WDQI Round 9_FOA-ETA-23-05.pdf

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS AND FUNDING OPPORTUNITY

ANNOUNCEMENT FOR: Workforce Data Quality Initiative – WDQI Round 9

ANNOUNCEMENT TYPE: Initial

FUNDING OPPORTUNITY NUMBER: FOA-ETA-23-05

CATALOG OF FEDERAL DOMESTIC ASSISTANCE (CFDA) NUMBER: 17.261

KEY DATES: The closing date for receipt of applications under this Announcement is 05/10/2023. We must receive applications no later than 11:59 pm Eastern Time.

Submit all applications in response to this solicitation through https://www.grants.gov. For complete application and submission information, including online application instructions, please refer to Section IV.

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

I. FUNDING OPPORTUNITY DESCRIPTION

A. PROGRAM PURPOSE

B. PROGRAM AUTHORITY

C. OTHER ACTIVITIES

II. AWARD INFORMATION

A. AWARD TYPE AND AMOUNT

B. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE

III. ELIGIBILITY INFORMATION

A. ELIGIBLE APPLICANTS

B. COST SHARING OR MATCHING

C. OTHER INFORMATION

IV. APPLICATION AND SUBMISSION INFORMATION

A. HOW TO OBTAIN AN APPLICATION PACKAGE

B. CONTENT AND FORM OF APPLICATION SUBMISSION

C. SUBMISSION DATE, TIME, PROCESS AND ADDRESS

D. INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW

E. FUNDING RESTRICTIONS

F. OTHER SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

V. APPLICATION REVIEW INFORMATION

A. CRITERIA

B. REVIEW AND SELECTION PROCESS

VI. AWARD ADMINISTRATION INFORMATION

A. AWARD NOTICES

B. ADMINISTRATIVE AND NATIONAL POLICY REQUIREMENTS

C. REPORTING

VII. AGENCY CONTACTS

VIII. OTHER INFORMATION

A. WEB-BASED RESOURCES

B. INDUSTRY COMPETENCY MODELS AND CAREER CLUSTERS

C. WORKFORCEGPS RESOURCES

D. SKILLSCOMMONS RESOURCES

IX. OMB INFORMATION COLLECTION

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The Employment and Training Administration (ETA), U.S. Department of Labor (DOL, or the Department, or we), announces the availability of approximately $11,600,000 in grant funds authorized by the WIOA Section 169 for the Workforce Data Quality Initiative (WDQI).

ETA plans to award approximately four to seven grants with a maximum award of $2,900,000 to eligible State Workforce Agencies (SWAs) for the development or enhancement of a state workforce longitudinal administrative database. ETA plans to prioritize the selection of applicants that identify the current capacity with regard to longitudinal administrative databases as Launch Point 2 (see section 1.A for LP definitions), and after those, prioritize applicants that have never received a WDQI grant (any LP). All of these grants have a 36-month period of performance, and cost sharing is not required for this program. Each interested SWA should submit one complete application.

Section 169 of WIOA explicitly describes the purpose and objectives of a continuing regimen of rigorous evaluation and research activities to examine the impacts and cost effectiveness of education and workforce programs. WDQI grants support the development of State workforce longitudinal administrative databases such that the databases will ultimately, at a minimum: (1) include information on programs that provide training and employment services; (2) connect with education data; (3) be linked at the individual level, and calculate disaggregated data on racial/ethnic lines; and (4) be capable of generating workforce training provider performance information and outcomes, including but not limited to, information and outcomes relevant to WIOA performance reporting, in a standardized, easy-to-understand format to help customers select the education and training programs that best suit their needs and deliver outcomes. Where such longitudinal systems do not exist, or are in the early stages of development, grantees may use WDQI grant assistance to design and develop these databases.

The Department will provide technical assistance to SWAs to help ensure the databases meet the terms provided in each grantee’s statement of work. The Department also works closely with the Department of Education on technical assistance and support activities.

WDQI grants provide funding to eligible SWAs to accomplish all or a combination, of the following objectives:

Develop or improve the State workforce longitudinal administrative database;

Connect workforce data with education data contained in the Statewide Longitudinal

Data System (SLDS);

Improve the quality and breadth of the data in workforce longitudinal administrative databases;

Use longitudinal data to assess the performance of federally and state-supported education and job training programs;

Understand the performance of Federal and State education and job training programs specifically in serving historically underserved groups;

Provide user-friendly information to help customers select the education and training programs that best suit their needs and deliver outcomes; and

Integrate performance, fiscal, and/or, case management systems with the longitudinal administrative database.

Applicants that choose to apply for the WDQI grant award of up to $2,900,000 are expected to clearly demonstrate their plans to build or expand the workforce longitudinal administrative databases and to store and use the data in adherence to all applicable confidentiality laws (20 CFR Part 603). LP2 and LP3 applicants that choose to apply are expected to demonstrate that they have an existing database or structure in place that can achieve the objectives outlined above.

This Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) provides a description of the application submission requirements, outlines the process that eligible entities must use to apply for funds covered by this FOA, and details how we will select grantees. Additional background information on the WDQI is available at https://www.dol.gov/agencies/eta/performance/wdqi.

I. FUNDING OPPORTUNITY DESCRIPTION

A. PROGRAM PURPOSE

This announcement solicits applications for the WDQI program.

The purpose of this program is to support the development or expansion of state workforce longitudinal administrative databases. Collecting and analyzing longitudinal data can provide a comprehensive picture of whether education programs lead to employment in related fields, whether jobseekers are obtaining training-related employment, and the impact of training on workers’ earnings throughout their careers. Through such deep dive analyses, states can identify service delivery strategies that improve employment opportunities, in particular for historically underserved populations, as well as demonstrate the benefits of education and workforce programs on employment outcomes. Data linkages can help state and local leaders identify effective pathways through education and training services that lead to success in the workforce and can provide individuals with information that helps them make informed choices about their education and career(s).

Section 169 of WIOA explicitly describes the purpose and objectives of a continuing regimen of rigorous evaluation and research activities to examine the impacts and cost effectiveness of education and workforce programs. This has long been a goal of the Department and was the driving idea behind the WDQI grant initiative. Longitudinal administrative databases are useful tools for longer-term research and evaluation projects. The knowledge gained through data analytics can help states improve the effectiveness of their programs, identify shifts in the labor market, and design services to better meet their customers’ needs. Sustainability beyond the use of federal funding for these systems is of particular interest to the Department; we will score applications on criteria that assess the applicants’ proposed plans for sustaining activities beyond the three-year grant period.

Consistent with President Biden’s Executive Order 14091 on “Further Advancing Racial Equity and Support for Underserved Communities Through the Federal Government,” issued on https://www.dol.gov/agencies/eta/performance/wdqi

February 16, 2023, the Department prioritizes advancing racial equity and support for underserved communities. These communities may include people who are socioeconomically disadvantaged; people with limited English proficiency; geographically isolated or educationally disenfranchised people; people of color as well as those of ethnic and national origin minorities;

women and children; opportunity youth; individuals with disabilities and others with access and functional needs; and seniors. Applicants will be required to describe the state’s objective in advancing racial equity and support for underserved communities through the use of demographic and customer characteristics data, including data disaggregated on racial and ethnic characteristics.

WDQI grants provide funding to eligible SWAs to accomplish all, or a combination, of the following objectives:

Develop or improve the State Workforce Longitudinal Administrative Database.

SWAs can use this funding to develop a new state workforce longitudinal administrative database, or expand/strengthen existing database. SWAs can also use this funding to incorporate new data sources, or to expand/strengthen existing data sources into their existing database so individual-level records can be matched across workforce training programs and over time.

Connect workforce data with education data contained in the Statewide Longitudinal Data System (SLDS). WDQI requires that workforce data be matched with education data, consistent with all relevant federal and state privacy and confidentiality laws, to ultimately create a state longitudinal administrative database with individual-level information from pre-kindergarten through post-secondary and training into the workforce system. The connection of workforce and education data enables the analysis of individuals’ receipt of both education and training services to help determine ways to maximize the outcomes of these services and improve the effectiveness of the programs.

Improve the quality and breadth of the data in workforce longitudinal administrative databases. It is important that data in the workforce longitudinal administrative databases are complete, accurate, and relevant to understand the impact of state workforce development programs on job seekers and employers. Data collection processes should be streamlined and standardized to ensure that the data are valid.

Use longitudinal data to evaluate the performance of federally and state- supported education and job training programs. Evidence-based decision making is the foundation for effective program management and strategic planning. Longitudinal administrative databases provide business intelligence for policymakers and stakeholders to make programmatic adjustments in an effort to improve education and workforce programs.

Understand the performance of Federal and State education and job training programs specifically in serving historically underserved groups. It is critical that policymakers, stakeholders, and program staff understand the performance outcomes of education and training programs not just in the aggregate but specifically for their most underserved groups. Such insight is necessary to ensure that programs are achieving equitable outcomes for all participants.

Provide user-friendly information to help customers select the education and training programs that best suit their skills. These state-customized scorecards contain data to help job seekers make informed decisions about programs that offer skills training needed to pursue in-demand jobs. Publicly-searchable-by-training provider and program-of-study scorecards allow anyone, including policymakers, students, and researchers, to search labor market information and available training and subsequent outcomes, such as program completion, employment, and wage information of participants in these training programs.

Integrate performance, fiscal, and/or case-management systems with the longitudinal administrative database. Integration across multiple components of state data systems is a vital step towards improved program management and enhanced state data analytics capabilities. WDQI grants become even more vital as states move towards developing and building a more integrated data system structure, as envisioned under WIOA. ETA believes that these system enhancements will facilitate SWA’s development of comprehensive information sharing tools (e.g., mobile applications, dashboards, or interactive scorecards) enabling access to longitudinal administrative data system for different program needs including case managers, fiscal staff, or performance staff, among others. Linking information from longitudinal data systems, state-based wage-data-matching systems, and cross-program/departmental systems has the potential to improve workforce data quality.

Advance Racial Equity. Applicants will be required to describe the state’s objective in advancing racial equity and support for underserved communities through the use of demographic and customer characteristics data. The Department requires SWAs to use the demographic and customer characteristics’ data in their longitudinal databases when evaluating the effectiveness of workforce programs and to analyze the data collected from workforce programs to recognize and address any inequities or barriers to equal opportunity. Such data should be disaggregated by race, ethnicity, gender, disability, etc., to encompass the underserved communities referenced in section I.A of this funding announcement so outcomes for these specific underserved populations can be tracked.

The Department suggests states consider best practices regarding data disaggregation consistent with OMB Statistical Directive 15 (Race and Ethnicity Flexibilities (whitehouse.gov)).

Promote Job Quality. A good job helps workers achieve economic stability and mobility, while prioritizing diversity and worker voice. To this end, the Departments of Commerce and Labor have jointly identified eight key principles of a good job. To fully assess job quality SWAs should measure the types of jobs, working conditions, benefits, starting salaries, salary growth for individuals across several years, salary equity, DEIA (including demographic group representation), and other quality metrics—as defined in a job quality framework or continuum—of the employers where participants are employed during and after program exit to determine whether job quality goals are being met. The Department strongly advises applicants to consider how their workforce longitudinal administrative databases support the collection, storage, and analysis of job quality data.

OTHER PROGRAM INFORMATION

Launch Point (LP)

The Department recognizes that states vary in their current capacity with regard to longitudinal administrative databases (referred to throughout this FOA as the “launch point”) and https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Flexibilities-and-Best-Practices-Under-SPD-15.pdf https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Flexibilities-and-Best-Practices-Under-SPD-15.pdf https://www.dol.gov/general/good-jobs/principles https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ETA/advisories/TEGL/2022/TEGL%2007-22/TEGL%2007-22%20%28Complete%20PDF%29.pdf expectations for grantees will differ depending on their launch points. The three categories are described below:

LP1 - States without a workforce longitudinal administrative database that are proposing to create a workforce longitudinal administrative database;

LP2 - States with a partially developed workforce longitudinal administrative database;

or

LP3 - States with a comprehensive workforce longitudinal administrative database.

Partnerships with Research Universities or Other Entities

SWAs without the internal capacity to operate the longitudinal administrative database may need to partner with an external entity (such as a research university or a private, for-profit, or non-profit organization) to develop, maintain, and use the workforce longitudinal administrative database, both operationally and for research purposes. In addition, SWAs with existing partnerships with external entities may propose to maintain those partnerships, and SWAs may propose partnerships with external entities for reasons other than lack of internal capacity. SWAs proposing to have their workforce longitudinal administrative databases operated by an outside entity should ensure that staff work closely with the state education agency. A proven model employed by many successful states is to have a state research university build and maintain the workforce longitudinal administrative database.

We will also consider alternative models that maintain the privacy and confidentiality of personally identifiable information (PII) consistent with federal and state laws and result in high-quality databases under the WDQI grant program.

If a SWA chooses to partner with a research university or other research entity, the SWA must consider the following in its development of the partnership model:

The research partner must have a demonstrated capacity to assist in the collection and storage or linkage of the longitudinal workforce administrative data;

The research partner must be able to ensure that the data collected will be stored, accessed, and used in accordance with local, state, and federal confidentiality and PII protective provisions;

and

The research partner will be responsible for processing data requests, conducting in- depth data analysis, preparing standard reports, responding to requests for additional papers, and reporting on state and local workforce and education issues and trends as requested by external entities, consistent with all applicable federal and state privacy laws.

When working with a state research university or research organization, applicants must investigate additional security measures that the Institutional Review Board (IRB) may require of that university or research organization. The IRB must give approval for the state research institution’s involvement in this partnership. The IRB must base its approval on the applicant’s plan for confidential transfer, storage, and usage of data and protection of PII.

B. PROGRAM AUTHORITY

The WIOA Section 169 (29 U.S.C. § 3224) authorizes this program.

C. OTHER ACTIVITIES

A wide range of activities may assist applicants in their efforts to establish new training models, expand existing programs, and offer employment and training services. Accordingly, applicants may propose to use grant funds to undertake additional activities designed to create an environment for employment and training opportunities, including, but not limited to, those listed in this section.

II. AWARD INFORMATION

A. AWARD TYPE AND AMOUNT

Funding will be provided in the form of a grant.

We expect availability of approximately $11,600,000 to fund approximately four to seven grants. You may apply for a ceiling amount of up to $2,900,000. Awards made under this Announcement are subject to the availability of federal funds. In the event that additional funds become available, we reserve the right to use such funds to select additional grantees from applications submitted in response to this Announcement. Any grant application with a proposed value greater than $2,900,000 will be deemed non-responsive and will not be considered and reviewed further. Applications submitted in response to this FOA will be awarded funds appropriated in FY 22 or in FY 23 for the Workforce Data Quality Initiative.

B. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE

The period of performance is 36 months with an anticipated start date of 07/01/2023. This performance period includes all necessary implementation and start-up activities.

III. ELIGIBILITY INFORMATION

A. ELIGIBLE APPLICANTS

State Workforce Agencies (SWAs) - SWAs in the 50 States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, American Samoa, Guam, Palau, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands.

Among the eligible applicants listed above, ETA plans to prioritize the selection of applicants that identify their current capacity with regard to longitudinal administrative databases as Launch Point 2 (see section 1.A for LP definitions) and after those, prioritize applicants that have never received a WDQI grant (any LP). Applicants that previously received three or more WDQI grants are ineligible to apply. The following States’ SWAs have received three or more WDQI grants and are ineligible for this reason: Arkansas, Indiana, Maine, Michigan, Mississippi, New Jersey, Texas and Rhode Island.

Applicants that have an active WDQI grant are ineligible to apply. The following States’ SWAs have active WDQI grants and are therefore ineligible to apply: Arkansas, Indiana, Maryland, Mississippi, and New Mexico.

B. COST SHARING OR MATCHING

This program does not require cost sharing or matching funds. Including such funds is not one of the application screening criteria and applications that include any form of cost sharing or match will not receive additional consideration during the review process. Instead, the agency considers any resources contributed to the project beyond the funds provided by the agency as leveraged resources. Section IV.B.2 provides more information on leveraged resources.

C. OTHER INFORMATION

1. Application Screening Criteria

You should use the checklist below as a guide when preparing your application package to ensure that the application has met all of the screening criteria. Note that this checklist is only an aid for applicants and should not be included in the application package. We urge you to use this checklist to ensure that your application contains all required items. If your application does not meet all of the screening criteria, it will not move forward through the merit review process.

Application Requirement Instructions Complete?

The deadline submission requirements are met Section IV.C

Eligibility Section III.A

If submitted through Grants.gov, the components of the application are saved in any of the specified formats and are not corrupt. (We will attempt to open the document, but will not take any additional measures in the event of problems with opening.)

Section

IV.C.2

Application federal funds request does not exceed the ceiling amount of $2,900,000 Section II.A

SAM Registration Section

IV.B.1

SF-424, Application for Federal Assistance Section

IV.B.1

SF-424 includes a DUNS Number Section

IV.B.1

SF-424A, Budget Information Form Section

IV.B.2

Budget Narrative Section

IV.B.2

Project Narrative Section

IV.B.3

2. Number of Applications Applicants May Submit

We will consider only one application from each organization. If we receive multiple applications from the same organization, we will consider only the most recently received application that met the deadline. If the most recent application is disqualified for any reason, we will not replace it with an earlier application.

3. Eligible Participants

Veterans’ Priority for Participants

38 U.S.C. 4215 requires grantees to provide priority of service to veterans and spouses of certain veterans for the receipt of employment, training, and placement services in any job training program directly funded, in whole or in part, by DOL. The regulations implementing this priority of service are at 20 CFR Part 1010. In circumstances where a grant recipient must choose between two qualified candidates for a service, one of whom is a veteran or eligible spouse, the veterans’ priority of service provisions require that the grant recipient give the veteran or eligible spouse priority of service by first providing him or her that service. To obtain priority of service, a veteran or spouse must meet the program’s eligibility requirements. Grantees must comply with DOL guidance on veterans’ priority. ETA’s Training and Employment Guidance Letter (TEGL) No. 10-09 (issued November 10, 2009) provides guidance on implementing priority of service for veterans and eligible spouses in all qualified job training programs funded in whole or in part by DOL. TEGL No. 10-09 is available at https://www.dol.gov/agencies/eta/advisories/training-and-employment-guidance-letter-no-10-09.

IV. APPLICATION AND SUBMISSION INFORMATION

A. HOW TO OBTAIN AN APPLICATION PACKAGE

This FOA, found at www.Grants.gov and https://www.dol.gov/agencies/eta/grants/apply/find-opportunities contains all of the information and links to forms needed to apply for grant funding.

B. CONTENT AND FORM OF APPLICATION SUBMISSION

Applications submitted in response to this FOA must consist of four separate and distinct parts:

1. SF-424, “Application for Federal Assistance”;

2. Project Budget, composed of the SF-424A and Budget Narrative;

3. Project Narrative; and

4. Attachments to the Project Narrative.

You must ensure that the funding amount requested is consistent across all parts and sub-parts of the application.

1. SF-424, “Application for Federal Assistance” https://www.dol.gov/agencies/eta/advisories/training-and-employment-guidance-letter-no-10-09 https://www.dol.gov/agencies/eta/advisories/training-and-employment-guidance-letter-no-10-09 http://www.Grants.gov https://www.dol.gov/agencies/eta/grants/apply/find-opportunities https://www.dol.gov/agencies/eta/grants/apply/find-opportunities

You must complete the SF-424, “Application for Federal Assistance” (available at https://www.grants.gov/web/grants/forms/sf-424-family.html#sortby=1).

In the address field, fill out the nine-digit (plus hyphen) zip code. Nine-digit zip codes can be looked up on the USPS website at https://tools.usps.com/go/ZipLookupAction!input.action.

The organization’s legal name on the SF-424 should match its name registered in the System for Award Management at www.sam.gov.

The SF-424 must clearly identify the applicant and must be signed by an individual with authority to enter into a grant agreement. Upon confirmation of an award, the individual signing the SF-424 on behalf of the applicant is considered the Authorized Representative of the applicant. As stated in block 21 of the SF-424 form, the signature of the Authorized Representative on the SF-424 certifies that the organization is in compliance with the Assurances and Certifications form SF-424B (available at https://www.grants.gov/web/grants/forms/sf-424-family.html#sortby=1). You do not need to submit the SF-424B with the application.

In addition, the applicant’s Authorized Representative’s signature in block 21 of the SF-424 form constitutes assurance by the applicant of compliance with the WIOA 188 rules issued by the Department at 29 CFR 38.25, which includes the following language:

As a condition to the award of financial assistance from the Department of Labor under Title I WIOA, the grant applicant assures that it has the ability to comply fully with the nondiscrimination and equal opportunity provisions of the following laws: Section 188 of the WIOA and its implementing regulations at 29 CFR Part 38, which prohibits discrimination against all individuals in the United States on the basis of race, color, religion, sex (including pregnancy, childbirth, and related medical conditions, transgender status, and gender identity), national origin (including limited English proficiency), age, disability, political affiliation or belief, and against beneficiaries on the basis of either citizenship or status as a lawfully admitted immigrant authorized to work in the United States, or participation in any WIOA Title I— financially assisted program or activity; Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, which prohibits discrimination on the bases of race, color, and national origin; Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, which prohibits discrimination against qualified individuals with disabilities; The Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of age; and Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex in educational programs.

The grant applicant also assures, that as a recipient of WIOA Title I financial assistance [as defined at 29 CFR 38.4(zz)], it will comply with 29 CFR part 38 and all other regulations implementing the laws listed above. This assurance applies to the grant applicant's operation of the WIOA Title I-financially assisted program or activity, and to all agreements the grant applicant makes to carry out the WIOA Title I-financially assisted program or activity. The grant applicant understands that the United States has the right to seek judicial enforcement of this assurance.

a. Requirement for Unique Entity Identifier https://www.grants.gov/web/grants/forms/sf-424-family.html#sortby=1 https://tools.usps.com/go/ZipLookupAction!input.action http://www.sam.gov https://www.grants.gov/web/grants/forms/sf-424-family.html#sortby=1

All applicants for federal grant funding must have a Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) and must supply their UEI on the SF-424. The UEI is a 12-character (alpha-numeric) code that uniquely identifies all entities. Any entity registering to do business with the government is required to have one. UEIs are issued by SAM.gov and are a part of an entity's record in the Entity Information section of SAM.gov. If you do not have a UEI, you can get one for free at https://sam.gov.

Grant recipients authorized to make subawards must meet these requirements related to UEI:

Grant recipients must notify potential subawardees that no entity may receive a subaward unless the entity has provided its UEI.

Grant recipients may not make a subaward to an entity unless the entity has provided its UEI.

(See Appendix A to 2 CFR Part 25.)

b. Requirement for Registration with SAM

Applicants must register with the System for Award Management (SAM) before submitting an application. Find instructions for registering with SAM at https://www.sam.gov.

A recipient must maintain an active SAM registration with current information at all times during which it has an active federal award or an application under consideration. To remain registered in the SAM database after the initial registration, the applicant is required to review and update the registration at least every 12 months from the date of initial registration or subsequently update its information in the SAM database to ensure it is current, accurate, and complete. For purposes of this paragraph, the applicant is the entity that meets the eligibility criteria and has the legal authority to apply and to receive the award. If an applicant has not fully complied with these requirements by the time the Grant Officer is ready to make a federal award, the Grant Officer may determine that the applicant is not qualified to receive a federal award and use that determination as a basis for making a federal award to another applicant.

2. Project Budget You must complete the SF-424A Budget Information Form (available at https://www.grants.gov/web/grants/forms/sf-424-family.html#sortby=1). In preparing the Budget Information Form, you must provide a concise narrative explanation to support the budget request, explained in detail below.

a. Budget Narrative The Budget Narrative must provide a description of costs associated with each line item on the SF-424A. The Budget Narrative should also include a section describing any leveraged resources provided (as applicable) to support grant activities. Leveraged resources are all resources, both cash and in-kind, in excess of this award. Valuation of leveraged resources follows the same requirements as match. Applicants are encouraged to leverage resources to increase stakeholder investment in the project and broaden the impact of the project itself.

Each category should include the total estimated cost for the period of performance. Use the following guidance for preparing the Budget Narrative.

https://sam.gov https://www.sam.gov https://www.grants.gov/web/grants/forms/sf-424-family.html#sortby=1

Personnel: List all staff positions by title (including individuals hired by an employment contract) including the roles and responsibilities. For each position give the annual salary, the percentage of time devoted to the project, and the amount of each position’s salary funded by the grant.

Fringe Benefits: Provide a breakdown of the amounts and percentages that comprise fringe benefit costs such as health insurance, FICA, retirement, etc.

Travel: For grantee staff only, specify the purpose, number of staff traveling, mileage, per diem, estimated number of in-state and out-of-state trips, and other estimated costs for each type of travel.

Equipment: Identify each item of equipment you expect to purchase that has an estimated acquisition cost of $5,000 or more per unit (or if your capitalization level is less than $5,000, use your capitalization level) and a useful lifetime of more than one year (see 2 CFR Part

200.1 for the definition of Equipment). List the item, quantity, and the unit cost per item.

Items with a unit cost of less than $5,000 are supplies, not “equipment.” In general, we do not permit the purchase of equipment during the last funded year of the grant.

Supplies: Identify the cost of supplies (e.g., general office supplies, desk/chairs, laptops/printers, other specialty items) in the detailed budget per category. Except for general office supplies, list the item, quantity, and the unit cost per item. Supplies include all tangible personal property other than “equipment” (see 2 CFR Part 200.1 for the definition of Supplies).

Contractual: Under the Contractual line item, delineate contracts and subawards separately. Contracts are defined according to 2 CFR Part 200.1 as a legal instrument by which a non-federal entity purchases property or services needed to carry out the project or program under a federal award. A subaward, defined by 2 CFR Part 200.1 means an award provided by a pass-through entity to a subrecipient for the subrecipient to carry out part of a federal award received by the pass-through entity. It does not include payments to a contractor or payments to an individual that is a beneficiary of a federal program.

For each proposed contract and subaward, specify the purpose and activities to be provided, and the estimated cost.

Construction: Construction costs are not allowed and this line must be left as zero. Minor alterations to adjust an existing space for grant activities (such as a classroom alteration) may be allowable. We do not consider this as construction and you must show the costs on other appropriate lines such as Contractual.

Other: Provide clear and specific detail, including costs, for each item so that we are able to determine whether the costs are necessary, reasonable, and allocable. List items, such as stipends or incentives, not covered elsewhere.

Indirect Costs: If you include an amount for indirect costs (through a Negotiated Indirect Cost Rate Agreement or De Minimis) on the SF-424A budget form, then include one of the following:

a) If you have a Negotiated Indirect Cost Rate Agreement (NICRA), provide an explanation of how the indirect costs are calculated. This explanation should include which portion of each line item, along with the associated costs, are included in your cost allocation base. Also, provide a current version of the NICRA.

or

b) If you intend to claim indirect costs using the 10 percent de minimis rate, please confirm that your organization meets the requirements as described in 2 CFR Part 200.414(f). Clearly state that your organization does not have a current negotiated (including provisional) rate, and is not one described in 2 CFR Part 200, Appendix VII(D)(1)(b).

Applicants choosing to claim indirect costs using the de minimis rate must use Modified Total Direct Costs (see 2 CFR Part 200.1 below for definition) as their cost allocation base. Provide an explanation of which portion of each line item, along with the associated costs, are included in your cost allocation base. Note that there are various items not included in the calculation of Modified Total Direct Costs. See the definitions below to assist you in your calculation.

2 CFR Part 200.1 Modified Total Direct Cost (MTDC) means all direct salaries and wages, applicable fringe benefits, materials and supplies, services, travel, and up to the first $25,000 of each subaward (regardless of the period of performance of the subawards under the award). MTDC excludes equipment, capital expenditures, charges for patient care, rental costs, tuition remission, scholarships and fellowships, participant support costs and the portion of each subaward in excess of $25,000. Other items may be excluded only when necessary to avoid a serious inequity in the distribution of indirect costs, and with the approval of the cognizant agency for indirect costs. The definition of MTDC in 2 CFR Part 200.1 no longer allows any sub-contracts to be included in the calculation. You will also note that participant support costs are not included in modified total direct cost. Participant support costs are defined below.

2 CFR Part 200.1 Participant Support Cost means direct costs for items such as stipends or subsistence allowances, travel allowances, and registration fees paid to or on behalf of participants or trainees (but not employees) in connection with conferences or training projects.

See Section IV.B.4. and Section IV.E.1 for more information. Additionally, the following link contains information regarding the negotiation of Indirect Cost Rates at DOL: https://www.dol.gov/agencies/oasam/centers-offices/office-of-the-senior-procurement-executive/cost-price-determination-division.

Note that the SF-424, SF-424A, and Budget Narrative must include the entire federal grant amount requested (not just one year).

Do not show leveraged resources on the SF-424 and SF-424A. You should describe leveraged resources in the Budget Narrative.

Applicants should list the same requested federal grant amount on the SF-424, SF-424A, and Budget Narrative. If minor inconsistencies are found between the budget amounts specified on the SF-424, SF-424A, and the Budget Narrative, ETA will consider the SF-424 the official funding amount requested. However, if the amount specified on the SF-424 would https://www.dol.gov/agencies/oasam/centers-offices/office-of-the-senior-procurement-executive/cost-price-determination-division https://www.dol.gov/agencies/oasam/centers-offices/office-of-the-senior-procurement-executive/cost-price-determination-division render the application nonresponsive, the Grant Officer will use his or her discretion to determine whether the intended funding request (and match if applicable) is within the responsive range.

3. Project Narrative

The Project Narrative must demonstrate your capability to implement the grant project in accordance with the provisions of this Announcement. It provides a comprehensive framework and description of all aspects of the proposed project. It must be succinct, self-explanatory, and well-organized so that reviewers can understand the proposed project.

The Project Narrative is limited to 20 double-spaced single-sided 8.5 x 11 inch pages with Times New Roman 12-point text font and 1-inch margins. You must number the Project Narrative beginning with page number 1.

We will not read or consider any materials beyond the specified page limit in the application review process.

The following instructions provide all of the information needed to complete the Project Narrative. Carefully read and consider each section, and include all required information in your Project Narrative. The agency will evaluate the Project Narrative using the evaluation criteria identified in Section V.A. You must use the same section headers identified below for each section of the Project Narrative.

a. Statement of Need (Up to 14 Points)

Scoring under this criterion will be based on the extent to which the following factors are clearly and accurately addressed:

i. Applicants must clearly articulate the need for a state workforce longitudinal administrative database including the nature and scope of any identified problems and consequences of not addressing the need. (Up to 4 points)

The state’s launch point must be identified/labeled (as described in Section 1.A as LP1, LP2, or LP3) and described.

LP1: Proposals from applicants with new or planned workforce longitudinal administrative database must include a discussion on why the state has decided to develop a workforce longitudinal administrative database and what purpose it will serve.

LP2: Applicants with partially developed workforce longitudinal databases must include a discussion on the current status of the state’s workforce longitudinal administrative database and how this funding will allow for a comprehensive database.

LP3: Applicants with comprehensive databases must include a discussion on the current status of the state’s database and the need to expand the breadth of data collected, particularly workforce data.

ii. All applicants must briefly describe the current status of the state’s SLDS, if any, including any current plans to further develop the state’s SLDS. The status description must include the ability to link K-12 and post-secondary education records to workforce records. (Up to 4 points)

If the applicant is planning to partner with a research entity, or has existing partnerships, the application must describe why the state chose to outsource the activity (e.g., describe limitations of capacity, or decision to maintain an existing partnership).

iii. All applicants must explain plans for sustaining these workforce longitudinal administrative databases beyond the three-year grant period, including how their planned or existing Memorandums of Understanding (MOU) and Data Sharing Agreements (DSAs) will be renewed with their partners to ensure continued maintenance and analysis of the workforce longitudinal administrative database. (Up to 6 points)

b. Expected Outcomes and Outputs (Up to 18 Points)

We will score this criterion based on the extent to which the following factors are clearly and accurately addressed:

i. Clearly identify the outcome(s) and output(s) that will result from the project. Outcomes are the measurable results of the project. They are the positive benefits or negative changes or measurable characteristics that occur as a result of project activities or outputs. Outputs are tangible products or services that result from the project. To differentiate between outcomes and outputs, an example would be a community college that receives a grant to address a need for more workers in all health-related fields. An outcome of the project is an increase in graduates in health-related fields by 5 percent. An output of the project is the creation of 3 additional courses in health-related fields. (Up to 6 points).

ii. Applicants must clearly identify and list the proposed outcomes and outputs (i.e., deliverables such as products, features, benchmarks) that will result from the project according to their LP. These outcomes and outputs must help address the needs and objectives the applicant identified in the Statement of Need. Outputs must be expressed as deliverables that can be shared with the Department at the end of the grant period. (Up to 6 points).

iii. The applicant must provide the state’s objective, in a sentence or two, for each of the following major activities listed below as applicable (each item is associated with the appropriate applicant type(s) as noted in parentheses) (Up to 6 points):

Creating or expanding workforce longitudinal database (all applicants);

Improving the quality of workforce data (all applicants);

Developing or expanding the capacity to match workforce and education data (all applicants);

Using data for analysis of workforce and education programs (LP3);

Producing and disseminating workforce training provider performance information and outcomes (LP2 and LP3);

Creating user-friendly portals to inform consumer choice (LP2 and LP3); and

Advancing racial equity and support for underserved communities through the use of demographic and customer characteristics data, including building out capacity to disaggregate data based on racial and ethnic characteristics and disaggregating by race, ethnicity, gender, disability, etc., so outcomes for these specific underserved populations can be tracked (all applicants).

Enhancing the capacity to collect, measure, store, and analyze data related to job quality (all applicants).

c. Project Design (Up to 44 Points)

We will score this criterion based on the extent to which the following factors are clearly, accurately and convincingly addressed:

i. Applicants must outline a plan that describes the scope and required activities and work necessary to accomplish the project requirements listed below according to the state’s launch point. The project design must include a timeline for the completion of work that will be updated quarterly throughout the grant period of performance. Applicants must summarize work done to obtain their current LP. (Up to 6 points)

ii. Applicants must account for all functions or activities identified in the application, cite factors that might accelerate or decelerate the work and state the reason for taking the proposed approach rather than other approaches, and identify any potential barriers and describe how the project will be able to overcome those barriers. DO NOT include proprietary information in the application. (Up to 6 points)

iii. The requirements are broken out by the launch point. Please refer to your launch point section below for your specific requirements. (Up to 32 points)

1. For Applicants with New or Planned Databases (LP1) (Up to 32 points)

The application must address the following:

a. Database Design, Data Quality Assurance, and Proposed Uses

Applicants with no workforce longitudinal administrative database must provide a complete project plan that outlines system specifications, data analysis functionality, and a detailed description of the intended design of data content and usage.

Applicants must specify the planned layout for the data files that will be contained in the databases. This layout must include the format for the data records and the format and definition of each included data field. Applicants are encouraged to incorporate data elements from the Participant Individual Record Layout (PIRL) for the workforce and education programs required under WIOA.

Applicants must also demonstrate the intended use of the following database design element:

Personal Identifier:

Applicants must explain how the database will be developed using the social security number

(SSN) or tax identification number as a unique personal identifier for individuals entering into the workforce system, in addition to job seekers and employees already in the workforce system.

The SSN is already in use throughout the workforce system and will allow States to gather this data longitudinally in order to accurately track movement into and out of workforce and education systems.

For most programs, DOL recognizes that SSNs are collected on a voluntary basis; therefore, DOL understands that the workforce longitudinal administrative databases will be restricted to those individuals having supplied their SSN and thus may not represent a complete database of all persons who are receiving workforce development services.

Applicants must also describe the capacity of the workforce longitudinal databases to link, consistent with Family Education Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) requirements, to unique identifiers in the SLDS. Specifically, for SWAs where the workforce longitudinal database is emerging or undeveloped, applicants must describe their plans to match the data between the education and workforce databases.

Applicants must provide a clear description of how they will develop data-validation measures and other quality assurance measures used to promote the quality, completeness, validity, and reliability of the data collected

b. Scope of Longitudinal Workforce Data:

Applicants must list the programs that will be included in the database and the plan to match data across each program. At a minimum, the database must include disaggregated individual- record data (including wage record information) for the following:

WIOA title I programs;

Adult Education and Family Literacy (AEFLA) program, authorized under WIOA title II;

Vocational Rehabilitation (VR) program, authorized under Title I of the Rehabilitation

Act, 1973, as amended by WIOA title IV;

Employment Service program authorized under the Wagner-Peyser Act, as amended by

WIOA title III;

Trade Adjustment Assistance for Workers program under the Trade Act of 1974, title II, as amended, and Trade Readjustment Allowances program data;

UI wage-record information from quarter to quarter measuring employment and income earning gains;

UI benefit data including demographic information associated with UI benefit payments;

and Federal employment data.

We also encourage applicants to include data from other education and human services programs such as: the Department of Health and Human Services’ Temporary Assistance for Needy Families; the Department of Agriculture’s Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program;

Registered Apprenticeship; and data from other similar programs that may yield workforce-related outcomes.

Applicants must also include plans on how the longitudinal database they are planning to build will support analysis by race, ethnicity, gender and disability and development of data driven policies that assist underserved job seekers and communities. This should include discussion of how applicants will achieve data disaggregation on racial and ethnic characteristics and gender and disability, and how such data will be used. The Department suggests states consider best practices regarding data disaggregation consistent with OMB Statistical Directive 15 (Race and Ethnicity Flexibilities (whitehouse.gov)).

Applicants must describe how their proposed workforce longitudinal databases will be used to promote and advance job quality for program participants and job seekers.