W91QVN-23-R-0015-A0001.pdf

0011863821

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04 EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

SEE NEXT PAGES

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 19

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 09-May-2023

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 15C. DATE SIGNED 15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer) (Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W91QVN23R0015

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

03-May-2023

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

08-May-2023

CODE

411TH CONTRACTING SUPPORT BRIGADE, KOREA

HUMPHREYS CONTRACTING DIVISION

UNIT 15289

APO AP 96271-5584

UNITED STATES

W91QVN 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODE CODE

EMAIL: TEL:

W91QVN23R0015

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following items are applicable to this modification:

P1

a. The purpose of this amendment is to change the below paragraphs as follows:

(1) Change Paragraph 2 (PROPOSAL FILES), VOLUME I, TECHNICAL, A-TECHNICAL PHASE I, FACTOR 3 - PRIME CONTRACTOR’S PRIOR EXPERIENCE of the Addendum to FAR 52.212-1, Instructions to the offeror(s).

FROM: The offeror shall provide evidence of experience of recent (calendar year 2019, 2020, and 2021) experience amounting to over W1,000,000,000 (10억원) per year in new work, repair, and maintenance of SCADA system. The experience of a subcontractor cannot substitute for the prime contractor’s experience. The Offeror shall provide evidence of prior experience in the following format:

- Title of the contract/Project

- A detail description of work completed

- Length of contract/Project (year/month/date – year/month/date)

- Value of contract/project in KW for total amount

- Complete name, phone number, and E-mail address of point of contact at Client Organization

(Company) or Requiring Activity (RA)

- A copy of performance certificate issued by Korea Information and Communication Contractor

Association (정보통신공사협회) , Korea Electrical Contractor Association (한국전기공사협회) or a copy of contract to include contract amount and length of contract

NOTE: The prior experience without a copy of performance certificate issued by Korea Information and

Communication Contractor Association (정보통신공사협회), Korea Information and

Communication Contractor Association (정보통신공사협회) Construction Association of Korea or a copy of contract include value and length of contract will not be considered for award.

TO: The offeror shall provide evidence of experience of recent (calendar year 2019, 2020, and 2021)

SCADA system. The experience of a subcontractor cannot substitute for the prime contractor’s experience.

The Offeror shall provide evidence of prior experience in the following format:

- Length of contract/Project (year/month/date – year/month/date)

- Value of contract/project in KW for total amount

- Complete name, phone number, and E-mail address of point of contact at Client Organization

(Company) or Requiring Activity (RA)

- A copy of performance certificate issued by Korea Information and Communication Contractor

Association (정보통신공사협회) , or Korea Electrical Contractor Association

(한국전기공사협회) or a copy of contract to include contract amount and length of contract

Communication Contractor Association (정보통신공사협회), or Korea Electrical Contractor Association

(한국전기공사협회), or a copy of contract include value and length of contract will not be considered for award.

(2) Change Paragraph 2 (PROPOSAL FILES), VOLUME I, TECHNICAL, A-TECHNICAL PHASE I, FACTOR 3 - PRIME CONTRACTOR’S PRIOR EXPERIENCE of the Addendum to FAR 52.212-2, Evaluation-Commercial Item.

FROM: The offeror will be evaluated on providing evidence of recent (Calendar Year 2019, 2020, and 2021) amounting to over W1,000,000,000 (10억원) per year in new work, repair, and maintenance of SCADA system. The experience of a subcontractor cannot substitute for the Prime Contractor’s experience. The offeror(s) shall provide evidence of prior experience:

- The title of the contract/project

- Contract number for the Government/Commercial Performance

- A clear description of work completed

- Length of contract/project (Year/Month/Date – Year/Month/Date)

- Value (Won amount) of contract/project

- Complete name and phone number of Point of Contact (POC) at Client Organization

A copy of performance certificate issued by Korea Information and Communication Contractor Association (정보통신공사협회) , Korea Electrical Contractor Association (한국전기공사협회) or a copy of contract to include contract amount and length of contract

Communication Contractor Association (정보통신공사협회), Korea Information and

Communication Contractor Association (정보통신공사협회) Construction Association of Korea or a copy of contract include value and length of contract will not be considered for award.

TO: The offeror will be evaluated on providing evidence of recent (calendar year 2019, 2020, and 2021)

SCADA system. The experience of a subcontractor cannot substitute for the prime contractor’s experience.

The Offeror shall provide evidence of prior experience in the following format:

- Length of contract/Project (year/month/date – year/month/date)

- Value of contract/project in KW for total amount

- Complete name, phone number, and E-mail address of point of contact at Client Organization

(Company) or Requiring Activity (RA)

- A copy of performance certificate issued by Korea Information and Communication Contractor

(한국전기공사협회), or a copy of contract include value and length of contract will not be considered for award.

(3) Change Paragraph 2 (PROPOSAL FILES), VOLUME I, TECHNICAL A-TECHNICAL PHASE II, FACTOR 4 (TECHNICAL AND MANAGEMENT), Sub-Factor 2 – Quality Control Plan (QCP), of the Addendum to FAR 52.212-1, Instructions to the offeror(s) and Addendum to FAR 52.212-2, Evaluation Commercial, to change

FROM:

The offeror will be evaluated on providing for Quality Control Plan (QCP) that demonstrates the offeror’s approach to conducting comprehensive quality control. The plan shall clearly describe the offeror’s quality control methods and practices such as standardized procedures to monitor performance, identify discrepancies, service call response, and take corrective action to prevent re-occurrences. As part of the QC Plan, the Offeror shall identify what items the Offeror will inspect under its comprehensive QC for each task listed in the PRS table. The QCP shall be used throughout the life of this contract and shall be updated by the Contractor when the changes affect the QCP. The plan shall include followings at minimum, but not limited to:

- A description of the preventive maintenance system to cover all services. The description shall specify the areas to be inspected on both a scheduled and unscheduled basis, frequency of inspection, and the title and organizational placement of the inspectors.

- A description of the methods to be used to identify and prevent defects in the quality of service performed.

- A description of the method to response service call and communicate with call requestor.

- A description of the method to maintain the record for preventive maintenance, repair work, response of service call and facility equipment list.

TO:

The offeror will be evaluated on providing for Quality Control Plan (QCP) that demonstrates the offeror’s approach to conducting comprehensive quality control. The plan shall clearly describe the offeror’s quality control methods and practices such as standardized procedures to monitor performance, identify discrepancies, service call response, and take corrective action to prevent re-occurrences. As part of the QC Plan, the Offeror shall identify what items the Offeror will inspect under its comprehensive QC for each task listed in the PRS table. The QCP shall be used throughout the life of this contract and shall be updated by the Contractor when the changes affect the QCP.

b. All other terms and conditions of the solicitation remain the same.

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

The following have been modified:

ADDENDUM TO FAR 52.212-1, INSTRUCTIONS TO THE OFFEROR(S)

NOTE: Performance Work Statement is attached to the Solicitation as ATTACHMENT A.

In accordance with FAR 52.212-1 "Instructions to Offerors-Commercial Items, the Government reserves the right, based on the Government's best interests, to make a determination to: 1) award without discussions; 2) make a single award for this requirement; and/or 3) make no award if, upon evaluation, none of the proposals are deemed likely to meet the requirements.

1. PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

a. Each paragraph should be single spaced and shall be separated by at least one blank line. A standard, 12-point minimum font size applies. Arial or New Times Roman fonts are required. Tables and illustrations may use a reduced font size no less than 8-point and may be produced in landscape mode.

b. The following volumes of material shall be submitted:

VOLUME TITLE DIGITAL COPIES MAXIMUM PAGES

I Technical 2 (1 original + 1 copy w/company name or symbol redacted) No page limit

II Past Performance 2 (1 original + 1 copy w/company name or symbol redacted

10 pages

III Price 2 (original in PDF + 1 copy in excel) No page limit

NOTE: Pages that exceed the required page limitations will not be evaluated. Additional pages over the maximum allowed will be removed or not read and will not be evaluated by the Government.

c. Pre-Award Survey: A pre-award survey may be conducted on firms and subcontractors indicating firm commitments to this acquisition that were included with the proposals. The pre-award survey is to determine the prospective contractor’s responsibility IAW FAR 9.104-1. Information may be requested as required by the Contracting Officer and the information shall be submitted within three (3) working days of the request.

d. Site Visit: Offerors are urged and expected to inspect the site where services are to be performed and to satisfy themselves regarding all general and local conditions that may affect the price of contract performance, to the extent that the information is reasonably obtainable. In no event shall failure to inspect the site constitute grounds for a claim after contract award. The site orientation schedule is as follows:

Date and Time: 12 May 2023, 0900 hours

Location: In front of the visitor center at ADAMS Gate (Doduri Gate – Bldg. #5502)

The attendee must bring a photo identification card (주민등록증 또는 운전면허증), vehicle insurance, and registration.

*NOTE: Any Offerors who are interested in participation of the site orientation should be present at not later than TBD date/time/location and also provide a list of attendants’ information (company name, attendant name, address & telephone number, ROK ID number and vehicle license plate number) to the Contract Specialist, Ms.

Kim, Chong-Ae at chongae.kim.ln@army.mil by 09 May 2023, 13:00 hrs for the installation access process.

Full Name – Maximum three (3) individual per offeror

Korean Identification Number Phone or Cell-Phone Number Name of Company Certification of last COVID vaccine

If already have post pass which is available to get access Camp Humphreys (Yes/No)

e. Each volume shall be submitted electronically via email to chongae.kim.ln@army.mil and hyonsuk.chong1.ln@army.mil by 1300 hours on the closing date of RFP as the following format.

- Write Solicitation Number (including amendment number, if applicable) in the Subject Line

- Identify Company Information including Company Name, POC, Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) and CAGE

Code in the Proposal.

- Provide Name and Phone Number of the email sender at the bottom of the email.

- The only acceptable file formats are PDF, Microsoft Word, and Microsoft Excel.

- The maximum size of e-mail is limited 10MB to the Government email address.

- Emails sent from Commercial email services of Gmail and Hotmail are acceptable. Other commercial email addresses may be blocked.

The confirmation of receipt of email to ensure that all submittal requirements are received prior to the solicitation closing date and time is offeror’s responsibility. Contact number is (0503) 355-0644 or (0503) 355-3373.

f. Official Means of Disseminating information after solicitation issued through SAM.gov website such as requests for clarification and/or information concerning this solicitation shall be submitted in writing or electronically with below information (for each question, comment or observation, identify the Paragraph number being referenced):

411th CSB Humphreys Contracting Division, Branch B, ATTN: Ms. Kim, Chong-Ae Reference: W91QVN-23-R-0015, Repair of Utility Infrastructure SCADA System at USAG Humphreys E-mail: hyonsuk.chong1.ln@army.mil and chongae.kim.ln@army.mil

g. All questions should be emailed to Kim, Chong Ae and Chong, Hyon Suk within 7 calendar days after the site visit is conducted. Questions received after this date and time may not be answered.

Representations and Certifications: The Offeror shall submit the following:

- Complete Standard Form 1449 and Standard Form 30 (if any amendment is issued)

- ATTACHMENT: CONTRACTOR’S TAX EXEMPTION DECLARATION : The offeror shall complete/SUBMIT the certifications, Special Exercise (Petroleum) Tax for the total two (2) years (Base plus one (1) option) mailto:chongae.kim.ln@army.mil mailto:chongae.kim.ln@army.mil mailto:hyonsuk.chong1.ln@army.mil mailto:hyonsuk.chong1.ln@army.mil mailto:chongae.kim.ln@army.mil

- FAR Clause 52.212-3, Alt I, OFFEROR REPRESENTATIOINS AND CERTIFICATIONS-Commercial Items: The offeror shall complete the certifications related to the FAR 52.213-3, Alt 1, (h) & (k).

- FAR Clauses 52.204-24, Representation Regarding Certain Telecommunications and Video Surveillance Services or Equipment

- FAR Clause 52.204-26 COVERED TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT OR SERVICES--REPRESENTATION

(OCT 2020): The offeror shall check mark in checkbox on the representation whether the offeror WILL or WILL NOT provide the covered telecommunications equipment or services and DOES or DOES NOT use covered telecommunications equipment. The Offeror shall provide the additional disclosure information required at paragraph of this section if the Offeror responds “WILL” or "DOES" in paragraph of this section. (If both Clauses have been in SAM (https://www.sam.gov) already, you are not required to check mark.

h. Offerors are cautioned to submit enough information to enable the Source Selection Evaluation Board to fully ascertain each offeror’s capability to perform all of the requirements of this solicitation. Offerors are cautioned to follow the detailed instructions fully and carefully, as the Government reserves the right to make a contract award determination without any discussions with offerors. The Government intends make a final determination as to whether an offer is acceptable or unacceptable solely on the basis of the proposals as submitted, without requesting any further information.

Nevertheless, Offerors may, at the discretion of the Government, be asked to provide minor clarifications regarding their proposals. Furthermore, if it is deemed necessary the Government may, at its sole discretion, establish a competitive range in order to conduct discussions in accordance with FAR 15.306(a)(3). In that case, the Government retains the right to limit the competitive range to the “most highly rated proposals” for the purpose of efficiency.

2. PROPOSAL FILES:

a. Format: The submission shall be clearly indexed and logically assembled. Each volume shall be clearly identified and shall begin at the top of a page. All pages of each volume shall be appropriately numbered and identified by the complete company name, date and Request for Proposal (RFP) number in the header and/or footer. A Table of Contents should be created using the Table of Content feature in MS Word. MS Word (doc) files shall use the following page setup parameters:

MARGINS Top, Bottom, Left, Right - 1”

GUTTER 0”

FROM EDGE Header, Footer - 0.5” PAGE SIZE Width: 8.5” Height: 11”

The following additional restrictions apply:

b. File Packaging: All of the proposal files shall be in read-only format, using PDF files. All price information (CLIN structure of the RFP and Submission of Offer Breakdown under Factor (6) to aide in the cost/price evaluation shall be submitted in Microsoft Excel 2010 .

c. Content Requirement: All information shall be confined to the appropriate file. The Offeror shall confine submissions to essential matters, sufficient to define the proposal in a concise manner, to permit a complete and accurate evaluation of each proposal. Each file of the proposal shall consist of a Table of Contents, Summary https://www.sam.gov/

Section, and the Narrative discussion. The Summary Section shall contain a brief abstract of the file. Proprietary information shall be clearly marked. The following shall be included in the Narrative discussion.

VOLUME I – TECHNICAL: The volume shall be organized into the following sections:

A. TECHNICAL PHASE I (ACCEPTABLE/UNACCEPTABLE)

FACTOR 1- PRIME CONTRACTOR’S BUSINESS REGISTRATION AND LICENSES. The Offeror shall provide a copy of Prime Contractor's business license issued by ROK Government in;

(1) Electrical System Repair (전기공사업) OR

(2) Information Communication (정보통신공사업)

• The license of subcontractor cannot be substituted for the prime contractor’s license.

FACTOR 2 - KEY PERSONNEL: The Offeror shall provide an individual (personal) resume for each of key personnel listed as below. All resumes must clearly identify the following, as required:

- Name of Key Personnel

- A description qualifying work experience includes contract/project information

- Complete point of contact of employer (including name and phone no) and validating personnel

- Length of work experience (year/month/date-year/month/date)

- A copy of License if applicable

- A Certified of experience issued by the company or the organization with job title (경력 증명서)

Subfactor 1 - CONTRACT MANAGER (CM): The Offeror shall provide a CM's resume with at least three (3) years of experience as a CM in maintenance of SCADA system within the last five (5) years from the closing date of this solicitation.

Subfactor 2 – QUALITY CONTROL MANAGER (QCM): The Offeror shall provide a QCM’s resume with at least five

(5) years of experience as a QCM in working with processing control programming languages such as Programmable Logic Controllers (PLC) and Human Machine Interface (HMI) devices related to SCADA system and integration within the last seven (7) years from the closing date of this solicitation. Additionally, the offeror shall provide a copy of QCM’s valid license at least one of the below categories issued by the ROK Government.

Professional Engineer Information Communication (정보통신기술사)

Engineer Information Processing (정보처리기사)

Engineer Information Communication (정보통신기사)

Engineer Information Security (정보보안기사)

Industrial Engineer Communication Cable (통신선로 산업기사)

Subfactor 3 - SCADA System Engineer (SSE): The Offeror shall provide a SSE’s resume with at least five (5) years of experience in process control programming languages such as programmable logic controller (PLC) and Human Machine Interface (HMI) devices the field of integrate SCADA systems within the last seven (7) years from the closing date of this solicitation. Additionally, the offeror shall provide a copy of SSE’s valid license at least one of the below categories issued by the ROK Government.

Engineer Information Communication (정보통신기사)

Engineer Information Security (정보보안기사)

Industrial Engineer Communication Cable (통신선로 산업기사)

Subfactor 4 – Electronic Control System Engineer (ECSE): The Offeror shall provide a ECSE’s resume with at least five (5) years of experience in installing, programming, troubleshooting Programmable Logic Controllers (PLC) Remote Terminal Units (RTU), design and implementation of control systems within the last seven (7) years from the closing date of this solicitation. Additionally, the offeror shall provide a copy of ECSE’s valid license at least one of the below categories issued by the ROK Government.

Engineer Information Communication (정보통신기사)

Engineer Information Security (정보보안기사)

Industrial Engineer Communication Cable (통신선로 산업기사)

Subfactor 5 – Security Integration Engineer (SIE): The offeror shall provide a SIE’s resume with at least five (5) years of experience in the electronic systems/information technology field and demonstrated experience of installation and repair SCADA system within the last seven (7) years from the closing date of this solicitation.

Additionally, the offeror shall provide a copy of SIE’s valid license at least one of the below categories issued by the ROK Government.

Engineer Information Communication (정보통신기사)

Engineer Information Security (정보보안기사)

Industrial Engineer Communication Cable (통신선로 산업기사)

Subfactor 6 – Safety Manager (SM/Electrical Engineer (EE): The offeror shall provide a SM/EE’s resume with at least five (5) years of experience in design and installation of medium and high voltage electrical distribution system and equipment within the last seven (7) years from the closing date of this solicitation. Additionally, the offeror shall provide a copy of SM’s valid license in Engineer Electricity (전기기사) or higher grade issued by the ROK Government.

FACTOR 3 – PRIME CONTRACTOR’S PRIOR EXPERIENCE: The offeror shall provide evidence of experience of recent (calendar year 2019, 2020, and 2021) experience amounting to over W1,000,000,000 (10억원) per year in new work, repair, and maintenance of SCADA system. The experience of a subcontractor cannot substitute for the prime contractor’s experience. The Offeror shall provide evidence of prior experience in the following format:

- Length of contract/Project (year/month/date – year/month/date)

- Value of contract/project in KW for total amount

- Complete name, phone number, and E-mail address of point of contact at Client Organization

(Company) or Requiring Activity (RA)

- A copy of performance certificate issued by Korea Information and Communication Contractor

(한국전기공사협회), or a copy of contract include value and length of contract will not be considered for award.

B. TECHNICAL PHASE II (TRADE OFF):

FACTOR 4 – TECHNICAL AND MANAGEMENT:

Subfactor 1- Technical Approach: The Offeror shall provide Technical Approach that demonstrates how the Contractor will complete all tasks contained in PWS paragraph 8 to show their understanding and capability in accomplishing all requirements specifically, SCADA system work plan, SCADA diagram, hardware/software install and deployment, test and simulation plan of factory acceptance testing, site acceptance testing and as-built documentation, and conduct operation and maintenance trainings. The Offerors are cautioned that “mirroring/copying” the technical requirements of the PWS with a statement of intent to perform does not reflect an understanding of the requirement of capability to perform. The Offeror shall provide staffing plan that clearly demonstrates how they will perform utility infrastructure SCADA repair and clearly identifies the labor mix and quantities by task, identifies the replacement strategy, backup policy, to ensure mitigation of turbulence caused by vacancies and leaves of absence to the execution of this requirement. The Offeror shall state the proposed Key Personnel and non-key personnel, both full time and part time staff, detailing roles, experience, license and responsibilities of each position supporting the utility infrastructure SCADA repair.

Subfactor 2 – Quality Control Plan (QCP): The Offeror shall provide a QCP that demonstrates the Offeror’s approach to conducting comprehensive quality control. The plan shall clearly describe the Offeror’s quality control methods and practices such as standardized procedures to monitor performance, identify discrepancies, and take corrective action to prevent re-occurrences. As part of the QCP, the Offeror shall identify what items the Offeror will inspect under its comprehensive QC for each task listed in the PRS table. The QCP shall be used throughout the life of this contract and shall be updated by the Contractor when the changes affect the QCP.

VOLUME II – PAST PERFORMANCE:

FACTOR 5 – PAST PERFORMANCE:

This volume shall contain past performance information regarding similar contracts.

*NOTE: Major subcontractor is defined as any subcontractor that will perform more than 10% of the Offeror’s proposed price. Offerors shall submit maximum ten (10) Government and/or commercial contracts for the prime Offeror and each major subcontractor in performance or awarded during calendar year of 2019, 2020 and 2021, which are relevant to the efforts required by this solicitation. Relevant efforts are defined as services/efforts that are the same as or similar to the effort (as compared to North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 238210 required by the RFP. Data concerning the Offeror shall be provided first, followed by each proposed major subcontractor, in alphabetical order. The Offeror shall also submit the written consent of its major subcontractors to allow the disclosure of its subcontractor’s past performance information to the Offeror. In addition, letters of commitment shall be included for all major subcontractors for their past performance to be considered. This volume shall be organized into the following sections:

(1) Section 1 (Contract Description): This section shall include the following information in the following format:

a. Contractor/Subcontractor place of performance: If the work was performed as a subcontractor, also provide the name of the prime contractor and Point of Contact (POC) within the prime contractor organization (name, and current address, e-mail address, and telephone and fax numbers).

b. Awarded price/cost.

c. Final or project final price/cost.

d. Original delivery schedule, including dates of start and completion of work.

e. Final or projected final, delivery schedule, including dates of start and completion of work.

(2) Section 2 (Performance):

a. Offerors shall provide a specific narrative explanation of each contract listed in Section 1, Contract Description, describing the objectives achieved and detailing how the effort is relevant to the requirement of this RFP.

b. For any contracts that did not/do not meet original schedule or technical performance requirements, provide a brief explanation of the reason(s) for the shortcomings and any corrective action(s) taken to avoid recurrence. The Offerors shall list each time the delivery schedule was revised and provide an explanation of why the revision was necessary. All Requests for Deviation and Requests for Waiver shall be addressed with respect to causes and corrective actions. The Offerors shall also provide copy of any Cure Notices or Show Cause Letters received on each contract listed and a description of any corrective action implemented by the Offeror or proposed subcontractor.

The Offerors shall indicate if any of the contracts listed were terminated and the type and reasons for the termination.

(3) Section 3 (Subcontracts): Offerors shall provide an outline of how the effort required by the RFP will be assigned for performance within the Offeror’s corporate entity and among the proposed subcontractors. The information provided for the prime Offeror and each proposed major subcontractor must include the entire company name, company address, CAGE Code, UEI Number and type of work to be performed by citing the applicable Government PWS subparagraph number. This includes all subcontractors who will be providing critical hardware/services or whose subcontract is for more than 10% percent of the total proposed cost/price. This section will further include written consent of major subcontractors to allow the disclosure of their subcontractor’s past performance information to the Offeror. In addition, letters of commitment shall be included for all major subcontractors.

(4) Section 4 (Submissions): Offerors are discouraged from providing points of contact with another contractors’ facility, i.e., in case an Offeror (or one of his/her team members) is in a subcontract with another contractor who has submitted a proposal on the same requirement. Offerors shall provide and submit the prime contract number and all Governmental agency POCs in lieu of subcontract numbers or prime contract POCs in situations as described above.

VOLUME III - COST/PRICE

FACTOR 6 (COST/PRICE): The offeror shall provide complete price proposal to include:

(1) Schedule of Services (CLINs/SubCLINs) of the RFP for base year plus one-year option (total two (2) years).

(2) Any escalation in additional option year pricing shall be identified.

(3) The offeror(s) shall round all unit prices to the nearest whole Korean Won (KRW) thereby eliminating the use of any decimal points.

(4) The offeror(s) shall submit a Summary Sheet of total proposed amount per each year.

Submission of Offer Breakdown: In accordance with FAR 52.212-2 (Evaluation – Commercial Items), price analysis will be conducted for each proposal to ensure completeness, reasonableness, realistic, and balance as specified in the Evaluation Factor 6. In order to perform price analysis, the Government requires that offerors shall submit a complete offer breakdown list including sufficient details relative to direct and indirect rates, subcontracts, material, equipment, and other necessary direct costs.

------End of Addendum to FAR 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors – Commercial Items (NOV 2021)-----

52.212-2 EVALUATION--COMMERCIAL ITEMS (NOV 2021)

(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered.

The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

ADDENDUM TO FAR 52.212-2, EVALUATION-COMMERCIAL ITEM

(1) In accordance with FAR Parts 12 and 15, the award will be made based on the best overall (i.e., best value) proposal that is determined to be the most beneficial to the Government, with appropriate consideration given to the RFP# W91QVN-23-R-0015 evaluation factors: Prime Contractor’s Business License, Key Personnel, Prime Contractor’s Prior Experience, Technical and Management, Past Performance, and Price/Cost.

(2) In accordance with FAR 15.101-1, Trade-Off process, an award may be made to other than the lowest priced offeror.

However, the Government will not pay a substantially higher amount for a minimal increase in capability.

(3) The Governments intends to execute a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) CLINs contract for Repair of Utility Infrastructure SCADA System at USAG Humphreys.

(4) The offeror must get an Acceptable rating for the Factor/Subfactor under Technical Phase I in order to be considered under the Technical Phase II Tradeoff criteria. Technical Phase I, Factors 1, 2, and 3 will be rated as Acceptable/Unacceptable only.

(5) Under the Technical Phase II, the Technical Evaluation-Factors 4, Past Performance-Factor 5, and Price-Factor 6 are listed in descending order of importance from Factor 4 (most important) down to Factor 6 (least important). In order to be considered, for award, the offeror must get an at least an Acceptable rating in all factors and subfactors in Technical Phase II.

(6) All subfactors under Factor 4 are of equal importance. All evaluation factors and significant subfactors other than cost or price, when combined, are significantly more importance than cost or price.

(7) Evaluation Factors Relative Order of Importance: All evaluation factors other than price, when combined, are significantly more important than the price factor.

FACTOR DESCRIPTIOIN RELATIVE IMPORTANCE

4 Technical/Management Most Important 5 Past Performance Less important than Factor 4, but more important than Factor

6 Price Least Important. Factor 4, and 5, when combined, are significantly more important than Factor 6

A. FACTORS AND SUBFACTORS: The following factors/sub-factors will be used to evaluate offers:

TECHNICAL PHASE I (ACCEPTABLE/UNACCEPTABLE):

FACTOR 1 (Prime Contractor’s Business License):

- Electrical System Repair (전기공사업) OR

- Information Communication (정보통신공사업)

FACTOR 2 (Key Personnel):

- Contract Manager (CM)

- Quality Control Manager (QCM)

- SCADA System Engineer (SSE)

- Electronic Control System Engineer (ECSE)

- Security Integration Engineer (SIE)

- Safety Manager/Electrical Engineer (SM/EE)

FACTOR 3 (PRIME CONTRACTOR’S PRIOR EXPERIENCE)

TECHNICAL PHASE II (TRADE-OFF)

FACTOR 4 (Technical and Management)

Sub-Factor 1: Technical Approach Sub--Factor 2: Quality Control Plan

FACTOR 5 (Past Performance)

FACTOR 6 (Price)

EVALUATION APPROACH: All proposal will be evaluated by the Source Selection Team (SST)

(1) The overarching evaluation approach for all factors and subfactors is as follows:

(a) Adequacy of Response: The proposal will be evaluated to determine whether the offeror’s methods and approach have adequately and completely considered, defined, and satisfied the requirements specified in the RFP. The proposal will be evaluated to determine the extent to which each requirement has been addressed in the proposal in accordance with the proposal submission section of the RFP.

(b) Feasibility of Approach: The proposal will be evaluated to determine the extent to which the proposed approach is workable and the end results achievable. The proposal will be evaluated to determine the extent to which successful performance is contingent upon proven devices and techniques. The proposal will be evaluated to determine the extent to which the offeror is expected to be able to successfully complete the proposed tasks and technical requirements within the required schedule.

(2) The technical evaluation is divided into the following two phases:

TECHNICAL PHASE I (ACCEPTABLE/UNACCEPTABLE): Under Technical Phase I, proposals will be evaluated in accordance with following rating method:

RATING DESCRIPTION

Acceptable Proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation

FACTOR I (PRIME CONTRACTOR’S BUSINESS LICENSE): The offeror will be evaluated on providing a copy of valid business registration or licenses issued by ROK Government in i) Electrical System Repair ( 전기공사업) or ii)

Information Communication (정보통신공사업) issued by the ROK Government. The license of subcontractor cannot be substituted for the prime contractor’s license.

FACTOR 2 (KEY PERSONNEL): Key personnel will be evaluated based on the resume and the following supporting documents. All resumes must clearly identify as required following:

- Name of Key Personnel

- A description qualifying work experience

- Complete point of contact of employer (including name and phone no) and validating personnel

- Length of work experience (year/month/date-year/month/date)

- A copy of License if applicable

- A Certified of experience issued by the company or the organization (경력 증명서)

Sub-Factor 1 - Contract Manager (CM): The offeror will be evaluated on providing CM's resume with at least three

(3) years of experience as a CM in maintenance of SCADA system within the last five (5) years from the closing date of this solicitation.

Sub-Factor 2 – Quality Control Manager (QCM): The offeror will be evaluated on providing QCM's resume with at least five (5) years of experience as a QCM in working with processing control programming languages such as Programmable Logic Controllers (PLC) and Human Machine Interface (HMI) devices related to SCADA system and integration within the last seven (7) years from the closing date of this solicitation. Additionally, the offeror will be evaluated on providing a copy of QCM’s valid license at least one of the below categories issued by the ROK Government.

Engineer Information Communication (정보통신기사)

Engineer Information Security (정보보안기사)

Industrial Engineer Communication Cable (통신선로 산업기사)

Sub-Factor 3 – SCADA System Engineer (SSE): The offeror will be evaluated on providing SSE's resume with at least five (5) years of experience in process control programming languages such as programmable logic controller (PLC) and Human Machine Interface (HMI) devices the field of integrate SCADA systems within the last seven (7) years from the closing date of this solicitation. Additionally, the offeror will be evaluated on providing a copy of SSE’s valid license at least one of the below categories issued by the ROK Government.

Engineer Information Communication (정보통신기사)

Engineer Information Security (정보보안기사)

Industrial Engineer Communication Cable (통신선로 산업기사)

Sub-Factor 4 – Electronic Control System Engineer (ECSE): The offeror will be evaluated on providing ECSE's resume with at least five (5) years of experience in installing, programming, troubleshooting Programmable Logic Controllers (PLC) Remote Terminal Units (RTU), design and implementation of control systems within the last seven (7) years from the closing date of this solicitation. Additionally, the offeror will be evaluated on providing a copy of ECSE’s valid license at least one of the below categories issued by the ROK Government.

Engineer Information Communication (정보통신기사)

Engineer Information Security (정보보안기사)

Industrial Engineer Communication Cable (통신선로 산업기사)

Sub-Factor 5 – Security Integration Engineer (SIE): The offeror will be evaluated on providing SIE’s resume with at least five (5) years of experience in the electronic systems/information technology field and demonstrated experience of installation and repair of SCADA system within the last seven (7) years from the closing date of this solicitation. Additionally, the offeror shall provide a copy of SIE’s valid license at least one of the below categories issued by the ROK Government.

Engineer Information Communication (정보통신기사)

Engineer Information Security (정보보안기사)

Industrial Engineer Communication Cable (통신선로 산업기사)

Sub-Factor 6 – Safety Manager/Electrical Engineer (SM/EE): The offeror will be evaluated on providing SM/EE’s resume with at least five (5) years of experience in design and installation of medium and high voltage electrical distribution system and equipment within the last seven (7) years from the closing date of this solicitation.

Additionally, the offeror shall provide a copy of SM/EE’s valid license in Engineer Electricity (전기기사) or higher grade issued by the ROK Government.

FACTOR 3 (PRIME CONTRACTOR’S PRIOR EXPERIENCE): The offeror will be evaluated on providing evidence of recent (Calendar Year 2019, 2020, and 2021) amounting to over W1,000,000,000 (10억원) per year in new work, repair, and maintenance of SCADA system. The experience of a subcontractor cannot substitute for the Prime Contractor’s experience. The offeror(s) shall provide evidence of prior experience:

- The title of the contract/project

- Contract number for the Government/Commercial Performance

- A clear description of work completed

- Length of contract/project (Year/Month/Date – Year/Month/Date)

- Value (Won amount) of contract/project

- Complete name and phone number of Point of Contact (POC) at Client Organization

A copy of performance certificate issued by Korea Information and Communication Contractor Association (정보통신공사협회) , or Korea Electrical Contractor Association

(한국전기공사협회) or a copy of contract to include contract amount and length of contract

NOTE: The prior experience without a copy of performance certificate issued by Korea Information and

Communication Contractor Association (정보통신공사협회Korea Electrical Contractor

Association (한국전기공사협회), or a copy of contract include value and length of contract will not be considered for award.

TECHNICAL PHASE II (TRADE-OFF): Technical Approach and Related Risk will be evaluated as shown on Table 1 below. This methodology considers risk, in conjunction with the strengths, weaknesses, uncertainties, and deficiencies in determining technical ratings.

TABLE 1 – COMBINED TECHNICAL/RISK RATINGS

Color Rating Description

Blue

Outstanding

Proposal indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Purple

Good

Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate.

Green

Acceptable

Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Yellow

Marginal

Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

Red

Unacceptable

Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation, and thus, contains one or more deficiencies, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is unacceptable. Proposal is un-awardable.

FACTOR 4 (TECHNICAL AND MANAGEMENT):

Sub-Factor 1 - Technical Approach: The Offeror will be evaluating on providing Technical Approach that demonstrate how the contractor will complete all tasks contained in PWS paragraph 8 to show their understanding and capability in accomplishing all requirements specifically, SCADA system work plan, SCADA diagram, hardware/software install and deployment, test and simulation plan of factory acceptance testing, site acceptance testing and as-built documentation, and conduct operation and maintenance trainings. The Offerors are cautioned that “mirroring/copying” the technical requirements of the PWS with a statement of intent to perform does not reflect an understanding of the requirement of capability to perform. The Offeror shall provide staffing plan that clearly demonstrates how they will perform utility infrastructure SCADA repair and clearly identifies the labor mix and quantities by task, identifies the replacement strategy, backup policy, to ensure mitigation of turbulence caused by vacancies and leaves of absence to the execution of this requirement. The Offeror shall state the proposed Key Personnel and non-key personnel, both full time and part time staff, detailing roles, experience, license and responsibilities of each position supporting the utility infrastructure SCADA repair.

Sub-Factor 2 – Quality Control Plan (QCP): The offeror will be evaluated on providing for Quality Control Plan (QCP) that demonstrates the offeror’s approach to conducting comprehensive quality control. The plan shall clearly describe the offeror’s quality control methods and practices such as standardized procedures to monitor performance, identify discrepancies, service call response, and take corrective action to prevent re-occurrences. As part of the QC Plan, the Offeror shall identify what items the Offeror will inspect under its comprehensive QC for each task listed in the PRS table. The QCP shall be used throughout the life of this contract and shall be updated by the Contractor when the changes affect the QCP.

FACTOR 5 (PAST PERFORMANCE): The Government will evaluate the offeror’s record of past and current performance to ascertain the probability of successfully performing the required efforts of the PWS.

(1) The Government will focus its inquiries on the Offeror’s (and major subcontractor’s) record of performance as it relates to all solicitation requirements, including cost, schedule, performance, and management of subcontractors.

A significant achievement, problem, or lack of relevant data in any element of the work can become an important consideration in the evaluation process. Therefore, Offerors will be reminded to include the most recent and relevant efforts during calendar year 2019, 2020 & 2021 in their proposal. Absent any recent and relevant past performance history or when the performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned, the Offeror will be assigned a “neutral confidence rating” and its proposal will not be evaluated either favorably or unfavorably on past performance. The Government may use data provided by the Offeror in its proposal and data obtained from other sources, including data in Government files or data obtained through interviews with personnel familiar with the contractor and their current and past performance under Government or commercial contracts for same or similar services as compared to the NAICS 238210.

(2) Offerors shall submit Government and/or commercial contracts for the prime Offeror and each major subcontractor in performance or awarded during calendar year 2019, 2020 & 2021 which are relevant to the efforts required by this solicitation. The Government may consider a wide array of information from a variety of sources but is not compelled to rely on all the information available.

(3) The past performance factor considers each Offeror’s demonstrated recent and relevant record of performance in new work, repair and maintenance of SCADA system during calendar year 20219, 2020 & 2021. There are three aspects to the past performance evaluation: recency, relevancy, and quality. Offerors’ recent and relevant past performance may consist of Government and/or commercial contracts for the prime Offeror performed during calendar year 2019, 2020 & 2021 using the registration and licenses as specified in Technical Phase I, Factor 1 above. Relevant past performance is that constitutes the same or similar services based on size, scope, complexity, and contract type.

- Recency: The first aspect is to evaluate the recency of the offeror’s past performance. Recency is generally expressed as a period during CY 2019, 2020 and 2021 are considered relevant, and is critical to establishing the relevancy of past performance information.

- Relevancy: The second aspect is to determine how relevant a recent effort accomplished by the offeror is to the effort to be acquired through the source selection. Relevancy is not separately rated; however, the following criteria (see Table 2) will be used to establish what is relevant which shall include similarity of service/support, complexity; dollar value, contract type, and degree of subcontract/teaming. Relevant service is same or similar to the tasks in this Performance Work Statement.

- Quality Assessment: The third aspect assesses the overall quality of the offeror’s past performance. Documented results from Past Performance Questionnaires, interviews, CPARS, and other sources form the support and basis for this assessment.

(4) Performance Confidence Assessment: Utilize the Performance Confidence Assessment to select the most appropriate confidence level for each Offeror. Ensure the rationale for the conclusions reached are included.

FACTOR 6. COST/PRICE: Proposed price will be reviewed to ensure completeness, realism, and reasonableness.

The pricing proposals will be evaluated in accordance with FAR 15.404- 1(b). The following applies to that evaluation:

(1) Completeness: The offeror shall complete the pricing information for all CLINs identified for base period including phase-in with one (1) option (total two (2) years). Any underlying assumptions including proposed escalation rates between the 1st and subsequent periods shall be clearly explained.

(2) Price Realism: Price Realism Analysis will be performed to determine if the proposed price is realistic for the work to be performed. The proposal will be evaluated using price analysis techniques to determine whether the proposal reflects a thorough understanding of the PWS, and whether the price proposed is realistic for the work to be performed and is consistent with approaches described in the technical proposals.