White Paper 009 Questions and Answers.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 10 KB Posted
- Attached to
- White Paper Call 009 Topic # FC-05 Q&A Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- Not on record
About this file
This document is a set of Questions and Answers related to a federal contract opportunity, White Paper Call 009 Topic # FC-05 "PNT Enablers and Modular Open System Architectures (MOSA) for Complementary & Assured Navigation Modules." The opportunity is an Advanced Technology Development effort by the U.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development Command (DEVCOM) C5ISR Center, Research and Technology Integration (RTI) Directorate.
The key details provided include: reference systems and compute platforms that are available, but access to additional technical details is controlled. The call seeks advanced technology development, not for a specific system/hardware, or demonstration and validation. Relevant documentation such as the "Reference Systems for Module Development" is access controlled. The opportunity does not explicitly outline specific system/hardware resource requirements. The document provides general guidance and instructions, but does not include details on products, services, response dates, award dates, pricing, set asides, or other salient contract information.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| BAA-W56KGU-23-R-RTID QA Responses_Dekowski.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| White Paper Call 0009 FC05 Updated 28 March 2024.pdf | ||
| White Paper Call 0009 FC05.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet1
| Question | TPOC Response |
| What dismounted and mounted reference systems are available for PNT? | Reference systems are called out in the supporting documentation under the 'Reference Systems for Module Development' which has access control restrictions. Follow guidance written in the 'Access to additional technical details' section prior. |
| What compute platforms are available for mounted applications? | As an Advanced Technology Development effort specific system/hardware resource requirements are not explicitly outlined. Also, see the 'Reference Systems for Module Development' controlled document as demonstrable compute resources can be inferred. |
| On Pages 4-5, the call discusses Level 1 (<3 months), Level 2 (<10 months), and Level 3 (>12 months) proposal efforts. Later on Page 5, the call says the government intends to make multiple awards with a period of performance of 18 months. Can you please clarify the desired Period of Performance that performers should propose, particularly if they are proposing a Level 1 or Level 2 effort? | Period of performance for this call for white paper should not exceed 18 months. The levels of Effort and Costs outlined in the 'Anticipated Funding' section are examples and not requirements. Vendors should proposed base on their expected levels of effort for development and integration to reach the desired Technology Readiness Level. |
| On Page 3, the call states that technical approach should leverage the following structure: Phase 1 (reference document review and strategy development), Phase 2 (capability development, maturation, and integration), and Phase 3 (test, demonstration, and final documentation). Is the intent that Phase 1 should be the base period, with Phase 2 and Phase 3 proposed as options? Would this be the case even if a shorter Level 1 or Level 2 effort is proposed that should only take between 3 – 10 months? | Phases are not necessarily indicative of contract periods. Base and Optional Period(s) of Performance described are at the discretion of the Submitter. A Module's Technology Readiness may be refined enough begin at a higher phased Technical Approach. |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .