Amendment 2 - Answers to Questions.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 13 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Headquarters, Department of the Army (HQDA) Civilian and Military Personnel Human Resource Support Services
- Solicitation number
- W91CRB-24-R-0014
About this file
This document contains an amendment to a solicitation for Civilian and Military Personnel Human Resource Support Services. The amendment provides answers to questions from offerors regarding requirements such as security clearances, virtual or in-person work, resume and proposal formatting, and the potential for sponsoring security clearances. The related federal contract opportunity solicits proposals for personnel and program management support services to the Office of the Administrative Assistant to the Secretary of the Army, Human Resources Management Directorate. Requirements include monitoring alignment of personnel to spaces, supporting manpower initiatives, providing HR services and training, and managing compensation programs. The firm fixed price contract would have a one year base period and four one year option periods. Proposals are due by March 20, 2024, and the 100% SDVOSB set-aside is under NAICS 541612 with a size standard of $29M. The incumbent is Gritter Francona, Inc., and the place of performance is Fort Belvoir, Virginia.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment 3 - Price Proposal Model HR Support Services.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Amendment 2 - PWS HR Support Services to HQDA.pdf | ||
| Amendment 1 - Answers to Questions.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| PWS HR Support Services to HQDA.pdf | ||
| Price Proposal Model HR Support Services.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Amendment 2
| Question | Answer | |
| 1. | In reference to Section 4.2 of the RFQ: “4.2 Secret Facility Clearance: The Contractor is preferred, but not required to possess and maintain a SECRET level facility clearance from the Defense Security Service IAW DoD 5220.22-M, National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual (NISPOM) and AR 380-49, Industrial Security Program. The Contractor’s employees, performing work in support of this contract are preferred, but not required to have been granted a SECRET security clearance from the Defense Industrial Security Clearance Office. The Facility Security Clearance must match the highest security clearance required for personnel. The Department Of Defense Contract Security Classification Specification (DD 254) is provided as an attachment in the basic contract.” For contractors with a current SECRET clearance, does this requirement allow contractors to maintain that SECRET facility clearance?” | A Secret level facility clearance is NOT required. PWS Paragraph 4.2 has been revised to read "Not Required" in Amendment 2. |
| 2. | Will this contract be virtual? and if so, will there be any requirements to travel for in person meetings? | Currently, work is being preformed both in person and remotely. The Government anticipates an increase of in-person requirements over time. Travel will be accounted for in the ODC CLIN. |
| 3. | Will resumes be required to be submitted with the proposal? | Yes |
| 4. | Is there a format requirement for the proposal? | The technical proposal is not to exceed 15 pages. There is no formal requirement for the technical proposal. The cost proposal shall follow the provided format in the Price Proposal Model. |
| 5. | Do we have to use the Price Proposal Model that is in the contract attachment? | Yes |
| 6. | Would the government be amenable to sponsoring a security clearance if a contract award was made under this requirement? | No, See question 1 on Amendment 2 tab of this document. |
Amendment 1
| Question | Answer | |
| 1. | If this is a brand new contract or if there is (was) an incumbent performing these services? | Gritter Francona, Inc. |
| 2. | If not brand new, could you please provide the current/previous contract number? | W91CRB-22-C-0039 |
| 3. | Will the 4 resumes for personnel identified in the PWS (2 at Ft Belvoir & 2 at NCR Government Facilities) count against the 15 page limit for the technical volume or will they be excluded from the page count? | No |
| 4. | Will the required labor compliance matrix count towards the 15 page limit for the technical volume? | No |
| 5. | Does the government have an estimated start date for the period of performance? | April/May 2024 |
| 6. | How many hours constitutes a full time equivalent (FTE) (e.g., 1920, 1880, or 1872) personnel for this effort? | 1920, Proposals shall be based on the LOE in the Cost Worksheet |
| 7. | What has the historical FTE number of hours been? | Proposals shall be based on the LOE in the Cost Worksheet |
| 8. | Who are the incumbent contractors currently providing these support services under any associated ongoing contracts/BPAs/task orders? | Gritter Francona, Inc. |
| 9. | What is the associated current contract/BPA/task order numbers for current support of these requirements | W91CRB-22-C-0039 |
| 10. | May CPARs be submitted in lieu of PPQs? | The Government will retrieve CPARS reports. PPQs are in addition. |
| 11. | Can text within the Top Margin, tables & diagrams be in Font Size 10? | Yes |
| 12. | On the current contract, is the Data Entry Specialist a full-time or part-time asset? | Proposals shall be based on the LOE in the Cost Worksheet |
* NOTE: there will be another Amendement posted with additional answers after 09:00 AM (EST) on 04 March 2024.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .