W912PL-17-R-0045_Amendment0004_Part2.pdf

griggsda Cloud griggsda Cloud

FY17 MILCON F-35 Squadron Operations/Aircraft Maintenance Unit 5, Luke AFB, AZ

Appendix W:

Bldg. 913 and 926 Asbestos & Lead Reports lavinekx Cloud lavinekx Typewritten Text Appendix W has been updated to include the Asbestos report for bldg.913.

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

56th CIVIL ENGINEER SQUADRON (AETC)

LUKE AIR FORCE BASE, ARIZONA

12 November 2012

MEMORANDUM FOR: 56 CES/CEPM

ATTENTION: SrA Foster

FROM: 56 CES/CEAN

SUBJECT: NUEX 11-1391; Renovate Restrooms, and NUEX 12-1317; Renovate Supply

Hallway, Building 291-Asbestos Survey and Sampling Results

1. On 30 October 2012 an asbestos inspection and corresponding sampling was performed to ensure the accuracy of original asbestos survey conducted in building 913 for the for subject project renovations.

2. The survey was conducted to determine whether the building material that would be disturbed during this project were tested for asbestos and/or to ensure that the material has not changed since the original survey dated 3 Apr 02. Additional samples were taken and analyzed from the impacted area (restrooms – tiles, grout, and caulking) and do not contain asbestos. ACM is present within the facility at for Pipe Fittings, roof tar, 12x12 Brown Floor Tile Adhesive, and Window/Door Glazing, Caulking Compounds. If these materials are to be disturbed, a management plan for containing any release and waste must be approved prior any renovations.

3. A copy of this letter and results must be on hand during the renovation. Failure to have this report available can trigger a NESHAP Notice of Violation with the Maricopa County Air Quality Division. A new inspection must be performed if the renovation is not performed within one year of the date of this letter.

4. If there is a change in the scope of work or you have any additional questions regarding this survey, please contact me at 6-8486.

//SIGNED//

JEFFERY D. SCHONE

Asbestos Program Manager

Attachments:

1. Re-certification Letter (9 Nov 12)

2. Original Asbestos Survey (22 Nov 99)

October 9, 2012

Ms. Yvonne Newell Asset Management Flight Luke A.F.B.

56 CES/CEAN

13970 Gillespie Street Luke A.F.B., Arizona 85309-1149

Re: NESHAP Asbestos Re-Certification:

Luke AFB Project No.: NUEX11-1391 Building 913 Restroom Project

Dear Ms. Newell:

Continental Envirotech, Inc. (CEI) is pleased to provide Maricopa Luke AFB, Asset Management Flight with this updated asbestos survey letter for the above referenced site. A thorough walk through was conducted of the restroom remodel area(s). A complete review of the above referenced area was conducted and there have been no changes in the structure or in the composition of building materials since the previous asbestos survey performed by Environomics on November 22, 1999. The following table summarizes the ACM that tested positive for asbestos content.

Table 1: ACM Summary

Material Information Abatement /Demo Classification (If material is subject to removal, repair, damage or demolition of any kind) HA # Material Assumed /

Tested Positive Approximate

Amount Friable

(Yes/No) OSHA Class NESHAP Category

*14 Pipe Fittings Tested Positive 40 Fittings Yes Class I RACM *17 Roof Tar Tested Positive N/A No Class II Cat. I 9 12x12 Brown Floor Tile

Adhesive Tested Positive 546 SF No Class II Cat. I

13 Window/Door Glazing, Caulking Compound

Tested Positive N/A No Class II Cat. I

For more information regarding the asbestos survey originally performed by Environomics on November 22, 1999, please consult Environomics Project No. 1629. I have enclosed the EPA/AHERA Inspector certification for the update inspection. If you have any questions or need further information or assistance, please contact me at 480/ 844-1710.

Sincerely, Continental Envirotech, Inc.

Steven Chamberlain Field Services Manager

October 9, 2012

Asset Management Flight Luke A.F.B.

56 CES/CEAN

13970 Gillespie Street Luke A.F.B., Arizona 85309-1149

Re: NESHAP Asbestos Re-Certification:

Luke AFB Building 913 Restroom Project

Luke AFB Project No.: NUEX11-1391 CEI Project No. 12-18182C

Dear Ms. Newell:

Continental Envirotech, Inc. (Continental) is pleased to provide you with results of limited asbestos bulk sampling performed at the above referenced site on October 2, 2012. Continental’s scope of work included sampling and analysis for asbestos content, materials currently proposed for renovation activities which have not been previously sampled. The following tables summarize the results of the inspection and bulk sampling performed.

Table 1: Bulk Sampling & Analysis Summary Homogeneous

Area # Laboratory

ID #

Sample

ID #

Material Sample Location

Results

1 1 1 6x6 Ceramic Tile / Brown Battery Shop Center Island @ Drain Negative 1 2 2 6x6 Ceramic Tile / Brown Battery Shop Center Island NEC 3’ AFS Negative 1 3 3 6x6 Ceramic Tile / Brown Battery Shop Center Island SWC 3’ AFS Negative 2 4 4 Ceramic Tile Grout Battery Shop Center Island @ Drain Negative 2 5 5 Ceramic Tile Grout Battery Shop Center Island NEC 3’ AFS Negative 2 6 6 Ceramic Tile Grout Battery Shop Center Island SWC 3’ AFS Negative 3 7 7 6x6 Ceramic Tile / Red

Brown Battery Shop Floor NEC @ FS Negative

3 8 8 6x6 Ceramic Tile / Red Brown

Battery Shop Floor SWC @ FS Negative

3 9 9 6x6 Ceramic Tile / Red Brown

Battery Shop Floor SEC @ FS Negative

4 10 10 Ceramic Tile Grout Battery Shop Floor NEC @ FS Negative 4 11 11 Ceramic Tile Grout Battery Shop Floor SWC @ FS Negative 4 12 12 Ceramic Tile Grout Battery Shop Floor SEC @ FS Negative 5 13 13 6x6 Ceramic Tile / Brown Break Room Men’s R/R SWC @ FS Negative 5 14 14 6x6 Ceramic Tile / Brown Break Room Men’s R/R Under Sink @ FS Negative 5 15 15 6x6 Ceramic Tile / Brown Break Room Women’s R/R SEC @ FS Negative

Luke A.F.B.

56 CES/CEAN

Table 1: Bulk Sampling & Analysis Summary Homogeneous

Area # Laboratory

ID #

Sample

ID #

Material Sample Location

Results

6 16 16 Ceramic Tile Grout Break Room Men’s R/R SWC @ FS Negative 6 17 17 Ceramic Tile Grout Break Room Men’s R/R Under Sink @ FS Negative 6 18 18 Ceramic Tile Grout Break Room Women’s R/R SEC @ FS Negative 7 19 19 4x10 Wall Tile / Gold South Men’s R/R S. Wall NEC 5’ AFS Negative 7 20 20 4x10 Wall Tile / Gold South Men’s R/R E. Wall SEC 1’ AFS Negative 7 21 21 4x10 Wall Tile / Gold South Men’s R/R N. Wall NEC 4’ AFS Negative 8 22 22 Ceramic Tile Grout South Men’s R/R S. Wall NEC 5’ AFS Negative 8 23 23 Ceramic Tile Grout South Men’s R/R E. Wall SEC 1’ AFS Negative 8 24 24 Ceramic Tile Grout South Men’s R/R N. Wall NEC 4’ AFS Negative 9 25 25 Fixture Caulking Break Room Men’s R/R Sink Negative 9 26 26 Fixture Caulking S. R/R Men’s Sink Negative 9 27 27 Fixture Caulking S. R/R Women’s Sink Negative

Table 2: ACM Summary

Material Information Abatement /Demo Classification (If material is subject to removal, repair, damage or demolition of any kind) HA # Material Assumed /

Tested Positive Approximate

Amount Friable

(Yes/No) OSHA Class NESHAP Category

*14 Pipe Fittings Tested Positive 40 Fittings Yes Class I RACM *17 Roof Tar Tested Positive N/A No Class II Cat. I 9 12x12 Brown Floor Tile

Adhesive Tested Positive 546 SF No Class II Cat. I

13 Window/Door Glazing, Caulking Compound

Tested Positive N/A No Class II Cat. I

* These materials were identified in a previous asbestos inspection performed by Environomics on November 22, 1999. For more information, please consult the Environomics report No. 1629.

This inspection/sampling was not a complete study of the entire area, building or site. Only the materials specified in this report were tested. Materials not sampled should always be assumed asbestos until proven not asbestos by a certified AHERA building inspector.

We have performed our services for this project in accordance with our agreement and understanding with our client. This document and information contained herein have been prepared solely for the use of our clients and their assigned parties.

Please find enclosed, bulk sample analysis results, chain of custody documentation, as well as inspector(s) and laboratory certificate of accreditation. If you have any questions regarding this report, please do not hesitate to contact me at (480) 844-1710.

Sincerely, CONTINENTAL ENVIROTECH, INC.

Steven Chamberlain Field Services Manager

EMSL Analytical, Inc.

3356 West Catalina Drive, Phoenix, AZ 85017 Phone/Fax: (602) 276-4344 / (602) 276-4053 www.emsl.com phoenixlab@emsl.com

121204531 CustomerID: CONT60 CustomerPO:

ProjectID:

EMSL Order:

Attn: Steve Chamberlain Continental Envirotech, Inc.

3041 North Norfolk Street Suite 101 Mesa, AZ 85215-1147

Received: 10/04/12 11:20 AM

Bldg. 913

Fax: (480) 844-1752 Phone: (480) 844-1710

Project:

10/6/2012Analysis Date:

10/2/2012Collected:

Sample Description Appearance % Type

AsbestosNon-Asbestos

% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020 Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy

121204531-0001

Battery Shop 6x6 Ceramic Tile / Brown

Brown None Detected Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

121204531-0002

Battery Shop 6x6 Ceramic Tile / Brown

Brown None Detected Non-Fibrous Homogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

121204531-0003

Battery Shop 6x6 Ceramic Tile / Brown

Brown None Detected Non-Fibrous Homogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

121204531-0004

Grout Tan None Detected Non-Fibrous Homogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

121204531-0005

Grout Tan None Detected Non-Fibrous Homogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

121204531-0006

Grout Tan None Detected Non-Fibrous Homogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

121204531-0007

Battery Shop 6x6 Ceramic Tile Floor / Brown

Brown None Detected Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

121204531-0008

Battery Shop 6x6 Ceramic Tile Floor / Brown

Brown None Detected Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

1Test Report PLM-7.16.0 Printed: 10/8/2012 7:48:54 AM

Michelle Wilson, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory

Analyst(s)

EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non-friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Phoenix, AZ NVLAP Lab Code 200811-0, AZ0937

Initial report from 10/08/2012 07:48:54

Amanda Lang (1) Carlos Rivadeneyra (18)

Mike J. Williams (8) http://www.emsl.com mailto:phoenixlab@emsl.com

Phone/Fax: (602) 276-4344 / (602) 276-4053 www.emsl.com phoenixlab@emsl.com

121204531 CustomerID: CONT60 CustomerPO:

ProjectID:

EMSL Order:

Attn: Steve Chamberlain Continental Envirotech, Inc.

3041 North Norfolk Street Suite 101 Mesa, AZ 85215-1147

Received: 10/04/12 11:20 AM

Bldg. 913

Fax: (480) 844-1752 Phone: (480) 844-1710

Project:

10/6/2012Analysis Date:

10/2/2012Collected:

Sample Description Appearance % Type

AsbestosNon-Asbestos

% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020 Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy

121204531-0009

Battery Shop 6x6 Ceramic Tile Floor / Brown

Brown None Detected Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

121204531-0010

Grout Gray None Detected Non-Fibrous Homogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

121204531-0011

Grout Gray/Tan None Detected Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

121204531-0012

Grout Gray/Tan None Detected Non-Fibrous Homogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

13-Ceramic Tile

121204531-0013

Restroom 6x6 Tile / Brown

Brown None Detected Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

13-Thinset

121204531-0013A

Restroom 6x6 Tile / Brown

Gray None Detected Non-Fibrous Homogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

14-Ceramic Tile

121204531-0014

Restroom 6x6 Tile / Brown

Brown None Detected Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

14-Thinset

121204531-0014A

Restroom 6x6 Tile / Brown

Gray None Detected Non-Fibrous Homogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

2Test Report PLM-7.16.0 Printed: 10/8/2012 7:48:54 AM

Michelle Wilson, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory

Analyst(s)

EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non-friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Phoenix, AZ NVLAP Lab Code 200811-0, AZ0937

Initial report from 10/08/2012 07:48:54

Amanda Lang (1) Carlos Rivadeneyra (18)

Mike J. Williams (8)

Phone/Fax: (602) 276-4344 / (602) 276-4053 www.emsl.com phoenixlab@emsl.com

121204531 CustomerID: CONT60 CustomerPO:

ProjectID:

EMSL Order:

Attn: Steve Chamberlain Continental Envirotech, Inc.

3041 North Norfolk Street Suite 101 Mesa, AZ 85215-1147

Received: 10/04/12 11:20 AM

Bldg. 913

Fax: (480) 844-1752 Phone: (480) 844-1710

Project:

10/6/2012Analysis Date:

10/2/2012Collected:

Sample Description Appearance % Type

AsbestosNon-Asbestos

% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020 Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy

121204531-0015

Restroom 6x6 Tile / Brown

Not Submitted

Empty sample bag.

121204531-0016

Grout White None Detected Non-Fibrous Homogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

121204531-0017

Grout White None Detected Non-Fibrous Homogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

121204531-0018

Grout Not Submitted

Empty sample bag.

121204531-0019

Restroom Wall 4x10 Tile

Tan None Detected Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

121204531-0020

Restroom Wall 4x10 Tile

Tan None Detected Non-Fibrous Homogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

121204531-0021

Restroom Wall 4x10 Tile

Brown/Tan None Detected Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

121204531-0022

Grout White None Detected Non-Fibrous Homogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

3Test Report PLM-7.16.0 Printed: 10/8/2012 7:48:54 AM

Michelle Wilson, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory

Analyst(s)

EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non-friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Phoenix, AZ NVLAP Lab Code 200811-0, AZ0937

Initial report from 10/08/2012 07:48:54

Amanda Lang (1) Carlos Rivadeneyra (18)

Mike J. Williams (8)

Phone/Fax: (602) 276-4344 / (602) 276-4053 www.emsl.com phoenixlab@emsl.com

121204531 CustomerID: CONT60 CustomerPO:

ProjectID:

EMSL Order:

Attn: Steve Chamberlain Continental Envirotech, Inc.

3041 North Norfolk Street Suite 101 Mesa, AZ 85215-1147

Received: 10/04/12 11:20 AM

Bldg. 913

Fax: (480) 844-1752 Phone: (480) 844-1710

Project:

10/6/2012Analysis Date:

10/2/2012Collected:

Sample Description Appearance % Type

AsbestosNon-Asbestos

% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020 Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy

121204531-0023

Grout White None Detected Non-Fibrous Homogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

121204531-0024

Grout White None Detected Non-Fibrous Homogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

121204531-0025

Fixture Caulking White None Detected Non-Fibrous Homogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

121204531-0026

Fixture Caulking White None Detected Non-Fibrous Homogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

121204531-0027

Fixture Caulking White None Detected Non-Fibrous Homogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

4THIS IS THE LAST PAGE OF THE REPORT.Test Report PLM-7.16.0 Printed: 10/8/2012 7:48:54 AM

Michelle Wilson, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory

Analyst(s)

EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non-friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Phoenix, AZ NVLAP Lab Code 200811-0, AZ0937

Initial report from 10/08/2012 07:48:54

Amanda Lang (1) Carlos Rivadeneyra (18)

Mike J. Williams (8)

HANGAR

TESTING

OFF2

TOIL1

MECH1

FIRST FLOOR

Exterior

STOR2

JW 1-3

DC 2-3

TC 3-3

JW 1-4

DC 2-4

TC 3-4

JW 1-5

DC 2-5

TC 3-5

JW 1-6

DC 2-6

TC 3-6

JW 1-7

DC 2-7

TC 3-7

CT 4-1

CT 4-2

CT 4-3

BA 5-1

BA 5-2

BA 5-3

FT 6-1

AD 7-1

FT 6-3

AD 7-3

FT 6-2

AD 7-2

FT 8-1

FT 8-2

FT 8-3

AD 9-1 5% CHR

AD 9-2 5% CHR

AD 9-3 5% CHR

BA 10-1

BA 10-2

BA 10-3

CT 11-1 CT 11-2

CT 11-3

CT 12-1

CT 12-2

CT 12-3

WP 13-1 3% CHR

WP 13-2 3% CHR

WP 13-3 3% CHR

PI 14-3 8% CHR

30 % AMO

PI 14-2 8% CHR

30% AMO

PI 14-1 8% CHR

30% AMO

WP 15-2

WP 15-3

WP 15-1

ASBESTOS BUILDING: 913

Nickolas.Durflinger Line

1 2

JW 1-1

DC 2-1

TC 3-1

JW 1-2

DC 2-2

TC 3-2

ASBESTOS BUILDING: 913

SECOND FLOOR

Nickolas.Durflinger Line

ROOF

ROOF 1 ROOF 2

ROOF 3

RM 16-1

RM 16-2

RM 16-3 RT 17-1 25% CHR

RT 17-2 25% CHR

RT 17-3 25% CHR

ASBESTOS: BUILDING 913

nv ir on om ic s, In c.

SCALE:

DATE:

PROJECT NO.:

DRAWN:

56 2 14 3

N O

D A T E

R E V I S I O N

A P P

Ph oe ni x, A ri zo na

1/1NTS

1/13/00

SAT

N th

S tr ee t, S te

A-

ASBESTOS-CONTAINING

MATERIAL and LEAD

PAINT SURVEYS

Building 926

Luke Air Force Base

14185 Falcon Street

Luke AFB, Arizona 85309

Prepared for:

Jacobs/Huitt-Zollars, JV

P.O. Box 709

Fort Worth, Texas 76101-0709

December 22, 2016

P.O. Box 969 Burleson, Texas 76097 | 817-447-0098 breitlingconsulting.com http://www.breitlingconsulting.com/

Breitling Consulting, LLC - i - Building 926, Luke AFB

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page No.

1.0 Introduction

1.1 General Site Information

1.2 Purpose and Scope

1.3 Limitations

2.0 Limited Asbestos Survey

2.1 Visual Observations

2.2 Sampling Procedures

2.3 Laboratory Analysis

2.4 Sample Results

3.0 Limited Lead Paint Survey

3.1 Visual Observations

3.2 Sampling Procedures

3.3 Laboratory Analysis

3.4 Sample Results

4.0 Conclusions and Recommendations

4.1 Conclusions

4.2 Recommendations

Tables

Table 1: Summary of Asbestos-Containing Materials & Approximate Quantities

Table 2: Asbestos Laboratory Analytical Results

Table 3: Summary of Lead-Containing Paint Chip Samples

Table 4: Paint Chip Laboratory Analytical Results

Appendices

Appendix 1: Annotated Drawings

Appendix 2: Laboratory Reports and Chain-of-Custody Forms

Breitling Consulting, LLC - 1 - Building 926, Luke AFB

1.0 Introduction

Project scope and details were provided to Breitling Consulting, LLC (Breitling Consulting) by Jacobs/Huitt-Zollars, JV, as well as U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and Luke Air Force Base (AFB) personnel.

Project Information Building 926 is an approximately 10,500 square-foot, metal-framed structure with slab-on-grade foundation constructed in 1975. The building functioned as storage space at the time of the survey. Building 926 is scheduled for demolition, which will include the abatement of asbestos-containing materials (ACM) and lead paint.

1.1 General Site Information

Site Name: Building 926, Luke AFB Site Location: 13970 W. Lighting Street, Luke AFB, Arizona 85309 Current Use: Storage Previous Use: Storage Year Built: 1975 Date of Site Visit: December 13, 2016 Assessor: Mr. Ronald Barnett

1.2 Purpose and Scope

The purpose of the pre-demolition inspection was to locate and identify suspect ACM and lead paint associated with the project.

1.3 Limitations

Breitling Consulting, in cooperation with Valley of the Sun Environmental Consultant, LLC (VSEC), has performed the ACM and lead paint assessment in accordance with generally accepted practices and procedures, in accordance with federal and state regulations, and in accordance with the scope of work under which the assessment is authorized. This report is covered by the limitations set forth in our proposal or this report, and any limitations encountered during the assessment. This report describes only the conditions present at the time of the assessment, in the areas assessed.

VSEC, on behalf of Breitling Consulting, collected samples of interior and exterior building materials considered to be suspect ACM, as well as interior and exterior painted surfaces.

Regardless of the thoroughness of surveys, the possibility exists that potential sources of ACM and lead paint may have escaped detection due to: (1) the limited scope of this assessment,

(2) the inaccuracy of records, interviews, work products or documents made available to Breitling Consulting or VSEC for this report, (3) the presence of undetected or unreported renovations and repairs, (4) inaccessible areas, and/or (5) deliberate concealment of detrimental information. The findings and opinions presented are relative to the dates of the site work and should not be relied on to represent conditions at substantially later dates due to changes in the condition of building materials over time, renovations, and repairs.

Breitling Consulting, LLC - 2 - Building 926, Luke AFB

This report is for the exclusive use of Jacobs/Huitt-Zollars, JV, USACE, Luke AFB and their agents, and use by any unauthorized parties in whole or in part, except as directed by legal jurisdiction, is at the sole risk of the user. If this assessment includes reliance on work products and/or documents prepared by others, Breitling Consulting has no responsibility for accuracy of information contained therein.

Breitling Consulting, LLC - 3 - Building 926, Luke AFB

2.0 Limited Asbestos Survey

The materials listed in Table 1 were identified as asbestos-containing.

Table 1: Summary of Asbestos-Containing Materials & Approximate Quantities

Sample ID Description Material Location Laboratory Results

Approximate Quantity

(Square Feet)

1A 3” TSI – Elbow Electrical Room 60% - Chrysotile

ND - Wrap

5 1B 3” TSI – Elbow Electrical Room 60% - Chrysotile

ND - Wrap

1C 3” TSI – Elbow Electrical Room 60% - Chrysotile

ND - Wrap

3A Drywall & Joint

Compound / Texture Electrical Room, East Wall

2% - 3% Chrysotile (joint compound, texture)

ND - Drywall

3B Drywall & Joint

Compound / Texture Electrical Room, West Wall

2% - 3% Chrysotile (joint compound, texture)

ND - Drywall

3E Drywall & Joint

Compound / Texture Women’s Restroom, Wall

2% - Chrysotile (joint compound, texture)

ND - Drywall 1,000

15A Exterior – Window

Caulk South Side

5% - Chrysotile 10

15B Exterior – Window

Caulk 5% - Chrysotile 10

16A Exterior – Caulk Swamp Cooler Unit, Northeast Corner

8% - Chrysotile 10

16B Exterior – Caulk 10% - Chrysotile 10

18A Roof Penetration Sealant Roofing Presumed Positive 1,000 linear feet

2.1 Visual Observations

Suspect materials were grouped into homogeneous areas (areas uniform in color and texture) in accordance with federal asbestos sampling protocols in preparation for sampling. VSEC, on behalf of Breitling Consulting, collected samples in accordance with Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) requirements. Samples of the suspect materials were collected in accordance with the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response ACT (AHERA), 40 CFR 763, Subpart E. Materials were collected in sufficient quantities to determine the potential asbestos content for each homogeneous area. In general, Breitling Consulting and VSEC considered the following materials to be non-suspect with regard to asbestos content unless observed conditions such as the presence of mastic, coating, or other suspect layer indicated otherwise: wood, glass, fiberglass, brick, bare concrete, unpainted concrete masonry unit (CMU), natural stone, ceramic tile, and bare metal.

2.2 Sampling Procedures

The pre-demolition asbestos survey was performed by Mr. Ronald Barnett (#G 4713). Mr.

Barnett is an EPA-certified Building Inspector for asbestos. The survey included visual observations, interviews with Mr. Robert Tetla III, Air Education and Training Command, identification of suspect ACM, bulk sampling of suspect ACM, and subsequent laboratory analysis of the samples for the detection of asbestiform minerals. Material samples were

Breitling Consulting, LLC - 4 - Building 926, Luke AFB sealed in airtight containers, documented on field data forms, and transported to the laboratory using appropriate chain-of-custody protocols to track handling of bulk samples.

VSEC, on behalf of Breitling Consulting, collected a total of 44 bulk samples of suspect ACM from Building 926. Annotated drawings showing approximate suspect ACM sample locations are in Appendix 1.

The roof of Building 926 was reported to be constructed of corrugated metal sheets without additional roofing materials such as asphalt, tar paper, shingles, etc. Please note that roofing penetration sealants were not sampled in order to maintain the current integrity of the roof. As a result, the roofing penetration sealants were presumed to be ACM for abatement and disposal purposes as there is a high likelihood that one or more of the penetration sealants would test positive (greater than 1% asbestos).

2.3 Laboratory Analysis

Samples were analyzed using Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) with dispersion staining (DS), in accordance with the EPA Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples (Method 600/R-93/116). EMC Lab, Inc., an accredited environmental laboratory for lead and asbestos testing in Phoenix, Arizona, performed the analysis.

Federal regulations require that each layer of suspect material be analyzed separately for asbestos content. In addition, federal regulations state that if any sample from a homogeneous area contains asbestos, then the entire homogeneous area is considered asbestos-containing, regardless of the results from the remaining samples from that area. Therefore, samples for this project were analyzed on a positive stop basis, meaning that once a positive (greater than 1% asbestos) result is obtained, the remaining samples for that homogeneous area are not analyzed. Conversely, all the samples from a homogeneous area must be analyzed and found to contain less than 1% asbestos before that homogeneous area can be considered non-asbestos-containing.

2.4 Sample Results

The results of the sample analysis are presented in Table 2, and the laboratory analytical reports are in Appendix 2. Samples found to contain asbestos are presented in RED.

Table 2: Asbestos Laboratory Analytical Results

Sample ID Description Material Location Laboratory Results

1A 3” TSI – Elbow Electrical Room 60% - Chrysotile

ND - Wrap

1B 3” TSI – Elbow Electrical Room 60% - Chrysotile

ND - Wrap

1C 3” TSI – Elbow Electrical Room 60% - Chrysotile

ND - Wrap

2A 3” TSI – Pipe Run Electrical Room ND

2B 3” TSI – Pipe Run Electrical Room ND

2C 3” TSI – Pipe Run Electrical Room ND

3A Drywall & Joint Compound /

Texture Electrical Room, East Wall

2% - 3% Chrysotile (joint compound, texture)

ND - Drywall

Breitling Consulting, LLC - 5 - Building 926, Luke AFB

Sample ID Description Material Location Laboratory Results

3B Drywall & Joint Compound /

Texture Electrical Room, West

Wall

2% - 3% Chrysotile

(joint compound, texture) ND - Drywall

3C Drywall & Joint Compound Electrical Room, North

Wall

ND

3D Drywall & Joint Compound /

Wallpaper Weight Room, Wall ND

3E Drywall & Joint Compound /

Texture Women’s Restroom, Wall

2% - Chrysotile (joint compound, texture)

ND - Drywall

4A 4” Black Cove Base w/ Mastic Electrical Room ND

4B 4” Black Cove Base w/ Mastic Electrical Room ND

4C 4” Black Cove Base w/ Mastic Weight Room ND

5A Fiberglass & Wrap Electrical Room ND

5B Fiberglass & Wrap Electrical Room ND

5C Fiberglass & Ceiling Tile Weight Room ND

6A 2’ x 4’ White Pin Holes

Acoustical Ceiling Tiles Weight Room ND

6B 2’ x 4’ White Pin Holes Acoustical Ceiling Tiles

Weight Room ND

6C 2’ x 4’ White Pin Holes Acoustical Ceiling Tiles

Weight Room ND

7A 4” Brown Cove Base w/ Mastic Weight Room ND

7B 4” Brown Cove Base w/ Mastic Weight Room ND

8A Floor – Expansion Joint

Compound Throughout

ND

8B Floor – Expansion Joint

Compound Throughout

ND

8C Floor – Expansion Joint

Compound Throughout

ND

9A Concrete / Foundation East ND

9B Concrete / Foundation North ND

9C Concrete / Foundation Front of Women’s

Restroom

ND

10A 4” x 4” off-white Ceramic Tile /

Grout / Underlayment Women’s Restroom, Wall ND

10B 4” x 4” off-white Ceramic Tile /

Grout / Underlayment Women’s Restroom, Wall ND

11A 1” x 1” White Ceramic Tile /

Grout / Underlayment Women’s Restroom, Floor ND

11B 1” x 1” White Ceramic Tile /

Grout / Underlayment Women’s Restroom, Floor ND

12A 1” x 1” Beige Ceramic Tile / Grout

/ Underlayment Women’s Restroom, Floor ND

12B 1” x 1” Beige Ceramic Tile / Grout

/ Underlayment Women’s Restroom, Floor ND

13A 1” x 1” Brown Ceramic Tile /

Grout / Underlayment Women’s Restroom, Floor ND

13B 1” x 1” Brown Ceramic Tile /

Grout / Underlayment Women’s Restroom, Floor ND

14A Exterior – Door Caulk South Side ND

14B Exterior – Door Caulk South Side ND

15A Exterior – Window Caulk South Side 5% - Chrysotile

Breitling Consulting, LLC - 6 - Building 926, Luke AFB

Sample ID Description Material Location Laboratory Results

15B Exterior – Window Caulk South Side 5% - Chrysotile 16A Exterior – Caulk Swamp Cooler, NE Corner 8% - Chrysotile

16B Exterior – Caulk Swamp Cooler, NE Corner 10% - Chrysotile

17A Exterior – Caulk HVAC Exhaust Duct ND

17B Exterior - Caulk HVAC Exhaust Duct ND

18A Roof Penetration Sealant Roofing Presumed Positive ND = None Detected

Should materials other than those discussed in this report and listed in the summary tables be encountered, they should be treated as ACM until sampling can confirm the presence or absence of asbestos.

Breitling Consulting, LLC - 7 - Building 926, Luke AFB

3.0 Limited Lead Paint Survey

The coatings listed in Table 3 were identified as lead-containing.

Table 3: Summary of Lead-Containing Paint Chip Samples

Sample ID Description/Location Laboratory Results

(% by weight)

L4 Paint Chip – Women’s Restroom, Wall 0.026

L5 Ceramic Tile – 4”x4” – Women’s Restroom, Wall 0.107

3.1 Visual Observations

Multiple painted surfaces were observed on the exterior and interior of Building 926.

3.2 Sampling Procedures

The lead paint survey was performed by Mr. Ronald Barnett, licensed by the EPA as a Lead Inspector (#AZ-F159171-1). The survey included visual observations, interviews with Mr.

Robert Tetla III, Air Education and Training Command, identification of painted surfaces, collection of paint chip samples, and subsequent laboratory analysis of the paint chip samples.

Samples were sealed in airtight containers, documented on field data forms, and transported to the laboratory using appropriate chain-of-custody protocols to track handling of bulk samples.

VSEC, on behalf of Breitling Consulting, collected a total of nine paint chip samples from Building 926. Annotated drawings showing approximate paint chip sample locations are in Appendix 1.

3.3 Laboratory Analysis

Samples were analyzed using “flame atomic absorption, direct aspiration” per EPA SW-846 Method 7420. EMC Lab, Inc., an accredited environmental laboratory for lead and asbestos testing in Phoenix, Arizona, performed the analysis.

3.4 Sample Results

The results of the lead testing are in Table 4. Samples found to contain lead are in bold.

Table 4: Lead in Paint Chip Laboratory Analytical Results

Sample ID Description/Location Laboratory Results

(% by weight)

L1 Paint Chip – TSI 6” Electrical Room BRL

L2 Paint Chip – TSI 3” Electrical Room BRL

L3 Paint Chip – Weight Room BRL

L4 Paint Chip – Women’s Restroom, Wall 0.026

L5 Ceramic Tile – 4”x4” – Women’s Restroom, Wall 0.107

L6 Ceramic Tile 1”x1” – White – Women’s Restroom, Floor BRL

L7 Ceramic Tile 1”x1” – Beige – Women’s Restroom, Floor BRL

L8 Ceramic Tile 1”x1” – Lt. Beige – Women’s Restroom, Floor BRL

L9 Paint Chip – Exterior Wall – North BRL

BRL = Below Reportable Limits

Breitling Consulting, LLC - 8 - Building 926, Luke AFB

4.0 Conclusions and Recommendations

4.1 Conclusions

ACM Survey The results of the pre-demolition ACM survey indicate that the following materials were found to be asbestos-containing: joint compound, texture, thermal system insulation (TSI) (elbow), exterior – window caulk, exterior – swamp cooler caulk, and roof penetration sealant (presumed).

Building 926 is regulated under the following federal asbestos regulations:

40 CFR 61, Subpart M (Federal Asbestos NESHAP) 29 CFR 1926.1101 (Federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)

Construction Industry Standard)

Under these statutes, a building owner is required to abate (remove) all regulated ACM prior to performing demolition or renovation (including planned abatement activities) which might disturb asbestos materials. Regulated ACM (RACM) is defined by NESHAP to be “(a) friable asbestos material, (b) Category I non-friable ACM that has become friable, (c) Category I non-friable ACM that will be or has been subjected to sanding, grinding, cutting, or abrading, or (d) Category II non-friable ACM that has a high probability of becoming or has become crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by the forces expected to act on the material in the course of demolition or renovation operations regulated by NESHAP”.

Building 926 is also regulated under Maricopa County Air Pollution Control Regulations - Regulation III Rule 370, section 301.9 Subpart M. All activities must comply with required certification, training, record keeping, asbestos renovation and demolition standards outlined by the regulation.

Lead Paint Survey The results of the pre-demolition lead paint survey indicate that the following materials were found to be lead-containing: wall paint and ceramic tile located in the Women’s Restroom.

Based upon the readings, the paint chip samples collected contained less than 1.0 milligrams per square centimeter (mg/cm2) lead, and are therefore not defined as lead-based paint (LBP).

4.2 Recommendations

ACM Survey Breitling Consulting recommends the following regarding the asbestos results:

� Asbestos-containing wallboard systems in the bathrooms, electrical room, TSI (elbow) in electrical room, and roof penetration sealants should be abated by a qualified abatement contractor prior to initiation of demolition/renovation activities.

Breitling Consulting recommends that the contractor be a state-licensed asbestos abatement contractor.

� In the event that demolition/renovation activities identify additional suspect ACM, a licensed asbestos inspector should be contacted to perform additional sampling activities.

Breitling Consulting, LLC - 9 - Building 926, Luke AFB

Lead Paint Survey Based upon the paint chip samples analytical results, all samples collected were below the EPA LBP limit with a total lead content less than 1.0 mg/cm2. According to Housing and Urban Development Department (HUD) Lead-Based Paint Interim Guidelines for Hazard Identification and EPA Lead-Based Paint in Target Housing and Child Occupied Facilities (40 CFR Part 745), the definition of LBP is paint which has a lead content greater than or equal to 5,000 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) (0.5% by weight) or greater, or 1.0 mg/cm2 which applies to target housing and child occupied facilities. HUD guidelines define target housing as “any housing constructed prior to 1978, except housing for the elderly or persons with disabilities (unless any child who is six years of age or younger resides or is expected to reside in such housing) or any zero-bedroom dwelling” and child-occupied facility as “a building or part of a building constructed before 1978, including but not limited to, a day-care center, preschool, or kindergarten classroom, that is visited regularly by the same child, six years of age or younger, at least two days in any calendar week if the visits are for at least three hours each day and 60 hours each year.”

At this time, the above referenced HUD regulations do not apply to Building 926 because it does not meet either the definition of target housing or of a child-occupied facility. There are currently no federal or state regulations requiring abatement of lead paint in buildings which are not considered to be target housing or child occupied facilities; however, state and federal disposal requirements apply to all demolished structures that include lead paint components.

It should be noted that the OSHA Construction Industry Standard, 29 CRF, 1926.62 does apply to any employee involved with demolition/renovation work that might occur in the above building. The Construction Industry Standard regulates occupational exposures to airborne lead, which includes demolition or salvage of structures where lead or materials containing lead are present, and any amount of lead present in painted surfaces, including those which fall below the above definition of lead-based paint, could result in regulated occupational exposures. They should therefore be monitored according to 29 CFR, 1926.62 whenever they are disturbed in a manner that could result in exposure to airborne lead particulates. It is the responsibility of the employer to comply with 29 CFR, 1926.62 to protect the safety and health of his/her employees involved in the demolition or renovation of the above structure. According to OSHA, the Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) for lead is 50 micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m3) (8-hour Time Weighted Average (TWA)) with an action limit of 30 µg/m3 (8-hour TWA).

Federal employees who are not subject to 29 CFR, 1926.62 (non-construction/demolition related work) are subject to the OSHA General Industry Standard, 29 CFR, 1910.1025. This standard was promulgated by OSHA to protect workers who could potentially be exposed to inorganic lead, including metallic lead, all inorganic compounds, and organic lead soaps.

Again, the occupational exposure to inorganic lead is to be limited to 50 µg/m3 (8-hour TWA).

Breitling Consulting, LLC Building 926, Luke AFB

Appendix 1: Annotated Drawings

3 4

3D; 4C; 5C; 6; 7

N Not to Scale

Asbestos Sample Locations Building 926

Luke AFB

3E; 10A; 11; 12; 13

1; 2; 3A/B/C;

4A/B; 5A/B

Electrical Room

Weight Room

Women's RR Men's RR

8A

9B

8B

8C

9A

9C

10B

14Red Denotes Positive for Asbestos Content

Roof Penetration Sealant Presumed Positive for Asbestos Content

3 4

L3

N Not to Scale

Lead Paint Sample Locations Building 926

Luke AFB

L9

L4, L5, L6, L7, L8

L1, L2 Electrical Room

Weight Room

Women's RR Men's RR

Breitling Consulting, LLC Building 926, Luke AFB

Appendix 2: Laboratory Reports and Chain-of-Custody Forms

Asbestos Detected

Layer Name / Sample Description

Lab ID Sample Location

Bulk Asbestos Analysis by Polarized Light Microscopy

Non-Asbestos Constituents

Laboratory Report

0179476

NVLAP#101926-0

Client ID

Client:

Address: 870 E. GARY DR.

CHANDLER AZ 85225

VSEC

Date Received: 12/13/2016

12/14/2016Date Analyzed:

Job# / P.O. #:

EMC LABS, INC.

Collected: 12/13/2016 EPA Method: Project Name: LUKE AIR FORCE BASE BLDG 926 Submitted By: RON BARNETTAddress:

Collected By:

9830 S. 51st Street, Suite B109, Phoenix, AZ 85044 Phone: 800-362-3373 or 480-940-5294 - Fax: (480) 893-1726

12/14/2016Date Reported:

EPA 600/R-93/116

Asbestos Type

Cellulose FiberYesLAYER 1 3" TSI Elbow, Lt. Gray

Chrysotile0179476-001 ELECTRICAL RM 121316-1A

60% 5%

Gypsum Carbonates Quartz Binder/Filler

35%

Cellulose FiberNoLAYER 2 3" TSI Elbow Wrap, Off White/ White

None Detected 70%

Carbonates

30%

Cellulose FiberNoLAYER 3 3" TSI Elbow Wrap, Off White/ White

None Detected 85%

15%

Cellulose FiberYesLAYER 1 3" TSI Elbow, Lt. Gray

Chrysotile0179476-002 ELECTRICAL RM 121316-1B

60% 5%

Gypsum Carbonates

3" TSI Elbow Wrap, Off White/ White

None Detected 70%

3" TSI Elbow Wrap, Off White/ White

None Detected 85%

Cellulose FiberYesLAYER 1 3" TSI Elbow, Lt. Gray

Chrysotile0179476-003 ELECTRICAL RM 121316-1C

60% 5%

Gypsum Carbonates

3" TSI Elbow Wrap, Off White/ White

None Detected 85%

Layer Name / Sample Description

Lab ID Sample Location

Bulk Asbestos Analysis by Polarized Light Microscopy

Non-Asbestos Constituents

Laboratory Report

0179476

NVLAP#101926-0

Client ID

Client:

Address: 870 E. GARY DR.

CHANDLER AZ 85225

VSEC

Date Received: 12/13/2016

12/14/2016Date Analyzed:

Job# / P.O. #:

EMC LABS, INC.

Collected: 12/13/2016 EPA Method: Project Name: LUKE AIR FORCE BASE BLDG 926 Submitted By: RON BARNETTAddress:

Collected By:

9830 S. 51st Street, Suite B109, Phoenix, AZ 85044 Phone: 800-362-3373 or 480-940-5294 - Fax: (480) 893-1726

12/14/2016Date Reported:

EPA 600/R-93/116

Asbestos Type

Fibrous GlassNoLAYER 1 3" TSI Pipe Run, Yellow

None Detected0179476-004 ELECTRICAL RM 121316-2A

95%

Gypsum

5%

Cellulose Fiber Fibrous Glass

NoLAYER 2 3" TSI Pipe Run Wrap, Yellow/ Beige/ Tan/ Silver

None Detected 50% 10%

Aluminum

40%

Fibrous Glass Cellulose Fiber

NoLAYER 1 3" TSI Pipe Run, Yellow

None Detected0179476-005 ELECTRICAL RM 121316-2B

95% 1%

4%

3" TSI Pipe Run Wrap, Yellow/ Beige/ Tan/ Silver

None Detected 60%

Aluminum

Fibrous GlassNoLAYER 1 3" TSI Pipe Run, Yellow

None Detected0179476-006 ELECTRICAL RM 121316-2C

95%

Fibrous Glass

NoLAYER 2 3" TSI Pipe Run Wrap, Yellow/ Beige/ Tan/ Silver

None Detected 50% 10%

Aluminum

Layer Name / Sample Description

Lab ID Sample Location

Bulk Asbestos Analysis by Polarized Light Microscopy

Non-Asbestos Constituents

Laboratory Report

0179476

NVLAP#101926-0

Client ID

Client:

Address: 870 E. GARY DR.

CHANDLER AZ 85225

VSEC

Date Received: 12/13/2016

12/14/2016Date Analyzed:

Job# / P.O. #:

EMC LABS, INC.

Collected: 12/13/2016 EPA Method: Project Name: LUKE AIR FORCE BASE BLDG 926 Submitted By: RON BARNETTAddress:

Collected By:

9830 S. 51st Street, Suite B109, Phoenix, AZ 85044 Phone: 800-362-3373 or 480-940-5294 - Fax: (480) 893-1726

12/14/2016Date Reported:

EPA 600/R-93/116

Asbestos Type

Cellulose FiberNoLAYER 1 Drywall, White/ Brown

None Detected0179476-007 ELECTRICAL RM-

EAST WALL121316-3A

12%

Gypsum Carbonates Mica

88%

Cellulose FiberYesLAYER 2 Joint Compound, White

Chrysotile 2% 2%

Carbonates

96%

YesLAYER 3 Texture / Paint, White/ Off White

Chrysotile 3%

Carbonates Mica

97%

Cellulose FiberNoLAYER 1 Drywall, White/ Brown

None Detected0179476-008 ELECTRICAL RM-

WEST WALL121316-3B

12%

Gypsum Carbonates

Joint Compound, White

Chrysotile 2% 1%

Carbonates

YesLAYER 3 Texture / Paint, White/ Off White

Chrysotile 3%

Carbonates Mica

Layer Name / Sample Description

Lab ID Sample Location

Bulk Asbestos Analysis by Polarized Light Microscopy

Non-Asbestos Constituents

Laboratory Report

0179476

NVLAP#101926-0

Client ID

Client:

Address: 870 E. GARY DR.

CHANDLER AZ 85225

VSEC

Date Received: 12/13/2016

12/14/2016Date Analyzed:

Job# / P.O. #:

EMC LABS, INC.

Collected: 12/13/2016 EPA Method: Project Name: LUKE AIR FORCE BASE BLDG 926 Submitted By: RON BARNETTAddress:

Collected By:

9830 S. 51st Street, Suite B109, Phoenix, AZ 85044 Phone: 800-362-3373 or 480-940-5294 - Fax: (480) 893-1726

12/14/2016Date Reported:

EPA 600/R-93/116

Asbestos Type

Cellulose FiberNoLAYER 1 Drywall, White/ Brown

None Detected0179476-009 ELECTRICAL RM-

NORTH WALL121316-3C

12%

Gypsum Carbonates

Joint Compound, White/ Off White

None Detected 2%

Carbonates Perlite

98%

Cellulose FiberNoLAYER 1 Drywall, White/ Brown

None Detected0179476-010 WEIGHT RM-WALL 121316-3D

12%

Gypsum Carbonates

Joint Compound, White

None Detected 3%

Carbonates

Wall Paper, White

None Detected 40%

Carbonates

60%

Layer Name / Sample Description

Lab ID Sample Location

Bulk Asbestos Analysis by Polarized Light Microscopy

Non-Asbestos Constituents

Laboratory Report

0179476

NVLAP#101926-0

Client ID

Client:

Address: 870 E. GARY DR.

CHANDLER AZ 85225

VSEC

Date Received: 12/13/2016

12/14/2016Date Analyzed:

Job# / P.O. #:

EMC LABS, INC.

Collected: 12/13/2016 EPA Method: Project Name: LUKE AIR FORCE BASE BLDG 926 Submitted By: RON BARNETTAddress:

Collected By:

9830 S. 51st Street, Suite B109, Phoenix, AZ 85044 Phone: 800-362-3373 or 480-940-5294 - Fax: (480) 893-1726

12/14/2016Date Reported:

EPA 600/R-93/116

Asbestos Type

Cellulose FiberNoLAYER 1 Drywall, White/ Brown

None Detected0179476-011 WOMEN'S RR-WALL 121316-3E

12%

Gypsum Carbonates

Joint Compound, White

Chrysotile 2% 2%

Carbonates

96%

Cellulose FiberYesLAYER 3 Texture / Paint, White/ Off White

Chrysotile 2% 1%

Carbonates Mica

NoLAYER 1 4" Cove Base, Black/ Brown

None Detected0179476-012 ELECTRICAL RM 121316-4A Carbonates

100%

Mastic, Brown

None Detected 3%

Quartz

4" Cove Base, Black/ Brown

None Detected0179476-013 ELECTRICAL RM 121316-4B Carbonates

Mastic, Brown

None Detected 1%

Quartz

99%

Layer Name / Sample Description

Lab ID Sample Location

Bulk Asbestos Analysis by Polarized Light Microscopy

Non-Asbestos Constituents

Laboratory Report

0179476

NVLAP#101926-0

Client ID

Client:

Address: 870 E. GARY DR.

CHANDLER AZ 85225

VSEC

Date Received: 12/13/2016

12/14/2016Date Analyzed:

Job# / P.O. #:

EMC LABS, INC.

Collected: 12/13/2016 EPA Method: Project Name: LUKE AIR FORCE BASE BLDG 926 Submitted By: RON BARNETTAddress:

Collected By:

9830 S. 51st Street, Suite B109, Phoenix, AZ 85044 Phone: 800-362-3373 or 480-940-5294 - Fax: (480) 893-1726

12/14/2016Date Reported:

EPA 600/R-93/116

Asbestos Type

NoLAYER 1 4" Cove Base, Black

None Detected0179476-014 WEIGHT RM 121316-4C Carbonates

Binder/Filler

100%

Cellulose FiberNoLAYER 2 Mastic, Yellow

None Detected 1%

Quartz

Mastic, Brown

None Detected 3%

Quartz

Fibrous Glass Cellulose Fiber

NoLAYER 1 Fiberglass, Yellow

None Detected0179476-015 ELECTRICAL RM-

WALL121316-5A

95% 1%

4%

Fibrous GlassNoLAYER 2 Fiberglass Wrap, White/ Silver

None Detected 70%

Aluminum

Fibrous GlassNoLAYER 1 Fiberglass, Yellow

None Detected0179476-016 ELECTRICAL RM-

WALL121316-5B

95%

Fibrous GlassNoLAYER 2 Fiberglass Wrap, White/ Silver

None Detected 70%

Aluminum

Layer Name / Sample Description

Lab ID Sample Location

Bulk Asbestos Analysis by Polarized Light Microscopy

Non-Asbestos Constituents

Laboratory Report

0179476

NVLAP#101926-0

Client ID

Client:

Address: 870 E. GARY DR.

CHANDLER AZ 85225

VSEC

Date Received: 12/13/2016

12/14/2016Date Analyzed:

Job# / P.O. #:

EMC LABS, INC.

Collected: 12/13/2016 EPA Method: Project Name: LUKE AIR FORCE BASE BLDG 926 Submitted By: RON BARNETTAddress:

Collected By:

9830 S. 51st Street, Suite B109, Phoenix, AZ 85044 Phone: 800-362-3373 or 480-940-5294 - Fax: (480) 893-1726

12/14/2016Date Reported:

EPA 600/R-93/116

Asbestos Type

Fibrous Glass Cellulose Fiber

NoLAYER 1 Fiberglass, Pink

None Detected0179476-017 WEIGHT RM 121316-5C

95% 2%

3%

Mineral Wool

NoLAYER 2 Ceiling Tile, Beige

None Detected 40% 40%

Carbonates Perlite

20%

Mineral Wool

No2'x4' Acoustical Ceiling Tile, White/ Beige

None Detected0179476-018 WEIGHT RM 121316-6A

40% 40%

Carbonates

Mineral Wool

No2'x4' Acoustical Ceiling Tile, White/ Beige

None Detected0179476-019 WEIGHT RM 121316-6B

40% 40%

Carbonates

Mineral Wool

No2'x4' Acoustical Ceiling Tile, White/ Beige

None Detected0179476-020 WEIGHT RM 121316-6C

40% 40%

Carbonates

4" Cove Base, Brown

None Detected0179476-021 WEIGHT RM 121316-7A Carbonates

Wollastonite Cellulose Fiber

NoLAYER 2 Mastic, Brown

None Detected 5% 1%

Quartz

94%

Layer Name / Sample Description

Lab ID Sample Location

Bulk Asbestos Analysis by Polarized Light Microscopy

Non-Asbestos Constituents

Laboratory Report

0179476

NVLAP#101926-0

Client ID

Client:

Address: 870 E. GARY DR.

CHANDLER AZ 85225

VSEC

Date Received: 12/13/2016

12/14/2016Date Analyzed:

Job# / P.O. #:

EMC LABS, INC.

Collected: 12/13/2016 EPA Method: Project Name: LUKE AIR FORCE BASE BLDG 926 Submitted By: RON BARNETTAddress:

Collected By:

9830 S. 51st Street, Suite B109, Phoenix, AZ 85044 Phone: 800-362-3373 or 480-940-5294 - Fax: (480) 893-1726

12/14/2016Date Reported:

EPA 600/R-93/116

Asbestos Type

NoLAYER 1 4" Cove Base, Brown

None Detected0179476-022 WEIGHT RM 121316-7B Carbonates

Wollastonite Cellulose Fiber

NoLAYER 2 Mastic, Brown

None Detected 5% 2%

Quartz

93%

Cellulose FiberNoExpansion Compound, Black None Detected0179476-023 THROUGHOUT 121316-8A

1%

Carbonates

Cellulose FiberNoExpansion Compound, Black None Detected0179476-024 THROUGHOUT 121316-8B

<1%

Carbonates

Cellulose FiberNoExpansion Compound, Black None Detected0179476-025 THROUGHOUT 121316-8C

1%

Carbonates

Cellulose FiberNoFoundation, Gray None Detected0179476-026 EAST 121316-9A

<1%

Gypsum Quartz Carbonates

Layer Name / Sample Description

Lab ID Sample Location

Bulk Asbestos Analysis by Polarized Light Microscopy

Non-Asbestos Constituents

Laboratory Report

0179476

NVLAP#101926-0

Client ID

Client:

Address: 870 E. GARY DR.

CHANDLER AZ 85225

VSEC

Date Received: 12/13/2016

12/14/2016Date Analyzed:

Job# / P.O. #:

EMC LABS, INC.

Collected: 12/13/2016…