Questions and Answers revised.pdf

Questions received:

1. Earlier today we discussed requirements such as UL 752 – Level 3 Ballistic Standards that would stop rounds from any handgun.

a. **Will there be any forthcoming amendments to the RFQ related to required ballistic test standards? No, however, please provide the test standards of proposed product.

2. For the entrances, we discussed that adding UL 752 – Level 3 ballistic panels will add weight to the door. Typically, the door closures and hinges need to be adjusted to tolerate this extra weight. Our company does not specialize in door calibration or egress standards, and these modifications are typically performed by a 3rd party. We also briefly discussed the diƯerences between mounting a ballistic rated shield directly to the door vs removing the glass and installing a ballistic rated shield (i.e.

re-glazing) in its place.

a. Will there be any forthcoming information or amendments related to door hardware? No

b. And, would there be any forthcoming information or amendments Re:

mounting ballistic shields direct to the door vs re-glazing the window panels on the door with ballistic rated shields? No

3. Do the existing windows need to remain “operable” post installation? Yes, which keeps the building to code

a. In other words, do they need to be able to open and close for fresh air or egress purposes? Yes, you need them to open and close to keep the building to code

b. If so, will there be a forthcoming amendment related to the design and construction for ballistic rated window treatments that can open and close?

Using Ballistic film will allow windows to open and close

4. When you build a ballistic shield in front of a window and seal it, you trap air between the existing window and the ballistic shield. It is absolutely imperative that the air trapped between the panels is able to circulate so that condensation does not build in between the panels. Over time, moisture and condensation between the panels will degrade the system and look unsightly as condensation forms and then dries repeatedly.

a. **With this in mind, will there be any requirements for the framing system to be ventilated or to oƯer moisture wicking features? Recommend utilizing Ballistic Film

5. If a company’s annual revenue exceeds the small business threshold, does that mean the company is not allowed to bid the project directly? unknown

6. If a company’s annual revenue exceeds the small business threshold, would that company be able to serve as a subcontractor for a Prime contractor or GC that does meet small business requirements? unknown

7. It was mentioned by one of the bidders yesterday that they would apply the bullet-resistant polycarbonate directly to the glass & windows. This would not only make the window inoperable but also potentially increase the weight load, making the window unsafe. Would you prefer an interior-mounted single-sheet and frame system, or the window case and frame, such as Riot Glass' AP100 Level 3 BR system?

8. For the second point of entry, would you prefer Riot Glass' GEN II AP100 Level 3 BR system to be mounted to the commercial-framed first layer in front of the glass or behind the glass? In front would help in preventing possible glass damage and breakage.

9. For the 2nd POE door system, we would recommend de-glazing and reglazing the glass lites and installing the Riot Glass' AP100 Level 3 BR system. Attempting to mount an additional piece of polycarbonate would potentially increase the weight-bearing load of the doors, resulting in new push bars needing to be ordered and installed, additional door hinges, and more modifications. How would you like these to be quoted and installed?

Proposed option: On all windows prefer to have ballistic rated film for window movement and to keep building to code

For front door area – the second set of doors/ AP100-BR LV2 or equivalent film system to the outer part to protect the inner.