W91QVN-17-R-0125-0002.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to revise Provision 52.212-2 EVALUATION-COMMERCIAL ITEMS (OCT 2014) and to extend the OFFER DUE

DATE & TIME as follow s:

A. Under FACTOR A - TECHNICAL: Sub-factor 1: Prime Contractor's Qualif ication, paragraph i. is removed in its entirety, and Sub-factor 3:

Prior Experience is removed in its entirety.

B. The OFFER DUE DATE / TIME has been extended to 1:00 PM Local Time, 25 August 2017.

C. All other terms and conditions of the solicitation remain the same.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 4

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 21-Aug-2017

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W91QVN-17-R-0125

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

09-Jul-2017

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

21-Aug-2017

CODE

411TH CONTRACTING SUPPORT BRIGADE, KOREA

RCC YONGSAN, UNIT #15289

APO AP 96205-5289

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (THE)

W91QVN 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W91QVN-17-R-0125

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

The required response date/time has changed from 08-Aug-2017 01:00 PM to 25-Aug-2017 01:00 PM.

The following have been modified:

52.212-2 EVALUATION--COMMERCIAL ITEMS (OCT 2014)

(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered.

Award will be made to the responsible Offeror submitting the Best Value Lowest Priced, Technically Acceptable

(LPTA) offer that satisfies all terms and condition of the solicitation. Offers will be evaluated for acceptability, but not ranked using non-price factors/subfactors. All non-price factors and subfactors will be rated as either

“acceptable” or “unacceptable”. The following ratings will be used in evaluating all non-price technical factors and subfactors. In order to be considered for award, there must be an “acceptable” rating in every non-price factor/subfactor. In other words, a rating of “unacceptable” for any factor or subfactor will result in the entire offer being rated “unacceptable”.

The following ratings will be used in evaluating all non-price technical factors and subfactors:

Acceptable Proposal -- clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal -- does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

The following ratings will be used in evaluating Past Performance:

Acceptable -- Based on the Offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the Offeror’s performance record is unknown (See note below)

Unacceptable -- Based on the Offeror’s performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the Offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Note: In the case of an Offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the

Offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305 (a) (2) (iv)).

Therefore, the Offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, “unknown” shall be considered “acceptable.

FACTOR A – TECHNICAL: All subfactors under technical factor are of equal importance and shall be evaluated on an acceptable or unacceptable basis. A rating of unacceptable for any factor or subfactor will result in technically unacceptable rating. Failure to provide below requirements will result in a rating of “Unacceptable”.

Subfactor 1: Prime Contractor’s Qualification:

The contractor shall submit all valid and current Certificates of Business Registration and Permission in accordance to ROK Law.

Subfactor 2: Staffing Plan: The Contractor shall provide a staffing plan that clearly demonstrates how the offeror will provide training and certification of official or officials for each individual sport.

FACTOR B – PAST PERFORMANCE

Past Performance: The offeror shall have recent and relevant past performance in the same or similar projects related to this requirement. Recent past performance is within the last seven (7) years from the solicitation issue dates.

Relevant past performances those that are the same or similar services based on size, scope, complexity, and contract type.

Past Performance of offerors will be evaluated based on the following processes:

(1) Review of the detailed explanation submitted by offerors, demonstrating the relevance of the references to the requirements of the solicitation.

(2) References will be contacted by phone or email to verify contents by providing a detail explanation and to determine record of compliance with contract requirements, accuracy of reports, technical and quality awards/certificates.

(3) The Government reserves the right to obtain past performance information from any reasonable source available, including the Government database; Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) website http://www.ppirs.gov in order to evaluate offerors' past performance. Also CPARS, if applicable, will be used for evaluation of the past performance.

The offeror’s past performance will be evaluated in accordance with FAR 15.305(a)(2) in the following manner:

Acceptable (A) – Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown. The offeror(s) has demonstrated satisfactory timeliness and quality of services within the last seven (7) years.

Unacceptable (U) – Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort and satisfactory timeliness and quality of services within the last seven (7) years.

Note: As part of the Responsibility Determination, the Contracting Officer will evaluate past performance to determine the offeror's capability to perform the contract. Failure to submit data or lack of any performance history will not in itself be a reason for determination of non-responsibility. The Contracting Officer is not limited to the information provided. The Contracting Officer may use this data along with data obtained from other sources the

Contracting Officer determines appropriate to obtain sufficient information on the offeror's past performance to make a responsibility determination.

FACTOR C – PRICE

Price analysis will be conducted for each proposal to ensure completeness, adequacy, and reasonableness. Proposed price shall be evaluated the price on fair and reasonableness in accordance with FAR 13.106-3.

The offeror shall estimate total cost to be expended for each line item unit price per sport and submit fully loaded rates accordingly.

The offeror shall provide complete the pricing information for each Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) and Sub

Contract Line Item Number (Sub-CLIN) identified to include:

(a) Schedule of Services (CLINs/SubCLINs) of the RFP for all five (5) years;

(b) Prices shall be in local currency (Korean Won)

(c) Any escalation in option year pricing shall be identified

Note 1: The Government will examine price proposals for artificially low unit prices. Offers found to be unreasonably high, unrealistically low (an indication of “buy-in”), or unbalanced, may be considered unacceptable and may be rejected on that basis.

Note 2: Price is not scored. The Government will review the price proposal to determine the extent to which it is reasonable, realistic, and consistent with the technical proposal. The lowest price for award purposes will be the combined total of the effective period five (5) years from the date of award. Price shall include all CLINs and Sub-

CLINs as listed on the Price Schedule including all five (5) years. The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions. Therefore, Offerors are instructed that submitted proposals should contain their best pricing.

Options

Option Clause 52.217-8. As part of price evaluation, As part of price evaluation, the Government will evaluate its option to extend services (FAR Clause 52.217-8 - Option to Extend Services) by adding one-half of the Offeror’s final option period price to the Offeror’s total price. Thus, the Offeror’s total price for the purpose of evaluation will include the 1st year, 2nd year, 3rd year, 4th year, 5th year, and one-half of the 5th year. Offerors are required only to price the five (5) years. Offerors shall not submit a price for the potential one-half year extension of services period.

Options. The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer's specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

(End of provision)

(End of Summary of Changes)