Engine Test Cell Upgrade & Sustainment, Building 100, USCG Aviation Logistics Center, Elizabeth City, NC

PLEASE NOTE: THE DUE DATE/TIME FOR RECEIPT OF PROPOSALS HAS BEEN CHANGED TO DECEMBER 4, 2009 AT 3:00 PM EST.

Q107: Please identify any government requirements or limitations regarding sub-contractor teammates located outside the continental United States?
A107: FAR 52.225-1 applies.

Q108: There seems to be some confusion as to the required capability of the test cell to be proposed. Do you know if the CG is planning a test cell with full "depot level" test capability, i.e. Inlet and venturi air flow measurement, data reduction calculations, etc. Is it a T700-TS or CT7-TP test cell?
A108: Full depot level testing. TS or turboshaft cell.

PLEASE NOTE: BASED ON THE DECISION OF THE SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS & APPEALS, NAICS 488190 IS APPROPRIATE FOR THIS PROCUREMENT. THERE WILL BE NO CHANGE IN THE NAICS.

Q103: Please detail the exhaust configuration of the T700 cell.
A103: The current T700 Exhaust Configuration is square tube that is approximately three feet by three feet and extends 80 inches into the exhaust stack before to bends 90 degrees up and goes up for about six feet. The Augmenter tube is approximately 35 3/4 inches by 35 3/4 inches and is 3 1/2 feet deep. It is inserted in the exhaust tube and is adjustable to fit the placement of the engine.

Q104: Please provide details in how the T700 augmenter tube discharges into the exhaust stack.
A104: The Augmenter tube is approximately 35 3/4 inches by 35 3/4 inches and is 3 1/2 feet deep. It is inserted in the exhaust tube and is adjustable to fit the placement of the engine.

Q105: What is the current operating condition of the existing ATF3-6 test cell hoists? The SOO states a requirement to have these components replaced. Is the requirement to replace both hoists trolley units or is the scope limited to only the hoist interface and controls?
A105: The current operating condition of the existing ATF3-6 test cell hoists is minimally acceptable. In accordance with the SOO section 5.0 REQUIREMENTS, This upgrade should include, but is not limited to, the following systems: 24. Hoist System and Controls. Both of the hoist and the control interfaces were original installed in 1986. As such both are obsolete and the models are no longer manufactured. Spare parts are rare and hard to find, therefore both the hoists and the control interface will need to be replaced. The replacement hoists could reuse the current rail system or may require replacement/modification of the rail system, depending on the model suggested in the contactors proposal.

Q106: Is it permitted to install underground sump tanks in the area behind the T700 cell?
A106: No, new sump tanks cannot be installed.

Q100: Do you have technical descriptions and/or Model/Mfg of the transducers that are being utilized and is this information available?
A100: ATF3: Bearing #6 accelerometer: Endevco Model 6222M46Front Frame Radial accelerometer: Helitune Model H306HTB Front Frame Tangential accelerometer: Wilcoxon Research Model 991D; T700: Gearbox accelerometer: Endevco Model 6222S-50A Vertical Exhaust Frame accelerometer: Endevco Model 6222S-50A Horizontal Exhaust Frame accelerometer: Endevco Model 6222S-50A

Q101: A reading of the solicitation Terms and Conditions, specifically FAR clause 52.219-6 - Notice of Total Small Business Set-Aside, states in part that: "A small business concern submitting an offer in its own name shall furnish, in performing the contract, only end items manufactured or produced by small business concerns in the United States or its outlying areas." Our question is: Can a large business be a subcontractor to a small business bidder on this total small business set aside solicitation?
A101: FAR 52.219-6(c) goes further to state "This paragraph does not apply to construction or service contracts." This solicitation will result in a service contract.

Q102: What is the exact small business criteria that is being applied to any prime contractor for the work specified?
A102: Small business criteria is identified in clauses identified in the synopsis/solicitation, specifically FAR 52.219.

Q88: What are the payment terms and project milestones for payment?
A88: To be proposed by offerors. See applicable clauses cited.

Q89: What was the original project contracted for, to whom, and what was the reason for the project cancellation/delay?
A89: Requirement is primarily the same.

Q90: Who is responsible for disposing any equipment or parts that might be removed, such as the air dyno, air dyno ducting, obsolete DACS instrumentation, etc? Does the Coast Guard wish to retain this material?
A90: The successful offeror. The Coast Guard does not intend to retain any material.

Q91: A Cage Code 1EE69 is listed in Section 17a of from SF 1449 which corresponds to one of the vendors who attended the industry Day on November 10. Please clarify why this code is specified?
A91: It is not specified; it is an oversight and does not apply.

Q92: Is all of the proposed work to be covered under NAICS Code 488190? This NAICS code seems to apply more to providing "testing services" rather than providing "test equipment and instrumentation."
A92: Yes, unless otherwise directed by the SBA OHA. The CG expects to receive OHA findings by close of business November 20, 2009.

Q93: What was the final outcome of the Honeywell data package in support of the ATF3-6 engine that was being prepared during the 15 May solicitation. What is the Honeywell contact information to obtain this information?
A93: The POC for Honeywell is David Shilliday, (480)592-2422.

Q94: The due date of the 30th is aggressive without the above information, nor the OEM specs that we have to obtain ourselves. Can it be extended?
A94: No.

Q95: Do you have drawings, technical descriptions, and/or channel lists for the NEFF system as it is currently be used. Is any of this information available?
A95: The Coast Guard does have drawings, technical descriptions and channel list for the NEFF system. However, this information is the property of Aero Systems Engineering Inc. and cannot be copied or released without their authorization.

Q96: What is the POC for the OEM to obtain the Manuals and Specifications?
A96: The GE and Honeywell technical manuals are proprietary to the OEM. Contractor must be able to obtain independently. See SOO page 5 of 13.

Q97: Are the transducers to be replaced in the station upgrade? If so, please identify.
A97: The minimum requirements for the upgrade shall consist of replacement of the pressure subsystem including both the hydraulic and the pneumatic systems. See SOO page 2 of 13.

Q98: Please provide user/operator manuals for the current test station if available.
A98: The user manual for the ATF3 is the proprietary information of Honeywell, Inc. and the user manual for the T700 is the proprietary information of CMR Technologies, Inc.

Q99: Please provide copies / examples of the test reports for each of the types of engines that are to be tested.
A99: The ATF3 test reports are the proprietary information of Honeywell, Inc. and the T700 test reports are proprietary information of CMR Technologies, Inc.

PLEASE NOTE: PLEASE READ THE SYNOPSIS/SOLICITATION, STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES (SOO), AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS - MANY OF THE QUESTIONS BEING ASKED ARE ALREADY COVERED IN THESE DOCUMENTS. THE SOO APPROACH HAS BEEN USED TO ALLOW MAXIMUM FLEXIBILITY FOR EACH OFFEROR TO PROVIDE ITS OWN INNOVATIVE APPROACH/SOLUTION IN RESOLVING THE GOVERNMENT'S OBJECTIVES.

Q80: Can you please post pictures of the T700 coupling shaft.
A80: Yes. Four photos have been attached for review.

Q81: What are the current maintenance schedules?
A81: Weekly, monthly, semiannual and annual preventive maintenance schedules, and calibration every 6 months.

Q82: The ATF3 test cell supports the HU-25 Falcon Jet which is currently being phased out with a twilight date of 2014. The SOO states that "all software must have the ability to be reprogrammed to accommodate a new engine type in the event the USCG re-engines the HU-25 Falcon." Which future engine is under consideration?
A82: The future engine selection has not been determined.

Q83: What is the capacity of the water reservoir?
A83: The current water reservoirs for the cooling tower and pump house are a 2000 gallon hot water reservoir and a 4000 gallon cold water reservoir. See facilities drawing number 400185; C4, T18, and T24.

Q84: Because of the volume of questions and that many have not yet been answered following the industry day event and because of the close time period between the Thanksgiving holiday and the proposal due date; we would like to respectfully request a two week extension on the proposal due date.
A84: A two-week extension is not possible. As explained at the Industry Day, the Coast Guard has a very limited time frame in which to obligate the funds for this project. Questions were due by close of business on November 16, 2009, and are being responded to in a timely manner. All questions received by the due date will be answered by close of business on November 20, 2009.

Q85: The FBO notice issued on 6 November indicates Sytronics has issued an appeal to the Office of Hearing and Appeals concerning the NAICS code assigned to the solicitation. Does this mean the Government is considering changing the NAICS Code? If so what is the alternative NAICS code the Government and/or Sytronics is requesting to be used?
A85: The Coast Guard does not intend to change the NAICS Code. However, the Coast Guard stands ready to fully comply with the findings of the SBA OHA. A response is expected from the OHA by close of business on November 20, 2009.

Q86: Since Sytronics has requested the Office of Hearing and Appeals to make a ruling on a new NAICS code for this solicitation, do potential offerors have a chance to provide comments to the OHA on the potential NAICS code change?
A86: SBA OHA rules of practice and other information can be found at www.sba.gov/oha.

Q87: Does the proposal Technical Volume 100 page limit include Factors II, III, and IV?
A87: As per Para 6 of the Proposal Submittal Instructions, "proposals, excluding pricing and manufacturer data sheets, shall not exceed 100 pages."

Q38: Is there an existing transducer enclosure for pressure transducers? Will it or the transducers be re-used?
A38: There is currently an enclosure for the pressure transducers in both test cells. The minimum requirements for the upgrade shall consist of replacement of the pressure subsystem including both the hydraulic and the pneumatic systems. The enclosure is not addressed in the SOO. See SOO Section 2.0.

Q39: Are there any connection boxes for sensors or power to the engine?
A39: There are currently enclosures for the pressure transducers in both test cells as well as raceways for electrical, temperature, and pressure lines. In the ATF3 test cell there are also a Hoffman type 12 electrical junction box, a hoist controls box, and an adapter controls box. The T700 also has connection boxes for the vibration system, and the camera controls.

Q40: Will the contractor provide all new sensors or re-use existing? Pressure Transducers; Thermocouples; RTD's; Load Cells; Frequency pickups
A40: The minimum requirements for the upgrade shall consist of replacement of the Engine Monitoring Sensor System to include temperature, pressure (hydraulic and pneumatic), and vibration systems. See SOO Section 2.0. The upgrade should also include the Load Cell system. See SOO Section 5.0.

Q41: What kind of power is available within the facility? Voltage? Current? DC/AC?
A41: The main power is supplied to the test cells through a 250 amp 480/277 Volt 3 PH. 4W. main breaker in the Motor Control Center, drawing T22 of Engine Test & Repair Facility plans. This supplies power to the motors, pumps, Toshiba 4200 FA 3 phase 30 kVA uninterruptable power system, which provides power to both test cell consoles, and a 28.5 Vdc 400 amp DC rectifier that provides power to the starters of the ATF3 and LTS-101 test cells.

Q42: Is it programmable/selectable?
A42: No.

Q43: What is the condition of the current hardware?
A43: The current hardware is in minimally acceptable condition.

Q44: Will clean 120VAC be provided for the control console?
A44: There is currently a 3 phase 30 kVA Toshiba 4200 FA uninterruptable power system providing power to both test cells.

Q45: Is external Ethernet access desired? Does the contractor provide LAN drops for the Ethernet connection?
A45: The minimum requirements for the upgrade do not address external Ethernet connections.

Q46: What is the current model and manufacturer of the current vibration system?
A46: The ATF3's current vibration system is manufactured by Vibro-Meter. There is also a Helitune RT5 JS+ which is used to balance the fan. The T700 vibration system uses an Endevco charge converter, P/N 2777A-2-10, to provide an input to a CMCP530A-100V-10R-H2500-L10 vibration velocity monitor that provides an input to the ADAS system.

Q47: Do instrumentation cabinets need to be NEMA12 (plant floor) or laboratory grade?
A47: The minimum requirements for the upgrade require the cabinets meet NEC and federal regulations. Current instrumentation in the control room is housed in Optima R series cabinets. Electronics used inside the test cell is housed in NEMA 12 enclosures.

Q48: How much existing test cell wiring can be re-used?
A48: None.

Q49: Does the USCG test T700 Series engines using calculated air flow?
A49: The USCG does not use calculated air flow to test T700engines.

Q50: Can the existing test cell fuel conditioning and delivery units be reused? (flow meters, connectors, hoses, etc.)
A50: Possibly if they are sustainable and meet the requirements as stated in the SOO. In accordance with the SOO section 2, Scope, paragraph 2. The objective is to enable ALC to have a modernized test cell facility to meet OEM Standards and support the United States Coast Guard engines for the next decade. Our goal is to utilize the latest versions of sustainable "Commercial-off-the-shelf" (COTS) technology. Award recipient should project sustainability of selected equipment, hardware, software, and spare parts for a term of at least 5 years from Test Cell Upgrade Acceptance.

Q51: Are the fuel system safeties reusable?
A51: Maybe if they are sustainable and meet the requirements as stated in the SOO. In accordance with the SOO section 2, Scope, paragraph 2. The objective is to enable ALC to have a modernized test cell facility to meet OEM Standards and support the United States Coast Guard engines for the next decade. Our goal is to utilize the latest versions of sustainable "Commercial-off-the-shelf" (COTS) technology. Award recipient should project sustainability of selected equipment, hardware, software, and spare parts for a term of at least 5 years from Test Cell Upgrade Acceptance.

Q52: To what degree are the electronic fuel system controls required to be separated and made independent?
A52: Ideally the system should be modified to single power control point for activation of the one shared fuel pump and supply system. Each test cell should maintain control of its own flow control valves, monitoring system, and meters.

Q53: Is there a specification for the fuel system controls change?
A53: No, ideally the system should be modified to single power control point for activation of the one shared fuel pump and supply system. Each test cell should maintain control of its own flow control valves, monitoring system, and meters. In accordance with the SOO section 2, Scope, paragraph 2. The objective is to enable ALC to have a modernized test cell facility to meet OEM Standards and support the United States Coast Guard engines for the next decade. Our goal is to utilize the latest versions of sustainable "Commercial-off-the-shelf" (COTS) technology. Award recipient should project sustainability of selected equipment, hardware, software, and spare parts for a term of at least 5 years from Test Cell Upgrade Acceptance.

Q54: Please provide electrical drawings available for existing system?
A54: In accordance with the SOO section 3, Government Documents, paragraph 3. All GE and Honeywell technical manuals are proprietary to the OEM. The Contractor must be able to obtain independently. In addition to the above mentioned manuals the ASE, CMR, Vibro-meter, and Helitune manuals are also proprietary.

Q55: Are the drawings up to date or do they need to be recreated electronically?
A55: Most of the drawings have not been updated and are not in electronic format. On page 6 of the SOO under DRAWINGS, it states that copies of the Facility Drawings will be provided to the contractor through the Contracting Officer. These drawings were uploaded to the FBO site.

Q56: Are fuel delivery drawings available for existing system?
A56: Most of the original building drawings have not been updated and are not currently available in an electronic format. On page 6 of the SOO under DRAWINGS, it states that copies of the Facility Drawings will be provided to the contractor through the Contracting Officer. These drawings were uploaded to the FBO site.

Q57: Are existing mechanical drawings available?
A57: Most of the original building drawings have not been updated and are not currently available in an electronic format. On page 6 of the SOO under DRAWINGS, it states that copies of the Facility Drawings will be provided to the contractor through the Contracting Officer. These drawings were uploaded to the FBO site.

Q58: Are existing facilities drawings available?
A58: Most of the original building drawings have not been updated and are not currently available in an electronic format. On page 6 of the SOO under DRAWINGS, it states that copies of the Facility Drawings will be provided to the contractor through the Contracting Officer. These drawings were uploaded to the FBO site.

Q59: Are existing water/air/fire systems drawings available?
A59: Most of the original building drawings have not been updated and are not currently available in an electronic format. On page 6 of the SOO under DRAWINGS, it states that copies of the Facility Drawings will be provided to the contractor through the Contracting Officer. These drawings were uploaded to the FBO site.

Q60: How much field wiring will be re-used vs. new?
A60: None of the existing test cell wiring maybe reused.

Q61: Can we re-use air inlets and outlets without modification?
A61: Reuse of the air inlets and outlets would be dependent upon the contractors proposed solution to testing the engines.

Q62: Can we-use test fixturing, hoist systems?
A62: Please define use and the word fixturing.

Q63: To what degree is "Test Cell component Inter-Changeability between the two Test Cells is required." (Reference Section 2) applied? Does this just refer to componentry as in the water cooling system or to actual product test interchangeability?
A63: In accordance with the SOO section 5.5 DESIGN, both Test cells are required to have interchangeable current versions of operating systems, hardware, software, peripherals and electronic devices. Interchangeable parts and components should be used wherever possible between the two test cells. They are also required to provide identical user interface and console set-up.

Q64: What are the data reporting requirements? If this is not listed in the test specification can you document these separately?
A64: Please see the SOO sections 5.1 DATA COLLECTION and 5.3 DATA RECORDING.

Q65: What is the current operating condition of the existing ATF3-6 test cell hoists? The SOO states a requirement to have these components replaced. Is the requirement to replace both hoists trolley units or is the scope limited to only the hoist interface and controls?
A65: The current operating condition of the existing ATF3-6 test cell hoists is minimally acceptable. In accordance with the SOO section 5.0 REQUIREMENTS, This upgrade should include, but is not limited to, the following systems: 24. Hoist System and Controls.

Q66: What is the load rating for each hoist?
A66: The load rating for each hoist is 3000lbs.

Q67: What is the Coast Guards preferred method of T700/ CT7 engine handling and transport within the test cell?
A67: The USCG seeks innovative solutions to handling and transporting engines within the test cell.

Q68: Section 5 of the SOO mentions "refurbishment" for the ATF3 adapters and inlet bell. Please clarify what you mean by "refurbishment." This is very open ended and could result in a wide range of scope and price.
A68: In accordance with the SOO section 5.0 REQUIREMENTS, This upgrade should include, but is not limited to, the following systems: 3. Electrical: (Test Cell and Adapters), 5. Pneumatic: (Test Cell and Adapters), 6. Hydraulic: (Test Cell and Adapters), 7. Sensor: (RTD's, Pressure, and Temperature), and 26. Test Cell Adapter Refurbishment (ATF3 Only). The USCG seeks innovative solutions to refurbishing the Adapters.

Q69: Does the Coast Guard have drawings of your existing FOD screen? If so, will these be made available to contractors?
A69: The USCG does not have any current drawings for the FOD screen.

Q70: Does the coast Guard have a T700 bellmouth suitable for use with a water break dynamometer? If so, please send pictures of the bellmouth.
A70: The bellmouth that the USCG currently uses is currently used with the T24 test stand, which has an air dynamometer. The inner nozzle P/N is 21C7726P12 and the outer nozzle P/N is 21C7726P17.

Q71: What type of coupling shaft does the Coast Guard have for connecting the T700 to the dynamometer?
A71: The torque shaft is P/N 21C7363P02.

Q72 : Is it correct to assume that the required software changes and all other modifications to the ATF3 test cell and any additional equipment and fixtures necessary to support the testing of another engine using the ATF3 test cell are not within the current scope of work?
A72: Yes.

Q73: The SOO requires that the Inlet Bell for the ATF3-6-4 engine be refurbished. Has the existing Inlet Bell been evaluated by the OEM or other qualified source to assess the present metallurgical condition and define the exact nature of required repairs?
A73: No.

Q74: Is there a preference for the type of dynamometer loading system for the T-700 test cell: Air, Water or Electrical?
A74: No. The USCG is looking for innovative solutions to testing jet engines. Solutions will be evaluated on their technical merit. The current air dynamometer is expensive to maintain, overhaul, or replace.

Q75: Does your team have drawings for the hot duct and bypass duct on the ATF3?
A75: Yes, but they contain proprietary information belonging to Garrett Airesearch Manufacturing Company and they are marked "FOR REFERENCE ONLY".

Q76: Can you please provide the model number for your test cell cameras?
A76: The ATF3 test cell has a COHU model 1620B-Z06N and the T700 uses a Pelco model EH5520-1 with a Toshiba camera and a Computar TV zoom lens.

Q77: Is the Toshiba backup power supply available for reuse?
A77: Yes.

Q78: Are the acoustic baffles still in place in the T700 cell as shown in the 400185 drawing, Sheet 53?
A78: Yes.

Q79: Is the diffuser/blast basket in the T700 cell shown in drawing 400185, Sheet 53 still in place?
A79: The diffuser/blast basket was removed when the system was upgraded to the T700.

Q23: Is the engine test specification (or Test Order) available?
A23: In accordance with the SOO section 3, Government Documents, paragraph 3, all GE and Honeywell technical manuals are proprietary to the OEM. The Contractor must be able to obtain independently.

Q24: Is the calibration procedure available?
A24: The current calibration procedures for the ATF3 and T700 test cells are a combination of Coast Guard generated documents and OEM proprietary documentation that reflects the calibration and operation of existing antiquated OEM systems; USCG documents may be made available to award recipient.

Q25: Can the engine control module be reused or does it need to be replaced? A25: In accordance with the SOO section 2, Scope, paragraph 2, the objective is to enable ALC to have a modernized test cell facility to meet OEM Standards and support the United States Coast Guard engines for the next decade. Our goal is to utilize the latest versions of sustainable "Commercial-off-the-shelf" (COTS) technology. Award recipient should project sustainability of selected equipment, hardware, software, and spare parts for a term of at least 5 years from Test Cell Upgrade Acceptance.

Q26: If the engine control module needs to be replaced, is it a government furnished item?
A26: No.

Q27: What are the specifications for the engine control module? (Drawings, schematics, communications protocols, analog signal list, digital signal list, etc)
A27: In accordance with the SOO section 3, Government Documents, paragraph 3, Honeywell technical manuals are proprietary to the OEM. The Contractor must be able to obtain independently. In addition to the above mentioned manuals the ASE manuals are also proprietary. In accordance with the SOO section 2, Scope, paragraph 2, the objective is to enable ALC to have a modernized test cell facility to meet OEM Standards and support the United States Coast Guard engines for the next decade. Our goal is to utilize the latest versions of sustainable "Commercial-off-the-shelf" (COTS) technology. Award recipient should project sustainability of selected equipment, hardware, software, and spare parts for a term of at least 5 years from Test Cell Upgrade Acceptance.

Q28: What are the dynamometer performance specifications/ratings (speeds, horsepower, response curves, etc.)?
A28: In accordance with the SOO section 3, Government Documents, paragraph 3, all GE technical manuals are proprietary to the OEM. The Contractor must be able to obtain independently. In addition to the above mentioned manuals the CMR manuals are also proprietary. Technical and Maintenance specifications for the Dynamometer system are contained in the following manuals: AG-240AC-OMP-000 TURBOSHAFT ENGINE TEST SYS - ORGAN & INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE MANUAL w/IPB; AG-240AC-OMP-100 TURBOSHAFT ENGINE TEST SYS - ORGAN & INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE MANUAL w/IPB; AG-502BA-MDB-000 AIR DYNAMOMETER T58/T700 - INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE & DEPOT INSTRUCTIONS w/IPB; 03-1-641 TURBOSHAFT ENGINE TEST SYS, A/F3- ORGAN & INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE MANUAL w/IPB; 03-01-642 T700 ENGINE TEST SYS, A/F37T-16(V)3 - ORGAN & INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE MANUAL w/IPB. These manuals are controlled and distributed by Commanding Officer, Naval Air Systems Command.

Q29: Can the engine throttle controls be reused?
A29: In accordance with the SOO section 2, Scope, paragraph 2, the objective is to enable ALC to have a modernized test cell facility to meet OEM Standards and support the United States Coast Guard engines for the next decade. Our goal is to utilize the latest versions of sustainable "Commercial-off-the-shelf" (COTS) technology. Award recipient should project sustainability of selected equipment, hardware, software, and spare parts for a term of at least 5 years from Test Cell Upgrade Acceptance.

Q30: If the engine throttle control needs to be replaced, is it a government furnished item?
A30: No. In accordance with the SOO section 10, the only government furnished equipment will be jet engines used to correlate the test cells.

Q31: What are the throttle control specifications?
A31: In accordance with the SOO section 3, Government Documents, paragraph 3. All GE and Honeywell technical manuals are proprietary to the OEM. The Contractor must be able to obtain independently. In addition to the above mentioned manuals the ASE and CMR manuals are also proprietary.

Q32: Are controllers (throttle, engine, etc.) available for development at the supplier site?
A32: In accordance with the SOO section 10, the only government furnished equipment will be jet engines used to correlate the test cells.

Q33: Can the low speed compressor trim balance analyzer be reused or does it need to be replaced?
A33: No the Trim Balance Analyzer may not be reused. In accordance with the SOO section 2, Scope, paragraph 2. The objective is to enable ALC to have a modernized test cell facility to meet OEM Standards and support the United States Coast Guard engines for the next decade. Our goal is to utilize the latest versions of sustainable "Commercial-off-the-shelf" (COTS) technology. Award recipient should project sustainability of selected equipment, hardware, software, and spare parts for a term of at least 5 years from Test Cell Upgrade Acceptance.

Q34: If low speed compressor trim balance analyzer needs to be replaced, is it a government furnished item?
A34: No, the replacement will not be government furnished item. In accordance with the SOO section 2, Scope, paragraph 2. The objective is to enable ALC to have a modernized test cell facility to meet OEM Standards and support the United States Coast Guard engines for the next decade. Our goal is to utilize the latest versions of sustainable "Commercial-off-the-shelf" (COTS) technology. Award recipient should project sustainability of selected equipment, hardware, software, and spare parts for a term of at least 5 years from Test Cell Upgrade Acceptance.

Q35: What are the low speed trim balancer analyzer specifications?
A35: In accordance with the SOO section 3, Government Documents, paragraph 3. All GE and Honeywell technical manuals are proprietary to the OEM. The Contractor must be able to obtain independently. In addition to the above mentioned manuals the ASE, CMR, Vibro-meter, and Helitune manuals are also proprietary.

Q36: Should the contractor provide the engine dress kit items such as the inlet bellmouth, tail pipe, starter, and output shaft?
A36: The minimum requirements for the upgrade should include the ATF3 Bypass Ducting, ATF3 Hot Shrouds, ATF3 Inlet Bellmouth, FOD Screens and dress kit items required to meet OEM test specifications. See SOO section 5.0.

Q37: Should the contractor provide instrument calibration standards?
A37: The contractor will provide manuals on electronic media and hard copy that cover calibration. See SOO Section 7.0.

Q4: Because of the open ended nature of the existing test cell mechanical systems and their associated hardware requirements, condition, and durability; there is inherent cost risk within this Statement of Objective, particularly for a small business. Would the government be open to a Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract structure in order to provide best value pricing?
A4: No. The Coast Guard intends to issue a firm fixed price contract. The Statement of Objectives (SOO) format is intended to allow offerors maximum flexibility in proposing a solution to the Coast Guard's objectives.

Q5: ATF3: Does the reference to the "Upgrade System Power" that is cited upon page 2 of the SOO apply only to the Control and Data Acquisition System or are updates to the test cell power distribution system also required?
A5: Minimum requirement is to upgrade system power for the following: ADAS , Data reduction system, display and control system as per page 2 of the SOO.

Q6: ATF3: Will the government make available to the contractor baseline correlation data from Honeywell performance run for the ATF3-6-4C engine for the purpose of final correlation of this test cell? Which Honeywell facility baseline tested this engine?
A6: Yes, base line data will be provided and the engine will be tested at Honeywell's facility in Phoenix, AZ.

Q7: ATF3: What type of engine start system is used and what is its condition?
A7: Hobart GPU-400 28.5volt, DC, 400amp, power supply. Condition is marginal to fair.

Q8: ATF3: What is the condition of the current load cell?
A8: Load Cells are 20 plus years old and need to be replaced.

Q9: ATF3: Should modifications or improvements be made to the fuel delivery system?
A9: Yes, from Main fuel pump to Test Cell system to include alarm circuits and Fuel metering and control systems. See pg 17 of SOO.

Q10: ATF3: Are the technical publications that are referenced within the SOO available for review during the Industry Day?
A10: Because of proprietary restrictions, all publications need to be obtained independently or USCG can provide after award of contract. See pg 4 and 5 of SOO.

Q11: T700: Based on drawing 400185, Mechanical Plan: Is the test cell that is labeled as the T-58 Test Cell within the drawing actually used for T700 series engine testing?
A11: Yes, cell was converted to T700 use after the T58 was taken out of service.

Q12: T700: Will the air dynamometer hardware be replaced or will only the control and instrumentation interfaces be replaced?
Q12: Yes, the entire load system requires replacing to include Air Dynamometer and all controls. See pg 3 of SOO.
Q13: T700: What method of torque measurement is currently used and should it be updated?
A13: Currently using an Air Dynamometer System P/N1314AS100-1 and requires upgrade.

Q14: T700: Should the engine portable trailer (P/N 128AS101-1) be updated or replaced?
A: Yes.

Q15: T700: Does the reference to the "Upgrade System Power" that is cited upon page 3 of the SOO apply only to the Control and Data Acquisition System or are updates to the test cell power distribution system also required.
A15: Minimum requirement is to upgrade system power for the following: ADAS , Data reduction system, display and control system as per page 2 of the SOO.

Q16: T700: Proposed use of the Cell #2 water tower suggests that the USCG is willing to consider conversion from an air dynamometer to a waterbrake or eddy current dynamometer system. If so, is there a reason to convert to a dynamometer system other than air?
A16: Operational reliability and cost.

Q17: T700: Will the government make available to the contractor baseline correlation data from the GE performance run for the T700 engine for the purpose of final correlation of this test cell? What T700 engine model is the "Gold" correlation engine? May the contractor discuss the status of this "Gold" engine with the GE performance department?
A17: Baseline data will be provided. Currently using new T700-401C engine as gold engine.

Q18: T700: What type of engine start system is currently used? What is its condition?
A18: Currently uses facility air; condition is poor.

Q19: T700: Should modifications or improvements be made to the test cell fuel delivery system?
A19: Yes, from Main fuel pump to Test Cell system to include alarm circuits and Fuel metering and control systems. See pg 17 of SOO.

Q20: T700: What is the condition of the air dynamometer? Who is the air dynamometer vendor?
A20: Dyno condition is poor and requires replacement. Manufactured by Northern Research Corp.

Q21: T700: Are the technical publications that are referenced within the SOO available for review during the Industry Day?
A21: Because of proprietary restrictions, all publications need to be obtained independently or USCG can provide after award of contract. See pg 4 and 5 of SOO.

Q22: Item 5.0 of the Proposal Submittal Instructions section, within the
Instructions-Evaluation Criteria document references a Section C. However, Section C is not defined or specified anywhere else within the solicitation documents. Please clarify the purpose and requirement for Section C.
A22: Section C refers to the Uniform Contract Format (UCF), where Section C is Description/Specifications/Statement of Work. UCF is not required for this procurement; however, Description/Specifications/Statement of Work does.

NAICS Appeal Pending. See attached OHA Notice and Order.

Q3: Thank you so much for providing the answer for our question #2. The answer pertaining to (b) (1) was provided. However, could you please clarify (b) (2)? Does (b) (2) apply to this solicitation since it is considered a "service contract"?
A3: Reference A2 above. No, para (b)(2) does not apply since this solicitation will result in a service contract.

This is a combined synopsis/solicitation for commercial item design, upgrade, modification and sustainment of the ATF3 Jet Engine Test Cell and the T-700-GE-401 Engine Turboshaft Test Cell located in Building 100 at the USCG Aviation Logistics Center in Elizabeth City, NC, prepared in accordance with the procedures in FAR 12, 13.5 and 15, as supplemented with additional information included in this notice.

Solicitation number HSCG38-10-R-410009 has been assigned to this procurement for tracking purposes only. The incorporated clauses and provisions are those in effect through Federal Acquisition Circular 2005-37. The procurement is being competed on a total small business set-aside basis. Selection will be made based on best value procedures. North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Code 488190, which has a size standard of $7M total annual revenue, applies.

A firm fixed price contract with a base period for the upgrades and warranty, and potential four one-year prepriced option periods for subsequent sustainment of equipment, hardware, software, and spare parts, renewable annually at the Government's discretion, is intended to result from this solicitation. A written Statement of Objectives (SOO) is attached. Additional attachments include a SF1449, sample schedule of firm fixed prices, sample vendor response matrix, instructions, conditions and notices, source selection procedures and criteria, additional clauses and paragraphs, and facility drawings.

All interested parties should contact Mrs. Ginger Woodington, Contract Specialist, at Ginger.G.Woodington@uscg.mil NLT 7 calendar days from the date of this posting to obtain information regarding the Industry Day, which is scheduled for November 10, 2009 from 0900-1200 est. A request for base access on company letterhead identifying attendees by name, date of visit, building number, and purpose of visit must be submitted at least 2 days prior to the date of the Industry Day. Attendees may take photographs of the site. Existing photographs are available by electronic mail upon request. All questions must be received within 5 calendar days of the Industry Day.

The Government will not reimburse offerors for costs incurred in attending the Industry Day or in providing proposals/solutions. Technical proposals, at a minimum, must include the statement of work, performance metrics and measurement plan, and quality assurance plan. Manufacturers' data sheets for all proposed equipment, hardware, and software is required. The Contractor is encouraged to provide an innovative approach/solution on its best terms, making certain to address all elements and requirements of the Statement of Objectives (SOO) and attachments.

The successful offeror's statement of work, performance metrics and measurement plan, quality assurance plan, and manufacturers' data sheets will become the property of the Government and may be issued with the contract award. A separate pricing proposal is required. Department of Labor (DOL) wage determinations, if applicable, must be clearly identified. Any proposed construction work must be clearly identified as such and must be minimal in terms of labor and cost. Only minor construction integral to the work may be permitted. Wage-related clauses will be added to the successful offeror's statement of work and resulting contract based on the work proposed.

The closing date for receipt of proposals is November 30, 2009, 3:00 pm EST. Proposals may be sent to USCG Aviation Logistics Center, Attn: Receiving Section, Bldg. 63, Elizabeth City, NC 27909-5001, ATTN: Ginger Woodington, Contract Specialist. Facsimile and/or electronic offers are not acceptable. Point of contact is Mrs. Ginger Woodington at ginger.g.woodington@uscg.mil.

FAR 52.212-2, Evaluation - Commercial Items (Jan 1999) Evaluation factors for award are listed in descending order of importance and together are more important than offered price: technical capability/best solution for meeting the Government's objectives, past performance, experience, quality indicators, and SDB participation program.

FAR 52.212-3, Offeror Representations and Certifications-Commercial Items (Aug 2009) --Offerors shall include a completed copy of this provision with their offer or complete only paragraph (b) of the provision if the offeror has completed the annual representations and certifications electronically at http://orca.bpn.gov . If an offeror has not completed the annual representations and certifications electronically at the ORCA website, the offeror shall complete only paragraphs (c) through (m) of this provision.

The following FAR provisions and clauses apply to this solicitation and are incorporated by reference. The full text of a clause may be accessed electronically at this/these address(es):
FAR: http://www.arnet.gov/far/
HSAR: http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/opnbiz/DHS_HSAR_With_Notice_05-01.pdf

FAR 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors - Commercial Items (Jun 2008); FAR 52.212-4, Contract Terms and Conditions-Commercial Items (Mar 2009); FAR 52.211-15, Defense Priority and Allocation Requirement (Apr 2008); FAR 52.252-2, Clauses Incorporated by Reference (Feb 1998); FAR 52.212-5, Contract Terms and Conditions Required to Implement Statutes or Executive Orders-Commercial Items (Sep 2009); FAR 52.203-6, Restrictions on Subcontractors Sales to the Government (Sep 2006), Alternate I (Oct 1995); FAR 52.219-6 Notice of Total Small Business Set-Aside (Jun 2003); FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns (May 2004); FAR 52.219-9, Small Business Subcontracting Plan (Apr 2008); FAR 52.219-14 Limitations on Subcontracting (Dec 1996); FAR 52.219-16, Liquidated Damages-Subcontracting Plans (Jan 1999); FAR 52.219-25, Small Disadvantaged Business Participation Program-Disadvantaged Status and Reporting (Apr 2008); FAR 52.219-28, Post Award Small Business Program Representation (Apr 2009); FAR 52.222-3, Convict Labor (Jun 2003); FAR 52.222-19 , Child-Labor-Cooperation with Authorities and Remedies (Aug 2009); FAR 52.222-21, Prohibition of Segregated Facilities (Feb 1999); FAR 52.222-26, Equal Opportunity (Mar 2007); FAR 52.222-35, Equal Opportunity for Special Disabled Veterans, Veterans of the Vietnam Era, and Other Eligible Veterans (Sep 2006); FAR 52.222-36, Affirmative Action for Workers with Disabilities (June 1998); FAR 52.222-37, Employment Reports on Disabled Veterans and Veterans of the Vietnam Era (Sep 2006); FAR 52.222-41 Service Contract Act of 1965 (Nov 2007); FAR 52.222-50 Combating Trafficking in Persons (Feb 2009); FAR 52.225-1, Buy American Act-Supplies (Feb 2009); FAR 52.225-13, Restriction on Certain Foreign Purchases (Jun 2008); FAR 52.228-5, Insurance - Work on a Government Installation (Jan 1997) with limits as identified in FAR 28.307-2 Liability; FAR 52.232-1 Payments (Apr 1984); FAR 52.232-18 Availability of Funds (Apr 1984); FAR 52.232-28 Invitation to Propose Financing Terms (Oct 1995); FAR 52.232-33, Payment by Electronic Funds Transfer-Central Contractor Registration (Oct 2003); FAR 52.233-3, Protest After Award (Aug 1996); FAR 52.233-4, Applicable Law for Breach of Contract Claim (Oct 2004); FAR 52.237-1, Site Visit (Apr 1984); FAR 52.237-2, Protection of Government Buildings, Equipment, and Vegetation (Apr 1984); FAR 52.242-13 Bankruptcy (Jul 1995); HSAR 3052.228-70 - Insurance (Dec 2003); HSAR 3052-242-72 Contracting Officer's Technical Representative (Dec 2003)

HSAR 3052.209-70 PROHIBITION ON CONTRACTS WITH CORPORATE EXPATRIATES (JUN 2006)

(a) Prohibitions.
Section 835 of the Homeland Security Act, 6 U.S.C. 395, prohibits the Department of Homeland Security from entering into any contract with a foreign incorporated entity which is treated as an inverted domestic corporation as defined in this clause, or with any subsidiary of such an entity. The Secretary shall waive the prohibition with respect to any specific contract if the Secretary determines that the waiver is required in the interest of national security.
(b) Definitions. As used in this clause:
Expanded Affiliated Group means an affiliated group as defined in section 1504(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (without regard to section 1504(b) of such Code), except that section 1504 of such Code shall be applied by substituting `more than 50 percent' for at least 80 percent each place it appears.
Foreign Incorporated Entity means any entity which is, or but for subsection (b) of section 835 of the Homeland Security Act, 6 U.S.C. 395, would be, treated as a foreign corporation for purposes of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
Inverted Domestic Corporation. A foreign incorporated entity shall be treated as an inverted domestic corporation if, pursuant to a plan (or a series of related transactions)-
(1) The entity completes the direct or indirect acquisition of substantially all of the properties held directly or indirectly by a domestic corporation or substantially all of the properties constituting a trade or business of a domestic partnership;
(2) After the acquisition at least 80 percent of the stock (by vote or value) of the entity is held-
(i) In the case of an acquisition with respect to a domestic corporation, by former shareholders of the domestic corporation by reason of holding stock in the domestic corporation; or
(ii) In the case of an acquisition with respect to a domestic partnership, by former partners of the domestic partnership by reason of holding a capital or profits interest in the domestic partnership; and
(3) The expanded affiliated group which after the acquisition includes the entity does not have substantial business activities in the foreign country in which or under the law of which the entity is created or organized when compared to the total business activities of such expanded affiliated group.
Person, domestic, and foreign have the meanings given such terms by paragraphs (1), (4), and (5) of section 7701(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, respectively. (c) Special rules. The following definitions and special rules shall apply when determining whether a foreign incorporated entity should be treated as an inverted domestic corporation.
(1) Certain Stock Disregarded. For the purpose of treating a foreign incorporated entity as an inverted domestic corporation these shall not be taken into account in determining ownership:
(i) Stock held by members of the expanded affiliated group which includes the foreign incorporated entity; or
(ii) stock of such entity which is sold in a public offering related to the acquisition described in subsection (b)(1) of Section 835 of the Homeland Security Act, 6 U.S.C. 395(b)(1).
(2) Plan Deemed In Certain Cases. If a foreign incorporated entity acquires directly or indirectly substantially all of the properties of a domestic corporation or partnership during the 4-year period beginning on the date which is 2 years before the ownership requirements of subsection (b)(2) are met, such actions shall be treated as pursuant to a plan.
(3) Certain Transfers Disregarded. The transfer of properties or liabilities (including by contribution or distribution) shall be disregarded if such transfers are part of a plan a principal purpose of which is to avoid the purposes of this section.
(d) Special Rule for Related Partnerships. For purposes of applying section 835(b) of the Homeland Security Act, 6 U.S.C. 395(b) to the acquisition of a domestic partnership, except as provided in regulations, all domestic partnerships which are under common control (within the meaning of section 482 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986) shall be treated as a partnership.
(e) Treatment of Certain Rights.
(1) Certain rights shall be treated as stocks to the extent necessary to reflect the present value of all equitable interests incident to the transaction, as follows:
(i) warrants;
(ii) options;
(iii) contracts to acquire stock;
(iv) convertible debt instruments; and
(v) others similar interests.
(2) Rights labeled as stocks shall not be treated as stocks whenever it is deemed appropriate to do so to reflect the present value of the transaction or to disregard transactions whose recognition would defeat the purpose of Section 835.
(f) Disclosure. The offeror under this solicitation represents that [Check one]: __ it is not a foreign incorporated entity that should be treated as an inverted domestic corporation pursuant to the criteria of (HSAR) 48 CFR 3009.104-70 through 3009.104-73;
__ it is a foreign incorporated entity that should be treated as an inverted domestic corporation pursuant to the criteria of (HSAR) 48 CFR 3009.104-70 through 3009.104-73, but it has submitted a request for waiver pursuant to 3009.104-74, which has not been denied; or
__ it is a foreign incorporated entity that should be treated as an inverted domestic corporation pursuant to the criteria of (HSAR) 48 CFR 3009.104-70 through 3009.104-73, but it plans to submit a request for waiver pursuant to 3009.104-74.
(g) A copy of the approved waiver, if a waiver has already been granted, or the waiver request, if a waiver has been applied for, shall be attached to the bid or proposal.
(End of provision)

NOTICE FOR FILING AGENCY PROTESTS
United States Coast Guard Ombudsman Program

It is the policy of the United States Coast Guard (USCG) to issue solicitations and make contract awards in a fair and timely manner. The Ombudsman Program for Agency Protests (OPAP) was established to investigate agency protest issues and resolve them without expensive and time-consuming litigation. OPAP is an independent reviewing authority that is empowered to grant a prevailing protester essentially the same relief as the General Accountability Office (GAO).

Interested parties are encouraged to seek resolution of their concerns within the USCG as an Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) forum, rather than filing a protest with the GAO or some external form. Interested parties may seek resolution of their concerns informally or opt to file a formal agency protest with the contracting officer or Ombudsman.

Informal forum with the Ombudsman. Interested parties who believe a specific USCG procurement is unfair or otherwise defective should first direct their concerns to the cognizant contracting officer. If the contracting officer is unable to satisfy the concerns, the interested party is encouraged to contact the USCG Ombudsman for Agency Protests. Under this informal process, the agency is not required to suspend contract award performance. Use of an informal forum does not suspend any time requirement for filing a protest with the agency or other forum. In order to ensure a timely response, interested parties should provide the following information to the Ombudsman: solicitation/contract number, contracting office, contracting officer, and solicitation closing date (if applicable).

Formal Agency Protest with the Ombudsman. Prior to submitting a formal agency protest, protesters must first use their best efforts to resolve their concerns with the contracting officer through open and frank discussions. If the protester's concerns are unresolved, an independent review is available by the Ombudsman. The protester may file a formal agency protest to either the contracting officer or as an alternative to that, the Ombudsman under the OPAP program. Contract award or performance will be suspended during the protest period unless contract award or performance is justified in writing, for urgent and compelling reasons or is determined in writing to be in the best interest of the Government. The agency's goal is to resolve protests in less than 35 calendar days from the date of filing. Protests shall include the information set forth at FAR 33.103. If the protester fails to submit the required information, resolution of the protest may be delayed or the protest may be dismissed. This will not preclude re-filing of the protest to meet the requirement. To be timely, protests must be filed within the period specified in FAR 33.103(e). Formal protests filed under the OPAP program should be submitted to:
Department of Homeland Security
United States Coast Guard (CG-9131)
Ombudsman Program for Agency Protests
1900 Half Street, SW, Room 11-0602
Washington D.C. 20593-0001
Telephone 202-372-3695
Fax: 202-475-3904

Q2: We have an additional questions referring to FAR 52.219-14 (Limitations on Subcontracting). In section (b) (2) "Supplies' - The type of equipment required by the above mentioned solicitation/contract may not be available from small business to meet the FAR requirement as stated in the section 52.219-14 (b) (2). Could you please clarify the sections of this FAR that apply to the solicitation, specifically (b) (1) "Services" and (b) (2) "Supplies"?
A2: Regarding FAR 52.219-14 Limitations on Subcontracting, this solicitation will result in a service contract; therefore, paragraph (b)(1) applies. Paragraph (b)(1) states that "at least 50 percent of the cost of contract performance incurred for personnel shall be expended for employees of the concern."

Q1: Regarding FAR 52.219-6 Notice of Total Small Business Set-Aside, does the end product have to be from a business considered small under NAICS 488190? This type of equipment may not be available from a small business.
A1: This solicitation will result in a service contract; therefore, FAR 52.219-6(c) does not apply.

This is a combined synopsis/solicitation for commercial item design, upgrade, modification and sustainment of the ATF3 Jet Engine Test Cell and the T-700-GE-401 Engine Turboshaft Test Cell located in Building 100 at the USCG Aviation Logistics Center in Elizabeth City, NC, prepared in accordance with the procedures in FAR 12, 13.5 and 15, as supplemented with additional information included in this notice.

Solicitation number HSCG38-10-R-410009 has been assigned to this procurement for tracking purposes only. The incorporated clauses and provisions are those in effect through Federal Acquisition Circular 2005-37. The procurement is being competed on a total small business set-aside basis. Selection will be made based on best value procedures. North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Code 488190, which has a size standard of $7M total annual revenue, applies.

A firm fixed price contract with a base period for the upgrades and warranty, and potential four one-year prepriced option periods for subsequent sustainment of equipment, hardware, software, and spare parts, renewable annually at the Government's discretion, is intended to result from this solicitation. A written Statement of Objectives (SOO) is attached. Additional attachments include a SF1449, sample schedule of firm fixed prices, sample vendor response matrix, instructions, conditions and notices, source selection procedures and criteria, additional clauses and paragraphs, and facility drawings.

All interested parties should contact Mrs. Ginger Woodington, Contract Specialist, at Ginger.G.Woodington@uscg.mil NLT 7 calendar days from the date of this posting to obtain information regarding the Industry Day, which is scheduled for November 10, 2009. A request for base access on company letterhead identifying attendees by name, date of visit, building number, and purpose of visit must be submitted at least 2 days prior to the date of the Industry Day. Attendees may take photographs of the site. Existing photographs are available by electronic mail upon request. All questions must be received within 5 calendar days of the Industry Day.

The Government will not reimburse offerors for costs incurred in attending the Industry Day or in providing proposals/solutions. Technical proposals, at a minimum, must include the statement of work, performance metrics and measurement plan, and quality assurance plan. Manufacturers' data sheets for all proposed equipment, hardware, and software is required. The Contractor is encouraged to provide an innovative approach/solution on its best terms, making certain to address all elements and requirements of the Statement of Objectives (SOO) and attachments.

The successful offeror's statement of work, performance metrics and measurement plan, quality assurance plan, and manufacturers' data sheets will become the property of the Government and may be issued with the contract award. A separate pricing proposal is required. Department of Labor (DOL) wage determinations, if applicable, must be clearly identified. Any proposed construction work must be clearly identified as such and must be minimal in terms of labor and cost. Only minor construction integral to the work may be permitted. Wage-related clauses will be added to the successful offeror's statement of work and resulting contract based on the work proposed.

The closing date for receipt of proposals is November 30, 2009, 3:00 pm EST. Proposals may be sent to USCG Aviation Logistics Center, Attn: Receiving Section, Bldg. 63, Elizabeth City, NC 27909-5001, ATTN: Ginger Woodington, Contract Specialist. Facsimile and/or electronic offers are not acceptable. Point of contact is Mrs. Ginger Woodington at ginger.g.woodington@uscg.mil.

FAR 52.212-2, Evaluation - Commercial Items (Jan 1999) Evaluation factors for award are listed in descending order of importance and together are more important than offered price: technical capability/best solution for meeting the Government's objectives, past performance, experience, quality indicators, and SDB participation program.

FAR 52.212-3, Offeror Representations and Certifications-Commercial Items (Aug 2009) --Offerors shall include a completed copy of this provision with their offer or complete only paragraph (b) of the provision if the offeror has completed the annual representations and certifications electronically at http://orca.bpn.gov . If an offeror has not completed the annual representations and certifications electronically at the ORCA website, the offeror shall complete only paragraphs (c) through (m) of this provision.

The following FAR provisions and clauses apply to this solicitation and are incorporated by reference. The full text of a clause may be accessed electronically at this/these address(es):
FAR: http://www.arnet.gov/far/
HSAR: http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/opnbiz/DHS_HSAR_With_Notice_05-01.pdf

FAR 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors - Commercial Items (Jun 2008); FAR 52.212-4, Contract Terms and Conditions-Commercial Items (Mar 2009); FAR 52.211-15, Defense Priority and Allocation Requirement (Apr 2008); FAR 52.252-2, Clauses Incorporated by Reference (Feb 1998); FAR 52.212-5, Contract Terms and Conditions Required to Implement Statutes or Executive Orders-Commercial Items (Sep 2009); FAR 52.203-6, Restrictions on Subcontractors Sales to the Government (Sep 2006), Alternate I (Oct 1995); FAR 219-6 Notice of Total Small Business Set-Aside (Jun 2003); FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns (May 2004); FAR 52.219-9, Small Business Subcontracting Plan (Apr 2008); FAR 52.219-14 Limitations on Subcontracting (Dec 1996); FAR 52.219-16, Liquidated Damages-Subcontracting Plans (Jan 1999); FAR 52.219-25, Small Disadvantaged Business Participation Program-Disadvantaged Status and Reporting (Apr 2008); FAR 52.219-28, Post Award Small Business Program Representation (Apr 2009); FAR 52.222-3, Convict Labor (Jun 2003); FAR 52.222-19 , Child-Labor-Cooperation with Authorities and Remedies (Aug 2009); FAR 52.222-21, Prohibition of Segregated Facilities (Feb 1999); FAR 52.222-26, Equal Opportunity (Mar 2007); FAR 52.222-35, Equal Opportunity for Special Disabled Veterans, Veterans of the Vietnam Era, and Other Eligible Veterans (Sep 2006); FAR 52.222-36, Affirmative Action for Workers with Disabilities (June 1998); FAR 52.222-37, Employment Reports on Disabled Veterans and Veterans of the Vietnam Era (Sep 2006); FAR 52.222-41 Service Contract Act of 1965 (Nov 2007); FAR 52.222-50 Combating Trafficking in Persons (Feb 2009); FAR 52.225-1, Buy American Act-Supplies (Feb 2009); FAR 52.225-13, Restriction on Certain Foreign Purchases (Jun 2008); FAR 52.228-5, Insurance - Work on a Government Installation (Jan 1997) with limits as identified in FAR 28.307-2 Liability; FAR 52.232-1 Payments (Apr 1984); FAR 52.232-18 Availability of Funds (Apr 1984); FAR 52.232-28 Invitation to Propose Financing Terms (Oct 1995); FAR 52.232-33, Payment by Electronic Funds Transfer-Central Contractor Registration (Oct 2003); FAR 52.233-3, Protest After Award (Aug 1996); FAR 52.233-4, Applicable Law for Breach of Contract Claim (Oct 2004); FAR 52.237-1, Site Visit (Apr 1984); FAR 52.237-2, Protection of Government Buildings, Equipment, and Vegetation (Apr 1984); FAR 52.242-13 Bankruptcy (Jul 1995); HSAR 3052.228-70 - Insurance (Dec 2003); HSAR 3052-242-72 Contracting Officer's Technical Representative (Dec 2003)

HSAR 3052.209-70 PROHIBITION ON CONTRACTS WITH CORPORATE EXPATRIATES (JUN 2006)

(a) Prohibitions.
Section 835 of the Homeland Security Act, 6 U.S.C. 395, prohibits the Department of Homeland Security from entering into any contract with a foreign incorporated entity which is treated as an inverted domestic corporation as defined in this clause, or with any subsidiary of such an entity. The Secretary shall waive the prohibition with respect to any specific contract if the Secretary determines that the waiver is required in the interest of national security.
(b) Definitions. As used in this clause:
Expanded Affiliated Group means an affiliated group as defined in section 1504(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (without regard to section 1504(b) of such Code), except that section 1504 of such Code shall be applied by substituting `more than 50 percent' for at least 80 percent each place it appears.
Foreign Incorporated Entity means any entity which is, or but for subsection (b) of section 835 of the Homeland Security Act, 6 U.S.C. 395, would be, treated as a foreign corporation for purposes of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
Inverted Domestic Corporation. A foreign incorporated entity shall be treated as an inverted domestic corporation if, pursuant to a plan (or a series of related transactions)-
(1) The entity completes the direct or indirect acquisition of substantially all of the properties held directly or indirectly by a domestic corporation or substantially all of the properties constituting a trade or business of a domestic partnership;
(2) After the acquisition at least 80 percent of the stock (by vote or value) of the entity is held-
(i) In the case of an acquisition with respect to a domestic corporation, by former shareholders of the domestic corporation by reason of holding stock in the domestic corporation; or
(ii) In the case of an acquisition with respect to a domestic partnership, by former partners of the domestic partnership by reason of holding a capital or profits interest in the domestic partnership; and
(3) The expanded affiliated group which after the acquisition includes the entity does not have substantial business activities in the foreign country in which or under the law of which the entity is created or organized when compared to the total business activities of such expanded affiliated group.
Person, domestic, and foreign have the meanings given such terms by paragraphs (1), (4), and (5) of section 7701(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, respectively. (c) Special rules. The following definitions and special rules shall apply when determining whether a foreign incorporated entity should be treated as an inverted domestic corporation.
(1) Certain Stock Disregarded. For the purpose of treating a foreign incorporated entity as an inverted domestic corporation these shall not be taken into account in determining ownership:
(i) Stock held by members of the expanded affiliated group which includes the foreign incorporated entity; or
(ii) stock of such entity which is sold in a public offering related to the acquisition described in subsection (b)(1) of Section 835 of the Homeland Security Act, 6 U.S.C. 395(b)(1).
(2) Plan Deemed In Certain Cases. If a foreign incorporated entity acquires directly or indirectly substantially all of the properties of a domestic corporation or partnership during the 4-year period beginning on the date which is 2 years before the ownership requirements of subsection (b)(2) are met, such actions shall be treated as pursuant to a plan.
(3) Certain Transfers Disregarded. The transfer of properties or liabilities (including by contribution or distribution) shall be disregarded if such transfers are part of a plan a principal purpose of which is to avoid the purposes of this section.
(d) Special Rule for Related Partnerships. For purposes of applying section 835(b) of the Homeland Security Act, 6 U.S.C. 395(b) to the acquisition of a domestic partnership, except as provided in regulations, all domestic partnerships which are under common control (within the meaning of section 482 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986) shall be treated as a partnership.
(e) Treatment of Certain Rights.
(1) Certain rights shall be treated as stocks to the extent necessary to reflect the present value of all equitable interests incident to the transaction, as follows:
(i) warrants;
(ii) options;
(iii) contracts to acquire stock;
(iv) convertible debt instruments; and
(v) others similar interests.
(2) Rights labeled as stocks shall not be treated as stocks whenever it is deemed appropriate to do so to reflect the present value of the transaction or to disregard transactions whose recognition would defeat the purpose of Section 835.
(f) Disclosure. The offeror under this solicitation represents that [Check one]: __ it is not a foreign incorporated entity that should be treated as an inverted domestic corporation pursuant to the criteria of (HSAR) 48 CFR 3009.104-70 through 3009.104-73;
__ it is a foreign incorporated entity that should be treated as an inverted domestic corporation pursuant to the criteria of (HSAR) 48 CFR 3009.104-70 through 3009.104-73, but it has submitted a request for waiver pursuant to 3009.104-74, which has not been denied; or
__ it is a foreign incorporated entity that should be treated as an inverted domestic corporation pursuant to the criteria of (HSAR) 48 CFR 3009.104-70 through 3009.104-73, but it plans to submit a request for waiver pursuant to 3009.104-74.
(g) A copy of the approved waiver, if a waiver has already been granted, or the waiver request, if a waiver has been applied for, shall be attached to the bid or proposal.
(End of provision)

NOTICE FOR FILING AGENCY PROTESTS
United States Coast Guard Ombudsman Program

It is the policy of the United States Coast Guard (USCG) to issue solicitations and make contract awards in a fair and timely manner. The Ombudsman Program for Agency Protests (OPAP) was established to investigate agency protest issues and resolve them without expensive and time-consuming litigation. OPAP is an independent reviewing authority that is empowered to grant a prevailing protester essentially the same relief as the General Accountability Office (GAO).

Interested parties are encouraged to seek resolution of their concerns within the USCG as an Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) forum, rather than filing a protest with the GAO or some external form. Interested parties may seek resolution of their concerns informally or opt to file a formal agency protest with the contracting officer or Ombudsman.

Informal forum with the Ombudsman. Interested parties who believe a specific USCG procurement is unfair or otherwise defective should first direct their concerns to the cognizant contracting officer. If the contracting officer is unable to satisfy the concerns, the interested party is encouraged to contact the USCG Ombudsman for Agency Protests. Under this informal process, the agency is not required to suspend contract award performance. Use of an informal forum does not suspend any time requirement for filing a protest with the agency or other forum. In order to ensure a timely response, interested parties should provide the following information to the Ombudsman: solicitation/contract number, contracting office, contracting officer, and solicitation closing date (if applicable).

Formal Agency Protest with the Ombudsman. Prior to submitting a formal agency protest, protesters must first use their best efforts to resolve their concerns with the contracting officer through open and frank discussions. If the protester's concerns are unresolved, an independent review is available by the Ombudsman. The protester may file a formal agency protest to either the contracting officer or as an alternative to that, the Ombudsman under the OPAP program. Contract award or performance will be suspended during the protest period unless contract award or performance is justified in writing, for urgent and compelling reasons or is determined in writing to be in the best interest of the Government. The agency's goal is to resolve protests in less than 35 calendar days from the date of filing. Protests shall include the information set forth at FAR 33.103. If the protester fails to submit the required information, resolution of the protest may be delayed or the protest may be dismissed. This will not preclude re-filing of the protest to meet the requirement. To be timely, protests must be filed within the period specified in FAR 33.103(e). Formal protests filed under the OPAP program should be submitted to:
Department of Homeland Security
United States Coast Guard (CG-9131)
Ombudsman Program for Agency Protests
1900 Half Street, SW, Room 11-0602
Washington D.C. 20593-0001
Telephone 202-372-3695
Fax: 202-475-3904