W912PP210009_DTRA Admin Bldg_Amendment 0001.pdf
PDF 36 MB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W912PP21R0009
About this file
This solicitation is for the design and construction of a new administrative office building for the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) located at Kirtland Air Force Base in Albuquerque, New Mexico. The project involves constructing a three-story, 7,164 square meter (77,110 square foot) building to house the DTRA Albuquerque Administrative Office. Additional work includes installing solar parking canopies, removing hazardous materials, and constructing new pavement with curb and gutter. The project will be completed according to ICD 705 Volume 2 requirements.
The solicitation will be issued on January 15, 2021 as a request for proposal evaluated using a best value tradeoff source selection method. Offerors must submit proposals by March 1, 2021. The contract type will be firm-fixed price. The project value is estimated between $25-75 million. Offerors must register with the System for Award Management and beta.sam.gov to receive solicitation documents and submit a proposal. The Department of the Army Corps of Engineers Engineering District in Albuquerque is the issuing agency.
View the file
Other files
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:
(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.
E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.
AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE
2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)
7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE
STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016)
Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243
FACILITY CODE
9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER
9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)
10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER
10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)
11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS
The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.
12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;
13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.
IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.
CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER
NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.
B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).
C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:
D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)
Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.
15C. DATE SIGNED
15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)
16C. DATE SIGNED
16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)
14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)
PAGE OF PAGES
6. ISSUED BY CODE
8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)
CODE
15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR
(Signature of person authorized to sign)
16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
(Signature of Contracting Officer)
Previous edition unusable
PROJECT: Design Bid Build FY 21 DTRA Albuquerque Administrative Office Building, Kirtland Air Force Base, Bernalillo County, New Mexico
1. This is Amendment No. 0001 to Solicitation No. W912PP21R0009. The following revisions shall be incorporated into the specifications. All other provisions shall remain unchanged.
U.S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, ALBUQUERQUE
CORPS OF ENGINEERS
4101 JEFFERSON STREET N.E. ALBUQUERQUE,
NEW MEXICO 87109-3435
W912PP21R0009
02/05/2021
01/15/2021
XX
W912PP2
AMENDMENT No. 0001
2. SPECIFICATIONS: Delete the following listed pages and substitute the pages attached hereto. On the revised pages, for convenience, changes are emphasized by STRIKETHROUGH for deletions and UNDERLINE for additions from the previous issue. All portions of the revised (or new) pages shall apply whether or not changes have been indicated.
Delete Page
Page (Page of
Insert Page
W912PP2
AMENDMENT No. 0001
////////LAST ITEM////////
3. DRAWING CHANGES: The following drawings have been revised and the sequence number changed to indicate such revision:
Delete Page
A-441 DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE AND FENCE
DETAILS, Page 53 of Drawing Package Section 2
Insert Page
A-441.1 DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE AND
FENCE DETAILS, 1 Page
DTRA ABQ Administrative Office Building Kirtland AFB, New Mexico
Solicitation No. W912PP21R0009
RTA
AMENDMENT No. 0001
33 71 02 UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION
33 82 00 TELECOMMUNICATIONS OUTSIDE PLANT (OSP)
PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 5
-- End of Project Table of Contents --
APPENDIX A
APPENDIX B
APPENDIX C
ASBESTOS AND LEAD BASED PAINT PROJECT REPORT
GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY REPORT
GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT
52.233-2 SERVICE OF PROTEST (SEP 2006)
(a). Protests, as defined in section 33.101 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation, that are filed directly with an agency, and copies of any protests that are filed with the Government Accountability Office (GAO), shall be served on the Contracting Officer (addressed as follows) by obtaining written and dated acknowledgment of receipt from
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Contracting Division (Attn: Contracting Officer) 4101 Jefferson Plaza NE Albuquerque, NM 87109
(b) The copy of any protest shall be received in the office designated above within one day of filing a protest with the GAO.
(End of provision)
52.236-27 SITE VISIT (CONSTRUCTION) (FEB 1995) – ALTERNATE I (FEB 1995)
(a) The clauses at 52.236-2, Differing Site Conditions, and 52.236-3, Site Investigations and Conditions Affecting the Work, will be included in any contract awarded as a result of this solicitation. Accordingly, offerors or quoters are urged and expected to inspect the site where the work will be performed.
(b) An organized site visit has been scheduled for February 8, 2021 at 10:00am.
(c) Participants will first meet at Truman Gate to obtain their base pass then proceed to the jobsite located Northwest of the Wyoming Blvd and M Ave on Kirtland Air Force Base. The Building number is 20358.
NOTE**Participants will need to fill out the KAFB Short Term Visitor Pass included in this solicitation and submit it to Filemon Gallegos at Filem.o Gallegos@usace.army.mil NLT Wednesday, February 0 , 2021 to ensure access/entry to KAFB for the site visit.
(d) Offerors are cautioned that nothing said or done at the pre-proposal conference or site visit will qualify or modify the terms of the solicitation document. The only instrument that shall qualify or modify the solicitation document is a formal amendment, in writing, per FAR 15.206. NO QUESTIONS WILL BE ANSWERED AT THE SITE
VISIT. ALL QUESTIONS MUST BE SUBMITTED VIA PROJNET IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RFP.
(End of provision)
52.252-1 SOLICITATION PROVISIONS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (FEB 1998)
This solicitation incorporates one or more solicitation provisions by reference, with the same force and effect as if they were given in full text. Upon request, the Contracting Officer will make their full text available. The offeror is cautioned that the listed provisions may include blocks that must be completed by the offeror and submitted with its quotation or offer. In lieu of submitting the full text of those provisions, the offeror may identify the provision by paragraph identifier and provide the appropriate information with its quotation or offer. Also, the full text of a solicitation provision may be accessed electronically at this/these address(es):
Information is to be compiled on the Contract Description Forms provided at the end of Section 00 22 16 and will be used to evaluate relevant contractor experience. Responses to this factor should take into account experience of the management team proposed for the contract, timeliness of performance, safety and health record, customer satisfaction and cost control. Projects submitted shall include challenges that were overcome and risks that were mitigated by use of quality management, risk evaluation and mitigation, and technical solutions.
Offerors are invited, but not required, to submit photographs of successful projects in conjunction with this section.
Each project example narrative shall utilize should include the Contract Description Form provided at the end of section 00 22 16. following information (provided on Contract Description Form):
1. Project and title location
2. Detailed scope of the project
3. Original contract award amount and final construction cost
4. Original contract finish date and actual finish date
5. Points of contact, as described below
6. Subcontractors utilized on the project and if they are proposed to be utilized for this project
7. Prime Contractor personnel on the project and if they are proposed to be utilized for this project
8. Narrative description of the project, as described below:
All project examples shall contain a Point of Contact (POC) as well as on alternate POC, to include the name, job title of the POC, address, telephone, and e-mail address. The POC and alternate shall be familiar with the construction performance of the proposer and be a representative of the owner/customer, not affiliated with the proposer. The POC and alternate shall be available to verify the experience cited.
Narratives for each project should include a brief overview of the project and providing specifics as noted herein, discussing major features of the project and each project’s relevance and similarities to this project. The role and work assigned to any sub-contractors and/or personnel noted in the narrative shall be explained.
CONTRACT DESCRIPTION FORM
Volume 1, Tab A, Section 1 Control No.: W912PP21R0009
Provide a completed form for each project for which experience is being submitted. Project experience submitted by the offeror as a subcontractor will not be evaluated.
(a) OFFEROR’S NAME (Prime Contractor): _____________________________________
Project Name: _________________________________________________________
Project Location: _______________________________________________________
Client/Customer: _______________________________________________________
(b) Contract Number: _________________________________________________ (For Indefinite Delivery type contracts, GSA contracts, and Blanket Purchase Agreements, include Delivery Order Numbers)
Contract Type (e.g. Fixed-Priced, Cost Reimbursement, etc.): _____________________
Awarded price/cost: __________________________
Final or projected final price/cost: _____________________________
Original delivery schedule (include dates of start and completion): __________________ Final or projected delivery schedule (include dates of start and completion):__________ Percent of Completion (if project is currently under construction) __________________
(c) Client/Customer Point of Contact/Job Title: ___________________________________
Address: _______________________________________________________________ Email: ______________________________ Telephone: ___________________________ Alternate POC Name/Job Title: ______________________ Address: _______________________________________________________________ Telephone: ___________________________ Email: _______________________________
(d) Government Contracting Activity/Agency (if applicable): ______________________
Address: ____________________________________________________________ Contracting Officer: ____________________________________________________ Email: ______________________________ Fax: ________________________________ Telephone: ___________________________ Government Contract Administration Activity (if applicable:_______________________ Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO): ____________________________________ Contracting Officer Representative (COR): ___________________________________ Address: ______________________________________________________________ Email: _________________________________ Fax: ___________________________________ Telephone: _____________________________
(e) Subcontractors utilized on the project and if they are proposed to be utilized for this project: _____________________________________________________________________
(f) Prime Contractor personnel utilized on the project and if they are proposed to be utilized for this project:
(g) Description of project: (Provide a specific narrative explanation of the contract and objectives achieved. Detail how the effort is relevant to the requirement of this RFP):
(h) If contract did not meet original schedule or technical performance requirements, provide a brief explanation of the reason(s) for the shortcomings and any corrective action(s) taken to avoid recurrence:
(i) List each time the delivery schedule was revised and provide an explanation of why the revision was necessary. Address all Requests for Deviation and Requests for Waiver with respect to causes and corrective actions:
(j) Was the project terminated early or was Cure Notices or Show Cause Letters received on this contract? Yes ____ No____: If yes, explain nature of termination (default/convenience).
Provide copy of any Cure Notices or Show Cause Letters received and describe any corrective action(s) implemented by the offeror or subcontractor:
(k) Safety record (Use the number reported on OSHA Form No. 200 or equivalent):
Injuries with Lost Workdays __________ Injuries without Lost Workdays _________
Explain any injuries that occurred and corrective action(s) taken:_________________________
(l) List and explain any customer concerns or dissatisfaction. Explain how you responded: ____
(m) Small Business Subcontracting Effort (Complete for Offeror/Prime Contractor only):
Large Business Offerors Only:
What were the various small business percentage goals in the original contract and the actual percentage attained, if applicable (see FAR 52.219-9)?
Goal (%)_ Actual (%) Small Business (SB): _________ _________ 8(a) Small Business: _________ _________ Woman Owned Small Business (WOSB): _________ _________ Historically Underutilized Business Zone (HUBZone): _________ _________ Veteran Owned Small Business (VOSB): _________ _________ Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (SDVOSB): _________ _________
If goals were not met, explain:____________________________________________________
Large and Small Business Offerors: List types of work subcontracted to small businesses and percentage of contract (see FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns):
Type of Work Subcontracted to SB % of Contract
1. ______________________________ ____________
2. ______________________________ ____________
3. ______________________________ ____________
4. ______________________________ ____________
5. ______________________________ ____________
6. ______________________________ ____________
(n) If applicable, provide data on all manufacturing warranty returns. Data shall delineate total number of warranty returns. Data shall delineate total number of warranty returns, number of Could Not Duplicate (CND), number of failures attributable to GFE component Failures, and number and nature of failures attributable to the offeror’s delivered product:________________
Minimum f'c psi Exposure Categories^
Miscellaneous Requirements
Footings 4500 at 28 days S0; C1;
W0; F2
Max. Slump: 6 in.
Nominal maximum aggregate size must be 1 in.
Elevated beams and slabs
3000 at 28 days S0; C0;
W0; F0
Nominal maximum aggregate size must be 3/4 in.
Grade beams and slabs-on-ground
4500 at 28 days S0; C1;
W0; F2
Nominal maximum aggregate size must be 3/4 in.
2.5.2 Durability
2.5.2.1 Alkali-Aggregate Reaction
Do not use any aggregate susceptible to alkali-carbonate reaction (ACR).
Use one of the three options below for qualifying concrete mixtures to reduce the potential of alkali-silica reaction (ASR):
a. For each aggregate used in concrete, the expansion result determined in accordance with ASTM C1293 must not exceed 0.04 percent at one year.
b. For each aggregate used in concrete, the expansion result of the aggregate and cementitious materials combination determined in accordance with ASTM C1567 must not exceed 0.10 percent at an age of 16 days.
c. Alkali content in concrete (LBA) must not exceed 4 pounds per cubic yard for moderately reactive aggregate or 3 pounds per cubic yard for highly reactive aggregate. Reactivity must be determined by testing in accordance with ASTM C1293 and categorized in accordance with ASTM C1778.
Alkali content is calculated as follows:
LBA = (cement content, pounds per cubic yard) × (equivalent alkali content of portland cement in percent/100 percent)
2.5.2.2 Freezing and Thawing Resistance
a. Provide concrete meeting the following requirements based on exposure class assigned to members for freezing-and-thawing exposure in Contract Documents:
Exposure class
Maximum w/cm*
Minimum f'c, psi Air content
Additional Requirements
F0 N/A 2500 N/A
F1 0.55 3500 Depends on aggregate size
N/A
SECTION 03 30 00 Page 22
3003030 0 0 0
DTRA ABQ Administrative Office Building Kirtland AFB, New Mexico
Solicitation No. W912PP21R0009
RTA
Solicitation No. W912PP21R0009
RTA
AMENDMENT No. 0001
33 71 02 UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION
33 82 00 TELECOMMUNICATIONS OUTSIDE PLANT (OSP)
PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 5
-- End of Project Table of Contents --
APPENDIX A
APPENDIX B
APPENDIX C
ASBESTOS AND LEAD BASED PAINT PROJECT REPORT
Solicitation No. W912PP21R0009
RTA
AMENDMENT No. 0001
33 71 02 UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION
33 82 00 TELECOMMUNICATIONS OUTSIDE PLANT (OSP)
PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 5
-- End of Project Table of Contents --
APPENDIX A
APPENDIX B
APPENDIX C
ASBESTOS AND LEAD BASED PAINT PROJECT REPORT
Solicitation No. W912PP21R0009
RTA
AMENDMENT No. 0001
33 71 02 UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION
33 82 00 TELECOMMUNICATIONS OUTSIDE PLANT (OSP)
PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 5
-- End of Project Table of Contents --
APPENDIX A
APPENDIX B
APPENDIX C
ASBESTOS AND LEAD BASED PAINT PROJECT REPORT
Date:
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
DTRA Albuquerque Administrative Office Building
Kirtland AFB New Mexico
Volume x
DTRA ABQ Administrative Office Building Solicitation No. W912PP21R0009 Kirtland AFB, New Mexico RTA
PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS
DIVISION 00 - PROCUREMENT AND CONTRACTING REQUIREMENTS
00 10 00 SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD, SF 1442; PROPOSAL
SCHEDULE, CORPORATE, PARTNERSHIP, JOINT VENTURE CERTIFICATES
00 20 00 INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS
00 21 00 INSTRUCTIONS
00 22 16 00 45 00 00 50 00
SUPPLEMENTARY INSTRUCTIONS
REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS
CONTRACTING FORMS AND SUPPLEMENTS - Wage Determination
00 70 00 CONDITIONS OF THE CONTRACT
DIVISION 01 - GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
01 01 01 SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS
01 11 00 SUMMARY OF WORK
01 14 00 WORK RESTRICTIONS
01 20 00 INTERFACE WITH OTHER WORK
01 30 00 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS
01 32 01.00 10 PROJECT SCHEDULE
01 33 00 SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES
01 33 29 SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING
01 35 26 GOVERNMENTAL SAFETY REQUIREMENTS
01 35 53.00 10 SECURITY PROCEDURES FOR SECURE AREAS
01 42 00 SOURCES FOR REFERENCE PUBLICATIONS
01 45 00.00 10 QUALITY CONTROL
01 45 00.15 10 RESIDENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CONTRACTOR MODE (RMS CM)
01 45 35 SPECIAL INSPECTIONS
01 50 00 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION FACILITIES AND CONTROLS
01 54 00 SECURITY
01 57 19 TEMPORARY ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS
01 58 00 PROJECT IDENTIFICATION
01 62 35 RECYCLED / RECOVERED MATERIALS
01 72 00 AS-BUILT DRAWINGS
01 72 80 TRANSFER AND ACCEPTANCE OF MILITARY REAL PROPERTY
01 74 19 CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION WASTE MANAGEMENT
01 78 00 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS
01 78 23 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE DATA
01 78 24.00 10 FACILITY DATA REQUIREMENTS
01 91 00.15 10 TOTAL BUILDING COMMISSIONING
DIVISION 02 - EXISTING CONDITIONS
02 41 00 DEMOLITION
DIVISION 03 - CONCRETE
03 30 00 CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE
03 45 00 PRECAST ARCHITECTURAL CONCRETE
DIVISION 04 - MASONRY
04 20 00 UNIT MASONRY
DIVISION 05 - METALS
05 05 23.16 STRUCTURAL WELDING
05 12 00 STRUCTURAL STEEL
PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1
05 21 00 STEEL JOIST FRAMING
05 30 00 STEEL DECKS
05 40 00 COLD-FORMED METAL FRAMING
05 50 13 MISCELLANEOUS METAL FABRICATIONS
05 51 00 METAL STAIRS
05 51 33 METAL LADDERS
05 52 00 METAL RAILINGS
05 72 00 DECORATIVE METAL SPECIALTIES
DIVISION 06 - WOOD, PLASTICS, AND COMPOSITES
06 10 00 ROUGH CARPENTRY
06 41 16.00 10 PLASTIC-LAMINATE-CLAD ARCHITECTURAL CABINETS
06 61 16 SOLID SURFACING FABRICATIONS
DIVISION 07 - THERMAL AND MOISTURE PROTECTION
07 05 23 PRESSURE TESTING AN AIR BARRIER SYSTEM FOR AIR TIGHTNESS
07 14 00 FLUID-APPLIED WATERPROOFING
07 21 13 BOARD AND BLOCK INSULATION
07 21 16 MINERAL FIBER BLANKET INSULATION
07 22 00 ROOF AND DECK INSULATION
07 27 10.00 10 BUILDING AIR BARRIER SYSTEM
07 27 19.01 SELF-ADHERING AIR BARRIERS
07 27 26 FLUID-APPLIED MEMBRANE AIR BARRIERS
07 42 13.19 INSULATED CORE METAL WALL PANELS
07 54 23 THERMOPLASTIC POLYOLEFIN (TPO) ROOFING
07 60 00 FLASHING AND SHEET METAL
07 81 00 SPRAY-APPLIED FIREPROOFING
07 84 00 FIRESTOPPING
07 92 00 JOINT SEALANTS
DIVISION 08 - OPENINGS
08 11 13 STEEL DOORS AND FRAMES
08 11 16 ALUMINUM DOORS AND FRAMES
08 14 00 WOOD DOORS
08 31 00 ACCESS DOORS AND PANELS
08 32 13 ALUMINUM SLIDING GLASS DOORS
08 34 01 FORCED ENTRY RESISTANT COMPONENTS
08 34 73 SOUND CONTROL DOOR ASSEMBLIES
08 41 13 ALUMINUM-FRAMED ENTRANCES AND STOREFRONTS
08 44 00 CURTAIN WALL AND GLAZED ASSEMBLIES
08 71 00 DOOR HARDWARE
08 81 00 GLAZING
08 91 00 METAL WALL LOUVERS
DIVISION 09 - FINISHES
09 22 00 SUPPORTS FOR PLASTER AND GYPSUM BOARD
09 29 00 GYPSUM BOARD
09 30 10 CERAMIC TILING
09 51 00 ACOUSTICAL CEILINGS
09 62 38 STATIC-CONTROL FLOORING
09 65 00 RESILIENT FLOORING
09 66 23 RESINOUS MATRIX TERRAZZO FLOORING
09 68 00 CARPETING
09 90 00 PAINTS AND COATINGS
PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 2
DIVISION 10 - SPECIALTIES
10 11 00 VISUAL DISPLAY UNITS
10 14 00.10 EXTERIOR SIGNAGE
10 14 00.20 INTERIOR SIGNAGE
10 21 13 TOILET COMPARTMENTS
10 26 00 WALL AND DOOR PROTECTION
10 28 13 TOILET ACCESSORIES
10 51 13 METAL LOCKERS
10 56 13 STEEL SHELVING
DIVISION 12 - FURNISHINGS
12 24 13 ROLLER WINDOW SHADES
12 48 13 ENTRANCE FLOOR MATS AND FRAMES
DIVISION 14 - CONVEYING EQUIPMENT
14 21 23 ELECTRIC TRACTION PASSENGER ELEVATORS
DIVISION 21 - FIRE SUPPRESSION
21 13 13.00 10 WET PIPE SPRINKLER SYSTEM, FIRE PROTECTION
DIVISION 22 - PLUMBING
22 00 00 PLUMBING, GENERAL PURPOSE
22 31 00 WATER SOFTENERS, CATION-EXCHANGE (SODIUM CYCLE)
DIVISION 23 - HEATING, VENTILATING, AND AIR CONDITIONING (HVAC)
23 00 00 AIR SUPPLY, DISTRIBUTION, VENTILATION, AND EXHAUST SYSTEMS
23 05 15 COMMON PIPING FOR HVAC
23 05 48.19 SEISMIC AND NON-SEISMIC BRACING FOR HVAC
23 05 93 TESTING, ADJUSTING, AND BALANCING FOR HVAC
23 07 00 THERMAL INSULATION FOR MECHANICAL SYSTEMS
23 09 00 INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROL FOR HVAC
23 09 13 INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROL DEVICES FOR HVAC
23 09 23.02 BACNET DIRECT DIGITAL CONTROL FOR HVAC AND OTHER BUILDING
CONTROL SYSTEMS
23 11 25 FACILITY GAS PIPING
23 21 23 HYDRONIC PUMPS
23 23 00 REFRIGERANT PIPING
23 25 00 CHEMICAL TREATMENT OF WATER FOR MECHANICAL SYSTEMS
23 52 46.00 20 LOW PRESSURE WATER HEATING BOILERS (OVER 800,000 BTU/HR
OUTPUT)
23 64 10 WATER CHILLERS, VAPOR COMPRESSION TYPE
23 64 26 CHILLED, CHILLED-HOT, AND CONDENSER WATER PIPING SYSTEMS
23 81 00 UNITARY AIR CONDITIONING EQUIPMENT
DIVISION 25 - INTEGRATED AUTOMATION
25 05 11.21 CYBERSECURITY FOR FACILITY-RELATED CONTROL SYSTEMS FIRE
AND LIFE SAFETY INCLUDING MASS NOTIFICATION SYSTEM
25 05 11.23 01 CYBERSECURITY FOR FACILITY-RELATED CONTROL SYSTEMS
UTILITY MONITORING CONTROL SYSTEM (UMCS) TO INCLUDE HVAC
25 05 11.26 01 CYBERSECURITY FOR FACILITY-RELATED CONTROL SYSTEMS
UTILITY CONTROL SYSTEMS INCLUDING ELECTRICAL TRANSMISSION
AND DISTRIBUTION AND UNINTERRUPTIBLE POWER SUPPLY (UPS)
PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 3
25 05 11.26 02 CYBERSECURITY FOR FACILITY-RELATED CONTROL SYSTEMS
BUILDING CONTROL SYSTEMS INCLUDING ELECTRICAL, LIGHTING,
IRRIGATION CONTROL SYSTEM, AND ELEVATOR CONTROLS
DIVISION 26 - ELECTRICAL
26 12 19.10 THREE-PHASE, LIQUID-FILLED PAD-MOUNTED TRANSFORMERS
26 20 00 INTERIOR DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
26 24 13 SWITCHBOARDS
26 28 01.00 10 COORDINATED POWER SYSTEM PROTECTION
26 29 23 VARIABLE FREQUENCY DRIVE SYSTEMS UNDER 600 VOLTS
26 31 00 SOLAR PHOTOVOLTAIC (PV) COMPONENTS
26 32 14.00 10 DIESEL-GENERATOR SET, STATIONARY 15-300 KW, STANDBY
APPLICATIONS
26 33 53 STATIC UNINTERRUPTIBLE POWER SUPPLY (UPS)
26 36 00.00 10 AUTOMATIC TRANSFER SWITCH AND BY-PASS/ISOLATION SWITCH
26 41 00 LIGHTNING PROTECTION SYSTEM
26 51 00 INTERIOR LIGHTING
26 56 00 EXTERIOR LIGHTING
DIVISION 27 - COMMUNICATIONS
27 10 00 BUILDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS CABLING SYSTEM
DIVISION 28 - ELECTRONIC SAFETY AND SECURITY
28 08 10 ELECTRONIC SECURITY SYSTEM ACCEPTANCE TESTING
28 10 05 ELECTRONIC SECURITY SYSTEMS (ESS)
28 31 76 INTERIOR FIRE ALARM AND MASS NOTIFICATION SYSTEM
DIVISION 31 - EARTHWORK
31 00 00 EARTHWORK
31 05 19 GEOTEXTILE
31 11 00 CLEARING AND GRUBBING
DIVISION 32 - EXTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS
32 01 19 FIELD MOLDED SEALANTS FOR SEALING JOINTS IN RIGID
PAVEMENTS
32 05 33 LANDSCAPE ESTABLISHMENT
32 11 23 AGGREGATE BASE COURSES
32 12 16 HOT-MIX ASPHALT (HMA) FOR ROADS
32 13 13.06 PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT FOR ROADS AND SITE
FACILITIES
32 16 19 CONCRETE CURBS, GUTTERS AND SIDEWALKS
32 17 23 PAVEMENT MARKINGS
32 31 13 CHAIN LINK FENCES AND GATES
32 84 24 IRRIGATION SPRINKLER SYSTEMS
32 93 00 EXTERIOR PLANTS
DIVISION 33 - UTILITIES
33 11 00 WATER UTILITY DISTRIBUTION PIPING
33 11 23 NATURAL GAS AND LIQUID PETROLEUM PIPING
33 30 00 SANITARY SEWERAGE
33 40 00 STORM DRAINAGE UTILITIES
33 46 13 FOUNDATION DRAINAGE SYSTEM
33 71 01 OVERHEAD TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION
PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 4
33 71 02 UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION
33 82 00 TELECOMMUNICATIONS OUTSIDE PLANT (OSP)
PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 5
-- End of Project Table of Contents --
APPENDIX A
APPENDIX B
APPENDIX C
ASBESTOS AND LEAD BASED PAINT PROJECT REPORT
GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY REPORT
GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT
DTRA ABQ Administrative Office Building Kirtland AFB, New Mexico
RTA
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Appendix
19-055 Kirtland Museum Page 1
PROJECT REPORT
ASBESTOS INSPECTION OF SUSPECT MATERIALS
AND LEAD-BASED PAINT INSPECTION
FORMER KIRTLAND MUSEUM,
ALBUQUERQUE, NM
Prepared by
ACME ENVIRONMENTAL, INC
3816 CARLISLE NE
ALBUQUERQUE, NM
19-055 Kirtland Museum Page 2
Asbestos and Lead-based Paint Inspection
May 15, 2019 ATTENTION: Jacobs Engineering Group SUBJECT: Asbestos Inspection and Lead-Based Paint Inspection PROJECT LOCATION: Former Kirtland Museum Albuquerque, NM
ACME PROJECT #: 19-055
To Whom It May Concern:
Acme Environmental, Inc. (Acme), an EPA Certified Lead Firm (NM-1637-5) has completed investigations of the cited facility.
David Chavez, EPA Certified Asbestos Inspector (022019-03), EPA Certified Lead-based Paint Inspector (LBP-I-I186293-1), performed the investigation.
SCHEDULED WORK
Acme performed bulk asbestos sampling of the following suspect materials;
9”x9” Tan VFT w/ Mastic 9”x9” Brown VFT w/ Mastic White Drywall w/ Smooth Texture White and Blue Drywall w/ Texture Brown Stucco – Interior Blue Baseboard w/ Mastic White Drywall w/ No Texture White Plaster 2’x4’ Perforated Ceiling Tile White Ceiling Drywall w/ Knockdown Texture 12”x12” Ceiling Tile w/ Mastic White and Yellow Ceiling Plaster White Window Glazing Purple Stucco – Exterior Tan Stucco Roofing Paper w/ Black Tar Silver Sealant
David Chavez (AHERA Accredited Asbestos Inspector) conducted the survey.
Acme performed lead-based paint inspections of the building at the above referenced property.
19-055 Kirtland Museum Page 3
SUMMARY
Asbestos WAS detected in any of the bulk samples collected and analyzed;
9”x9” Brown VFT w/ Mastic – Approx. 3,000 Sq. Ft.
Silver Sealant – Approx. 500 Sq. Ft.
Based on the samples analyzed by X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) lead-based paint WAS Identified in the following building materials;
All Painted Columns in Garage/ Showroom Areas All Painted Interior Metal Doors All Painted Exterior Garage Door Jambs Exterior Painted Stairwell Support Columns All Exterior Painted Vents All Exterior Metal Painted Windows
NOTE: See map for locations.
Please contact our office at (505) 433-4461 if any additional information is required.
Respectfully, Acme Environmental, Inc.
David Chavez EPA Certified Lead Inspector EPA Certified Asbestos inspector Industrial Hygiene Technician Acme Environmental, Inc.
Acme Environmental Inc.
EPA Certified Lead Firm #NM-1637-5 R6T-1637-5
Acme Lead-based Paint Inspection © Page 319-055 Kirtland Museum
ASBESTOS INSPECTION
Introduction
Acme Environmental, Inc. (Acme) was contracted to conduct an Asbestos Inspection at the cited property in Albuquerque, New Mexico. The survey was conducted on May 15 of 2019. Acme conducted the survey in accordance with EPA National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP).
Acme performed asbestos bulk sampling in substantial compliance with the established 40 CFR 763 sampling protocol and requirements set forth in OSHA's 29 CFR 1926.1101.
Mr. David Chavez (US EPA AHERA-accredited Asbestos Inspector) conducted the survey.
Property Information The structure consists of mostly a single-story facility, with a small 40’ x 20’ office acting as the only second floor space. Access to the second floor was not permissible at the time of the inspection, however, through a visual assessment allowed by a window, a red carpet presumably having a mastic is classified as presumed, until sampled. Access to all other areas was found through interior accesses within the building and some exterior doors.
The facility is no longer in use and has been unoccupied for some unspecified time. There are no utilities found throughout the facility. Some areas/ offices have signage indicating the presence of asbestos containing materials, but full descriptions of the materials are not found on some signs.
NOTE: The 9”x9” Brown VFT w/ Mastic which is asbestos containing, is found underneath the 9”x9” Tan VFT w/ Mastic in some areas. The exterior was subject to sampling.
Asbestos-Containing Materials (ACM) Based on the analytical data reported, the following materials were found to contain greater than 1% asbestos and therefore, are considered asbestos containing material (ACM).
9”x9” Brown VFT w/ Mastic (Asbestos containing floor underneath mastic, shown above)
9”x9” Tan VFT w/ Mastic (Asbestos containing floor underneath mastic, shown above)
Acme Lead-based Paint Inspection © Page 419-055 Kirtland Museum
Silver Sealant (asbestos containing, shown above)
Asbestos Bulk Sample Analysis Bulk samples were collected and submitted to an independent laboratory to be analyzed using Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) in accordance with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency “Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Samples” (EPA 600/R-93/116, July 1993). Crisp Analytical Laboratories, Carrollton, TX performed the analysis. Crisp is accredited for asbestos analysis under the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP), accreditation #200349-0.
Laboratory results can be found in the Appendix of this report.
Analysis Method: The analytical method chosen to identify asbestos within the bulk sample was the Interim (40CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E) / Improved (EPA-600/R-93/116). Preparation Method:
Hydrochloric Acid washing for carbonate-based samples, chemical reduction for organically bound components, oil immersion for identification of asbestos types by dispersion staining / becke line method.
Asbestos Data Results for asbestos content as reported in the comprehensive inspection report are interpreted in the following manner.
Samples were collected after the accredited inspector inventoried suspect materials. These materials were identified as to their homogeneity, specifically; materials that are considered the same, for example floor tile or ceiling plaster are sampled in a representative manner. That is, a specified number of samples are collected from each homogenous material. This is dictated by the EPA sampling rules.
Acme Lead-based Paint Inspection © Page 519-055 Kirtland Museum
These homogenous materials are grouped for analysis by the laboratory. If a single sample of a homogenous material is found to contain greater than 1% asbestos, then that homogenous material is considered asbestos containing.
Asbestos-Containing Materials (ACM) The asbestos containing materials (9”x9” Brown VFT w/ Mastic and Silver Sealant) which may be impacted or generate dust are to be treated as special waste.
9”x9” Brown VFT w/ Mastic – Approx. 3,000 Sq. Ft.
Silver Sealant – Approx. 500 Sq. Ft.
NOTE: Samples taken of roofing material were not examined by the laboratory, due to unfortunate events making the samples unusable. At this time, the roofing paper and tar are presumed asbestos, until samples can confirm or deny the presence of asbestos.
Prior to demolition or renovation, materials found to contain greater than 1% asbestos and considered ACM that will be impacted during activities must be removed and segregated from the general waste stream by a qualified asbestos contractor. These materials cannot be disposed in a regular landfill in the State of New Mexico.
Conclusions Based on the analytical data reported to Acme derived from the bulk samples collected, the following homogeneous materials are NOT considered ACM in the relative facility.
9”x9” Tan VFT w/ Mastic White Drywall w/ Smooth Texture White and Blue Drywall w/ Texture Brown Stucco – Interior Blue Baseboard w/ Mastic White Drywall w/ No Texture White Plaster 2’x4’ Perforated Ceiling Tile White Ceiling Drywall w/ Knockdown Texture 12”x12” Ceiling Tile w/ Mastic White and Yellow Ceiling Plaster White Window Glazing Purple Stucco – Exterior Tan Stucco
Acme Lead-based Paint Inspection © Page 619-055 Kirtland Museum
LEAD-BASED PAINT INVESTIGATION
PART I: IDENTIFYING INFORMATION
The following lead-based paint (LBP) inspection was conducted at the property cited at Kirtland Base in Albuquerque, NM. It was conducted in an effort to identify the presence of lead-based paint and or lead-containing materials.
Acme Environmental Inc. was contracted to conduct the investigation of the designated property.
This investigation was conducted on May 16 of 2019. Sampling was performed in substantial compliance with the jointly published EPA/HUD protocols for housing. Paint was sampled by x-ray fluorescence (XRF).
PART II: ENVIRONMENTAL RESULTS AND ANALYSES
XRF Testing Report
Based on sampling, the following painted components throughout the facility were found to be considered painted with lead-based paint.
LEAD-BASED PAINT (LBP) is defined by HUD and the EPA as paint containing lead in amounts greater than or equal to 1.0 mg/cm2 lead when analyzed by XRF.
Lead Painted Component
All columns were found to be positive (Shown Above)
All columns were found to be positive (Shown Above)
Acme Lead-based Paint Inspection © Page 719-055 Kirtland Museum
All interior metal door jambs were found to be positive.
(Shown Above)
All interior metal door jambs were found to be positive.
(Shown Above)
All interior metal door jambs were found to be positive.
(Shown Above)
All metal garage exterior/ interior door jambs were found to be positive.
Acme Lead-based Paint Inspection © Page 819-055 Kirtland Museum
All metal garage exterior/ interior door jambs were found to be positive.
(Shown Above)
Exterior stairwell support columns were found to be positive
(Shown Above)
All exterior vents were found to be positive
(Shown Above)
All metal framed windows were found to be positive
Acme Lead-based Paint Inspection © Page 919-055 Kirtland Museum
Lead containing paint is present in the building and contractors should follow the elements of the standard promulgated by OSHA. However, the lead content is very low according to the XRF. It is reasonable to believe that lead content is insignificant relative to exposure potential when standard construction methods are utilized
LEAD-CONTAINING PAINT (PAINT WITH LEAD BUT NOT CONSIDERED LEAD-BASED PAINTED)
OSHA regulates occupational exposure to lead containing materials during construction activities. Any occurrence of lead in construction materials could be potentially hazardous during activities that may impact a lead containing material.
XRF SAMPLING PROTOCOL
The Heuresis Pb200i XRF (X-Ray Fluorescence) provides near instant results of lead content. Since this technique does not harm the sample in any way, it is considered a non-destructive testing method.
The instrument was operated in Quick Mode – The measurement time is determined by the LPA-1 Analyzer to achieve a 95% confidence in accordance with guidelines established by HUD and EPA.
Test results are classified on the data sheets, under HUD guidelines, into three categories:
Positive (for lead-based paint), Inconclusive (for lead-based paint), and Negative (for lead-based paint). Note: Lead content may still be present in a Negatively classified sample.
Operation of the Heuresis Pb200i XRF (X-Ray Fluorescence) was consistent with HUD and EPA documented methodologies and the Performance Characteristic Sheet.
PART III: RECOMMENDATIONS AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Lead-based painted components must be handled in accordance with OSHA and HUD.
Acme recommends removal and replacement of all lead painted components. Minimal impact to painted surfaces is recommended. Qualified, lead safe trained workers are required for renovation and remodeling activities.
Acme Lead-based Paint Inspection © Page 1019-055 Kirtland Museum
XRF DATA SUMMARIES REPORT LEGEND
The following abbreviations are defined in context of the XRF data summaries that follow.
Please note the wall location information. This is represented on the site plan and is essential in locating the areas that the samples were analyzed.
Read No. Reading Number Is the sequential number of the actual sample.
Room Name Room identifier established by the inspector based on best judgment.
Wall Walls are identified by letters. The "A" wall is generally the main entry side of the building. Walls are then identified in a clockwise fashion.
Structure This is the identified part of a component, such as a window sill or a door casing Paint Cond Paint condition is identified as "I" for intact, "F" for fair and "P" for poor.
Substrate This is the suspected construction material.
Lead(mg/cm2) The reading as analyzed by the XRF. A reading of 1.0 mg/cm2 is considered Positive for Lead-based Paint by the Environmental Protection Agency.
Acme Lead-based Paint Inspection © Page 1119-055 Kirtland Museum
Acme Lead-based Paint Inspection © Page 1219-055 Kirtland Museum
Acme Lead-based Paint Inspection © Page 819-055 Kirtland Museum
Project Report Limitations The environmental services described in this report have been conducted in general accordance with current regulatory guidelines and the standard-of-care exercised by environmental consultants performing similar work in the project area. Variations in site conditions may exist and conditions not observed or described in this report may be encountered during subsequent activities.
Acme’s opinions and recommendations regarding environmental conditions, as presented in this report, are based on visual inspection and limited sampling only. The samples collected and used for testing, and the observations made are believed to be representative of the area(s) evaluated. It should be understood that the conditions of a site could change with time as a result of activities at the subject site or nearby sites.
This report is intended exclusively for use by the clients. Any use or reuse of the findings, conclusions, and/or recommendations of this report by parties other than the client is undertaken at said parties’ sole risk.
Drawing Not To Scale
Former Kirtland Museum - West Asbestos Sample Locations
Brown/ Tan VFT Sample Locations
Former Kirtland Museum - East Asbestos Sample Locations
Silver Sealant Locations
Silver Sealant Sample Locations
Former Kirtland Museum - West Lead Component Locations
Interior Metal Door Jambs
Exterior Metal Vents
Painted Metal Windows
Former Kirtland Museum - East Lead Component Locations
Columns and Garage Exterior Jamb Locations
Stairwell Support Columns Location
Customer Project:
Reference #: Date: 5/21/2019
Analysis and Method
Discussion
Qualifications
Crisp Analytical, L.L.C.
1929 Old Denton Road Carrollton, TX 75006 Phone 972-242-2754 Fax 972-242-2798
CA Labs, L.L.C.
12232 Industriplex, Suite 32 Baton Rouge, LA 70809 Phone 225-751-5632 Fax 225-751-5634
Materials Characterization - Bulk Asbestos Analysis Laboratory Analysis Report - Polarized Light
ACME Environmental 3816 Carlisle NE Albuquerque, NM 87107
19-055, 701 Kirtland Museum
CAL19053155AG
Summary of polarized light microscopy (PLM / Stereomicroscopy bulk asbestos analysis) using the methods described in 40CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E (Interim and EPA 600 / R-93 / 116 (Improved). The sample is first viewed with the aid of a stereomicroscope. Numerous liquid slide preparations are created for analysis under the polarized microscope where identifications and quantifications are preformed. Calibrated liquid refractive oils are used as liquid mouting medium. These oils are used for identification (dispersion staining). A calibrated visual estimation is reported, should any asbestiform mineral be present. Other techniques such as acid washing are used in conjugation with refractive oils for detection of smaller quantities of asbestos. All asbestos percentages are based on calibrated visual estimation traceable to NIST standards for regulated asbestos. Traceability to measurement and calibration is achieved by using known amounts and types of asbestos from standards where analyst and laboratory accuracy are measured. As little as 0.001% asbestos can be detected in favorable samples, while detection in unfavorable samples may approach the detection limit of 0.50% (well above the laboratory definition of trace).
Vermiculite containing samples may contain trace amounts of actinolite/tremolite. When not detected by PLM, these samples should be analyzed using TEM methods and / or water separation techniques. Suspected actinolite/vermiculite presence will be indicated through the sample comment section of this report.
Fibrous talc containing samples may contain a regulated asbestos fiber known as anthophyllite. Under certain conditions the same fiber may actually contain both talc and anthophyllite (a phenomenon called intergrowth). Again, TEM detection methods are recommended. CA Labs PLM report comments will denote suspected amounts of asbestiform anthophyllite with talc, where further analysis is recommended.
Some samples (floor tiles, surfacings, etc.) may contain fibers too small to be delectable by PLM analysis and should be analyzed by TEM bulk protocols.
AIHA LAP, LLC Laboratory #102929
A "trace asbestos" will be reported if the analyst observes far less than 1% asbestos. CA Labs defines "trace asbestos" as a few fibers detected by the analyst in several preparations and will indicate as such under these circumstances.
Since allowable variation in quantification of samples close to 1% is high, <1% may be reported. Such results are ideal for point counting, and the technique is mandatory for friable samples (NESHAP, Nov. 1990 and clarification letter 8 May 1991) under 1% percent asbestos or "trace asbestos".
In order to make all initial PLM reports issued from CA Labs NESHAP compliant, all <1% asbestos results (except floor tiles) will be point counted at no additional charge.
CA Labs is accredited by the National Voluntary Accreditation Program (NVLAP) for selected test methods for airborne fiber analysis (TEM), and for bulk asbestos fiber analysis (PLM). CA Labs is also accredited by AIHA LAP, LLC. in the PLM asbestos field of testing for Industrial Hygiene. All analysts have completed college courses or hold a degree in a natural science (geology, biology, or environmental science). Recognition by a state professional board in one these disciplines is preferred, but not required. Extensive in-house training programs are used to augment the educational background of the analyst. The Laboratory Director and Quality Manager have received supplemental McCrone Research training for asbestos identification. Analysis performed at Crisp Analytical Labs, LLC 1929 Old Denton Road Carrollton, TX 75006
Dallas NVLAP Lab Code 200349-0 TEM/PLM TCEQ# T104704513-15-3 TDH 30-0235
Labs
A
C
/data/wordandspreadsheets/templates/asbestos/PLMReport.xls (Revision 3 3/7/17) Page 1 of 16
Overview of Project Sample Material Containing Asbestos
Customer Project: 19-055, 701 Kirtland Museum CA Labs Project #: CAL19053155AG tan floor tile black mastic silver surfaced black sealant
*Samples 46, 47 and 48 were unable to be analyzed due to the sampling method used. Unable to extract materials properly from core.
Glossary of abbreviations (non-asbestos fibers and non-fibrous minerals):
This report relates to the items tested. This report is not to be used by the customer to claim product certification, approval or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, AIHA LAP, LLC, or any other agency of the federal government. This report may not be reproduced except in full without written permission from CA Labs. These results are submitted pursuant to CA Labs' current terms and sale, condition of sale, including the company's standard warranty and limitations of liability provisions and no responsibility or liability is assumed for the manner in which the results are used or interpreted. Unless notified in writing to return the samples covered by this report, CA Labs will store the samples for a period of ninety (90) days before discarding. A shipping or handling fee may be assessed for the return of any samples.
Dallas NVLAP Lab Code 200349-0 TEM/PLM TCEQ# T104704513-15-3 TDH 30-0235
AIHA LAP, LLC Laboratory #102929 ca - carbonate gypsum - gypsum bi - binder or - organic ma - matrix mi - mica ve - vermiculite ot - other pe - perlite qu - quartz fg - fiberglass mw - mineral wool wo - wollastinite ta - talc sy - synthetic ce - cellulose br - brucite ka - kaolin (clay) pa - palygorskite (clay)
3% Chrysotile
049 49-1 silver surfaced black sealant 2% Chrysotile
4-3 black mastic
004 4-2 tan floor tile 3% Chrysotile
Crisp Analytical, L.L.C.
1929 Old Denton Road Carrollton, TX 75006 Phone 972-242-2754 Fax 972-242-2798
CA Labs, L.L.C.
12232 Industriplex, Suite 32 Baton Rouge, LA 70809 Phone 225-751-5632 Fax 225-751-5634
Sample # Layer
Analysts Physical Description of Subsample
Asbestos type / calibrated visual estimate percent
List of Affected Building Material Types
/data/wordandspreadsheets/templates/asbestos/PLMReport.xls (Revision 3 3/7/17) Page 2 of 16
Polarized Light Asbestiform Materials Characterization
Customer Info: Attn: Customer Project:
5/21/2019
5/20/19 10:30AM
Phone # 5/17/2019 Fax #
Senior Analyst
Julio RoblesAnalyst Tanner Rasmussen
1. Fire Damage significant fiber damage - reported percentages reflect unaltered fibers
2. Fire Damage no significant fiber damages effecting fibrous percentages
3. Actinolite in association with Vermiculite
4. Layer not analyzed - attached to previous positive layer and contamination is suspected
5. Not enough sample to analyze
6. Anthophyllite in association with Fibrous Talc
7. Contamination suspected from other building materials
8. Favorable scenario for water separation on vermiculite for possible analysis by another method
9. < 1% Result point counted positive
10. TEM analysis suggested
Julio Robles Technical Manager
Dallas NVLAP Lab Code 200349-0 TEM/PLM TCEQ# T104704513-15-3 TDH 30-0235
AIHA LAP, LLC Laboratory #102929 Analysis Method: Interim (40CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E) / Improved (EPA-600 / R-93/116). All samples received in good condition unless noted.
Preparation Method: HCL acid washing for carbonate based samples, chemical reduction for organically bound components, oil immersion for identification of asbestos types by dispersion attaining / becke line method.
ca - carbonate gy - gypsum bi - binder or - organic ma - matrix mi - mica ve - vermiculite ot -other pe - perlite qu - quartz fg - fiberglass mw - mineral wool wo - wollastonite ta - talc sy - synthetic ce - cellulose br - brucite ka - kaolin (clay) pa - palygorskite (clay) Approved Signatories:
y None Detected 100% gy,bi004 4-1 tan mastic y None Detected 100% gy,bi3-2 tan mastic y None Detected 100% qu,ca003 3-1 tan floor tile y None Detected 100% gy,bi2-2 tan mastic y None Detected 100% qu,ca002 2-1 tan floor tile y None Detected 100% gy,bi1-2 tan mastic y None Detected 100% qu,ca001 1-1 tan floor tile
Homo-geneo us (Y/N)
Asbestos type / calibrated visual estimate percent
Non-asbestos fiber type / percent
Non-fibrous type / percent
Sample # Com ment
Layer
Analysts Physical Description of Subsample
505-872-2263 24 hours Date Of Sampling:
505-889-8261 Purchase Order #:
CA Labs Project #:
ACME Environmental
19-055, 701 Kirtland Museum
CAL19053155AG
3816 Carlisle NE Albuquerque, NM 87107 Date:
Turnaround Time: Samples Received:
Crisp Analytical, L.L.C.
1929 Old Denton Road Carrollton, TX 75006 Phone 972-242-2754 Fax 972-242-2798
CA Labs, L.L.C.
12232 Industriplex, Suite 32 Baton Rouge, LA 70809 Phone 225-751-5632 Fax 225-751-5634
/data/wordandspreadsheets/templates/asbestos/PLMReport.xls (Revision 3 3/7/17) Page 3 of 16
5/21/2019
5/20/19 10:30AM
Phone # 5/17/2019 Fax #
Senior Analyst
Julio RoblesAnalyst Tanner Rasmussen
1. Fire Damage significant fiber damage - reported percentages reflect unaltered fibers
2. Fire Damage no significant fiber damages effecting fibrous percentages
3. Actinolite in association with Vermiculite
4. Layer not analyzed - attached to previous positive layer and contamination is suspected
5. Not enough sample to analyze
6. Anthophyllite in association with Fibrous Talc
7. Contamination suspected from other building materials
8. Favorable scenario for water separation on vermiculite for possible analysis by another method
9. < 1% Result point counted positive
10. TEM analysis suggested
Julio Robles Technical Manager
Dallas NVLAP Lab Code 200349-0 TEM/PLM TCEQ# T104704513-15-3 TDH 30-0235
AIHA LAP, LLC Laboratory #102929 Analysis Method: Interim (40CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E) / Improved (EPA-600 / R-93/116). All samples received in good condition unless noted.
Preparation Method: HCL acid washing for carbonate based samples, chemical reduction for organically bound components, oil immersion for identification of asbestos types by dispersion attaining / becke line method.
ca - carbonate gy - gypsum bi - binder or - organic ma - matrix mi - mica ve - vermiculite ot -other pe - perlite qu - quartz…
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .