 124 |
| 2 | Yolanda Ikner | 89 |
| 3 | Jeff Morgan | 77 |
| 4 | Michelle Aguilar | 59 |
| 5 | Go Ishikawa | 36 |
| 6 | Zainab Obatayo | 31 |
| 7 | SFC Ngoran Joseph | 31 |
| 8 | Jacob Kamelamela | 28 |
| 9 | Paul Curley | 26 |
| 10 | Yi, Sung Yong | 25 |
| 11 | Michael Ehara | 24 |
| 12 | Joshua Medley | 22 |
| 13 | MAJ Peter Hamill | 22 |
| 14 | Sukyong Choe | 19 |
| 15 | Naomi Chiba | 16 |
| 16 | Christopher Taylor | 15 |
| 17 | Alan Henrichson | 13 |
| 18 | Mark Dahilig | 13 |
| 19 | Un Chong | 10 |
| 20 | YI, IN U | 10 |
About this agency
The Department of the Army Pacific Command, a major command within the Department of Defense, executes military operations and logistics for U.S. Army forces across the Indo-Pacific region and contracts for supplies, services, and regional support operations across its footprint.
The command has awarded 48,428 federal contracts since 1998, generating $4.79 billion in combined potential value and obligating $3.81 billion to date. Recent activity shows 592 awards in 2022, 666 in 2023, 638 in 2024, 632 in 2025, and 405 year-to-date in 2026. The portfolio spans 3,609 distinct prime contractors. Contract competitive concentration is highly fragmented—the top five primes by award count hold only 10 percent of recent awards, and the top five by potential value hold only 2 percent of combined potential value. Sani-Can, Inc. leads by award count with 74 awards totaling $3.3 million in potential value; El Dorado Resort Co., Ltd. leads by potential value with 54 awards valued at $30.7 million. The command executes the vast majority of awards as open competition without set-asides—44,647 awards (92 percent) carry no set-aside designation. Small business awards comprise 7 percent of the portfolio, split between total small business (3,209 awards) and specialized designations including 8(a) sole source (325 awards), with service-disabled veteran-owned small business, HUBZone, and woman-owned small business collectively accounting for fewer than 100 awards combined.
The command has made one federal grant award on record—a $63 million cooperative agreement to the University of Hawaii in December 2021. No additional grant awards have been recorded in the intervening five years, and no recent grant opportunities are documented. Contract opportunities remain the primary vehicle for pursuing work with the command. Prospective contractors should note the highly fragmented competitive landscape and the dominance of open competition over set-asides, indicating a merit-based selection environment with low barriers to new entrants relative to small-business carve-outs or consolidated prime-contractor relationships.
Description
Headquartered in Hawaii, the U.S. Pacific Command is responsible for defending and promoting U.S. interests in the Pacific and Asia.
Quick answers
What is Army Pacific Command?
Army Pacific Command (USARPAC) is part of Department of the Army, Department of Defense. Its full name is Department of the Army Pacific Command.
How much does Army Pacific Command spend on contracts?
Contracts funded by Army Pacific Command and its offices obligated $400,716,403 in fiscal year 2025 and $1,345,458,485 in fiscal years 2023 through 2027.
Who are Army Pacific Command's largest contractors?
The contractors Army Pacific Command and its offices obligated the most to in fiscal years 2026 and 2027 are Innovative Management Concepts, Inc. ($33,212,364), Peraton Inc. ($17,874,196) and Valiant Global Defense Services Inc. ($14,467,492).
Which contract vehicles does Army Pacific Command use most?
The contract vehicles Army Pacific Command and its offices obligated the most through in fiscal years 2026 and 2027 are Veterans Technology Services 2 (VETS 2) ($33,212,364), Information Technology Enterprise Solutions 3 - Services (ITES-3S) ($17,649,388) and One Acquisition Solution for Integrated Services (OASIS) ($15,473,070). Orders through any contract vehicle obligated $106,717,135 in those years, 47% of its contract obligations.
On GovTribe
See the full record
- Federal contract awards it made
- Federal contract awards it funded
- IDV awards it made
- IDV awards it funded
- Federal grant awards
- Funding analysis by contractor, NAICS and set-aside
- Contacts at this agency
- Ask GovTribe AI about this agency