Migratory Bird Treaty Centennial Communications Campaign
Awarded Award Notice Posted
- Solicitation number
- F15PS00609
- Agency
- DOI Fish and Wildlife Service Headquarters Region 9 Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of the Interior
- Awarded
- to Cook & Schmid, LLC
- Set-aside
- No set-aside
Opportunity facts
- Contract number
- INF15PX01687 Federal contract award
- NAICS code
- 541820 Public Relations Agencies
- PSC
- Not on record
- More information
Notice details come from SAM.gov. Updated .
Notice text
2 versions
Update #2 · Latest ·
Added: Jun 02, 2015 12:36 pm
Modified: Jun 29, 2015 12:35 pmTrack Changes
The purpose of this amendment is to answer contractor questions and clarify that the period of performance is contract award to 11/30/15.
RFP 15PS00609 - Migratory Bird Treaty Centennial Campaign
Response to Questions
1. Should the proposal address all of the preliminary objectives and tactics listed in your RFP?
Response: The preliminary objectives and tactics were provided to give context for the larger Centennial program. We are not requesting deliverables associated with these objectives however, we will refer to the vision, goal statement and objectives during the design process.
2. Can the USFWS provide an estimated budget for this scope of work?
Response: The budget proposal will be a factor in our selection of the best value firm. We expect the offerors to have a sense of the budget parameters we often work within.
3. For Task 5: Graphics for Social Media - the RFP talks about draft concepts for the central themes. Can the USFWS share those draft concepts with the Offeror prior to contract award?
Response: The themes and concepts listed under Task 5 are preliminary and only provided for context during the bid process. We will not be providing additional content like this prior to award. We will provide this information at the kick-off workshop.
4. For Task 5, will Offerors need to draft and develop new content for the infographics?
Response: Generally yes, our expectation is that the offeror will work with USFWS Team members to identify, develop and refine content for the infographics. These will draw from several proposals and concepts that are being generated and prioritized nationally but we expect the creative Team to propose new and compelling design to express existing ideas.
5. The initial draft graphics that were provided with the RFP, are vendors required to use those or build upon those further, or were those only provided for broad reference?
Response: These were only provided for reference.
6. Can you provide a budget for the desired media plan? As this can vary depending on your overall budget.
Response: No media plan budget is available at this time as it is dependent upon appropriations in 2016 and will come from the various regions. The media plan expenditures will likely be minimal.
7. Task 4: Print Media Packets ¿ can the USFWS provide dimensions and specs for the poster and banner?
Response: We are not locked into any standard size of poster. The last National Poster we did was 20" x 33" with graphic image front and educational information on the back. The USFWS will assist with educational content for the back side of the poster. The vinyl banner design would be suitable for display on front of a table typical at an event.
8. Is the Offeror responsible for printing and production of the media packet? If so, does the USFWS have a preferred vendor who we should work with?
Response: No, the offeror is not responsible for printing as that will be done in-house through the Government Publishing Office (GPO).
9. Can the USFWS provide additional information as to the quantities of the media packets that will need to be printed/produced if the Offeror is required to cover production costs?
Response: See Response to 8 above.
10. Does work have to be done in Oregon? Or can the contractor work from their location?
Response: the Work can be done from outside of Oregon, however the kick off meeting and perhaps other face to face coordination meetings will be necessary in person. These coordination meetings should be described in your proposal and the travel cost will be the responsibility of the offeror.
11. Is there an incumbent contractor currently providing communications products and services? If so, please identify the firm and how long they have been providing services to FWS. Is there a creative or branding agency already identified for the branding portion?
Response: No there is no incumbent for this scope of work. A consulting firm, Marstel-Day has a coordination role in the National Centennial activities. There is no creative agency hired. This process will hire and create the branding.
12. Is the USFW thinking this will primarily be a print campaign aside from social media?
Response: At this point we anticipate that this will be a print and social media campaign. It is unknown if other partners outside of the Agency will bring additional capacity and options.
13. Is the contractor expected to use the logos provided with the RFP? Does the FWS intend to further develop the logo concepts presented or is another approach desired?
Response: No, these were provided for reference only. Our expectation is that the selected consultant will take a comprehensive and fresh look at branding the MBT Centennial campaign in a way that is compelling and meaningful to the broader effort.
14. Who will be responsible for coordinating and conducting the Kickoff Workshop (Task 1)?
Response: The Offeror will be responsible for coordinating and conducting the workshop, however the USFWS may assist with logistics such as room location and support materials like projector and flip chart easels if needed.
15. Will FWS pay for travel to Portland, OR for the Kickoff Workshop?
Response: The offeror is responsible for any travel associated with this work. We require a fixed fee proposal that includes travel and expenses. Our assumption is that all communications design work will be managed from Portland, Oregon and if necessary national USFWS Team members will fly in to Portland as appropriate. No National presentations are anticipated but if needed, we would modify the contract to cover this client-requested travel cost.
16. Does the Detailed Cost Proposal (Section F under Submission Requirements) or the transmittal letter count toward the ten (10) pages of written material for the response or should it be submitted as a separate volume?
Response: No, the cost proposal and the transmittal letter will not count towards the 10 page limit of the written proposal.
17. Who developed the draft logos for the Migratory Bird Treaty, and are those being considered for possible adaptation or use? If both have been rejected, why were they rejected?
Response: The draft logos were done in-house. They were developed based on one artist's interpretation of the centennial. Our desire is to develop a brand image that comes out of a facilitated process to more comprehensively brand the campaign.
18. Will information included in the appendices (e.g., staff resumes, work samples) be scored in the evaluation of the proposal?
Response: Yes, we will look at those to inform/rate several of the evaluation criteria.
19. Who developed the national strategic plan for this work?
Response: This was developed by our National Centennial Team. They are made up of staff throughout the country primarily working in our Migratory Bird program and a few staff from our External Affairs office.
20. Will you please share with us the National Strategic Plan for this work, so that we can more fully consider how to apply that plan through branding and communications?
Response: The five (5) page Strategic Framework and Plan was included with the RFP materials posted on Fed Connect.
21. Is there a disincentive for proposing a timeline that is more compressed than the final delivery date outlined in the RFP (December 15, 2015)? Does the FWS anticipate extending the period of performance?
Response: No, there is no disincentive for proposing a more compressed timeline. We noticed inconsistencies with the final delivery and Performance end date. We will be issuing an addendum to change all Performance end dates to November 30, 2015. We do not anticipate extending the period of performance.
22. Is it correct that final deliverables will be electronic in nature only?
Response: Yes, all final deliverables will be electronic. Two versions are needed , one pdf version suitable for posting on social media and websites and a second version being the high resolution original design files (InDesign, Illustrator) for subsequent printing or if changes are needed to the graphics in the future. It is desirable to have the consultant provide a limited number (5 or so) of high quality paper hard copies for key reviews during the process when design and colors are being reviewed.
23. How will you measure success of the campaign? Have KPI or metrics been identified to benchmark progress and success? These goals will drive the brand development and tactics to develop and execute the PR in 2016.
Response: No metrics have been identified to measure campaign success at this time. We anticipate that this could be a topic at the kick-off workshop but not one to consume too much of the effort. The National Centennial Team will likely be addressing this topic and need. 24. Has the Service conducted any background research? This information would help frame the brand attributes, target audience prioritization, and current perceptions about the Service and MBT going into the kick-off workshop.
Response: No background research has been conducted. In preparing for the Kick-off workshop we could utilize the National Centennial Team and a few key partners to respond to specific questions to help inform our understanding and perceptions about the Service and MBT. We will look to offerors to help navigate this need with little or no research. 25. Final question relates to audience(s). There are several different audience groups I'd assume this campaign should reach, including: general public (subset birders), policy makers, partners, and internal stakeholders. Are these correct assumptions?
Response: Identifying target audiences and preparing suitable graphics and messages for these audiences is a key part of the campaign effort . We will expect the offeror to define your approach to this task. Your initial assumptions are correct however, we will likely want to engage not only our traditional birding public but perhaps non- traditional millennials as well.
26. Is there a preference for working with firms in Oregon?
Response: We have not limited this RFP to firms only in Oregon and no additional points will be awarded to Oregon firms. The cost proposals will likely differ for some due to any travel proposed.
27. Is there a standard transmittal letter form to be employed?
Response: We do not have a standard for the transmittal letter. The Transmittal letter does not count towards the total pages.
28. At the Kick-off meeting, will we be expected to present initial approaches or will we be collaboratively brainstorming with the Fish and Wildlife representatives?
Response: The contractor will be expected to organize, lead and facilitate the kickoff meeting process and collaboratively brainstorm with FWS.
29. What does size standard $15 million refer to in the project description?
Response: The $15 million referenced in the introductory paragraph is boiler plate Federal Government guidelines related to Small Business. My understanding is that this RFP is open to businesses making under $15M per year. It does not have anything to do with the value of this specific contract.
30. How are payments made and should we recommend a payment schedule in our proposal?
Response: There is no need to include this with your proposal. We will discuss this with the winning bidder. We use on-line Federal Business Management System for submitting invoices. Payments are typically made periodically as tasks are completed.
31. The evaluation criteria refers "Directly Related Project Experience". What constitutes "Directly Related"? Does this mean work directly related to the migratory bird treaty? Work directly with the Department of the Interior?
Response: By "directly related" we generally mean communications work related to wildlife conservation. If a firm has done work related to bird conservation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife then they would likely receive the highest points available. If they did natural resource related conservation communications for others then points will be awarded based on the each evaluator interpretation of how relative this work is to this project. We have five evaluators making these determinations and awarding points so we expect individual judgements will balance out in the end.
32. Task 6 of the SOW asks for a deliverables schedule. Section E of the technical requests the same. Is the contractor expected to hand over a schedule as a deliverable separate to the implementation schedule requested in Section E?
Response: A deliverable schedule could be integrated into the implementation schedule. We are looking for the offeror to clearly design a process that identifies when each of the products (deliverables) will be submitted and what amount of time is needed for reviews.
33. The Government has not responded to questions as of 26 June. Can an extension be granted to allow time to incorporate answers to questions into the proposal?
We will be posting a final master list of questions as an addendum late on the 26th of June or early on the 27th. We do not anticipate providing an extension.
34. To clarify, the Period of Performance ends 11/30/2015.
Update #1 ·
Added: Jun 02, 2015 12:36 pm
This is a combined synopsis/solicitation for commercial items prepared in accordance with the format in FAR Subpart 12.6, as supplemented with additional information included in this notice. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is seeking communications and visual design services to assist the agency in promotion of migratory bird conservation throughout the 2016 celebration of the Centennial of the Migratory Bird Treaty. This announcement constitutes the only solicitation; proposals are being requested and a written solicitation will not be issued. Solicitation number F15PS00609 is issued as a Request for Proposal (RFP). This solicitation document and incorporated provisions and clauses are those in effect through Federal Acquisition Circular 2005-66. The associated North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) code for this procurement is 541820, Public Relations Agencies. The size standard is $15M. The Universal Product Code for this procurement is U009.
The selected Offeror must comply with the following commercial item terms and conditions, which are incorporated herein by reference: FAR 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors - Commercial Items, applies to this acquisition; FAR 52.212-3, Offeror Representations and Certifications - Commercial Items - the selected offeror must submit a completed copy of the listed representations and certifications; FAR 52.212-4, Contract Terms and Conditions - Commercial Items; FAR 52.212-5, Contract Terms and Conditions Required To Implement Statutes or Executive Orders-Commercial Items, paragraph (a) and the following clauses in paragraph (b): 52.222-21, 52.222-26, 52.222-35, 52.222-36, 52.222-37, 52.225-13, 52.232-33. The full text of the referenced FAR clauses may be accessed electronically at https://www.acquisition.gov/far/.
PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: July 15, 2015 through December 15, 2015
CLIN 010: Migratory Bird Centennial Branding $_________
Request for Proposal (RFP) F15PS00609
I. Introduction
Migratory Bird Treaty Centennial Communications Campaign
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is seeking communications and visual design services to assist the agency in promotion of migratory bird conservation throughout the 2016 celebration of the Centennial of the Migratory Bird Treaty. The anticipated performance period of this contract is July 15, 2015 to November 30, 2015.
Background
The year 2016 marks the centennial of the Convention between the United States and Great Britain (for Canada) for the Protection of Migratory Birds, signed on Aug. 16, 1916. The resulting Migratory Bird Treaty, and three others that followed, form the cornerstones of our efforts to conserve birds that migrate across international borders.
The Treaty connects the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (Service) with our federal, state, private, non-governmental, tribal, and international partners, who share our long, successful history of conserving, protecting, and managing migratory bird populations and their habitats. Celebrating the centennial of the first Treaty allows us to bring together those who have contributed to its success.
Throughout 2016, the Service will work with partners to create awareness, promote actions, increase support, and expand engagement in the conservation of migratory birds. The products of this contract will be provided to agency staff in Headquarters and all eight regional offices. The products will also be distributed to key partners throughout the conservation community.
A Service team has developed a national strategy that will provide the framework for our agency and our partners to work together to promote the Centennial and achieve mutual goals and objectives.
Our Vision
A world where birds and people thrive
Our Goal
Create awareness, promote key actions, increase support, and expand opportunities for engagement in the conservation of migratory birds.
Migratory birds
¿ Connect people with nature and add beauty, sound, and color to our world. They provide countless opportunities for enjoyment by birders, hunters, and outdoor enthusiasts and have cultural and spiritual importance.
¿ Contribute environmental benefits, including pollination, insect and rodent control, and seed dispersal.
¿ Good indicators of environmental health because they are so visible and relatively easy to study. Studying birds can give us a picture of what is going on in the world.
¿ Play a key role in the U.S. economy, supporting recreational opportunities that create jobs and generate billions of dollars in revenue.
Preliminary Objectives and Tactics
Create awareness about the importance of migratory bird conservation
¿ Encourage stories in news media about Treaty achievements, migratory birds, and habitat conservation
¿ Connect people to migratory bird conservation via social media
Promote key actions to help conserve birds
¿ Increase participation in citizen science programs
¿ Expand property/homeowner use of best practices (lights out, reduce collisions, wildlife-friendly gardens)
Increase support for funding that benefits migratory bird conservation
¿ Strengthen international partnerships
¿ Increase knowledge and understanding during reauthorization of key legislation
Expand opportunities for engagement in bird watching, hunting, and conservation
¿ Support bird-focused programs and festivals in Urban Bird Treaty Cities and Urban Refuge Partnerships
¿ Increase participation in Duck Stamp/Jr. Duck Stamp
¿ Promote youth birding and hunting events at National Wildlife Refuges
For additional Information visit the Centennial website:
Web: http://www.fws.gov/birds/mbtreaty100/index.php
II. Proposed Scope of Work:
Overall Task
This contract will visually brand the Migratory Bird Treaty Centennial and develop messaging in support of the national Migratory Bird Treaty Centennial strategy. Bold communications are needed to compete for attention in a crowded and noisy digital marketplace by creating concisely framed messages and unique experiences, delivered with wit, humor and great art.
The Migratory Bird Treaty Centennial Campaign would:
¿ clearly and succinctly name and describe the campaign for public audiences;
¿ develop the verbal and visual identity to promote and increase awareness of the campaign and need for bird conservation;
¿ generate local momentum for action and collaboration; and
¿ ultimately activate partners to help secure funding for this important outreach effort.
Task 1: Kickoff Workshop to Create Communications Goals and Identify Target Audiences
The full day Kick-off workshop, held in Portland, Oregon, will build on these Migratory Bird Treaty Centennial goals by developing communication and marketing goals and identifying tangible outcomes. As part of this workshop we will identify migratory bird conservation issues most important to the USFWS and partners; define who is most affected by these issues; and define what change and outcomes are desired. We will explore various aspects of brand identity used by USFWS and others. This workshop will also identify and profile our target audiences. We know that achieving desired conservation marketing and public relations goals is a four step process: Awareness, Education, Perception Change, and Behavior Change.
Deliverable 1: Migratory Bird Treaty Centennial Brand White Paper
This document is the foundation for development and promotional activities, marketing materials, and media plans. The Brand White Paper will become the central platform for all communication moving forward. This document outlines the core tenets, positioning, value proposition, mission and vision and target audience identification and their profiles.
Task 2: Graphic and Identity Recommendation:
Develop graphic and word mark options that express the brand. The combination creates an identity system. The goal of this task is to express the visual translation of the new brand in a bold yet simple graphic mark. This will include a final graphic, color palette, word mark, fonts, as well as arrangement/stacking options. This graphic will be used by USFWS and all partners developing materials associated with the Migratory Bird Treaty Centennial to provide a common thread focused on the centennial message.
Deliverable 2: Initial graphic branding concepts for review and feedback followed by final selection and refinement of the final branding. Final delivery includes full rights of design and final files in InDesign and or Illustrator.
Task 3 ¿ Campaign and Media Concepts
During this stage, develop a unique storyline that empowers people to intellectually and emotionally connect with all aspects of the Migratory Bird Treaty Centennial. This exploration of the brand provides organizations with a deep well of inspiration and executable ideas for the Migratory Bird Treaty Centennial campaign, including interpretive outreach and promotions, and guides messaging to diverse and distinct audience groups in diverse and distinct locations. These will provide the Service and partners executable ideas for implementation in 2016.
Deliverable 3: A graphic concept presentation describing the communication analysis and brand design inserted into several potential media/marketing tactics.
Task 4 ¿ Print Media Packet: Poster Design, Banner, Postcards
These materials will focus around the Four Major Migration Corridors: Pacific Flyway, Central Flyway, Mississippi Flyway and the Atlantic Flyway and cities within those corridors designated as Urban Bird Treaty Cities. These products will be designed to be suitable for distribution to major partners nationwide who agree to promote the Centennial in local communities. These partners may include National Parks, National Forests, State Fish and Wildlife agencies, National Audubon Chapters, Bird Observatories, Joint Ventures, and other conservation organizations.
Deliverable 4: Design four graphic media packets for printed media (poster, banner, and postcard) to promote interest in the Migratory Bird Treaty Centennial and relate to the seasonality of migrating birds in each of the four Flyways.
Task 5- Graphic Messaging for Social Media (12 images)
These materials will focus around the central themes to be developed for social media campaigns. These themes need to be further developed but draft concepts include: Migration Has No Borders (bird migration across international borders), Take Action Now! (providing information on what every day Americans can do to help birds), Bird¿s Eye View (100 YouTube videos on birds). Products will be designed to be suitable for distribution to major partners nationwide who agree to promote the Centennial on social media.
Deliverable 5: Design 12 infographic images for social media to promote interest in the Migratory Bird Treaty Centennial and the central themes.
Task 6: Schedule for Project and Deliverables
The USFWS looks to the contractor to propose a delivery schedule that would culminate with a December 15th, 2015 or earlier completion date. At most major submittal reviews the Service would require a two-week review period.
The schedule parameters include:
July 15, 2015: Initial meeting with U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Week of July 27th, 2015: The service anticipates the initial Kick-off meeting.
December 15th, 2015: All Final materials delivered and performance end date.
III. Materials Provided by the Government
Centennial Flyer/Handout
National Strategic Plan
Initial draft graphics
Invitation Letter to Partners
IV. RESPONSE INSTRUCTIONS
A. Submission of Response
Four (4) copies of the response shall be mailed or hand-delivered to: US. Fish and Wildlife Service, 911 NE 11th Ave, Portland, OR 97232 Attention: Contracting Officer Josh Gordon
B. Deadline
Responses will not be considered if received after the date and time indicated on the RFP.
C. RFP as Basis for Responses:
This Request for Proposals represents the most definitive statement the USFWS will make concerning the information upon which responses are to be based. Any verbal information which is not written in the response to this RFP will not be considered by the selecting Team. All questions relating to this RFP should be addressed to Mike Marxen, mike_marxen@fws.gov, (503) 872-2700. Any questions, which in the opinion of USFWS, warrant a written reply, an addendum will be furnished to all parties receiving this RFP. SAS/USFWS may not respond to questions received after 3:00 p.m. on June 26th, 2015.
D. Procurement Procedures and Requirements
Participation in this RFP is voluntary and any expense incurred in providing a response, including interviews shall be the sole responsibility of the vendor.
In the event that procurement results from this RFP, price alone will not be the only criteria that will be used to select vendors. Other criteria will include, but not limited to, experience, past performance, and other factors (See selection criteria Section VI). Additional elements and clauses may be added and negotiated with the successful firm.
V. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS
The response should contain no more than ten (10) pages of written material (excluding resumes and/or brochures, which may be included in an appendix), describing the information requested, as outlined below. Potential vendors should address each of the following items in their response to this RFP:
Section A. Transmittal Letter containing signature of authorized party who submits the response on behalf of the responding Team. The response will be considered valid for one hundred-eighty (180) days.
Section B. Proposed Scope of Work that your Design Team will provide. The proposal should outline your process and deliverables proposed in response to this RFP and the required elements under the Scope of Work, Section II. Your response should address all elements but is not limited to those listed in Section II.
Section C. Description of your philosophy and approach to the design of the Migratory Bird Treaty Centennial Campaign and the process you will use to identify and engage our audiences with targeted campaigns.
Section D. Description of Team assigned to this project including roles, responsibilities and estimated hours for each during the design process. Description of past relevant experience of Team members in the design and development of any relevant, nature-based branding or communication campaigns for government agencies or other large organizations.
Section E. Draft Schedule proposed to meet the December 15th, 2015 performance end date.
Section F. Detailed Cost Proposal for all design services. This RFP requires a firm fixed-price proposal that includes estimated expenses.
Section G. Identify all assumptions, exclusions, and conditions associated with your response to this RFP. Interested parties must identify and detail any assumptions, conditions, exclusions, and requirements related to their proposal, such as and including, furnished materials, review and comments process, approvals, and client participation in the design process.
VI. EVALUATION CRITERIA
The proposals will be evaluated on the following basis. Proponent scores after proposal submission will be used to shortlist consultants for further reference checks and interviews if needed.
Maximum Points
A. Firm Overview Background and Values: 10
B. Individual Team Members Related Project
Experience, expertise and compatibility 20
C. Team Organization: 10
D. Directly Related Project Experience: 20
E. Understanding of the Project and Client Goals: 15
F. Design Approach: 15
G. Project Management Methodology (cost, schedule, QC) 10
Total Points 100
Any firm that believes it is capable of meeting the USFWS requirements may submit a response no later than 6/30/2015, 1700 PS to be considered. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 911 NE 11th Ave, Portland, OR 97232 CGS ATTN: Josh Gordon. Offerors must be registered at http://www.sam.gov to be eligible for award. All questions relating to RFP F15PS00609 should be addressed to Mike Marxen, mike_marxen@fws.gov, 503-872-2700.
Please follow the link to FedConnect for solicitation documents.
Attachments
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Sol_F15PS00609_Amd_000001.pdf | ||
| Sol_F15PS00609.pdf | ||
| Notice_to_Offerors.pdf | ||
| Initial_draft_graphics_1.pdf | ||
| National_Strategic_Plan.pdf | ||
| Statement_of_Work_05-14-15.pdf | ||
| Centennial_Flyer_Handout.pdf | ||
| Initial_draft_graphics_2.pdf | ||
| Invitation_Letter_to_Partners.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work this opportunity on GovTribe
- Track it in your pipeline
- Find teaming partners
- Similar opportunities
- Ask GovTribe AI about this opportunity