Fort Carson - Industry Day Slides_06 OCT 2026 Final_Email.pptx

INDUSTRY DAY FORUM

Fort Carson ECS PROJECT Presenters:

Jason L. Cain – Project Manager Chris Brackett– Agreements Officer John White – Project Engineer

Date: 06 October 2026

”The views, opinions and findings contained in this report are those of the author(s) and should not be construed as an official Department of the Army position, policy or decision, unless so designated by other official documentation.”

ADMINISTRATIVE ANNOUNCEMENTS

Please ensure that you have signed in Company Name, POC Name, Email, Phone Are you interested in being the Prime or Subcontractor If you’re interested in being a subcontractor, state the type of work you are interested (Electrical, Mechanical, Roofing, etc.)

Please turn off all mobile devices No recording This briefing and the attendee roster will be posted to SAM Please be advised that none of the information discussed today is contractually-binding

Introduction of Team Members

Overview of the Fort Carson ECS Project

USACE Procurement Process Overview

Army Reserve Overview

Other Project Opportunities

Q&A Session

AGENDA

Jason L. Cain Project Manager U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Louisville District Fort Carson ECS OVERVIEW

John White Project Engineer U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

Aerial View of the Project Site

Site Layout

General purpose warehouse + Area Maintenance support activity floor plan

Renderings

What Questions do you have for us?

USACE PROCUREMENT PROCESS OVERVIEW

Chris Brackett Agreements Officer

Legal authority to enter into transactions other than standard contracts, grants, or cooperative agreements. Provides flexibility to adopt commercial industry standards and best practices.

OTAs are NOT subject to Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR). This can attract non-traditional partners and encourages flexible, collaborative, and commercial arrangements.

Historically used for R&D/prototypes. New authority has expanded use for construction (10 U.S.C. §2808a).

OTAs are awarded by Agreements Officers (AOs).

Will have Administrative Agreements Officers (AAO) for Construction Administration support

What is other transaction authority?

CM@Risk w/OTA Overview CM@Risk with OTA allows for more flexibility/collaboration than traditional FAR-based acquisitions.

Streamlined and simplified selection processed – Qualifications based

Negotiated terms and conditions

Increased cost fidelity, early identification of risks, and Construction Manager input/involvement during design phase

Applicable Laws

Buy American Act (if otherwise would apply) Davis-Bacon (for construction) Miller Act (for construction) Prohibition against using cost-plus for military construction Fiscal Law (e.g. Purpose Statute at 31 USC 1301, Anti-deficiency Act, 31 USC 1341-1342, 1350-1351, The Recording Statute, 31 USC 1501(a)(9)) Tucker Act, 28 USC 1491 Procurement Integrity Act 41 USC 2101-2107 Other ethics laws and regulations Laws of general applicability that would apply to any entity doing business in the United States (e.g. environmental laws, inport/export control, criminal laws, civil rights, etc.)

Trade Secrets and Defend Trade Secrets Acts (18 USC Ch. 90 and 18 USC 1836)

FOIA

CM@Risk Process for Fort Carson ECS Competition will be full and open Small business subcontracting and/or mentor/protégé opportunities Request for Qualifications (RFQ) will be solicited publicly through www.SAM.Gov Qualifications packages will be submitted via the PIEE solicitation module

Agreement will be awarded in two phases:

Phase I Agreement (Pre-Construction Services) Phase II – Bilateral modification to agreement for Construction phase

Evaluation Process and Award Selection Step 1: Request for Statement of Qualifications Rapid, credentials-focused evaluation to identify a short list of highest qualified Construction Managers

Step 2: Pitch Presentations Up to three (3) firms will provide live pitch presentations to Government team.

Oral presentation demonstrating understanding of project requirements, CM@Risk and why they are most highly qualified firm.

Step 3: Negotiation with Most Highly Qualified Offeror Enter into negotiations with single, most highly qualified Offeror based on qualifications and pitch presentations. Fair and reasonable price for Phase I – Pre-construction services must be determined prior to award.

Request for Qualifications Interested firms will submit qualification package to demonstrate their qualifications and understanding of the project.

The district is considering the following evaluation factors:

Corporate Experience and Relevance Technical Narrative Proof of Bonding Capability

Advertisement Period: Estimated 3-4 weeks to prepare qualifications.

The Agreements Officer will determine which firms demonstrate the highest potential in their qualifications statement.

Approximately 3 of the most qualified firms will be invited to individual, confidential Pitch Meetings

Firms will have 60 minutes to deliver an oral presentation about why they are the best qualified firm to deliver the project.

After 60 minutes, a panel of government reviewers will ask questions about the qualification statement, presentation, and the firm’s capabilities.

The Pitch Meetings are intended to be conversational, rather than a strict Q&A session.

Pitch Presentations

The USACE acquisition team, led by the Agreements Officer, will meet to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each firm.

The team may consider:

The firm’s proposal Pitch meeting discussions Other information within the government’s possession Any other publicly available information about the firms

• Agreements Officer will select one qualified firm to proceed to negotiations.

All other firms will be notified that they were not selected. However, non-selected firms may be asked to return for negotiations if the negotiations with the selected firm are unsuccessful.

Selection of Single/Highest Qualified Firm

USACE will provide a draft agreement to the selected firm.

Parties will meet to negotiate and finalize the terms of the agreement Negotiations may include the agreement articles, pricing, and other considerations.

Fair and reasonable price must be determined in order to award the Phase I Agreement.

If USACE and selected offeror cannot reach consensus on the agreement, USACE reserves the right to discontinue negotiations and take any action determined to be in the Government’s best interest, including entering negotiations with another firm, revising the acquisition approach, or canceling the RFQ.

Negotiations

If negotiations are successful, the Agreements Officer will award Phase I of the Agreement for Pre-Construction Services to the awardee.

Phase II – Full Construction will be incorporated as bilateral modification as design nears completion.

Award

Feedback

Please provide all feedback on CM@Risk process for Fort Carson ECS requirement by 09 October 2026.

All feedback, questions and/or concerns can be provided to Chris Brackett at Christopher.Brackett@usace.army.mil.

Formal RFQ should be issued in mid/late October.

US Army Reserve OVERVIEW

Project Manager

Army reserve program

Other PROJECT OPPORTUNITIES

Program Manager

Project: New Training Barracks Location: Ft Hunter-Liggett

The primary scope of work delivers four (4) CTE Barracks and one (1) IPIMT Barracks to restore modern housing capabilities to the installation. The four (4) CTE Barracks will each span approximately 46,000 square feet, utilizing open-bay configurations equipped with integrated officer sleeping rooms, team rooms, laundry facilities, restrooms, showers, storage, and janitorial closets.

Complementing these collective spaces, the single 45,000-square-foot IPIMT Barracks will provide individual sleeping quarters with private bathrooms, study/day rooms, laundry rooms, storage, and janitorial closets.

Also, part of this project is to completely demolish and dispose of the five existing legacy multi-story barracks that have exceeded their useful life. This comprehensive replacement directly resolves critical facility deficits, bringing Fort Hunter Liggett's training housing into full alignment with modern operational requirements.

Ft Hunter-Liggett – New Training Barracks Location of new CT Barracks

COA –

Demo four CT Barracks. All barracks are three-story with load bearing masonry construction.

Construct four 3-story CT Barracks (300 beds each).

Existing four CT Barracks to be demolished

Ft Hunter-Liggett – New Training Barracks Location of new IPIMT Barracks

COA –

Demo existing 156 IPIMT Barracks.

Construct new 156 two or three story IPIMT Barracks.

Existing IPIMT Barracks to be demolished

Heather Duggan, Rocky Mountain Area Engineer October 6, 2026 File Name Rocky Mountain Area office overview

“The views, opinions and findings contained in this report are those of the authors(s) and should not be construed as an official Department of the Army position, policy or decision, unless so designated by other official documentation.”

USACE Rocky Mountain Area Overview Organizational Structure Future Work Opportunities Q&A overview

Omaha district –rocky mountain Area office

Areas of Responsibility USAF Academy Peterson-Schriever Garrison Cheyenne Mountain SFS Fort Carson Pueblo Chemical Depot Pinon Canyon Maneuver Site

Rocky Mountain Area Office Organization 5475 Tech Center Dr, Ste 205, Colorado Springs, CO 80919

Area Engineer Heather Duggan Rocky Mountain Area Office

Fort Carson Resident Office Kem Reliford Ft Carson Space Force Resident Office Jake Brakeman Peterson-Schriever Garrison USAFA Resident Office Ken Hornbostel

USAFA

Contract Resources Kaitlin Peacock Area Office Cheyenne Mountain SFS Sijan Hall Project Office Melissa Dye Schriever SFS

Rocky Mountain Area - Future Work opportunities Future Contract Opportunities https://sam.gov/content/home

General Small Business Information – Omaha District https://www.nwo.usace.army.mil/Business-With-Us/Small-Business/

Questions?

image3.png image4.png image12.jpeg image13.png image14.png image15.png image16.png image17.png image18.png image19.jpeg image20.jpeg image21.jpeg image22.png image23.jpeg image24.png image25.png image26.png image27.jpeg image28.png image29.png

Microsoft_Excel_Worksheet.xlsx Sheet1

Project Name Location $ Est. (mil) Type FY

DLA Disposition Warehouse FTC $70-100 MILCON FY27

Ambulatory Care Center (ACC) @ BAAF FTC $50-70 MILCON FY28

ACC Preventative Medicine @ EACH FTC $30-50 MILCON FY28

SOF Group Ops FTC $70-100 MILCON FY28

SOF Data Comm Center FTC <$10 UMMC FY28

Fort Carson Dorm Modernization FTC $10-30 O&M FY28+

Various Small Projects FTC $10-30 O&M FY27+

Aero Lab USAFA $10-30 O&M FY27

Various Mechanical Projects USAFA ? O&M FY27

USAFA 2050 USAFA ? ? ?

Space Operations Program Various $250+ MILCON ?

25th SRS Range Support Facility SSFB $30-50 MILCON FY28

Electrical Distribution PSFB $30-50 MILCON FY29

Hazardous Waste Collection Point PSFB <$10 O&M FY27 image30.emf image1.png image2.png image5.png image6.png image7.png image8.png image9.tiff image10.png image11.tiff