107-20260324082336 Tylertown

The Town of Tylertown, Mississippi, in Wayne County, has issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) for qualified firms or individuals to provide comprehensive engineering services for the implementation of approved FY 2026 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) project(s). The procurement encompasses extensive engineering support including project planning, design, permitting, and project oversight for community development initiatives funded through the federal CDBG program. Selected firms will be required to coordinate with local municipal officials and maintain adherence to all CDBG program requirements and compliance standards. Key qualifications for prospective vendors include demonstrated experience in municipal engineering projects and familiarity with CDBG-funded initiatives. The RFP was posted on March 26, 2026, with a proposal submission deadline of April 20, 2026. Interested parties must submit their proposals by the specified deadline to be considered for award. Evaluation criteria prioritize firms with established track records in similar municipal engineering engagements and prior experience navigating CDBG program guidelines.

As a federal grant-funded opportunity, the selected engineering firm must demonstrate full compliance with applicable federal procurement regulations, Davis-Bacon prevailing wage requirements where applicable, and all CDBG program guidelines and directives. The contract term and any renewal options are contingent upon the project scope and funding availability through the CDBG program cycle, with specific arrangements to be determined during final contract negotiations. Funding for this engagement is provided through the FY 2026 Community Development Block Grant program administered at the federal level and allocated to the Town of Tylertown. The specific project costs, fee structures, and contract amounts have not been predetermined and will be established based on the scope of work and detailed project requirements outlined during final contract negotiations between the selected firm and the municipality. No incumbent vendors or current contractors were identified in the available documentation, nor were any set-aside designations or restrictions on organizational types specified in the RFP materials provided.