Sample Response Matrix.doc
DOC document 67 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Engine Test Cell Upgrade & Sustainment, Building 100, USCG Aviation Logistics Center, Elizabeth City, NC
- Solicitation number
- HSCG38-10-R-410009
About this file
SAMPLE Vendor Response Matrix
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| MVC-005F.JPG | JPG image | |
| MVC-007F.JPG | JPG image | |
| MVC-003F.JPG | JPG image | |
| MVC-004F.JPG | JPG image | |
| Industry Day Attendance.pdf | ||
| OHA Notice Order.pdf | ||
| Instr-Eval Crit.doc | DOC document | |
| SF1449.pdf | ||
| SOO.doc | DOC document | |
| 400185.pdf | ||
| Clauses Para.doc | DOC document | |
| Sched of FFP.doc | DOC document |
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Solicitation HSCG38-10-R-410009
Engine Test Cell Upgrade & Sustainment
ATTACHMENT – SAMPLE VENDOR RESPONSE
Responses are required in matrix format that clearly details the offeror(s)’ responses to the requirements of the Solicitation. It is recommended that responses be divided by solicitation section for the entire solicitation document. The table provided is a preferred sample of submission and is only a partial representation for Section C of the solicitation. Regardless of the format used, offeror(s) are required to submit a matrix format that provides point-by-point responses for each section of the solicitation using the definitions below.
Compliance Response Matrix
| Ref. |
| Paragraph |
| Compliance |
| Comments (Clarification/Qualification) |
Responses are: Exceeds Requirement, Compliant, Partial Compliance, Not Compliant, or Noted. Responses of
“Exceeds, Partial Compliance or Non Compliant require explanation in the section of this matrix labeled
“Comments”.
| C.2 |
| Definitions |
| Noted |
C.3.1
C.3.2
C.3.3
C.3.4
C.3.5
C.3.6.1
The USCG understands a “noted, meets or compliant” response as the following:
1) The vendor understands the USCG requirement; and
2) The vendor agrees with the specific wording in the RFP; and
3) The vendor is compliant with the requirement as stated in the RFP;
4) No other wording elsewhere in the proposal contradicts the requirements of the RFP.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .