Science and Technology Directorate

Agency facts

Sub-tier code
7040
Organization
Contract obligations
$309,009,540 In FY2025

Agency codes and contract spending come from SAM.gov/FPDS.

Contract obligations by fiscal year

Fiscal year Obligated
FY2027 To date $3,425,231
FY2026 $324,697,955
FY2025 $309,009,540
FY2024 $540,899,124
FY2023 $439,441,267

Top contractors by obligations

Rank Contractor Obligated, FY2026–FY2027 Share
1 Asrc Federal Field Services, LLC $62,413,190
2 Science Applications International Corporation $28,694,910
3 The Mitre Corporation $27,821,027
4 Noblis, Inc. $20,071,940
5 Battelle National Biodefense Institute, LLC $16,516,449
6 Battelle Memorial Institute $14,289,854
7 Silosmashers, Inc. $10,648,823
8 Dignari, LLC $8,584,225
9 Mantech SRS Technologies, Inc. $8,278,083
10 Mississippi State University $7,487,386

Top contract vehicles by obligations

Rank Vehicle Obligated, FY2026–FY2027 Share
1 Multiple Award Schedule (MAS) GSA Schedule run by GSA · 30 contractors $34,612,886
2 One Acquisition Solution for Integrated Services (OASIS) IDIQ run by GSA · 7 contractors $29,915,825
3 Systems Engineering and Technical Assistance III (SETA III) IDIQ run by DHS · 2 contractors $28,350,023
4 One Acquisition Solution for Integrated Services - Small Business (OASIS SB) IDIQ run by GSA · 9 contractors $7,513,896
5 Solutions for Enterprise Wide Procurement V (SEWP V) GWAC run by NASA · 14 contractors $7,165,650
6 One Acquisition Solution for Integrated Services Plus - Total Small Business (OASIS+SB) IDIQ run by GSA · 3 contractors $3,335,501
7 Veterans Technology Services 2 (VETS 2) GWAC run by GSA · 1 contractor $2,838,629
8 Chief Information Officer - Solutions and Partners 3, Small Business (CIO-SP3 SB) GWAC run by HHS · 3 contractors $1,890,918
9 8(a) STARS III (STARS III) GWAC run by GSA · 1 contractor $1,554,762
10 Enterprise Infrastructure Solutions (EIS) IDIQ run by GSA · 1 contractor $1,248,928

10 of 19 vehicles listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.

Contracting staff

Rank Person SAM.gov records, last 2 years
1 Donna Wright 80
2 John Whipple 35
3 Frances Gray 34
4 Jason Rios 20
5 Bjorn Miller 15
6 Charnelle Brown 15
7 James Chu 3
8 Nicholas Uom 2
9 Sung Yoo 2
10 Keith Bubar 1
11 Duane Schatz 1
12 Hing Pan Wong 1
13 Linda E. Woolard 1
14 Gregory Blaszko 1
15 Luis Nieves 1
16 David Crawford 1

About this agency

The Department of Homeland Security Science and Technology Directorate is a civilian sub-agency within DHS that procures research, development, and technical services to advance homeland security capabilities across border management, cybersecurity, disaster resilience, and counterterrorism.

The Directorate has awarded 4,621 federal contracts totaling $9.87 billion in combined potential value since 2003, with $8.06 billion obligated. Contract activity in the last five years averaged 185 awards annually: 247 in 2022, 264 in 2023, 207 in 2024, 97 in 2025, and 110 so far in 2026. The most recent award closed on September 30, 2026. Among active primes over the last five years, competitive concentration is highly fragmented — the top five primes by award count hold 19 percent of recent awards. The Mitre Corporation leads by award count with 61 awards worth $155.4 million in combined potential value, followed by The Rand Corporation with 49 awards ($53.6 million) and Battelle National Biodefense Institute, LLC with 38 awards ($64.3 million). Noblis, Inc. ranks highest by potential value at $156.7 million across 7 awards. Three-quarters of contract awards carry no set-aside designation; small-business set-asides account for about one-fifth of awards, with HUBZone, service-disabled veteran-owned small business, and 8(a) awards splitting the remainder in small percentages.

The Directorate has made 379 federal grant awards totaling $597.1 million in combined federal dollars obligated since 2004, with most recent grant activity closing on June 7, 2024. Grant activity in the last five years averaged 7.4 awards annually, showing sparse and uneven funding: 1 award in 2019, 1 in 2020, 14 in 2021, 14 in 2023, and 7 in 2024. Grant recipient concentration is highly fragmented — the top five recipients by award count hold 32 percent of recent awards. Florida International University and University of Alaska Anchorage each received 2 recent awards; Northeastern University leads by federal dollars obligated at $17.7 million from 1 award. Grants are split nearly evenly between Cooperative Agreements (54 percent) and Project Grants (46 percent), reflecting the Directorate's research-partnership model across academic and research institutions.

No recent contract opportunities or grant opportunities are present in source data.

Quick answers

What is Science and Technology Directorate?

Science and Technology Directorate is part of Department of Homeland Security.

How much does Science and Technology Directorate spend on contracts?

Contracts funded by Science and Technology Directorate and its offices obligated $309,009,540 in fiscal year 2025 and $1,617,473,116 in fiscal years 2023 through 2027.

Who are Science and Technology Directorate's largest contractors?

The contractors Science and Technology Directorate and its offices obligated the most to in fiscal years 2026 and 2027 are Asrc Federal Field Services, LLC ($62,413,190), Science Applications International Corporation ($28,694,910) and The Mitre Corporation ($27,821,027).

Which contract vehicles does Science and Technology Directorate use most?

The contract vehicles Science and Technology Directorate and its offices obligated the most through in fiscal years 2026 and 2027 are Multiple Award Schedule (MAS) ($34,612,886), One Acquisition Solution for Integrated Services (OASIS) ($29,915,825) and Systems Engineering and Technical Assistance III (SETA III) ($28,350,023). Orders through any contract vehicle obligated $118,239,781 in those years, 36% of its contract obligations.

On GovTribe

See the full record

  • Federal contract awards it funded
  • IDV awards it funded
  • Contract vehicles it funds
  • Federal grant programs
  • Federal grant awards
  • Funding analysis by contractor, NAICS and set-aside
  • Contacts at this agency
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this agency