W912QR22R0022 Amendment 0005.pdf
PDF 914 KB Posted
- Attached to
- ERSC Small Business MATOC
- Solicitation number
- W912QR22R0022
About this file
This solicitation is seeking proposals for multiple award indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity contracts for environmental restoration services within the Great Lakes and Ohio River Division of the Army Corps of Engineers. Up to seven small business contractors will be selected to provide a wide variety of remediation project support for programs involving formerly used defense sites, Air Force civil engineer centers, and military installations. Services will include activities complying with defense environmental restoration programs, Superfund, and various other environmental laws. Proposals will be evaluated on key personnel qualifications and experience, past performance, and pricing, with technical factors considered more important than cost. The estimated award date is June 2022. Interested parties must ensure registration in the System for Award Management by the response deadline to be eligible. The point of contact listed can address any offeror questions.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT
Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.
15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)
30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30
APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84
STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA
FAR (48 CFR) 53.243
Solicitation W912QR22R0022 is amended as follow s:
1) Past Performance Questionnaire is attached to Section M.
2) Schedule A Rates are updated to remove the EOD Technician I, II and III positions; change Geophysicist hours from 200 to 800; change Senior UXO Supervisor hours from 800 to 500 and change UXO Quality Control Specialist from 1000 to 800 hours.
3) All other solicitation terms and conditions and previous amendments remain in full effect.
1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES
1 11
16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)
16C. DATE SIGNED
BY
16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR
(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)
8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street , County, State and Zip Code) X W912QR22R0022
X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)
20-Dec-2021
10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)
9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.
11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS
X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.
Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:
(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;
or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN
REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.
12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)
13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.
IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.
A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE
CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.
B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).
C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:
D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)
E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.
14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)
10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.
2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO.
5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)
6. ISSUED BY
3. EFFECTIVE DATE
25-Jan-2022
CODE
U. S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, LOUISVILLE
600 DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. PLACE
ROOM 821
LOUISVILLE KY 40202-2239
W912QR 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)
4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.
CODE
See Item 6
FACILITY CODECODE
EMAIL:TEL:
W912QR22R0022
SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE
SUMMARY OF CHANGES
SECTION B - SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES
The following have been modified:
SCHEDULE A - RATES
SCHEDULE A – YEAR 1
Discipline Proposed Hourly Rate (fully burdened in $US) for Year 1
Estimated # of Hours Total Per Discipline
Program Manager 500 Project Manager 5000 Archaeologist 60 Certified Health Physicist (CHP) 80 Architectural Historian 48 Biologist / Limnologist 36 Environmental Researcher 1000 Certified Industrial Hygienist (CIH, ABIH)
Certified Safety Professional (CSP) 150 Corporate Safety and Health Manager 300 Chemist Sr. 300 Chemist Jr. 1000 Cost Estimator Sr. 640 Construction Manager 2000 Ecologist 50 Ecological Risk Assessor 5000 Environmental Engineer Sr. 400 Environmental Engineer Jr. 1000 Environmental Scientist Sr. 400 Environmental Technician 1500 Environmental Law Specialist 30 Hydrogeologist Sr. 1600 Geographer 20 Geologist Sr. 500 Geologist Jr. 1000 Human Health Risk Assessor 5000 Geophysicist 800 UXO Safety Officer (UXOSO) 300 Senior UXO Supervisor (SUXOS) 500 UXO Quality Control Specialist
(UXOQCS)
Project Administrator 1500 Quality Control Manager 500 Regulatory Specialist 320 Surveyor 500 Technical / Specification Writer 1600
TOTAL (Year 1): $
NOTE 1: Offerors must complete all items on the Schedule A.
NOTE 2: The hourly rates proposed on the Schedule A-YEAR 1 are considered fully burdened rates that shall remain in effect for the first year of the contract. The proposed rates shall become binding upon award of the base contract. These rates must be adhered to throughout the first year of the contract. Adherence to these rates will be reviewed through the submittal of supporting documentation for each task order.
NOTE 3: The hours provided above are estimated for cost evaluation purposes only and do not constitute a guarantee that any amount of work above the minimum guarantee will be awarded under this contract.
NOTE 4: Total Evaluated Price MUST be calculated by the offeror. Offerors are instructed to multiply the proposed rate by the number of estimated hours (provided by the Government) for each discipline for each contract year and enter the total amount in the space provided below.
SCHEDULE A – YEAR 2
Discipline Proposed Hourly Rate (fully burdened in $US) for Year 2
Estimated # of Hours Total Per Discipline
Program Manager 500 Project Manager 5000 Archaeologist 60 Certified Health Physicist (CHP) 80 Architectural Historian 48 Biologist / Limnologist 36 Environmental Researcher 1000 Certified Industrial Hygienist (CIH, ABIH)
Certified Safety Professional (CSP) 150 Corporate Safety and Health Manager 300 Chemist Sr. 300 Chemist Jr. 1000 Cost Estimator Sr. 640 Construction Manager 2000 Ecologist 50 Ecological Risk Assessor 5000 Environmental Engineer Sr. 400 Environmental Engineer Jr. 1000 Environmental Scientist Sr. 400 Environmental Technician 1500 Environmental Law Specialist 30 Hydrogeologist Sr. 1600 Geographer 20 Geologist Sr. 500 Geologist Jr. 1000 Human Health Risk Assessor 5000 Geophysicist 800 UXO Safety Officer (UXOSO) 300 Senior UXO Supervisor (SUXOS) 500 UXO Quality Control Specialist
(UXOQCS)
Project Administrator 1500 Quality Control Manager 500 Regulatory Specialist 320 Surveyor 500 Technical / Specification Writer 1600
TOTAL (Year 2): $
NOTE 1: Offerors must complete all items on the Schedule A.
NOTE 2: The hourly rates proposed on the Schedule A-YEAR 2 are considered fully burdened rates that shall remain in effect for the second year of the contract. The proposed rates shall become binding upon award of the base contract. These rates must be adhered to throughout the second year of the contract. Adherence to these rates will be reviewed through the submittal of supporting documentation for each task order.
NOTE 3: The hours provided above are estimated for cost evaluation purposes only and do not constitute a guarantee that any amount of work above the minimum guarantee will be awarded under this contract.
NOTE 4: Total Evaluated Price MUST be calculated by the offeror. Offerors are instructed to multiply the proposed rate by the number of estimated hours (provided by the Government) for each discipline for each contract year and enter the total amount in the
SCHEDULE A – YEAR 3
burdened in $US) for Year 3
Estimated # of Hours Total Per Discipline
Program Manager 500 Project Manager 5000 Archaeologist 60 Certified Health Physicist (CHP) 80 Architectural Historian 48 Biologist / Limnologist 36 Environmental Researcher 1000 Certified Industrial Hygienist (CIH, ABIH)
Certified Safety Professional (CSP) 150 Corporate Safety and Health Manager 300 Chemist Sr. 300 Chemist Jr. 1000 Cost Estimator Sr. 640 Construction Manager 2000 Ecologist 50 Ecological Risk Assessor 5000 Environmental Engineer Sr. 400 Environmental Engineer Jr. 1000 Environmental Scientist Sr. 400 Environmental Technician 1500 Environmental Law Specialist 30 Hydrogeologist Sr. 1600 Geographer 20 Geologist Sr. 500 Geologist Jr. 1000 Human Health Risk Assessor 5000 Geophysicist 800 UXO Safety Officer (UXOSO) 300 Senior UXO Supervisor (SUXOS) 500 UXO Quality Control Specialist
(UXOQCS)
Project Administrator 1500 Quality Control Manager 500 Regulatory Specialist 320 Surveyor 500 Technical / Specification Writer 1600
TOTAL (Year 3): $
NOTE 1: Offerors must complete all items on the Schedule A.
NOTE 2: The hourly rates proposed on the Schedule A-YEAR 3 are considered fully burdened rates that shall remain in effect for the third year of the contract. The proposed rates shall become binding upon award of the base contract. These rates must be adhered to throughout the third year of the contract. Adherence to these rates will be reviewed through the submittal of supporting documentation for each task order.
NOTE 3: The hours provided above are estimated for cost evaluation purposes only and do not constitute a guarantee that any amount of work above the minimum guarantee will be awarded under this contract.
NOTE 4: Total Evaluated Price MUST be calculated by the offeror. Offerors are instructed to multiply the proposed rate by the number of estimated hours (provided by the Government) for each discipline for each contract year and enter the total amount in the
SCHEDULE A – YEAR 4
burdened in $US) for Year 4
Estimated # of Hours Total Per Discipline
Program Manager 500 Project Manager 5000 Archaeologist 60 Certified Health Physicist (CHP) 80 Architectural Historian 48 Biologist / Limnologist 36 Environmental Researcher 1000 Certified Industrial Hygienist (CIH, ABIH)
Certified Safety Professional (CSP) 150 Corporate Safety and Health Manager 300 Chemist Sr. 300 Chemist Jr. 1000 Cost Estimator Sr. 640 Construction Manager 2000 Ecologist 50 Ecological Risk Assessor 5000 Environmental Engineer Sr. 400 Environmental Engineer Jr. 1000 Environmental Scientist Sr. 400 Environmental Technician 1500 Environmental Law Specialist 30 Hydrogeologist Sr. 1600 Geographer 20 Geologist Sr. 500 Geologist Jr. 1000 Human Health Risk Assessor 5000 Geophysicist 800 UXO Safety Officer (UXOSO) 300 Senior UXO Supervisor (SUXOS) 500 UXO Quality Control Specialist
(UXOQCS)
Project Administrator 1500 Quality Control Manager 500 Regulatory Specialist 320 Surveyor 500 Technical / Specification Writer 1600
TOTAL (Year 4): $
NOTE 1: Offerors must complete all items on the Schedule A.
NOTE 2: The hourly rates proposed on the Schedule A-YEAR 4 are considered fully burdened rates that shall remain in effect for the fourth year of the contract. The proposed rates shall become binding upon award of the base contract. These rates must be adhered to throughout the fourth year of the contract. Adherence to these rates will be reviewed through the submittal of supporting documentation for each task order.
NOTE 3: The hours provided above are estimated for cost evaluation purposes only and do not constitute a guarantee that any amount
NOTE 4: Total Evaluated Price MUST be calculated by the offeror. Offerors are instructed to multiply the proposed rate by the number of estimated hours (provided by the Government) for each discipline for each contract year and enter the total amount in the
SCHEDULE A – YEAR 5
burdened in $US) for Year 5
Estimated # of Hours Total Per Discipline
Program Manager 500 Project Manager 5000 Archaeologist 60 Certified Health Physicist (CHP) 80 Architectural Historian 48 Biologist / Limnologist 36 Environmental Researcher 1000 Certified Industrial Hygienist (CIH, ABIH)
Certified Safety Professional (CSP) 150 Corporate Safety and Health Manager 300 Chemist Sr. 300 Chemist Jr. 1000 Cost Estimator Sr. 640 Construction Manager 2000 Ecologist 50 Ecological Risk Assessor 5000 Environmental Engineer Sr. 400 Environmental Engineer Jr. 1000 Environmental Scientist Sr. 400 Environmental Technician 1500 Environmental Law Specialist 30 Hydrogeologist Sr. 1600 Geographer 20 Geologist Sr. 500 Geologist Jr. 1000 Human Health Risk Assessor 5000 Geophysicist 800 UXO Safety Officer (UXOSO) 300 Senior UXO Supervisor (SUXOS) 500 UXO Quality Control Specialist
(UXOQCS)
Project Administrator 1500 Quality Control Manager 500 Regulatory Specialist 320 Surveyor 500 Technical / Specification Writer 1600
TOTAL (Year 5): $
NOTE 1: Offerors must complete all items on the Schedule A.
NOTE 2: The hourly rates proposed on the Schedule A-YEAR 5 are considered fully burdened rates that shall remain in effect for the fifth year of the contract. The proposed rates shall become binding upon award of the base contract. These rates must be adhered to throughout the fifth year of the contract. Adherence to these rates will be reviewed through the submittal of supporting documentation for each task order.
NOTE 3: The hours provided above are estimated for cost evaluation purposes only and do not constitute a guarantee that any amount
NOTE 4: Total Evaluated Price MUST be calculated by the offeror. Offerors are instructed to multiply the proposed rate by the number of estimated hours (provided by the Government) for each discipline for each contract year and enter the total amount in the
TOTAL EVALUATED PRICE (YEARS 1-5): $
SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD
The following have been modified:
Past Performance Questionnaire
USA CE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0)
CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)
1. Contractor Information Firm Name: CAGE Code:
Address: DUNs Number:
Phone Number:
Email Address:
Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:
2. Work Performed as: □ Prime Contractor □ Sub Contractor D Joint Venture D Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:
If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone#):
3. Contract Information Contract Number:
Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):
Contract Type: □ Firm Fixed PriceO Cost Reimbursement □ Other (Please specify):
Contract Title:
Contract Location:
Award Date (mm/dd/yy):
Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):
Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):
Explain Differences:
Original Contract Price (Award Amount):
Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):
Explain Differences:
4. Project Description:
Complexity of Work□ High □ Med 0 Routine How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)
CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)
5. Client Information
Name:
Title:
Phone Number:
Email Address:
6. Describe the client's role in the project:
7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):
8. Client's Signature:
ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT
YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR'S PERFORMANCE
RATING DEFINITION
(E) Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner's benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.
(VG) Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government's/Owner's benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken bv the contractor were effective.
(S) Satisfactory Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
(M) Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
(U) Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
(N) Not No information or did not apply to your Applicable contract
NOTE
An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO sienificant weaknesses identified.
A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.
A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.
A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.
An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.
Rating will be neither positive nor negative.
TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT
I
PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RA TING WHICH BEST REFLECTS
YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR'S PERFORMANCE.
1. QUALITY:
a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts
b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance
c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance
d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)
2. SCHEDULE/fIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:
a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)
b) Rate the contractor's use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract
3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:
a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project?
b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes;
responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)
c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer?
d) Overall customer satisfaction
4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR
a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force?
b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort
c) Government Property Control
d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel
e) Utilization of Small Business concerns
f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines
g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes
h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)
5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)?
E VG s
E VG s
E VG s
E VG s
E VG s
E VG s
E VG s
E VG s
E VG s
E VG s
E VG s
E VG s
E VG s
E VG s
E VG s
E VG s
E VG s
E VG s
E VG s
I
M u N
M u N
M u N
M u N
M u N
M u N
M u N
M u N
M u N
M u N
M u N
M u N
M u N
M u N
M u N
M u N
M u N
M u N
M u N
b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced E VG s M u cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client
c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor's timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance E VG s M u with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns)
d) Is the Contractor's accounting system adequate for management and Yes No tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section.
e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending
Yes No terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.
f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any fmancial Yes No problems? If yes, please explain below.
6. SAFETY /SECURITY
a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues?
E VG s M u (Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)
b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and E VG s M u personnel security requirements.
7.GENERAL
a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner E VG s M u regarding urgent contractual issues).
b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues) E VG s M u
c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below) Yes No
d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this E VG s M u contractor.
Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary):
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .