B01_Tech_Eval_LPTA.pdf

PDF 213 KB Posted

Attached to
Temporary Aircraft Shelter
Solicitation number
W912SV-15-R-0026
Issued by

About this file

Technical Evaluation Checklist

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
A07_RFI_20150916_1520.pdf PDF
H01_Drawing_10_Sep_2015.pdf PDF
Temp_Shelter_Requirements.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

LPTA EVALUATION FORM

TECHNICAL EVALUATION

SOLICITATION #: W912SV-15-R-0026 / Temporary Aircraft Shelter

EVALUATOR: OFFEROR:

ACCEPTABLE

Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths and weaknesses are offsetting or will have little or no impact on contract performance. Risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

UNACCEPTABLE Proposal does not meet requirements and contains one or more deficiencies.

Proposal is un-awardable.

REQUIREMENT CHECKLIST:

Y N Note Requirement Item

Tensioned fabric structure

Electrical winch (or similar) for door opening

100 amp electrical panel

Overhead lighting - minimum lighting compliant with OSHA requirements

Lightning protection

Sized to accommodate one F-15C

End panel with an aircraft access door

Solid end wall/panel

Personnel door

Electrical work, interior; including installing, hanging, and running lights, winch, and electrical wiring/cable to the electrical panel (Is there evidence that they plan on performing this work)

Shipping and Installation (Is there evidence that they plan on performing this work)

Timeline (Does the offeror propose a timeline for complete installation within 75 days)

ADDITIONAL RATIONALE:

LPTA EVALUATION FORM

PRICE EVALUATION

REASONABLE

Reasonableness: For cost (Price) to be reasonable, it must represent a cost (Price that provides best value to the Government when consideration is given to price in the market (market conditions may be evidenced by other competitive proposals), and technical and functional capabilities of the offeror.

UNREASONABLE

COMMENTS (describing the reasonableness or unreasonableness. If unreasonable comments must provide detailed rationale for determination):

Check Box 01_Y: Off
Check Box 01_N: Off
Check Box 02_Y: Off
Check Box 02_N: Off
Check Box 03_Y: Off
Check Box 03_N: Off
Check Box 04_Y: Off
Check Box 04_N: Off
Check Box 05_Y: Off
Check Box 05_N: Off
Check Box 06_Y: Off
Check Box 06_N: Off
Check Box 07_Y: Off
Check Box 07_N: Off
Check Box 09_Y: Off
Check Box 09_N: Off
Check Box 10_Y: Off
Check Box 10_N: Off
Check Box 11_Y: Off
Check Box 11_N: Off
Text 01:
Text 02:
Text 05:
Text 03:
Text 04:
Text 06:
Text 07:
Text 09:
Text 10:
Text 11:
Additional:
Check Box Acceptable: Off
Check Box Unacceptable: Off
Evaluator:
Offeror:
Check Box 08_Y: Off
Check Box 08_N: Off
Text 08:
Check Box 12_Y: Off
Check Box 12_N: Off
Text 12:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .