W912QR21R0033_Specs_Vol1-0000.pdf
PDF 22 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Homestead ARB BAK 12
- Solicitation number
- W912QR21R0033
About this file
This document outlines a federal contract opportunity for repair work at Homestead Air Reserve Base in Florida. The Army Corps of Engineers seeks bids to repair aircraft arresting systems and restripe runways at Homestead ARB for an estimated price between $1 million and $5 million. The solicitation number is W912QR21R0033, and the NAICS code for this opportunity is 236220. This project requires at least 10% of the price to be awarded under the HUBZone program. Bids are due through the ProjNet website and no contract will be awarded until funds are appropriated. The response deadline and award date are not specified.
View the file
Other files
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Solicitation For Repair Aircraft Arresting System Homestead Air Reserve Base, FL
P2: 478241
Design-Bid-Build
Specifications Vol. 1 of 2 Certified Final Design
18 March 2021
W912QR21R0033
ARIMS: 200A
Disposition: Maintain for 15yrs after construction
W912QR21R0033_Specs_Vol1-0000
Repair Aircraft Arresting Systems and Re-Striping Project located at Homestead ARB, FL.
The Estimated Price Range is betw een $1,000,000.00 and $5,000,000.00 in accordance w ith FAR 36.204.
Funds are not presently available for this acquisition. No contract aw ard w ill be made until appropriated funds are made available.
NAICS Code: 236220 - Size Standard: $39.5M
This is a single phase, Design/Bid/Build, Full and Open procurement. In accordance w ith Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 19.1307, this project requires HUBZone 10% price evaluation.
Central Contractor Registration and ORCA are now available through the System for Aw ard Management (SAM), available at w w w .sam.gov Offerors must comply w ith the requirements of FAR 52.232-33 and any other CCR/ORCA requirements in this solicitation through SAM.
PLEASE NOTE: SAM is completely free of charge for both registrants and users.
Technical inquiries and questions relating to the proposal procedures or bonds are to be submitted via Bidder Inquiry in ProjNet at http://projnet.org/projnet. Please see Section 00 21 00, Projnet Instructions for further instructions.
JESSICA MANLEY 502.315.6172
NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".
10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS
NEGOTIATED
18-Mar-2021
(RFP)
(IFB)
X
CALL:
B. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)
See Item 7
2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION
SEALED BID
3. DATE ISSUED
9. FOR INFORMATION A. NAME
SOLICITATION
NSN 7540-01-155-3212 1442-101 STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 4-85)
Prescribed by GSA
FAR (48 CFR) 53.236-1(e)
11. The Contractor shall begin performance w ithin _______10 calendar days and complete it w ithin ________365 calendar days after receiving aw ard, X notice to proceed. This performance period is X mandatory, negotiable. (See _________________________FAR 52.211-10
12 A. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?
(If "YES," indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)
X YES NO
13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:
A. Sealed offers in original and __________1 copies to perform the w ork required are due at the place specif ied in Item 8 by ___________ local time ______________19 Apr 2021 (date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers must be publicly opened at that time.
shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time of fers are due.
B. An offer guarantee is, X is not required.
C. All offers are subject to the (1) w ork requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.
D. Offers providing less than _______60 calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due w ill not be considered and w ill be rejected.
SOLICITATION, OFFER,
AND AWARD
(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)
1. SOLICITATION NO.
IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.
4. CONTRACT NO.
7. ISSUED BY CODE
U. S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, LOUISVILLE
600 DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. PLACE
ROOM 821
LOUISVILLE KY 40202-2239
W912QR
PAGE OF PAGES
1 OF
CODE
(Title, identifying no., date):
12B. CALENDAR DAYS
11:00 AM (hour)
Sealed envelopes containing offers
5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NO. 6. PROJECT NO.
8. ADDRESS OFFER TO (If Other Than Item 7)
502.315.6195 OR 6193FAX:TEL: 502.315.6172 TEL: FAX:
W912QR21R0033 85
20B. SIGNATURE
(REV. 4-85)STANDARD FORM 1442 BACK
TO SIGN
NSN 7540-01-155-3212
SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD (Continued) (Construction, Alteration, or Repair)
CODE FACILITY CODE
17. The offeror agrees to perform the w ork required at the prices specif ied below in strict accordance w ith the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in w riting w ithin ________ calendar days after the date offers are due.
the minimum requirements stated in Item 13D. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13D.)
AMOUNTS SEE SCHEDULE OF PRICES
18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.
19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS
(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation -- give number and date of each)
AMENDMENT NO.
DATE
20A. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN
OFFER (Type or print)
AWARD (To be completed by Government)
21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:
22. AMOUNT 23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA
24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN ITEM
(4 copies unless otherwise specified)
CODE
(Insert any number equal to or greater than
20C. OFFER DATE
25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO
10 U.S.C. 2304(c) 41 U.S.C. 253(c)
CODE27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY:26. ADMINISTERED BY
(Include ZIP Code)14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR 15. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code)
See Item 14
(Include only if different than Item 14)16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS
30B. SIGNATURE
29. AWARD (Contractor is not required to sign this document.)
document and return _______ copies to issuing office.) Contractor agrees Your of f er on this solicitation, is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award con-to f urnish and deliv er all items or perf orm all work, requisitions identif ied summates the contract, which consists of (a) the Gov ernment solicitation and on this f orm and any continuation sheets f or the consideration stated in this y our of f er, and (b) this contract award. No f urther contractual document is contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be necessary .
gov erned by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certif ications, and specif ications or incorporated by ref er-ence in or attached to this contract.
30A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED 31A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)
30C. DATE
(Type or print)
TEL: EMAIL:
31B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 31C. AWARD DATE
BY
CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE
(Contractor is required to sign this28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT
(M ust be fully completed by offeror)OFFER
Section 00 10 00 - Solicitation
PRICE BREAKOUT SCHEDULE
PRICE BREAKOUT SCHEDULE
PROJECT:_REPAIR AIRCRAFT ARRESTING SYSTEMS
LOCATION: HOMESTEAD AIR RESERVE BASE, FLORIDA
OFFEROR’S NAME:____________________________
Item Description Estimated No. Quantity Unit Amount Base 0001 Arresting Gear (EEIC 52495) 1 Job $__________
0002 Shelter Roads (EEIC 52495) 1 Job $__________
0003 Restriping of Runway (EEIC 52195) 1 Job $__________
TOTAL BASE $ _____
PROPOSAL OPTIONS
Item Description Estimated No. Quantity Unit Amount
0004 Option 001 1 Job $__________ BAK-14M installation (EEIC 52495)
This option may be exercised within 90 days of Notice to Proceed
0005 Option 002 1 Job $__________ Construct Permanent Roads (EEIC 52995) At Runway Overrun Ends This option may be exercised within 90 days of Notice to Proceed
TOTAL OPTIONS $ _____
TOTAL BASE PLUS OPTIONS PROPOSAL $ _____
EXPLANATION OF ITEMS
GENERAL:
This section comprises an explanation of the line items identified in the Price Breakout Schedule. This section is a general scope of work for the line items described in the Price Breakout Schedule and is not intended to be all encompassing in the description. All work specified herein shall be accomplished in accordance with the procedures prescribed in the technical provisions of the specifications and the plans/details as shown on the contract drawings. The contractor shall propose for each type of work under the applicable line item. Measurement for payment shall not be made. Payment described for the various line items shall be full compensation for all labor, materials, and equipment required to complete the work. Compensation for any item of work described in the contract but not listed in the Price Breakout Schedule shall be included in the payment for the item of work to which it is made subsidiary.
BASE
1. Payment under Item No. 0001 "Arresting Gear (EEIC 52495)" shall constitute full compensation for furnishing all materials, plant, tools, labor costs, and other associated incidentals necessary to complete the design requirements of the REPAIR AIRCRAFT ARRESTING SYSTEM as required by the contract document drawings and specifications. This shall include the shelters, generators, systems, foundations, tape tubes, textile brake foundations/pavements, demolition not specific to Item No. 0002 and 0003 and all other items not specifically related to road specific work noted in Item No. 0002 and the pavement restriping work necessary as stated in Item No. 0003.
2. Payment under Item No. 0002 "Shelter Roads (EEIC 52495)" shall constitute full compensation for furnishing all materials, plant, tools, labor costs, and other associated incidentals necessary to complete the design requirements of the new Shelter Roads as required by the contract document drawings and specifications. This only applies specifically to work being done to complete work noted for roads to shelters.
3. Payment under Item No. 0003 "Restriping of Runway (EEIC 52195)" shall constitute full compensation for furnishing all materials, plant, tools, labor costs, and other associated incidentals necessary to complete the necessary work for removal and/or replacement of runway striping, displaced threshold markings, and other items as shown on contract document drawings and specifications. This shall also include any temporary phasing work for restriping, lighting, etc.
OPTIONS (OPTs)
1. Payment under Option 001 Item No. 0004 "BAK-14M Installation (EEIC 52495)" shall constitute full compensation for furnishing all materials, plant, tools, labor costs, and other associated incidentals necessary to complete the BAK-14M system and adjacent pavements installation work as shown on contract document drawings and specifications. This equipment for the BAK-14M system shall be GFCI (Government Furnished Contractor Installed).
Contractor shall secure the services of the BAK-14M manufacturer to inspect the existing system, foundation and conduits to perform this work.
This option may be exercised within 90 days of Notice to Proceed.
2. Payment under Option 002 Item No. 0005 "Construct Permanent Haul Roads at
Runway Overrun Ends (EEIC 52995)" shall constitute full compensation for furnishing all materials, plant, tools, labor costs, and other associated incidentals necessary to complete the construction of permanent haul roads at runway overrun ends work as shown on contract document drawings and specifications. This option may be exercised within 90 days of Notice to Proceed.
PROJNET INSTRUCTIONS
OFFEROR'S QUESTIONS AND
COMMENTS
Technical inquiries and questions relating to proposal procedures or bonds are to be submitted via Bidder Inquiry in ProjNet at http://www.ProjNet.org/ProjNet. As noted below, offerors shall not submit their proposals via ProjNet.
Offerors shall submit their proposals in accordance with the provisions stated in the solicitation.
To submit and review bid inquiry items, bidders will need to be a current registered user or self-register into system.
The Solicitation Number is: W912QR20R0033
The Bidder Inquiry Key is: 64RV3S-EB4XQ2
Specific Instructions for ProjNet Bid Inquiry Access:
1. From the ProjNet home page linked above, click on Quick Add on the upper right side of the screen.
2. Identify the Agency. This should be marked as USACE.
3. Key. Enter the Bidder Inquiry Key listed above.
4. Email. Enter the email address you would like to use for communication.
5. Select Continue. A page will then open stating a user account was not found and will ask you to create one using the provided form.
6. Enter your First Name, Last Name, Company, City, State, Phone, Email, Secret Question, Secret Answer, and Time Zone. Make sure to remember your Secret Question and Answer as they will be used from this point on to access the ProjNet system.
7. Select Add User. Once this is completed you are now registered within ProjNet and are currently logged into the system.
Specific Instructions for Future ProjNet Bid Inquiry Access:
1. For future access to ProjNet, you will not be emailed any type of password. You will utilize your Secret Question and Secret Answer to log in.
2. From the ProjNet home page linked above, click on Quick Add on the upper right side of the screen.
3. Identify the Agency. This should be marked as USACE.
4. Key. Enter the Bidder Inquiry Key listed above.
5. Email. Enter the email address you used to register previously in ProjNet.
6. Select Continue. A page will then open asking you to enter the answer to your Secret Question.
7. Enter your Secret Answer and click Login. Once this is completed you are now logged into the system.
From this page you may view all bidder inquiries or add an inquiry.
Bidders will receive an acknowledgement of their question via email, followed by an answer to their question after it has been processed by our technical team.
Offerors are requested to review the specification in its entirety and to review the Bidder Inquiry System for answers to questions prior to submission of a new inquiry.
The call center operates weekdays from 8AM to 5PM U.S. Central Time Zone (Chicago). The telephone number for the Call Center is 800-428-HELP.
Information concerning the status of the evaluation and/or award will NOT be available after receipt of bids/proposals.
NOTES:
1. Offerors shall not submit their proposals via ProjNet, but in accordance with the provisions stated in the solicitation. Any questions regarding acceptable means of submitting offers shall be made directly to the Contract Specialist identified in the solicitation.
2. Government responses to technical inquiries and questions relating to proposal procedures or bonds that are submitted to ProjNet in accordance with the procedures above are not binding on the Government unless an amendment is issued on Standard Form 30. In the case of any conflicts, the solicitation governs. Any changes or revisions to the solicitation will be made by formal amendment.
Government responses will be limited to: (a) Notice that an amendment will be issued; (b) Reference to an existing requirement contained in the solicitation; or (c) Notice that a response is not necessary.
3. The ability to enter technical inquiries and questions relating to proposal procedures or bonds will be disabled five (10) days prior to the closing date stated in the solicitation. No Government responses will be entered into the ProjNet system within two (5) days prior to the closing date stated in the solicitation.
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS
- Starting 29 June 2018, vendors creating or updating their SAM registration can have their registration activated prior to the approval of the required notarized letter. However, the signed copy of the notarized letter must be sent to the GSA Federal Service Desk (FSD) with 30 days of activation or the vendor risks no longer being active in SAM.
- Unless otherwise stated, all references to days are calendar days in accordance with FAR 52.202-1.
‐ Bid and Proposals are used interchangeably throughout this solicitation and means a response to a solicitation that, if accepted, would bind the offeror to perform the resultant contract.
‐ Page numbers throughout this solicitation may not be accurate.
ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION
Proposals: ALL SUBMISSIONS TO THIS PROPOSAL ANNOUNCEMENT SHALL BE SUBMITTED ELECTRONICALLY THROUGH DOD SAFE. No paper copies, CD-ROMs or facsimile submissions will be accepted. Electronic Proposal Submission is required through the Army’s Electronic File Sharing Service, DOD SAFE (https://safe.apps.mil). The DOD SAFE Application is used to send large files to individuals that would normally be too large to send via email. There are no user accounts for SAFE. Authentication is handled via email.
Anyone has access to DOD SAFE, and the application is available for use by anyone. The SAFE “Getting Started Guide” has information on how to utilize the system (https://safe.apps.mil/about.php). Instructions for uploading are as follows:
1. Send an email to the Contracting Officer and Contract Specialist to receive the link to drop off your proposal. This will need to be completed five (5) business days prior to proposal due date.
a. Jessica Manley, Contract Specialist at Jessica.Manley@usace.army.mil
b. Emily Moore, Contracting Officer at Emily.A.Moore@usace.army.mil
2. You will receive an email with the link to submit your drop-off. The link will be provided no later than two
(2) business days prior to the proposal due date.
3. Short Note to the Recipients: Click the Add Files or Drag and Drop your files. For file description, enter
W912QR21R0033-FIRMNAME.
4. Click Upload button to send documents.
5. Guest users will need to check their email to verify their email address before the recipients will be notified. (Government-issued Common Access Cards (CACs) are not required).
File Size Limitations: Offerors are advised to follow the DOD SAFE instructions for uploading files. DOD SAFE supports delivery up to 8GB. If needed, Offerors are advised to break the files down into smaller sections in order to upload it to the system. In such cases, please divide the sections as logically as possible and be sure to clearly name the files as specified below.
File Naming Convention: To ensure your submission is received and processed appropriately, it is important that interested parties CAREFULLY ensure their electronic files adhere to the following naming convention:
W912QR21R0033-FIRMNAME-VOLUME I
W912QR21R0033-FIRMNAME-VOLUME II
Each file name shall begin with the solicitation number followed by the firm’s name and a brief file description.
Please see examples above.
File Organization: Although hard copies are not accepted, each file shall be clearly indexed, and logically assembled. Font size shall be 10 or larger. Pages shall be letter sized (larger page sizes (such as 11x17 fold-outs, etc.) will be counted as two pages. Proposals shall be in a narrative format, organized and titled so that each section of the proposal follows the order and format of the factors. Information presented should be organized so as to pertain to only the evaluation factor in the section that the information is presented. Information pertaining to more than one evaluation factor should be repeated in the each section for each factor.
Upload Completion & Deadline: Interested parties shall submit responses no later than the date specified on the solicitation document. The time & date of proposal receipt will be the upload completion / delivery time & date recorded within DOD SAFE site. Do not assume that electronic submission will occur instantaneously. Large files (e.g. 10MB or more) will take some time to upload. Offerors should time their upload effort with prudence by not waiting until the last few minutes—this will allow for unexpected delays in the transmittal process. Offerors are encouraged to keep a copy of the upload confirmation for their record. Submissions after the deadline will be considered late and will be processed in accordance with FAR 15.208.
Electronic Files: Files shall be in their native format (i.e. doc, xls, ppt, etc.), or if in pdf format, shall be in searchable text. Text and graphics portfolios of the electronic copies shall be in a format readable by Microsoft Office or Adobe applications. Data submitted in a spreadsheet format shall be readable by MS Excel (all cells and formulas should be unlocked).
Any information, presented in a proposal that the Offeror wants safeguarded from disclosure to other parties must be identified and labeled in accordance with the requirements of Provision “FAR 52.215-1, Instructions to Offerors – Competitive Acquisition (Jan 2017),” subparagraph (e), which is found in 00 21 00 Instructions of the RFP. The Government will endeavor to honor the restrictions against release requested by Offerors, to the extent permitted under United States law and regulations.
Section 00 21 00 - Instructions
CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
52.204-7 System for Award Management OCT 2018 52.204-16 Commercial and Government Entity Code Reporting AUG 2020 52.204-22 Alternative Line Item Proposal JAN 2017 52.211-1 Availability of Specifications Listed in the GSA Index of
Federal Specifications, Standards and Commercial Item Descriptions, FPMR Part 101-29
AUG 1998
52.211-7 Alternatives to Government-Unique Standards NOV 1999 52.215-1 Instructions to Offerors--Competitive Acquisition JAN 2017 52.217-5 Evaluation Of Options JUL 1990
CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT
52.216-1 TYPE OF CONTRACT (APR 1984)
The Government contemplates award of a Firm Fixed Price contract resulting from this solicitation.
(End of provision)
52.222-5 CONSTRUCTION WAGE RATE REQUIREMENTS--SECONDARY SITE OF THE WORK (MAY
2014)
(a)(1) The offeror shall notify the Government if the offeror intends to perform work at any secondary site of the work, as defined in paragraph (a)(1)(ii) of the FAR clause at 52.222-6, Construction Wage Rate Requirements,of this solicitation.
(2) If the offeror is unsure if a planned work site satisfies the criteria for a secondary site of the work, the offeror shall request a determination from the Contracting Officer.
(b)(1) If the wage determination provided by the Government for work at the primary site of the work is not applicable to the secondary site of the work, the offeror shall request a wage determination from the Contracting Officer.
(2) The due date for receipt of offers will not be extended as a result of an offeror's request for a wage determination for a secondary site of the work.
52.225-10 NOTICE OF BUY AMERICAN REQUIREMENT--CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS (MAY 2014)
(a) Definitions. “Commercially available off-the-shelf (COTS) item,” “construction material,” “domestic construction material,” and “foreign construction material,” as used in this provision, are defined in the clause of this solicitation entitled “Buy American --Construction Materials” (Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) clause 52.225-9).
(b) Requests for determinations of inapplicability. An offeror requesting a determination regarding the inapplicability of the Buy American statute should submit the request to the Contracting Officer in time to allow a determination before submission of offers. The offeror shall include the information and applicable supporting data required by paragraphs (c) and (d) of the clause at FAR 52.225-9 in the request. If an offeror has not requested a determination regarding the inapplicability of the Buy American statute before submitting its offer, or has not received a response to a previous request, the offeror shall include the information and supporting data in the offer.
(c) Evaluation of offers. (1) The Government will evaluate an offer requesting exception to the requirements of the Buy American statute, based on claimed unreasonable cost of domestic construction material, by adding to the offered price the appropriate percentage of the cost of such foreign construction material, as specified in paragraph (b)(3)(i) of the clause at FAR 52.225-9.
(2) If evaluation results in a tie between an offeror that requested the substitution of foreign construction material based on unreasonable cost and an offeror that did not request an exception, the Contracting Officer will award to the offeror that did not request an exception based on unreasonable cost.
(d) Alternate offers.
(1) When an offer includes foreign construction material not listed by the Government in this solicitation in paragraph (b)(2) of the clause at FAR 52.225-9, the offeror also may submit an alternate offer based on use of equivalent domestic construction material.
(2) If an alternate offer is submitted, the offeror shall submit a separate Standard Form 1442 for the alternate offer, and a separate price comparison table prepared in accordance with paragraphs (c) and (d) of the clause at FAR 52.225-9 for the offer that is based on the use of any foreign construction material for which the Government has not yet determined an exception applies.
(3) If the Government determines that a particular exception requested in accordance with paragraph (c) of the clause at FAR 52.225-9 does not apply, the Government will evaluate only those offers based on use of the equivalent domestic construction material, and the offeror shall be required to furnish such domestic construction material. An offer based on use of the foreign construction material for which an exception was requested--
(i) Will be rejected as nonresponsive if this acquisition is conducted by sealed bidding; or
(ii) May be accepted if revised during negotiations.
52.233-2 SERVICE OF PROTEST (SEP 2006)
(a) Protests, as defined in section 33.101 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation, that are filed directly with an agency, and copies of any protests that are filed with the Government Accountability Office (GAO), shall be served on the Contracting Officer (addressed as follows) by obtaining written and dated acknowledgment of receipt from
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Attn: Emily Moore 600 Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Place Louisville, KY 40202
(b) The copy of any protest shall be received in the office designated above within one day of filing a protest with the GAO.
52.236-27 SITE VISIT (CONSTRUCTION) (FEB 1995) – ALTERNATE I (FEB 1995)
(a) The clauses at 52.236-2, Differing Site Conditions, and 52.236-3, Site Investigations and Conditions Affecting the Work, will be included in any contract awarded as a result of this solicitation. Accordingly, offerors or quoters are urged and expected to inspect the site where the work will be performed.
(b) A site visit is scheduled for 10:00 on Wednesday, 7 April 2021 where interested contractor’s will be permitted to investigate the site and take photographs. Each contractor will be limited to 2-persons.
Contractors will be required to be processed at the Visitor Center and will be issued access badges. A USACE representative be at the Visitor’s Center to assist with process. Contractor shall arrive no later than 9:00 a.m. on the day of the site visit. The Visitor’s Center is located at the southwest corner of the round-about intersection of Biscayne Dr (SW 288th Street) and Coral Sea Blvd (SW 127th Ave) in Homestead, FL. Contractors shall be escorted by USACE personnel at all times while on Base and will be escorted off Base at the conclusion of the site visit.
Due to concerns with the spread of COVID-19, contractor’s will be required to wear face mask coverings at all times while on Base (including outdoors) and shall limit touch-point surface contact. Social-distancing and frequent hand washing or use of hand sanitizer shall be required. Contractors will not be allowed access to the base if they are experiencing or have experienced fever or flu-like symptoms within the previous 24-hours. Each visitor shall expect to have their temperature taken with an infrared sensor by Base personnel and to be questioned regarding fever and flu-like symptoms upon access. Investigation of the shelters will be in a confined area and will be limited to 2-persons at a time.
Contractors wishing to visit the project site shall submit information required on the attached Background Investigation Request form to Ileana Burns at Ileana.Burns@usace.army.mil no later than noon Thursday, 1 April 2021. Information will be utilized by Base Security personnel to perform appropriate background checks.
52.252-1 SOLICITATION PROVISIONS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (FEB 1998)
This solicitation incorporates one or more solicitation provisions by reference, with the same force and effect as if they were given in full text. Upon request, the Contracting Officer will make their full text available. The offeror is cautioned that the listed provisions may include blocks that must be completed by the offeror and submitted with its quotation or offer. In lieu of submitting the full text of those provisions, the offeror may identify the provision by paragraph identifier and provide the appropriate information with its quotation or offer. Also, the full text of a solicitation provision may be accessed electronically at this/these address(es):
The full text of FAR clauses and provisions can be found at https://www.acquisition.gov/
The full text of DFARS clauses and provisions can be found at https://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/dfarspgi/current/index.html
52.252-5 AUTHORIZED DEVIATIONS IN PROVISIONS (NOV 2020)
(a) The use in this solicitation of any Federal Acquisition Regulation (48 CFR Chapter 1) provision with an authorized deviation is indicated by the addition of "(DEVIATION)" after the date of the provision.
(b) The use in this solicitation of any (48 CFR Chapter ) provision with an authorized deviation is indicated by the addition of "(DEVIATION)" after the name of the regulation.
252.204-7008 COMPLIANCE WITH SAFEGUARDING COVERED DEFENSE INFORMATION CONTROLS
(OCT 2016)
(a) Definitions. As used in this provision--
Controlled technical information, covered contractor information system, covered defense information, cyber incident, information system, and technical information are defined in clause 252.204-7012, Safeguarding Covered Defense Information and Cyber Incident Reporting.
(b) The security requirements required by contract clause 252.204-7012 shall be implemented for all covered defense information on all covered contractor information systems that support the performance of this contract.
(c) For covered contractor information systems that are not part of an information technology service or system operated on behalf of the Government (see 252.204-7012(b)(2))--
(1) By submission of this offer, the Offeror represents that it will implement the security requirements specified by National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Special Publication (SP) 800-171, ``Protecting Controlled Unclassified Information in Nonfederal Information Systems and Organizations'' (see http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-171) that are in effect at the time the solicitation is issued or as authorized by the contracting officer not later than December 31, 2017.
(2)(i) If the Offeror proposes to vary from any of the security requirements specified by NIST SP 800-171 that are in effect at the time the solicitation is issued or as authorized by the Contracting Officer, the Offeror shall submit to the Contracting Officer, for consideration by the DoD Chief Information Officer (CIO), a written explanation of—
(A) Why a particular security requirement is not applicable; or
(B) How an alternative but equally effective, security measure is used to compensate for the inability to satisfy a particular requirement and achieve equivalent protection.
(ii) An authorized representative of the DoD CIO will adjudicate offeror requests to vary from NIST SP 800-171 requirements in writing prior to contract award. Any accepted variance from NIST SP 800-171 shall be incorporated into the resulting contract.
252.204-7019 NOTICE OF NIST SP 800-171 DOD ASSESSMENT REQUIREMENTS (NOV 2020)
(a) Definitions.
Basic Assessment, Medium Assessment, and High Assessment have the meaning given in the clause 252.204-7020, NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessments.
Covered contractor information system has the meaning given in the clause 252.204-7012, Safeguarding Covered Defense Information and Cyber Incident Reporting, of this solicitation.
(b) Requirement. In order to be considered for award, if the Offeror is required to implement NIST SP 800-171, the Offeror shall have a current assessment (i.e., not more than 3 years old unless a lesser time is specified in the solicitation) (see 252.204-7020) for each covered contractor information system that is relevant to the offer, contract, task order, or delivery order. The Basic, Medium, and High NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessments are described in the NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessment Methodology located at https://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/pdi/cyber/strategically_assessing_contractor_implementation_of_NIST_SP_800- 171.html.
(c) Procedures.
(1) The Offeror shall verify that summary level scores of a current NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessment (i.e., not more than 3 years old unless a lesser time is specified in the solicitation) are posted in the Supplier Performance Risk System (SPRS) (https://www.sprs.csd.disa.mil/) for all covered contractor information systems relevant to the offer.
(2) If the Offeror does not have summary level scores of a current NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessment (i.e., not more than 3 years old unless a lesser time is specified in the solicitation) posted in SPRS, the Offeror may conduct and submit a Basic Assessment to webptsmh@navy.mil for posting to SPRS in the format identified in paragraph (d) of this provision.
(d) Summary level scores. Summary level scores for all assessments will be posted 30 days post-assessment in SPRS to provide DoD Components visibility into the summary level scores of strategic assessments.
(1) Basic Assessments. An Offeror may follow the procedures in paragraph (c)(2) of this provision for posting Basic Assessments to SPRS.
(i) The email shall include the following information:
(A) Cybersecurity standard assessed (e.g., NIST SP 800-171 Rev 1).
(B) Organization conducting the assessment (e.g., Contractor self-assessment).
(C) For each system security plan (security requirement 3.12.4) supporting the performance of a DoD contract--
(1) All industry Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) code(s) associated with the information system(s) addressed by the system security plan; and
(2) A brief description of the system security plan architecture, if more than one plan exists.
(D) Date the assessment was completed.
(E) Summary level score (e.g., 95 out of 110, NOT the individual value for each requirement).
(F) Date that all requirements are expected to be implemented (i.e., a score of 110 is expected to be achieved) based on information gathered from associated plan(s) of action developed in accordance with NIST SP 800-171.
(ii) If multiple system security plans are addressed in the email described at paragraph (d)(1)(i) of this section, the Offeror shall use the following format for the report:
Brief CAGE codes description of Date of Total Date score of System security plan supported by this the plan assessment score 110 will plan architecture achieved
(2) Medium and High Assessments. DoD will post the following Medium and/or High Assessment summary level scores to SPRS for each system assessed:
(i) The standard assessed (e.g., NIST SP 800-171 Rev 1).
(ii) Organization conducting the assessment, e.g., DCMA, or a specific organization (identified by Department of Defense Activity Address Code (DoDAAC)).
(iii) All industry CAGE code(s) associated with the information system(s) addressed by the system security plan.
(iv) A brief description of the system security plan architecture, if more than one system security plan exists.
(v) Date and level of the assessment, i.e., medium or high.
(vi) Summary level score (e.g., 105 out of 110, not the individual value assigned for each requirement).
(vii) Date that all requirements are expected to be implemented (i.e., a score of 110 is expected to be achieved) based on information gathered from associated plan(s) of action developed in accordance with NIST SP 800-171.
(3) Accessibility.
(i) Assessment summary level scores posted in SPRS are available to DoD personnel, and are protected, in accordance with the standards set forth in DoD Instruction 5000.79, Defense-wide Sharing and Use of Supplier and Product Performance Information (PI).
(ii) Authorized representatives of the Offeror for which the assessment was conducted may access SPRS to view their own summary level scores, in accordance with the SPRS Software User's Guide for Awardees/Contractors available at https://www.sprs.csd.disa.mil/pdf/SPRS_Awardee.pdf.
(iii) A High NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessment may result in documentation in addition to that listed in this section.
DoD will retain and protect any such documentation as "Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)" and intended for internal DoD use only. The information will be protected against unauthorized use and release, including through the exercise of applicable exemptions under the Freedom of Information Act (e.g., Exemption 4 covers trade secrets and commercial or financial information obtained from a contractor that is privileged or confidential).
Section 00 22 00 - Supplementary Instructions
SECTION 00 22 12
PROCEDURES FOR SUBMITTAL OF OFFERS AND PROPOSAL EVALUATION CRITERIA
1.0 Overview.
1.1 The intent of this solicitation is to select one contractor for the Repair Aircraft Arresting Systems and
Re-Striping project at Homestead ARB, FL. The basis of award is the Best Value Trade-Off process.
The Government will evaluate the proposals in accordance with the criteria described herein. The Contracting Officer will award a firm fixed price contract to the responsible offeror whom the Source Selection Authority (SSA) determines conforms to the solicitation, is fair and reasonable in price, and offers the best overall value to the Government, all factors considered. The Government reserves the right to accept other than the lowest priced offer or to reject all offers.
1.2 This project will provide a fully functional, state of the art aircraft arresting systems for the runway. This project will accomplish all work required to complete the 10-year overhaul for the existing BAK-12 AAS, Project will replace the deteriorated BAK-12 shelters with new, frangible shelters. Tape tubes will be replaced. BAK-14s will be retrofitted with BAK-14Ms. Existing road surface from the taxiway to BAK-12 shelters will be paved. The E-5 cables in the overruns will be replaced with MB100.10.C bidirectional textile brake and hook cable arresting systems. Concrete tape sweeps and bypass roads for the textile brake systems will be placed. Project to include the restriping of the runway to return the runway to its current markings in well-marked condition after both thresholds have been relocated and returned to normal. All design, construction and AAS installation work will conform to the requirements of AFI32-1043, Managing, Operating and Maintaining Aircraft Arresting Systems, and applicable Technical Orders.
Displaced thresholds, temporary marking and lighting are required when construction work is performed at each end of the runway. Phasing of work for this project shall be the responsibility of the contractor and will need to be coordinated with the Airfield Manager.
2.0 Submittal of offers.
2.1 Offerors submitting proposals for this project should limit submissions to data essential for evaluation of proposals so that a minimum of time and monies will have been expended in preparing information required herein. However, in order to be effectively and equitably evaluated, the proposals must include information sufficiently detailed to clearly describe the offeror's capability for successfully completing the solicited project. Requirements stated in this Request for Proposal (RFP) are minimums. Proposals should follow in the order of sequence set forth in the RFP. Information provided out of sequence may not be evaluated and may result in the offeror’s disqualification from award.
2.2 Due to COVID-19 impacts, all submissions to this proposal announcement shall be submitted electronically through DoD Safe no later than the time and date specified in Block 13 of Standard Form 1442. Please refer to and follow the instructions specified in the Electronic Proposal Submission Instructions, attached herein.
2.3 Offerors are required to submit a proposal consisting of the information identified in paragraphs 2.4 and 2.5 below. The sections should parallel the submission requirements identified herein.
2.4 Volume I shall be submitted electronically and include the following information:
Volume I – Factor I: Past Performance Volume I – Factor II: Management Approach Volume I – Factor III: Small Business Participation Plan
NOTE: Failure to place the required submission information under the appropriate tab for the factor may result in a lower rating if the evaluators cannot readily find the appropriate information. Any specified page limits will be strictly adhered to and enforced. Information submitted that exceeds the specified limit will not be evaluated.
2.5 Volume II shall be submitted electronically and shall include the following information:
Volume II – Tab A: Standard Form 1442 and Price Breakout Schedule Volume II – Tab B: Joint Venture Agreements Volume II – Tab C: Evidence of Ability to Obtain Bonding and Proof of Financial Ability Volume II – Tab D: Pre-Award Information Volume II – Tab E: Subcontracting Plan
NOTE: Failure to place the required submission information under the appropriate tab may result in a lower rating if the evaluators cannot readily find the appropriate information.
3.0 Proposal Evaluation Process.
3.1. A Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB) comprised of representatives of the Corps of Engineers, User/Customer, and other required personnel will evaluate the proposals. Offerors are advised that the technical evaluation and rating of proposals will be conducted in strict confidence. Technical proposals (Volume I) will be reviewed and rated without knowledge of the price offered. The number and identities of offerors are not revealed to anyone not involved in the evaluation and award process or to other offerors.
Proposals will be evaluated based on the factors described herein, and the basis of award is a Best Value Trade-Off, as stated above.
3.2 The evaluation process essentially consists of four parts: proposal compliance review and responsibility review, technical evaluation, price evaluation, and price/technical trade-off analysis.
3.2.1 Proposal Compliance/Responsibility Review: This is an initial review to ensure that all required forms and certifications are complete, that both a technical and price proposal were received, and that the offeror is financially capable of sustaining performance under the contract and is able to obtain the required level of performance and payment bonds from an acceptable surety.
3.2.2 Technical Evaluation: The SSEB will evaluate and rate the Volume I proposals against the RFP requirements. Factor I – Past Performance will be rated using Tables 1 and 2 below. The rating will be based on overall confidence in performance, with the final confidence assessment rating based on the extent of recent, relevant past experience and the quality of the offeror’s performance. Factor II – Management Approach will be rated using Table 3 below. Factor III – Small Business Participation Plan will be rated using Table 4.
3.2.3 Price Evaluation: The SSEB and Contracting Officer/SSA will evaluate price proposals independent of the technical evaluation. The SSEB will not have access to price information until completion of the technical evaluation.
3.2.4 Price/Technical Trade-off Analysis: After all above evaluations are complete, the Contracting Officer/SSA will compare the ratings of the technical proposals, including the strengths and weaknesses, and compare prices. The Source Selection Authority (SSA) will then consider all factors to select the proposal offering the best value to the Government.
4.0 Proposal Information and Related Evaluation Factors.
4.1 Proposals will be evaluated in accordance with the factors below, listed in order of relative importance. All evaluation factors, other than price, when combined are approximately equal to price. The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)). Therefore, the offeror’s initial proposal should contain the offeror’s best terms from a price and technical standpoint. The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary. If the Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.
4.2 Volume I – Factor I – Past Performance 1st most important factor
4.3 Volume I – Factor II – Management Approach 2nd most important factor
4.4 Volume I – Factor III – Small Business Participation Plan 3rd most important factor
4.5 Volume II - Price and Pro Forma Information (Sealed Envelope) All evaluation factors, other than price, when combined, are approximately equal to price.
Tab A Standard Form 1442 and Price Breakout Schedule Not Rated
Tab B Joint Venture Agreement Not Rated
Tab C Evidence of Ability to Obtain Bonding and Not Rated Proof of Financial Ability
Tab D Pre-Award Information Not Rated
Tab E Subcontracting Plan Acceptable / Unacceptable
4.6 Ratings
Evaluators will apply a single rating for the definition that most closely matches the evaluation.
TABLE 1
Past Performance Relevancy Ratings Rating Description Very Relevant Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.
Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.
Somewhat Relevant Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.
Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.
TABLE 2
Performance Confidence Assessments
Substantial Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Satisfactory Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Neutral Confidence No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. The offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance.
Limited Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
No Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
TABLE 3
Technical / Risk Assessment Ratings Adjectival Rating Description
Outstanding Proposal indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low.
Good Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate.
Acceptable
Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.
Marginal Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high.
Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation, and thus, contains one or more deficiencies, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is unacceptable. Proposal is unawardable.
TABLE 4
Small Business Ratings
Acceptable Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the small business objectives.
Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the small business objectives.
4.7 Definitions
1. Deficiency. A material failure of a proposal to meet a Government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level. See FAR 15.001.
2. Strength. An aspect of an offeror’s proposal that has merit or exceeds specified performance or capability requirements in a way that will be advantageous to the Government during contract performance.
3. Significant Strength. An aspect of an offeror’s proposal that has appreciable merit or appreciably exceeds specified performance or capability requirements in a way that will be appreciably advantageous to the Government during contract performance.
4. Weakness. A flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance. See
FAR 15.001.
5. Significant Weakness. A flaw in the proposal that appreciably increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance. See FAR 15.001.
6. Uncertainty. Any aspect of a non-cost/price factor proposal for which the intent of the offeror is unclear (e.g., more than one way to interpret the offer or inconsistencies in the proposal indicating that there may have been an error, omission, or mistake).
7. Clarification. Limited exchanges between the Government and offerors that may occur when award without discussions is contemplated. See FAR 15.306(a)(1).
8. Adverse Past Performance. Past performance information that supports a less than satisfactory rating on any evaluation. Adverse past performance that must be addressed with Offerors includes unfavorable comments received from sources such as those received from respondents from past performance questionnaires or interviews that have not been finalized within a formal rating system.
5.0 Volume I – Factor I: Past Performance
5.1 Submission Requirements:
5.1.1 Provide descriptions of up to three (3) projects substantially complete or completed by the Prime
Contractor within the last seven (7) years (from…
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .