B08_-_Solicitation_Attachment_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 115 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Range Maintenance Support Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W91CRB-19-R-0053
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire and federal contract opportunity solicitation for range maintenance support services. The U.S. Army Aberdeen Test Center is seeking proposals for range maintenance and improvement, engineering design, environmental remediation, facility installation and maintenance, fire suppression, HVAC, and vegetation and soil management. Services will be required at various test ranges. The base period of performance is from October 2019 to October 2024 with a potential seven-year period of performance. The solicitation includes cost-reimbursement and firm-fixed-price contract line items for labor, materials, surge support, and other direct costs over five one-year ordering periods. Proposals are due by September 6, 2019. The procurement is set aside for small businesses and issued under NAICS code 238990.
Past Performance Questionnaire Form
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| B08_-Amended_Solicitation_W91CRB-19-R-0053_0003_20190916.pdf | ||
| B08_-Amended_Solicitation_W91CRB-19-R-0053_0002_20082719.pdf | ||
| B08_-W91CRB-19-R-0053_0001_Amended_Solicitation_20082019.pdf | ||
| A03_-_CDRL_1423-Submittals_and_Progress_Schedules.pdf | ||
| Solicitation_Final_080519.pdf | ||
| A03_-_CDRL_1423-Monthly_Task_Order_Delivery_Order_Progress_Report.pdf | ||
| B08_-_LOE_Spreadsheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| A03_-_Wage_Determination_2015-4266,_Rev._2019.04.25.pdf | ||
| A02_-_Performance_Work_Statement_W91CRB-19-R-0053.pdf | ||
| A03_-_QASP_ATC_RANGE_SUPPORT.docx | DOCX document | |
| B08_-_Solicitation_Attachment_Competency_Area_Experience_Form.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
U.S. ARMY CONTRACTING COMMAND - ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND ABERDEEN DIVISION D
6515 INTEGRITY COURT, BLDG 4310
ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND, MD 21005-3013
SUBJECT: Offeror Past Performance Questionnaire in Support of Request for Proposal (RFP) Number W91CRB-19-R-0053
Dear Sir/Ma’am;
The US Army Aberdeen Test Center is currently conducting a competitive source selection to evaluate offerors on subject RFP. As part of this evaluation, we have requested that the offerors provide information about their past performance on same or similar federal government contracts as compared to North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) 238990. You have been identified as the point of contact cited on the enclosure.
Your assessment of their performance is extremely valuable to our evaluation. Please complete the enclosure and return to both myself, Erin Weber and Contract Specialist, Alyssa Grice, 6515 Integrity Court, BLDG 4310, Aberdeen Proving Ground, 21005-5001, NLT 19 July 2019. Your questionnaire may be submitted electronically to alyssa.r.grice.civ@mail.mil, cc. erin.k.weber.civ@mail.mil.
Your cooperation is greatly appreciated. Questions may be directed to POC or the undersigned at (410-306-2790).
Sincerely, Erin Weber Contracting Officer
ACC-APG
PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE FORM
Contractor:
Subcontract No. (if applicable): POC:
Contract No.:
Title:
(Name) (E.G. PCO/ACO/TM)
(Agency, Telephone No., E-mail Address & Fax Number)
The following questions pertain to the contractor’s record of past (within the past three years) and current performance. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of a federal contract. Therefore, it is important that our information be as factual and accurate as possible. Please provide examples and/or explanations (use additional pages if necessary). The following adjectival ratings shall be used in your response.
Outstanding: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Acceptable: Performance meets contractual requirements. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective.
Unacceptable: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective.
PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror) A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
Contractor/Company Name/Division: Address:
Program Identification/Title: Contract Number:
Contract Type:
Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above): Contract Award Date:
Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:
Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:
B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE
Name: Title: Date:
Telephone Number: Address:
E-mail Address:
PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent)
A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship
| Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) |
| Good |
| Acceptable |
| Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) |
| Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) |
Comments:
B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).
| Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) |
| Good |
| Acceptable |
| Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) |
| Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) |
Comments:
C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.
| Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) |
| Good |
| Acceptable |
| Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) |
| Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) |
Comments:
D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs (Use this Question on Cost Reimbursement Type Contracts Only).
| Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) |
| Good |
| Acceptable |
| Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) |
| Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) |
Comments:
E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest
| Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) |
| Good |
| Acceptable |
| Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) |
| Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) |
Comments:
F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.
G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:
Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?
If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:
H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:
Organization: Name:
Title: Date:
Telephone Number Address:
E-mail Address:
PART III. RETURN INFORMATION
Please return this completed Questionnaire via e-mail to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter.
Thank you for your assistance.
Signature Date
Typed or Printed Name image1.png image10.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .