W91CRB-25-Q-5004_Amendment 0001 (AE24142).pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. Contract ID Code Page Of

2. Amendment/Modification No.

3. Effective Date

4. Requisition/Purchase Req No.

5. Project No. (If applicable)

6. Issued By Code 7. Administered By (If other than Item 6) Code

8. Name And Address Of Contractor (No., Street, City, County, State and Zip Code)

9A. Amendment Of Solicitation No.

9B. Dated (See Item 11)

10A. Modification Of Contract/Order No.

10B. Dated (See Item 13) Code Facility Code

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning ____________ copies of the amendments: (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. Accounting And Appropriation Data (If required)

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS

It Modifies The Contract/Order No. As Described In Item 14.

A. This Change Order is Issued Pursuant To: The Changes Set Forth In Item 14 Are Made In

The Contract/Order No. In Item 10A.

B. The Above Numbered Contract/Order Is Modified To Reflect The Administrative Changes (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) Set

Forth In Item 14, Pursuant To The Authority of FAR 43.103(b).

C. This Supplemental Agreement Is Entered Into Pursuant To Authority Of:

D. Other (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return _______________ copies to the Issuing Office.

14. Description Of Amendment/Modification (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. Name And Title Of Signer (Type or print)

16A. Name And Title Of Contracting Officer (Type or print)

15B. Contractor/Offeror 15C. Date Signed 16B. United States Of America 16C. Date Signed

By (Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

PREVIOUS EDITIONS UNUSABLE

30-105-02 STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

SEE SCHEDULE

X

Firm Fixed Price

W91CRB

ACC-APG - DIVISION D (W91CRB)

6515 INTEGRITY COURT

APG, MD 21005-3013

CHARRISSA M. STANCELL

EMAIL: CHARRISSA.M.STANCELL.CIV@ARMY.MIL

W91CRB-25-Q-5004

2024DEC16

X

X

2 signed

SEE SECOND PAGE FOR DESCRIPTION

1 2

CONTINUATION SHEET

Reference No. of Document Being Continued Page of

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

Buyer Name: CHARRISSA M. STANCELL

Buyer Office Symbol/Telephone Number: CCAP-MDD/(410)278-5424

Type of Contract 1: Firm Fixed Price

Kind of Contract: Service Contracts

*** End of Narrative A0000 ***

Question 1: On Brand-Specific Requirements - Could you kindly confirm if the solicitation requires the training to be provided exclusively by Mandiant, or if equivalent training services from other leading industry providers meeting the performance criteria outlined in the PWS would also be deemed acceptable? If exclusive to Mandiant, is this considered a brand-specific justification?

Answer 1: In response to below, all I can say is that the LOR from Romania, and therefore the LOA as written, names the specific

Mandiant training courses, ie Mandiant On Site Cyber Intelligence Foundation Training.\~ Therefore, I feel as if that specific course needs to be provided, but I am unsure of the contracting legalities as to whether or not an equivalent course could be provided to meet

Romania needs.\~ There is no sole-source, so again I am unsure to the legalities.

Question \~2: Regarding the evaluation process, could you provide additional details on how technical acceptability will be assessed for offerors? Specifically, will the evaluation criteria prioritize the provider's brand recognition or the alignment of the proposed training content with the objectives in the Performance Work Statement?

Answer 2: Same with the second question on evaluation criteria, this would have to be addressed by legal / contracting.\~ CECOM SAMD engineers only provide guidance as to whether or not an offer is technically acceptable, I dont think we have anything to do with determining best value and making an award selection.

*** END OF NARRATIVE A0002 ***

2 2

W91CRB-25-Q-5004

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION