179CW STC 50 Doors

This is a combined synopsis/solicitation for commercial items prepared in accordance with the format in Subpart 12.6, as supplemented with additional information included in this notice. This announcement constitutes the only solicitation; quotes are being requested and a written solicitation will not be issued. This solicitation W50S8R-24-R-5035 is being issued as a Request for Quotation (RFQ). The solicitation document and incorporated provisions and clauses are those in effect through Federal Acquisition Circular 2024-05. This solicitation is set-aside 100 percent for Small Business. The NAICS code that applies is 332321 and business size is 750 employees. This action will result in a FFP purchase order, utilizing simplified acquisition procedures.

The 179th Cyberspace Wing requires STC 50 rated doors and installation as outline below.

CLIN

Qty

Description

0001

1 EA

Single High Security Door (Primary)

Salient Characteristics:

*Metal door

*New metal frame for door opening w/grout and mineral rockwool insulation

* Nominal door size 3068

*STC 50 sound rating w/ 90 min fire rating

*Internal raceway for electric release capability

*GSA approved combination lock in accordance with FF-L-2890C/2740B

*Type IV PDLAP Hardware in accordance with FF-L-2890C/2740B

*Door construction, frame and all hardware compliant with ICD/ICS 705

*ICD/ICS 705, Version 1.5.1, July 26, 2021 to be followed

0002

2 EA

Double High Security Door (Secondary)

Salient Characteristics

*Metal door

*Set of double doors with Astragal

*New metal frame w/grout and mineral wool insulation

*Nominal size 3068

*STC 50 Sound Rating w/ 90 min fire rating

*Internal raceway for electric release capability

*Type X PDLAP Hardware in accordance with FF-L-2890C/2740

*Door construction and all hardware compliant with ICD/ICS 705

*ICD/ICS 705, Version 1.5.1, July 26, 2021 to be followed

0003

1 EA

Installation – Please see attached Statement of Work

Location - 1947 Harrington Memorial Drive, Mansfield, Ohio 44903 utilizing FOB Destination.

Evaluations factors will be Best Value determination by evaluation of Responsiveness, Technical, and Price as set out in Attachment 1: Provisions and Clauses under Addendum to 52.212-2.

***Offerors shall include with their proposal a filled out 52.204-24 representation.***

ADDENDUM TO 52.212-2

1 BASIS FOR CONTRACT AWARD: This solicitation is for a Firm Fixed Price Contract. The Government intends to award a single contract to a qualified Small Business Offeror deemed responsible in accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), whose quote conforms to all solicitation requirements and is judged to represent the Best Value to the Government in accordance with the evaluation scheme set out in this solicitation. The award will be made based on the lowest price, technically acceptable offer IAW FAR 15.101-2. Best value is expected to result from selection of the technically acceptable proposal with the lowest evaluated price, with appropriate consideration given to the two (2) evaluation factors: Technical and Price.

2 EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD: The evaluation factors are (1) Responsiveness, (2) Technical and (3) Price. To arrive at a Best Value decision, the Contracting Officer will integrate the evaluation of Responsiveness, Technical and Price as set out in the solicitation.

The overarching evaluation approach for all factors and subfactors is to determine the acceptability of the response. The quote will be evaluated to determine whether each requirement has been addressed in the quote in order to meet the acceptability standards described in the solicitation.

(a) Responsive Offerors. Initially, the government shall evaluate the quote on a pass/fail basis. The quotes shall be evaluated on whether offerors have submitted a complete package to include:

1. Technical Documentation:
   1. Contractors shall provide their proposed work timeline to meet 16 week requirement from contract award, detailing steps/actions required to meet requirements set forth in Attachment 2 Statement of Work. Provided documents shall provide enough information to be properly evaluated to determine if proposed approach meets the requirements of Attachment 2 Statement of Work and shall not simply restate SOW requirements.
   2. Submit certificates/manufacturer catalog data for door & associated components showing conformance to required STC ratings.

1. Total Quoted Price

RESPONSIVE OFFEROR RATING

Rating

Description

PASS

Offeror has returned a complete proposal package.

FAIL

Offeror has NOT returned a complete proposal package.

(b) Technical Evaluation. Technical Capability will be evaluated on an Acceptable/Unacceptable basis. An offeror shall obtain an “Acceptable” rating to continue further in the competition. Offerors who are deemed to merit an “Unacceptable” rating in the Technical Capability Factor will be removed from further consideration for award. Once the minimum requirements are established, the team shall evaluate the offeror's quote against these requirements to determine whether the quote is acceptable or unacceptable, using the ratings and descriptions outlined herein. Quotes are evaluated for acceptability, but not ranked using the non-price factors/subfactors. In order to be considered awardable, there must be an "acceptable" rating in every non-price factor/subfactor.

(End of provision)

All offers must include a detailed description sufficient to confirm compliance with above technical criteria and Statement of Work. Offers are due by 10:00 A.M. EST 20 June 2024: email casity.schag@us.af.mil and jeffrey.snyder.20@us.af.mil

List of Attachments:

Attachment 1: Clauses and Provisions

Attachment 2: Statement of Work