Resurfacing Various County Roads

The Putnam County Board of Commissioners issued Invitation to Bid No. 25-42001-002 for the resurfacing of various county roads, representing a sealed bid procurement process. The project encompasses approximately 12.30 miles of patching and resurfacing work on eleven roads: Denham Road, Old Copelan Road, Quail Knoll Road, Carter Dearman Road, Lakeview Lane, Lakeview Drive, Willow Forest Road, Willow Trace Court, Bark Circle, Shoreline Court, and Cold Branch Road. The scope of work includes shoulder clipping, rebuilding shoulders to a maximum 5-foot width, grassing, and striping. All contractors must be Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) approved to qualify for this project. Sealed bids were required to be received by 2:15 P.M. on Thursday, August 21, 2025, at the Putnam County Board of Commissioners office located at 117 Putnam Drive, Suite A, Eatonton, Georgia 31024, with all bids submitted in duplicate and marked with the bidder's name, opening date and time, bid number, and project name. Bidding documents were available for purchase at $25 per copy (non-refundable) from Atlas Technical Consultants, LLC, with inquiries directed to Alan Smith at (478) 357-4192 or alan.smith@oneatlas.com. Questions regarding bidding documents, drawings, and specifications were required to be submitted via email no later than Thursday, August 14, 2025, with no verbal responses provided. The award was to be made to the contractor submitting the lowest responsive and responsible bid.

No set-aside designations or restrictions on types of organizations responding were specified in the procurement documents. The Notice of Award document indicates that Pittman Construction was selected as the successful bidder for this project; however, specific pricing, contract term, and other financial details were not disclosed in the available documents. The Putnam County Board of Commissioners reserved the right to reject any or all bids, waive technicalities, and negotiate terms, conditions, and pricing with the lowest responsive and responsible bidder at its discretion. No disadvantaged enterprise requirements, incumbent vendor information, or required technology integrations were noted in the available procurement materials. The project did not specify a stated budget range or award value in the public documentation.