National Community Centers of Excellence in Women's Health

Active

Assistance listing
93.290
Agency
Grant awards
31 $16,760,045 in federal obligations

Program facts

Also known as
Coalition for a Healthier Community (CHC)
Assistance types
  • Cooperative Agreement
  • Block Grant
Eligible applicants
  • Local (includes State-designated lndian Tribes, excludes institutions of higher education and hospitals
  • State (includes District of Columbia, public institutions of higher education and hospitals)
  • Public nonprofit institution/organization (includes institutions of higher education and hospitals)
  • Private nonprofit institution/organization (includes institutions of higher education and hospitals)
  • Other private institutions/organizations
  • Native American Organizations (includes lndian groups, cooperatives, corporations, partnerships, associations)
  • Other public institution/organization
Beneficiaries
  • Health Professional
Treasury account
  • 75-0120-0-1-551
More information

Program details come from SAM.gov Assistance Listings. Updated . Grant award figures come from USAspending.gov.

About this program

The Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Secretary funds coalitions developing and implementing strategic action plans to reduce gender-based health disparities affecting women and girls across the life span through the National Community Centers of Excellence in Women's Health program (CFDA 93.290), with the most recent grant award made on February 13, 2015.

This program is no longer actively soliciting new applications. The portfolio contains 31 awards totaling $16.8 million in federal obligations across a two-decade span, but the most recent award was disbursed over eleven years ago. Award activity peaked in 2010 (16 awards) and 2011 (10 awards) before declining sharply; no awards have been issued since February 2015. The program operated a two-phase structure: Phase I provided one year of financial and technical support to coalitions for developing strategic and implementation plans to address gender-based health disparities, while Phase II supported up to five years of implementation of those plans. Phase II applicants were limited to prior Phase I grantees.

The program funded coalitions composed of public health departments, community-based and faith-based organizations, academic institutions, hospitals, and medical groups. At least one-third of coalition partners were required to demonstrate prior experience addressing gender differences through appropriate interventions, programs, or research. Awards supported coalitions in geographies ranging from Inkster, Michigan and Yellowstone County, Montana to Baltimore, Delaware, and Utah, addressing health issues including cardiovascular disease, diabetes, obesity, cancer, mental health, and gender-specific concerns such as diversion from prostitution.

The assistance mix consisted predominantly of Cooperative Agreements (90 percent, 28 awards) with a smaller share of Block Grants (10 percent, 3 awards). A single federal agency administered the entire program. Representative Phase II awards included the Utah Coalition for a Healthier Community Program ($1.5 million obligated, September 2011), the Inkster, Michigan Coalition ($1.5 million obligated, September 2011), and the Delaware Prostitution Diversion Program continuation ($1.49 million obligated, September 2011). Phase I awards issued in 2010 were substantially smaller, typically in the $90,000 to $100,000 range. The Philadelphia Ujima Coalition ($744,375, February 2015) represented the final funded award under this listing.

Objective and description

Objective

Phase 1 1.Provide 1 year of financial and technical support to an existing wellness coalition to develop a strategic action plan and implementation plan to reduce gender based health disparities in targeted communities. 2. Enhance collaborative working partnerships among health organizations, community based and faith based organizations, public and private academic institutions, hospitals, medical groups and practices. 3. Enhance consumer and provider awareness of gender-based health issues in the community; 4. Increase the capacity and strengthen infrastructure among local public health organizations to increase the coordination of services to better serve women and girls Phase II 5. Provide up to 5 years of financial and technical support for implementation of the strategic action health plan. 6. To develop and implement a health intervention plan which will be sustained after OWH funding ends. 7. To use a public health systems approach to improve on two or more identified health issues affecting women and/or girls. 8. Improve surveillance/information systems that allow tracking of program progress on gender based morbidity/ mortality objectives at the grantee level. 9. Reduce the incidence and prevalence of adverse health outcomes among women girls in local communities.

Eligibility

Applicant eligibility

Eligible applicants include public and private non profit organizations (public and private academic institutions and hospitals); community-based and faith-based organizations, medical groups/practices and State, city, county, and local health departments, tribes and tribal organizations with expertise/experience in the proposed objectives. The applicant must be part of an existing coalition. At least a third of the partners should have demonstrated experience addressing gender differences through appropriate interventions, programs, or research related to the selected objectives. Phase II: Eligible applicants are limited to Phase I grantees.

Beneficiary eligibility

Women and girls across the life span.

Credentials and documentation

Each applicant for a cooperative agreement funded under this CCOE announcement must, at a minimum: (1) present a plan to integrate all six components of the CCOE program by the end of the first year of funding, although only four components have to be in place at the time the application is submitted; (2) develop a CCOE advisory board or ensure that their already established advisory board is included in the decision-making process for CCOE program development, identification of community-based research questions, and formulation of CCOE policies; (3) be a sustainable organization with an established network of partners capable of providing coordinated and integrated women's health services in the targeted community; (4) have an established clinical care center/facility, an operating public educational/outreach program, and a community identified as the recipient of technical assistance at the time the application is submitted; (5) demonstrate the ways in which the organization and the care that are coordinated through its partners are women-focused, women-friendly, women-relevant, and sensitive to the importance of patient/provider communication/relationships for medically underserved women of all ages; (6) detail/specify the roles and resources/services that each partner organization brings to the program, the duration and terms of agreement as confirmed by a signed agreement between the applicant organization and each partner, and describe how the partner organizations will operated within the CCOE structure; (7) describe in detail plans for the local evaluation of the CCOE program and when and how information obtained from the evaluation will be used to enhance the CCOE program; and(8) describe in detail the planned community-based research and the research methodology/procedure.

Uses of assistance

Funds may be used to implement evidence-based strategies to program objectives. Phase II: to implement the approved strategic plan and evaluate the effectiveness of the program

Length and time phasing of assistance

For Phase I, project period is not to exceed 1 year. For Phase II, project period is not to exceed 5 years.

How to apply

Application procedure

All available grant opportunities are posted on www.grants.gov.

Criteria for selecting proposals

To be considered for review, applications must be received by the Office of The Assistant Secretary for Health, Office of Grants Management, c/o LCG by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on the due date published in the "Dates" section of the FR. Applications will be screened upon receipt. Those that are judged to be in compliance will be reviewed for technical merit by a technical panel composed of experts with experience with sex and gender programs, program management, program delivery, outreach, health education and program assessment in accordance with DHHS policy. The technical review of the applications will consider the following factors for Phase I: • Factor 1: Background and Summary (10 points) • Factor 2: Coalition and Capacity Plan (20 points) • Factor 3: Management Plan (25 points) • Factor 4: Target Population (15 points) • Factor 5: Evaluation Plan (20 points) • Factor 6: Sustainability Plan (10 points) The technical review of the applications will consider the following factors for Phase II: • Factor 1: Background and Need (20 points) • Factor 2: Implementation Plan (25 points) • Factor 3: Management Plan (20 points) • Factor 4: Evaluation Plan (20 points) • Factor 5: Sustainability Plan (15 points) Details regarding the elements to be addressed within each Factor are available in the FR notice

Award procedure

Applications will be screened upon receipt. Those that are judged to be ineligible will be returned to the applicant. Accepted applications will be reviewed for technical merit in accordance with PHS policies. Applications will be evaluated by a technical review panel composed of independent experts. Funding decisions will be made by the OWH and will take into consideration the recommendations of the review panel; program needs; stated preferences; and geographic location. Applicants approved and funded will be issued a Notice of Grant Award.

Time to approval or disapproval

Approximately 90 days from the application deadline date.

Grant awards

Latest 10 of 31 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.

Top recipients by federal obligations

Rank Recipient Federal obligations Share
1 Drexel University $1,735,962 10%
2 The Family League Of Baltimore City, Inc. $1,697,465 10%
3 National Kidney Foundation Of Michigan $1,600,000 10%
4 University Of Utah $1,599,912 10%
5 University Of Illinois $1,599,761 10%
6 Yale Univ $1,597,052 10%
7 County Of Thurston $1,596,477 10%
8 Brandywine Counseling & Community Services, Inc. $1,596,214 10%
9 ST. Vincent Healthcare Foundation, Inc. $1,576,886 9%
10 Domestic Violence Action Center $1,558,913 9%

10 of 21 recipients listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.

Federal obligations by fiscal year

Fiscal year Federal obligations
FY2018 -$9,616
FY2017 -$69,406
FY2015 $2,999,888
FY2014 $3,343,808
FY2013 $2,979,511
FY2012 $3,006,118
FY2011 $2,999,742
FY2010 $1,900,000
FY2008 -$450,000
FY2007 $60,000

Quick answers

What is Assistance Listing 93.290?

Assistance Listing 93.290 is National Community Centers of Excellence in Women's Health, a federal grant program run by Immediate Office of the Secretary (Department of Health and Human Services).

What is the CFDA number for National Community Centers of Excellence in Women's Health?

Its CFDA number is 93.290: Assistance Listing numbers were called CFDA numbers before 2018.

How much funding has Assistance Listing 93.290 awarded?

31 grant awards under 93.290 have obligated $16,760,045 in federal funds to 21 recipients.

Who receives the most funding from 93.290?

The recipients obligated the most under National Community Centers of Excellence in Women's Health are Drexel University ($1,735,962), The Family League Of Baltimore City, Inc. ($1,697,465) and National Kidney Foundation Of Michigan ($1,600,000).

On GovTribe

See this program's full record

  • Every grant award and opportunity under it
  • Funding by recipient, agency and assistance type
  • Alerts for new opportunities
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this program