Bldg 855-asbestos-survey.pdf

PDF 715 KB Posted

Attached to
OHARNG FY24 CJAG Demo Project
Solicitation number
W91364-24-Q-0049
Issued by

About this file

This document appears to be an Asbestos Survey Report for Building 855 at Camp James A. Garfield. The survey was conducted by Tara Management Consulting Ltd. on April 22, 2024 to identify potential asbestos exposure concerns prior to the building's demolition. The report found no friable or non-friable asbestos-containing materials in the building.

The related federal contract opportunity is for the demolition of multiple buildings at Camp James A. Garfield Joint Military Training Center, including Building 855. This is a total Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) set-aside solicitation, with a Firm Fixed Price contract to be awarded to the SDVOSB offeror whose quote is most advantageous based on past performance and price. The solicitation includes a base project and six additional option locations. Quotes are due by September 12, 2024 and a site visit is scheduled for August 29, 2024.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Questions-Answers.docx DOCX document
HAZMAT MFR.pdf PDF
Questions-Answers.docx DOCX document
Bldg 63-837 HAZMAT Report.pdf PDF
Bldg 63-836 HAZMAT Report.pdf PDF
Bldg 63-836 HAZMAT Report - Copy.pdf PDF
Bldg SD21 HAZMAT Report.pdf PDF
Bldg SD1A HAZMAT Report.pdf PDF
Bldg 855 HAZMAT Report.pdf PDF
Site Visit Sign-in Sheet.pdf PDF
W91364-23-Q-0049 Q-A.docx DOCX document
W91364-23-Q-0049 Q-A.docx DOCX document
Sol W91364-24-Q-0049 .pdf PDF
Wage Determination.pdf PDF
Instructions to Offerors.docx DOCX document
PWS FY24 CJAG Demo.pdf PDF
Show all 16

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Providing aggressive, cost effective solutions for today’s compliance needs TMC Ltd. 145 Cheshire Road Hudson, OH 44236 330.998-1551 Phone mgradert@tmcconsulting.net Email

May 7, 2024

Nate Pietras Account Executive Eurofins Environment Testing North Central, LLC 180 S. Van Buren Barberton, OH 44203

RE: Asbestos Survey - Building 855 Camp James A Garfield

Dear Mr. Pietras:

Please find enclosed the report for the asbestos survey conducted at Building 855 Camp James A Garfield, 8451 State Route 5 in Ravenna, Ohio 44266 on April 22, 2024 by a representative of Tara Management Consulting, Ltd.

After completing your review of the enclosed report, please contact me to further discuss the findings and recommendations that have been developed as a result of this air monitoring survey.

Sincerely, Mark Gradert

Mark A. Gradert, CIH, CSP Vice President mailto:mgradert@tmcconsulting.net

ASBESTOS MATERIAL SURVEY

Building 855 - Camp James A Garfield 8451 State Route 5

Ravenna, Ohio 44266

PREPARED FOR:

Nate Pietras

Account Executive

Eurofins Environment Testing North Central, LLC

180 S. Van Buren

Barberton, OH 44203

PREPARED BY:

Tara Management Consulting Ltd.

145 Cheshire Road Hudson, Ohio 44236

April 26, 2024

Project Number: 24-05-127

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PAGE

PROJECT SUMMARY 1

SCOPE OF WORK 1

INSPECTIONS LIMITATIONS 2

RESULTS 2

RECOMMENDATIONS 3

APPENDIX A - Table 1: Asbestos-Containing Material Summary

APPENDIX B - Analytical Reports

PROJECT SUMMARY

Tara Management Consulting (TMC) performed an asbestos material survey of Building 855 at Camp James A Garfield at 8451 State Route 5 in Ravenna, Ohio. The asbestos material survey was performed to identify potential asbestos exposure concerns prior to demolition of this structure as required by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) NESHAPS. The sampling was performed in accordance with AHERA 763.86 sampling protocol.

Mr. Daniel C. Peders performed an inspection of all areas on April 22, 2024. Mr. Peders identified the following:

Friable Asbestos-Containing Materials - Friable asbestos is strictly regulated and must be removed prior to building demolition and/or equipment dismantling. There were no Friable asbestos materials identified for this structure.

Non-friable asbestos is materials that cannot be crumbled by hand pressure when dry and is divided into two categories: Category I and Category II. There were no Friable asbestos materials identified for this structure.

Category I non-friable material is material such as floor covering and roof shingles that are not expected to release significant amounts of asbestos fibers during normal demolition activities. These materials are also strictly regulated and can remain in place as long as it will not be subjected to sanding, grinding, cutting or abrading. There were no Category I non-friable asbestos materials identified for this structure.

Category II non-friable material is material such as asbestos-cement products, drywall or plaster that is expected to release significant amounts of asbestos fibers during normal demolition activities. Depending on the potential for fiber release these materials may be required to be removed prior to demolition if the material is expected to release significant fibers. There were no Category II non-friable asbestos materials identified for this structure.

Table 1 in the report provides a summary of estimated quantities. Table 2 in Appendix A provides summary of the asbestos-containing materials and the analytical results.

SCOPE OF WORK

TMC was retained by Eurofins Environment Testing North Central, LLC (Eurofins) to perform an asbestos material survey of the Building 855 at Camp James A Garfield at 8451 State Route 5 in Ravenna, Ohio. Ohio EPA Certified Asbestos Hazard Evaluation Specialist, Mr. Daniel C. Peders (CAHES #31134), visually inspected all accessible areas of these structures.

INSPECTION'S LIMITATIONS

The results of this survey are based on the structure identified by Eurofins Environment Testing North Central, LLC and identified in the red in the image to the right. All areas were accessible by the inspector.

The structure is the balance room for the weight vehicle weight scales and the date of construction was not known at the time of the survey. The total square footage is approximately 100 square feet.

RESULTS

All accessible friable and non-friable materials in the identified functional spaces were sampled and submitted for analysis. A total of 5 homogeneous materials were noted during the inspection. A total of 10 bulk samples were collected from these materials.

The bulk samples were analyzed by Amianthus Labs LLC laboratory that is enrolled in the American Industrial Hygiene Associations Bulk Asbestos Proficiency Analytical Testing (BAPAT) Program, laboratory ID number 198622, for the analysis of asbestos bulk material samples.

All samples were analyzed using Polarized Light Microscopy with Dispersion Staining (PLM/DS) techniques in accordance with the methodology approved by the U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The percentage of asbestos present in the samples was determined on the basis of visual area estimation. As set forth in the Code of Federal Regulations, 40 CFR Part 763, Appendix A to Subpart F, Section 1.2 and 1.7.2.4, the lower limit of reliable detection for asbestos using the PLM method is approximately one percent (1%) by volume.

When "None Detected" (ND) appears in this report, it should be interpreted as meaning no asbestos was observed in the sample material above the reliable limit of detection for the PLM method (1%). Material reported to contain 1% or less of asbestos by point count analysis is not considered hazardous by U.S. EPA, and therefore, do not require removal and disposal prior to demolition or renovation.

The following table summarizes the type of ACM identified in this limited survey:

Table 1: ACM Estimated Quantity Summary

Homogeneous Group #

Material Description Estimated Quantity

No Asbestos Detected

RECOMMENDATIONS

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) requires that Regulated Asbestos Containing Material (RACM) that will be disturbed during demolition be removed. RACM is defined as; (a) friable ACM;

(b) category I non-friable ACM that has become friable; (c) category I non-friable ACM that will be or has been subjected to sanding, grinding cutting or abrading; or (d) category II non-friable ACM that has a high probability of becoming or has become crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by forces expected to act on the material in the course of demolition or renovation operation.

Based on the understanding that these structures will be demolished, EPA NESHAP regulation requires the removal of all RACM prior to demolition or renovation activities that may disturb these materials.

If you have any questions or concerns regarding the above information, please contact the undersigned at 216-346-7694.

Sincerely, Daniel C. Peders Certified Asbestos Hazard Evaluation Specialist OEPA CAHES #33134, exp. 8-18-2024

APPENDIX A

Table 2: Suspect Asbestos-Containing Material Summary

Table 2 – Summary of Suspect Asbestos-Containing Materials

Sample Number

Homo-geneous

I.D.

Sample Description Asbestos (Y/N)

Location EPA Category

RACM

(Y/N)*

Analytical Results

855-01 & 02 RS1 Asphalt-based roof shingles, green/black

N On roof

NF1

N

None Detected

855-03 & 04 RF1 Asphalt-based roof felt, black N NF1 N None Detected

855-05 & 06 DB1 Unfinished drywall board N Ceiling panels NF2 N None Detected

855-07 & 08 CBD1 Wall panels N Wall panels F N None Detected

855-09 & 10 WG1 Window glazing N Wooden windows NF2 N None Detected

Field Notes: Exterior: Wood clapboards on a cement slab. Interior: Exposed cement slab floor with a cement cove base. Electric heater/fan has no suspect materials.

No water source or plumbing. Void between walls and above ceiling have no additional insulation. Wood roof deck.

Asbestos as Asbestos-Containing which by definition is greater than one percent (1%) by weight as analyzed by the Point Count (PC) method.

EPA Categories: F = Friable, NF1 = Non-friable Category I, NF2 = Non-friable Category II RACM classification is based on normal demolition procedures and does not apply if the structure will be burned intentional for live fire training or recycled.

Daniel C. Peders, Certified Asbestos Hazard Evaluation Specialist, OEPA CAHES#33134, exp. 8/18/2024 Date: April 22, 2024

APPENDIX B

Analytical Reports

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

Amianthus LLC Environmental Consulting

583 Grayton Road Berea, Ohio 44017

216-346-7694 fax 440-891-0022

Client: Tara Management Consulting Ltd. Report Date: Apr. 23, 2024

145 Cheshire Road Project No.: 24-05-127

Hudson, Ohio 44236 Log No.: 5715

BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS SUMMARY

Sample Identification:

Ten (10) samples from the Building 855 at 8451 State Route 5 Ravenna, Ohio were submitted by Daniel C. Peders.

These bulk samples were delivered to Amianthus laboratory in Berea, Ohio for asbestos content determination.

Analytical Method:

Analytical procedures were performed in accordance with the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Recommended Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Samples by Polarized Light Microscopy and Dispersion Staining (PLM/DS) (EPA-600/M4-82-020, EPA-600/R-93-170). This report relates only to those samples actually analyzed and may not be indicative of other similar appearing materials existing at this, or other sites.

Quantification of asbestos content was determined by Calibrated Visual Estimation.

The EPAs requires that friable samples with analytical results of 10% or less asbestos, by visual estimation, be treated as asbestos-containing material unless these quantities are verified using the point counting method. The point counting method is a systematic technique for estimating concentration, also using PLM. The point counting method, however, does not increase the analyst’s ability to detect fibers.

In any given material, fibers with a small diameter (<0.25µm) may not be detected by the PLM method. Floor tile and other resinous bound material may yield a false negative if the asbestos fibers are too small to be resolved using PLM. Additional analytical methods may be required.

Analysis Performed By: Daniel C. Peders Approved By:

Date: April 23, 2024 Daniel C. Peders

Laboratory Director

AIHA PAT for Bulk Asbestos no. 198622 This confidential report relates only to those item(s) tested and does not represent an endorsement by AIHA or any agency of the U.S. Government

Analysis Method: EPA 600/R-93/116

Report Date: 04/23/2024 Project: 24-05-127 Log No.: 5715

Asbestos Type(s) Detected Non-Asbestos Materials 1 of 1

La b o.

Client No.

Description

Location

Color

C hr ys ot ile

A m os ite ro ci do lit e

O th er el lu lo se

F ib ro us G la ss

M in er al W oo l

O th er

F ib ro us

M at er ia ls on -F ib ro us

M at er ia ls

Comments

111551 855-01 Roof shingles Main roof Green/Black 0 0 0 0 45 0 0 55

111552 855-02 Green/Black 0 0 0 0 45 0 0 55

111553 855-03 Roof felt Black 0 0 0 0 55 0 0 45

111554 855-04 Black 0 0 0 0 55 0 0 45

111555 855-05 Ceiling panel Ceiling Green/Tan/ White

111556 855-06 Green/Tan/ White 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 97

111557 855-07 Wall panel Wall Green/Brown 0 0 0 0 95 0 0 5

111558 855-08 Green/Brown 0 0 0 0 95 0 0 5

111559 855-09 Window glazing Wood window White 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100

111560 855-10 White 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100

AIHA PAT for Bulk Asbestos no. 198622 This confidential report relates only to those item(s) tested and does not represent an endorsement by AIHA or any agency of the U.S. Government

Analysis Method: EPA 600/R-93/116

Comments: PLM is not consistently reliable in detecting asbestos in floor coverings and similar non-friable organically bound materials. Before this material can be considered or treated as non-asbestos containing, confirmation must be made by quantitative TEM. (PC) Indicates Stratified Point Count Performed. Method not performed unless stated. Quantification at <0.25% by volume is possible with this method. (PC-Trace) represents this limitation of quantitation.

(PC-Trace) means that asbestos was detected but is not quantifiable under the Point Count regimen.

Date: _April 23. 2024 Daniel C. Peders

Laboratory Director

Analysis Performed By: _Daniel C. Peders Approved By:

PREPARED FOR:
PREPARED BY:
PROJECT SUMMARY
SCOPE OF WORK
INSPECTION'S LIMITATIONS
RESULTS
RECOMMENDATIONS
APPENDIX A
APPENDIX B
BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS SUMMARY
AIHA PAT for Bulk Asbestos no. 198622
AIHA PAT for Bulk Asbestos no. 198622

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .