PastPerformanceQuestionnaire.pdf

PDF 25 KB Posted

Attached to
support USAFRICOM for Security Badging Services Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
W91WFU16T0001
Issued by
Department of the Army Materiel Command Expeditionary Contracting Command Regional Contracting Office Stuttgart 409th CSB

About this file

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to support USAFRICOM for Security Badging Services, newest first.
File Type Posted
QandA.pdf PDF
W91WFU16T001Mod03.pdf PDF
W91WFU16T0001MODIFICATION.pdf PDF
Revised_Security_Badge_Operator_Synopsis_Draft.pdf PDF
W91WFU16T0001SOLICITATION.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT 2

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)

Cover Letter for Questionnaire

I. Background: The purpose of this questionnaire is to obtain past performance information relative to contract(s) that have previously been completed or are currently being performed by the Contractor identified above. This Contractor is a potential source for a purportedly similar project to be performed at USAFRICOM in Stuttgart, Germany. This questionnaire is designed to enable an evaluation of this potential Contractor's past performance on projects similar to the one to be performed at USAFRICOM.

II. Instructions: Please complete the survey entitled "Past Performance Questionnaire," using the following guidance:

A. Legible handwritten responses are sufficient.

B. A single questionnaire should to be agreed upon and completed by the Program Manager, Contracting Officer and Administrative Contracting Officer or appropriate functional representative. If desired, a separate questionnaire may be completed by specific individuals.

C. Based upon the definitions below, indicate your assessment of this Contractor's performance on your (subject) project, by placing an "X" in the appropriate box. Your assessment should consider the Contractor's performance in accordance with the contractual requirements.

NOTE: Comments must be provided for exceptional ratings, unsatisfactory ratings and other ratings where problems have not been satisfactorily resolved.

Not Applicable (N/A): Indicates that the Contractor was not required to perform similar efforts on the subject contract. An N/A response will be evaluated neither favorably nor unfavorably.

D. May provide additional comments

WHEN FILLED IN, THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION IAW FAR 3.104

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

A. Contractor:

B. Cage Code of contractor contract was awarded to:

C. Contract number:

D. Contract type:

E. Was this a competitive contract? Yes No

F. Period of performance:

G. Initial contract cost: $

H. Current/final contract cost: $

I. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs:

J. Description of service provided:

SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

A. Customer or agency name:

B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):

C. Geographic description of services under this contract, e.g. local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands:

SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION

A. Evaluator's name:

B. Evaluator's title:

C. Evaluator's phone/fax number:

D. Number of years evaluator worked on subject contract:

SECTION 4: EVALUATION

Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing and “X” in the appropriate block using the columns provided to the right of each question. The scale is defined as follows:

CODE PERFORMANCE LEVEL

A ACCEPTABLE: The contractor’s performance clearly meets the minimum contractual requirements of the contract .

U UNACCEPTABLE: The contractor’s performance does not clearly meet the minimum contractual requirements of the contract.

N/A NOT APPLICABLE: The contractor was not required to perform such in accordance with contractual requirements.

Program Management Acceptable

(A) Unacceptable

(U) Not

Applicable (N/A)

1. Effectiveness of overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage, and control the program).

2. Ability to hire/apply a qualified workforce to this effort.

3. Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes/corrective actions).

4. Ability to manage Government Furnished Property on this effort.

5. Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance.

6. Understood/complied with customer objectives and technical requirements.

7. Successfully responded to emergency and/or surge situations.

8. Contractor maintained an effective quality control plan.

9. Contractor ability to comply with applicable safety standards.

Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated (U) Unacceptable in response to the above (use additional sheets, if necessary).

Explanation:

Management of Personnel Acceptable

(A) Unacceptable

(U) Not

Applicable

(NA)

1. Contractor’s approach to organizing, staffing, leading, planning, coordinating, and controlling resources to meet the requirements of this contract.

2. Contractor’s ability to effectively coordinate, integrate, and manage subcontractors.

3. Quality/effectiveness of contractor’s ability to retain, train a capable workforce to meet mission requirements and established training and exercise metrics and goals.

4. Contractor’s ability to implement and maintain a training program.

5. Ability to meet surge requirements with required personnel/skill sets within timelines in accordance with contract requirements.

Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated (U) Unacceptable in response to the above (use additional sheets, if necessary).

Explanation:

2. Government Contracts Only: Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

YES Default Convenience Pending Terminations

NO

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc).

SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY

What were the contractor’s most positive aspects in the performance of the contract?

What was the contractor’s most negative aspect in the performance of the contract?

Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?

Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.

Evaluator’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire to:

MARK: (SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION IAW FAR 3.104)

Mailing Address:

Source Selection Facility RCO Stuttgart

Unit 30401 ATTN: Brian Vaughan and Birgit De Luca

APO AE 09107-0401

Email: brian.d.vaughan.civ@mail.mil Brigit.deluca.LN@mail.mil

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .