B01_Tech_Eval_LPTA.pdf
PDF 213 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Temporary Aircraft Shelter
- Solicitation number
- W912SV-15-R-0026
About this file
Technical Evaluation Checklist
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| A07_RFI_20150916_1520.pdf | ||
| H01_Drawing_10_Sep_2015.pdf | ||
| Temp_Shelter_Requirements.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
LPTA EVALUATION FORM
TECHNICAL EVALUATION
SOLICITATION #: W912SV-15-R-0026 / Temporary Aircraft Shelter
EVALUATOR: OFFEROR:
ACCEPTABLE
Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths and weaknesses are offsetting or will have little or no impact on contract performance. Risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.
UNACCEPTABLE Proposal does not meet requirements and contains one or more deficiencies.
Proposal is un-awardable.
REQUIREMENT CHECKLIST:
Y N Note Requirement Item
Tensioned fabric structure
Electrical winch (or similar) for door opening
100 amp electrical panel
Overhead lighting - minimum lighting compliant with OSHA requirements
Lightning protection
Sized to accommodate one F-15C
End panel with an aircraft access door
Solid end wall/panel
Personnel door
Electrical work, interior; including installing, hanging, and running lights, winch, and electrical wiring/cable to the electrical panel (Is there evidence that they plan on performing this work)
Shipping and Installation (Is there evidence that they plan on performing this work)
Timeline (Does the offeror propose a timeline for complete installation within 75 days)
ADDITIONAL RATIONALE:
LPTA EVALUATION FORM
PRICE EVALUATION
REASONABLE
Reasonableness: For cost (Price) to be reasonable, it must represent a cost (Price that provides best value to the Government when consideration is given to price in the market (market conditions may be evidenced by other competitive proposals), and technical and functional capabilities of the offeror.
UNREASONABLE
COMMENTS (describing the reasonableness or unreasonableness. If unreasonable comments must provide detailed rationale for determination):
| Check Box 01_Y: Off |
| Check Box 01_N: Off |
| Check Box 02_Y: Off |
| Check Box 02_N: Off |
| Check Box 03_Y: Off |
| Check Box 03_N: Off |
| Check Box 04_Y: Off |
| Check Box 04_N: Off |
| Check Box 05_Y: Off |
| Check Box 05_N: Off |
| Check Box 06_Y: Off |
| Check Box 06_N: Off |
| Check Box 07_Y: Off |
| Check Box 07_N: Off |
| Check Box 09_Y: Off |
| Check Box 09_N: Off |
| Check Box 10_Y: Off |
| Check Box 10_N: Off |
| Check Box 11_Y: Off |
| Check Box 11_N: Off |
| Text 01: |
| Text 02: |
| Text 05: |
| Text 03: |
| Text 04: |
| Text 06: |
| Text 07: |
| Text 09: |
| Text 10: |
| Text 11: |
| Additional: |
| Check Box Acceptable: Off |
| Check Box Unacceptable: Off |
| Evaluator: |
| Offeror: |
| Check Box 08_Y: Off |
| Check Box 08_N: Off |
| Text 08: |
| Check Box 12_Y: Off |
| Check Box 12_N: Off |
| Text 12: |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .